150/160 Associates v. Mojo-Stumer Architects, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the crime of “knowingly touching another person with the intent to injure, insult, or provoke” does not involve moral turpi- tude
• holding that the crime of “knowingly touching another person with the intent to injure, insult, or provoke” does not involve moral turpi- tude
• describing, for purposes of discerning whether an assault crime constitutes a CIMT, the inverse relationship between the requisite degree of harm and scienter
• “[D]e minimis conduct or harm ... is not ordinarily considered to be inherently vile, depraved, or morally reprehensible.”
• “[A]s the level of conscious behavior decreases ... from intentional to reckless conduct, more serious resulting harm is required in order to find that the crime involves moral turpitude.”
• \[A] conviction will be found to be for a crime involving moral turpitude only if the full range of the conduct prohibited in the statute supports such a finding.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).