Skip to main content
HOUSE 142119th CongressReferred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Recognizing the 80th anniversary of the amphibious landing on the Japanese island of Iwo Jima during World War II and the raisings of the flag of the United States on Mount Suribachi.

Last Action
2/18/2025

Actions

  • 2025-01-03Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • 2025-01-03Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • 2025-01-03Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • 2025-01-03Introduced in House
  • 2025-01-03Introduced in House

CRS Summary

As of 2025-01-03 (00)

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025

This bill revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking.

Specifically, the bill establishes a congressional approval process for a major rule. A major rule may only take effect if Congress approves of the rule. A major rule is a rule that has resulted in or is likely to result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.

The bill generally preserves the current congressional review process for a nonmajor rule.

Cosponsors (20)

  • Chuck Edwards (R-NC)
  • Clay Higgins (R-LA)
  • Jack Bergman (R-MI)
  • Rick Allen (R-GA)
  • Russ Fulcher (R-ID)
  • William Timmons (R-SC)
  • Brad Finstad (R-MN)
  • Aaron Bean (R-FL)
  • Dan Crenshaw (R-TX)
  • Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA)
  • Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY)
  • Barry Moore (R-AL)
  • Blake Moore (R-UT)
  • Ben Cline (R-VA)
  • David Rouzer (R-NC)
  • Jefferson Van Drew (R-NJ)
  • Daniel Meuser (R-PA)
  • John Rose (R-TN)
  • Earl Carter (R-GA)
  • Mike Flood (R-NE)

Subjects

  • Administrative law and regulatory procedures
  • Advanced technology and technological innovations
  • Budget deficits and national debt
  • Business investment and capital
  • Competition and antitrust
  • Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits
  • Congressional oversight
  • Congressional-executive branch relations
  • Economic performance and conditions
  • Government information and archives
  • Government studies and investigations
  • Industrial policy and productivity
  • Inflation and prices
  • Judicial review and appeals
  • Legislative rules and procedure
  • Monetary policy
  • Unemployment
Read on Congress.gov

Sourced from Congress.gov (public domain).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.