Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding union has standing to pursue injunctive relief for Title VII claims on behalf of its members and that “[t]he effectiveness of these suits can be increased by allowing unions to place their financial resources and expertise behind the suit.”
• in Title VII case union did not have standing to seek back pay or other individualized forms of monetary relief
• union has no standing to seek “individualized forms of monetary relief’ on behalf of its members
• “Often a union finds itself in the position of representing a membership whose interests conflict, not only in Title VII cases but in its collective bargaining role. This does not disqualify it from acting at all.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).