111 W. 57th Inv. LLC v. 111 W57 Mezz Inv. LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a claim that the payment of income taxes burdened the free exercise of religion by making participation in religious activities more difficult
• denying charitable deductions where quid pro quo exchange for services was clear
• religious exercise as “the observation of a central religious belief or practice” (citations omitted)
• “[i]t is not within the judicial ken to question the centrality of particular beliefs or practices to a faith, or the validity of particular litigants’ interpretations of those creeds.”
• “It is not within the judicial ken to question the centrality of particular beliefs or practices to a faith, or the validity of particular litigants’ interpretations of those creeds.”
• “It is not within the judicial ken to question the centrality of particular beliefs or practices to a faith, or the validity of particular litigants’ interpretations of those creeds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).