HOUSE 3089118th CongressReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

NDO Fairness Act

Last Action: 5/16/2023

Actions

2023-05-16Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
2023-05-15Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2023-05-15On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 0 (Roll no. 213). (text: CR H2321-2322)
2023-05-15Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 0 (Roll no. 213). (text: CR H2321-2322)
2023-05-15Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2330)
2023-05-15At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
2023-05-15DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. R. 3089.
2023-05-15DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3089.
2023-05-15Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2321-2323)
2023-05-15Mr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
2023-05-15Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 37.
2023-05-15Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-54.
2023-05-15Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-54.
2023-05-10Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
2023-05-10Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Showing 15 of 18 actions. Full history on Congress.gov.

CRS Summary

As of 2023-05-05 (00)

NDO Fairness Act

This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.

Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services (providers) to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.

With respect to delayed notification orders, the bill

raises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order,
requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts, and
requires orders to be narrowly tailored.

Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Cosponsors (1)

JERROLD NADLER (D-NY)

Subjects

Business records
Computers and information technology
Congressional oversight
Consumer affairs
Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation
Internet, web applications, social media
Judicial procedure and administration
Right of privacy
Telephone and wireless communication

Read on Congress.gov

Sourced from Congress.gov (public domain).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.