No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act
- Last Action
- 9/23/2024
Actions
- 2024-09-23Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2024-09-20Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2024-09-20On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 186 (Roll no. 437).
- 2024-09-20Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 186 (Roll no. 437).
- 2024-09-20On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 190 - 200 (Roll no. 436).
- 2024-09-20Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5539-5540)
- 2024-09-19POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 5717, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Bowman demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- 2024-09-19The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
- 2024-09-19Mr. Bowman moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H5505)
- 2024-09-19The House adopted the amendments en gros as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
- 2024-09-19The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 2024-09-19The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 5717.
- 2024-09-19DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1455, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 2.
- 2024-09-19DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1455, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 1.
- 2024-09-19GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 5717.
Showing 15 of 20 actions. Full history on Congress.gov.
CRS Summary
As of 2023-09-26 (00)
No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act
This bill makes a state or political subdivision of a state ineligible for any federal funds the jurisdiction intends to use to benefit non-U.S. nationals (i.e., aliens under federal law) who are unlawfully present if the jurisdiction withholds information about citizenship or immigration status or does not cooperate with immigration detainers.
Specifically, such funds are denied to any jurisdiction that has a law, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts any government entity from
- maintaining, sending, or receiving information regarding the citizenship or immigration status of any individual;
- exchanging information regarding an individual's citizenship or immigration status with a federal, state, or local government entity;
- complying with a valid immigration detainer from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS); or
- notifying DHS about an individual's release from custody.
The funding restriction does not apply to a law, policy, or practice that only applies to an individual who comes forward as a victim of or a witness to a criminal offense.
The bill applies beginning in the fiscal year following its enactment.
Cosponsors (20)
- Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY)
- Michael McCaul (R-TX)
- Anthony D'Esposito (R-NY)
- Claudia Tenney (R-NY)
- Andrew Garbarino (R-NY)
- Michael Lawler (R-NY)
- Brandon Williams (R-NY)
- Carlos Gimenez (R-FL)
- Erin Houchin (R-IN)
- August Pfluger (R-TX)
- Russell Fry (R-SC)
- Chuck Edwards (R-NC)
- Mark Green (R-TN)
- Stephanie Bice (R-OK)
- Randy Weber (R-TX)
- Byron Donalds (R-FL)
- Mike Ezell (R-MS)
- James Baird (R-IN)
- Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL)
- Gary Palmer (R-AL)
Subjects
- Border security and unlawful immigration
- Congressional oversight
- Immigration status and procedures
- State and local finance
- State and local government operations
Sourced from Congress.gov (public domain).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.