16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1295, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,732 United States of America v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding appeal from successive motion timely where changed circumstances justified revisiting issue decided by original order
• finding appeal from successive motion timely where changed circumstances justified revisiting issue decided by original order
• “An appeal from an interlocutory order does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction.”
• “An appeal from an interlocutory order does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).