Targeting Child Predators Act of 2017
- Last Action
- 5/23/2017
Actions
- 2017-05-23Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2017-05-22Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2017-05-22On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4406)
- 2017-05-22Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H4406)
- 2017-05-22DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 883.
- 2017-05-22Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4406-4409)
- 2017-05-22Mr. Goodlatte moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- 2017-05-22Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 90.
- 2017-05-22Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 115-141.
- 2017-05-22Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 115-141.
- 2017-03-22Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- 2017-03-22Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
- 2017-03-09Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
- 2017-02-06Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2017-02-06Introduced in House
Showing 15 of 16 actions. Full history on Congress.gov.
CRS Summary
As of 2017-05-22 (81)
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary has been expanded because action occurred on the measure.)
Targeting Child Predators Act of 2017
(Sec. 2) This bill amends the federal criminal code to modify the process for issuing a nondisclosure requirement in connection with administrative subpoenas in four categories of investigations: health care offenses, child sexual exploitation or abuse, unregistered sex offenders, and imminent threats to an individual protected by the U.S. Secret Service.
It lengthens the period of time during which a recipient of an administrative subpoena is prohibited from disclosure.
(Sec. 3) The bill subjects a nondisclosure requirement to judicial review, requires the administrative subpoena to include notice of the availability of judicial review, and establishes a process for judicial review.
Cosponsors (8)
- John Ratcliffe (R-TX)
- Tom Marino (R-PA)
- Trent Franks (R-AZ)
- LAMAR SMITH (R-TX)
- F. SENSENBRENNER (R-WI)
- Luke Messer (R-IN)
- Claudia Tenney (R-NY)
- David Young (R-IA)
Subjects
- Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation
- Criminal procedure and sentencing
- Evidence and witnesses
- Judicial review and appeals
Sourced from Congress.gov (public domain).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.