14TH & HEINBERG, LLC v. Henricksen & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the landlord’s interest could not be subject to the mechanics’ liens because the lease “did not require that the improvements be made, nor did the improvements constitute the pith of the lease.”
• in reaching its holding that there was no claim of lien against the landlord, the court noted that the tenant needed written consent from the landlord before making improvements
• in reaching its holding that there was no claim of lien against the landlord, the court noted that the tenant needed written consent from the landlord before making improvements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).