Skip to main content
· 9/7/1976

Federal Case

Citations

  • 542 F.2d 579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a district court has the ultimate discretion whether to deduct funds received from a collateral source, such as a public unemployment fund, from a back pay award
  • affirming district court residence requirement as a reflection of class definition
  • affirming district court residence requirement as a reflection of class definition
  • no abuse of discretion to award federally subsidized public interest law firm less than a non-federally subsidized law firm
  • to be eligible for backpay, claimant must show either written or oral application for union membership
  • no abuse of discretion to award federally subsidized public interest law firm less than a non-federally subsidized law firm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.