HOUSE 288118th CongressMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Encouraging the EU to DESIGNATE Resolution

Last Action: 4/16/2024

Actions

2023-06-20Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
2023-06-15Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2023-06-15On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 211 (Roll no. 271).
2023-06-15Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 211 (Roll no. 271).
2023-06-15On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 220 (Roll no. 270).
2023-06-15Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2944-2945)
2023-06-15POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. R. 288, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Dean (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2023-06-15The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
2023-06-15Ms. Dean (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H2944)
2023-06-15The previous question was ordered on the amendment and the bill pursuant to the rule.
2023-06-15DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 1.
2023-06-15DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 288.
2023-06-15Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.
2023-06-15Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 495. (consideration: CR H2938-2944; text: CR H2938-2939)
2023-06-12Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 495 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.

Showing 15 of 20 actions. Full history on Congress.gov.

CRS Summary

As of 2023-06-15 (53)

Separation of Powers Restoration Act of 2023 or SOPRA

This bill modifies the scope of judicial review of agency actions to authorize courts reviewing agency actions to decide de novo (i.e., without giving deference to the agency's interpretation) all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of (1) constitutional and statutory provisions, (2) rules made by agencies, (3) interpretative rules, (4) general statements of policy, and (5) all other agency guidance documents.

No law may exempt a civil action from the standard of review required by this bill except by specific reference to such provision.

Cosponsors (13)

Mary Miller (R-IL)
Jeff Duncan (R-SC)
Tom McClintock (R-CA)
Michael Burgess (R-TX)
Ken Buck (R-CO)
Thomas Tiffany (R-WI)
Dan Bishop (R-NC)
Ronny Jackson (R-TX)
Ben Cline (R-VA)
Mike Johnson (R-LA)
Harriet Hageman (R-WY)
Josh Brecheen (R-OK)
Russell Fry (R-SC)

Subjects

Administrative law and regulatory procedures
Constitution and constitutional amendments
Judicial review and appeals

Read on Congress.gov

Sourced from Congress.gov (public domain).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.