FTC

Federal Trade Commission

Protects consumers and promotes competition

Founded
1914
Employees
1,123

Mission & Role

Federal Trade Commission

Federal Trade Commission

United States government agency

|
Seal of the Federal Trade Commission | |
Flag of the Federal Trade Commission | | Agency overview | | Formed | September26, 1914;111 years ago(1914-09-26) | | Preceding agency | - Bureau of Corporations | | Jurisdiction | Federal government of the United States | | Headquarters | Federal Trade Commission Building
Washington, DC | | Employees | 1,123 (FY 2021)[1] | | Annualbudget | $425.7 million (FY 2024)[2] | | Agency executive | - Andrew N. Ferguson, Chairman | | Website | ftc.gov | | Footnotes | | [3][4] |

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission ( FTC) is an independent agency of the United States government whose principal mission is the enforcement of civil (non-criminal) antitrust law and the promotion of consumer protection. It shares jurisdiction over federal civil antitrust law enforcement with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. The FTC is headquartered in the Federal Trade Commission Building in Washington, D.C.

The FTC was established in 1914 by the Federal Trade Commission Act, which the U.S. Congress passed in response to the 19th-century monopolistic trust crisis. Since its inception, the FTC has enforced the provisions of the Clayton Act, a key U.S. antitrust statute, as well as the provisions of the FTC Act, 15U.S.C. §41 et seq. Over time, the FTC has been delegated with the enforcement of additional business regulation statutes and has promulgated a number of regulations (codified in Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations). The broad statutory authority granted to the FTC provides it with more surveillance and monitoring abilities than it actually uses.[5]

The FTC is composed of five commissioners who are nominated by the president and subject to Senate confirmation. Commissioners serve seven-year terms, and by law can only be fired for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." No more than three FTC members can be from the same party. One member of the body serves as FTC chair at the President's pleasure, with Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson having served as chair since January 2025.

History

History

Early history

In the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States in 1911,[6] the first version of a bill to establish a commission to regulate interstate trade was introduced on January 25, 1912, by Oklahoma congressman Dick Thompson Morgan. He would make the first speech on the House floor advocating its creation on February 21, 1912.

Though the initial bill did not pass, the questions of trusts and antitrust dominated the 1912 election.[7] Most political party platforms in 1912 endorsed the establishment of a federal trade commission with its regulatory powers placed in the hands of an administrative board, as an alternative to functions previously and necessarily exercised so slowly through the courts.[8][9]

With the 1912 presidential election decided in favor of the Democrats and Woodrow Wilson, Morgan reintroduced a slightly amended version of his bill during the April 1913 special session. The national debate culminated in Wilson's signing of the FTC Act on September 26, 1914, with additional tightening of regulations in the Clayton Antitrust Act three weeks later.

The new FTC would absorb the staff and duties of Bureau of Corporations, previously established under the Department of Commerce and Labor in 1903. The FTC could additionally challenge "unfair methods of competition" and enforce the Clayton Act's more specific prohibitions against certain price discrimination, vertical arrangements, interlocking directorates, and stock acquisitions.[7][ non-primary source needed]

1980s

In 1984,[10][ non-primary source needed] the FTC began to regulate the funeral home industry in order to protect consumers from deceptive practices. The FTC Funeral Rule requires funeral homes to provide all customers (and potential customers) with a General Price List (GPL), specifically outlining goods and services in the funeral industry, as defined by the FTC, and a listing of their prices.[11][ non-primary source needed] By law, the GPL must be presented on request to all individuals, and no one is to be denied a written, retainable copy of the GPL.[10][ non-primary source needed]

1990s

In 1996, the FTC instituted the Funeral Rule Offenders Program (FROP), under which "funeral homes make a voluntary payment to the U.S. Treasury or appropriate state fund for an amount less than what would likely be sought if the Commission authorized filing a lawsuit for civil penalties. In addition, the funeral homes participate in the NFDA compliance program, which includes a review of the price lists, on-site training of the staff, and follow-up testing and certification on compliance with the Funeral Rule."[10][ non-primary source needed]

In the mid-1990s, the FTC launched the fraud sweeps concept where the agency and its federal, state, and local partners filed simultaneous legal actions against multiple telemarketing fraud targets. The first sweeps operation was Project Telesweep in July 1995 which cracked down on 100 business opportunity scams.[12][ non-primary source needed]

Bush administration

Gateway Learning case

In the 2004 case In re Gateway Learning Corp., the FTC alleged that Gateway committed unfair and deceptive trade

Programs & Activities

Activities

icon This section relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Federal Trade Commission"news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR(August 2024)

The FTC investigates issues raised by reports from consumers and businesses, pre-merger notification filings, congressional inquiries, or reports in the media. These issues include, for instance, false advertising and other forms of fraud. FTC investigations may pertain to a single company or an entire industry. If the results of the investigation reveal unlawful conduct, the FTC may seek voluntary compliance by the offending business through a consent order, file an administrative complaint, or initiate federal litigation. During the course of regulatory activities, the FTC is authorized to collect records, but not on-site inspections.[109]

Traditionally an administrative complaint is heard in front of an independent administrative law judge (ALJ) with FTC staff acting as prosecutors. The case is reviewed de novo by the full FTC commission which then may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals and finally to the Supreme Court.[ citation needed][110]

Under the FTC Act, the federal courts retain their traditional authority to issue equitable relief, including the appointment of receivers, monitors, the imposition of asset freezes to guard against the spoliation of funds, immediate access to business premises to preserve evidence, and other relief including financial disclosures and expedited discovery. In numerous cases, the FTC employs this authority to combat serious consumer deception or fraud. Additionally, the FTC has rulemaking power to address concerns regarding industry-wide practices. Rules promulgated under this authority are known as Trade Rules.[ citation needed]

One of the Federal Trade Commission's other major focuses is identity theft. The FTC serves as a federal repository for individual consumer complaints regarding identity theft. Even though the FTC does not resolve individual complaints, it does use the aggregated information to determine where federal action might be taken. The complaint form is available online or by phone (1-877-ID-THEFT).[ citation needed]

The FTC has been involved in the oversight of the online advertising industry and its practice of behavioral targeting for some time. In 2011 the FTC proposed a " Do Not Track" mechanism to allow Internet users to opt-out of behavioral targeting.[ citation needed]

The FTC, along with the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Justice also empowers third-party enforcer-firms to engage in some regulatory oversight, e.g. the FTC requires other energy companies to audit offshore oil platform operators.[111]

In 2013, the FTC issued a comprehensive revision of its Green guides, which set forth standards for environmental marketing.[112][ non-primary source needed]

Unfair or deceptive practices affecting consumers

Endorsement Guides from the FTC

Section 5 of the Federal T

Agency overview, history, and program data sourced from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 3.0).

Key Regulations

16 CFR 312active

Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule (COPPA)

Requires websites and apps to get parental consent before collecting personal information from children under 13.

16 CFR 316active

CAN-SPAM Act Rules

Sets rules for commercial email including opt-out requirements and prohibitions on deceptive subject lines.

16 CFR 310active

Telemarketing Sales Rule

Sets rules for telemarketing calls including time restrictions, disclosure requirements, and Do Not Call compliance.

16 CFR 444active

Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices (Credit Practices Rule)

Bans unfair terms in consumer credit contracts and requires cosigners to be warned about their liability.

16 CFR 318active

Health Breach Notification Rule

Requires health apps and personal health record companies to notify users when their health data is breached.

Enforcement Actions

settlement$5 billionJul 24, 2019

FTC v. Facebook — Privacy Violations

Respondent: Facebook, Inc. (now Meta Platforms, Inc.)

The FTC imposed a record-breaking $5 billion penalty on Facebook for violating a 2012 consent order that required the company to protect users' privacy. The settlement resolved allegations that Facebo...

Outcome: $5 billion fine; restructured corporate governance; independent privacy oversight.

settlementNon-monetaryDec 9, 2015

FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide — Data Security Failures

Respondent: Wyndham Worldwide Corporation

The FTC settled charges against Wyndham Worldwide after three data breaches between 2008 and 2010 compromised the payment card information of more than 619,000 consumers and led to more than $10.6 mil...

Outcome: Comprehensive security program required; 20 years of third-party audits; FTC authority upheld on appeal.

litigationJan 21, 2025

FTC v. Amazon — Dark Patterns in Prime Enrollment

Respondent: Amazon.com, Inc.

The FTC sued Amazon alleging that the company used manipulative user interface designs, known as dark patterns, to trick millions of consumers into enrolling in its Amazon Prime subscription service a...

Outcome: Litigation ongoing; seeking injunctive relief, civil penalties, and restitution.

settlement$700 millionJul 22, 2019

FTC v. Equifax — Data Breach Settlement

Respondent: Equifax Inc.

Equifax agreed to pay at least $575 million—potentially up to $700 million—to settle charges related to its 2017 data breach, which exposed the personal information of approximately 147 million Americ...

Outcome: Up to $700M settlement; $425M consumer fund; 20 years of security assessments.

litigationFeb 26, 2024

FTC v. Kellogg/Albertsons Merger Challenge

Respondent: Kroger Company and Albertsons Companies, Inc.

The FTC sued to block the proposed $24.6 billion merger of Kroger and Albertsons, the two largest supermarket chains in the United States. The FTC alleged that the merger would eliminate direct compet...

Outcome: FTC filed suit to block merger; litigation pending; divestiture plan challenged as inadequate.

litigationSep 25, 2019

FTC v. Match Group — Deceptive Use of Fake Profiles

Respondent: Match Group, Inc. (Match.com)

The FTC sued Match Group, the operator of Match.com, alleging that the company used fake love interest advertisements to trick consumers into purchasing paid subscriptions. According to the complaint,...

Outcome: Litigation resulted in settlement requiring refunds and business practice changes.

settlement$520 millionDec 19, 2024

FTC v. Epic Games — Children's Privacy Violations (Fortnite)

Respondent: Epic Games, Inc.

The FTC imposed a record-breaking $520 million penalty on Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite, for violating children's privacy laws and using dark patterns to trick players into making purchases. The $...

Outcome: $520M total penalties; record COPPA fine; $245M in consumer refunds.

litigationJan 17, 2017

FTC v. Qualcomm — Anticompetitive Licensing Practices

Respondent: Qualcomm Incorporated

The FTC sued Qualcomm alleging that the semiconductor company used anticompetitive tactics to maintain its monopoly in the supply of certain baseband processors used in cell phones and other devices. ...

Outcome: District court ruled for FTC; reversed on appeal by Ninth Circuit; FTC declined further review.

litigation$8.5 millionNov 2, 2024

FTC v. Frontier Communications — Internet Speed Deception

Respondent: Frontier Communications

The FTC sued Frontier Communications for failing to provide internet speeds advertised to customers in many areas it served. The complaint alleged that Frontier charged customers for internet service ...

Outcome: $8.5M settlement; required to stop advertising undeliverable speeds; customer restitution.