Skip to main content
HOUSE 6547119th CongressPlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.

Least Cost Exception Act

Last Action
2/2/2026

Actions

  • 2026-02-02Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.
  • 2026-02-02Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.
  • 2026-02-02Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.
  • 2025-12-17Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 0.
  • 2025-12-17Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  • 2025-12-16Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  • 2025-12-10Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
  • 2025-12-10Introduced in House
  • 2025-12-10Introduced in House

CRS Summary

As of 2026-02-02 (07)

Least Cost Exception Act

This bill allows the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to waive the least-cost resolution requirement for failed insured depository institutions and use alternative methods of resolution, particularly alternatives that do not involve global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).

Under current law, the FDIC must use the resolution method (such as a deposit payoff or the purchase and assumption of a bank’s assets and liabilities) that costs the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund the least to implement when an insured depository institution fails.

The bill provides an exception to this requirement if the following criteria are met:

  • the alternative method is the least costly of all alternatives that do not involve a G-SIB and that do not exceed the cost of liquidation;
  • the difference in cost between the selected alternative and the cost of a resolution involving a purchase and assumption by a G-SIB is less than a maximum cost as established by rule;
  • if the alternative involves a person purchasing assets or assuming liabilities, that person must pay an assessment to the FDIC; and
  • it is determined that the risks to the fund are outweighed by the benefits of limiting the concentration of U.S. banking under G-SIBs.

FDIC must issue a report on any use of the exception established by this bill containing an analysis of the economic impact of cost differences between the selected alternative and the least-cost alternative.

Cosponsors (4)

  • Bill Foster (D-IL)
  • John Rose (R-TN)
  • Jared Moskowitz (D-FL)
  • Michael Lawler (R-NY)

Subjects

  • Accounting and auditing
  • Bank accounts, deposits, capital
  • Banking and financial institutions regulation
  • Congressional oversight
  • Corporate finance and management
  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
  • Performance measurement
  • User charges and fees
Read on Congress.gov

Sourced from Congress.gov (public domain).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.