138-140 W. 32nd St. Assoc. LLC v. 138-140 W. 32nd St. Assoc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that evidence that the plaintiff had multiple violations of regulations prior to his termination was relevant
• stating, “[t]o be sure, submission to arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement does not give preclusive effect to the arbitral decision in a later statutory discrimination action brought before a court or specialized agency.”
• evidence of discharged employees is “not very instructive” without knowledge of “the reasons underlying those discharges”
• evidence of discharged employees is \not very instructive\ without knowledge of \the reasons underlying those discharges\
• “interest does not, in any event, lie against the Commonwealth or its instrumentalities [as here] in the absence of express statutory authorization”
• \forum adjudicating a statutory claim of discrimination may receive an arbitration decision in evidence and accord it the weight that seems appropriate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).