117 W. 142, L.L.C. v. Villanueva

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading § 1295(a)(4) “to incorporate a finality requirement” (quot- ing Loughlin v. Ling, 684 F.3d 1289, 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2012))
• reading § 1295(a)(4) “to incorporate a finality requirement” (quot- ing Loughlin v. Ling, 684 F.3d 1289, 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2012))
• reading § 1295(a)(4)\to incorporate a finality requirement\ (quoting Loughlin v. Ling , 684 F.3d 1289 , 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2012) )
• reading § 1295(a)(4) “to incorporate a finality requirement” (quot- ing Loughlin v. Ling, 684 F.3d 1289, 1292 (Fed. Cir. Case: 17-1555 Document: 82 Page: 17 Filed: 08/17/2020 BENNETT REG. GUARDS, INC. v. ATLANTA GAS LIGHT CO. 17 2012))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).