Certain Glow Fish Tape Systems, Safety Helmet Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order; Termination of Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("the Commission") has determined that respondent Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation of Brookfield, Wisconsin ("Milwaukee") has violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, by importing, selling for importation, or selling in the United States after importation certain glow fish tape systems and components thereof that infringe claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 12,187,573 ("the '573 patent"). The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedies are a limited exclusion order ("LEO") and cease and desist order ("CDO") against Milwaukee, and that the public interest factors do not preclude issuance of such remedial orders. The Commission has also determined to set a bond in the amount of 100 percent (100%) of the entered value of the covered products imported during the period of Presidential review. This investigation is hereby terminated.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 215 (Monday, November 9, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 215 (Monday, November 9, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70896-70898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-22768]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1442]
Certain Glow Fish Tape Systems, Safety Helmet Systems, and
Components Thereof; Notice of a Final Determination Finding a Violation
of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and
Desist Order; Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (``the Commission'') has determined that respondent
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation of Brookfield, Wisconsin
(``Milwaukee'') has violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, by importing, selling for importation, or selling in the
United States after importation certain glow fish tape systems and
components thereof that infringe claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 12,187,573
(``the '573 patent''). The Commission has determined that the
appropriate remedies are a limited exclusion order (``LEO'') and cease
and desist order (``CDO'') against Milwaukee, and that the public
interest factors do not preclude issuance of such remedial orders. The
Commission has also determined to set a bond in the amount of 100
percent (100%) of the entered value of the covered products imported
during the period of Presidential review. This investigation is hereby
terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Bretscher, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2382. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e6e7eaf090ebc6cfd3e3d6d0cad7c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f3a3b362c4c371a130f3f0a0c160b1c51181009">[email protected]</span></a>.
[[Page 70897]]
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-
impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 19, 2025, the Commission instituted
this investigation based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed by
Klein Tools, Inc. of Lincolnshire, Illinois (``Klein''), accusing
Milwaukee of violating section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), by importing into the United
States, selling for importation, or selling in the United States after
importation certain glow fish tape systems, safety helmet systems, and
components thereof by reason of the infringement of the asserted claims
of the '573 patent and U.S. Patent Nos. 11,713,209 (``the '209
patent'') and 11,452,327 (``the '327 patent''). 90 FR 12790 (Mar. 19,
2025). The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists.
Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations did not participate in
the investigation. Id.
On May 30, 2025, the Commission amended the notice of investigation
to include allegations of infringement of certain asserted claims of
U.S. Patent No. 12,268,265 (``the '265 patent''). Order No. 6 (May 1,
2025), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (May 30, 2025). The '265 patent and
related '327 patent are collectively referred to as the ``Helmet
Patents.'' The '209 patent and related '573 patent are collectively
referred to as the ``Glow Fish Tape Patents.''
The Commission subsequently partially terminated the investigation
with respect to certain asserted claims of the '327 patent, '209
patent, and '573 patent due to Klein's withdrawal of the complaint with
respect to those claims. Order No. 14 (Nov. 20, 2025), unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (Dec. 12, 2025); Order No. 19 (Jan. 5, 2026), unreviewed
by Comm'n Notice (Jan. 28, 2026).
On January 20, 2026, the Commission granted Klein's motion for
summary determination that it has satisfied the technical and economic
prongs of the domestic industry requirement for the Glow Fish Tape
Patents. Order No. 17 (Dec. 19, 2025), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice
(Jan. 20, 2026).
The presiding Chief Administrative Law Judge (``CALJ'') held an
evidentiary hearing from January 5-8, 2026. At the time of the hearing,
the asserted claims of the Helmet Patents still at issue were claims 8,
10, and 17 of the '327 patent and claims 1-4 of the '265 patent. The
asserted claims of the Glow Fish Tape Patents still at issue were claim
6 of the '209 patent and claim 6 of the '573 patent.
On June 5, 2026, the CALJ issued a final Initial Determination on
Violation of Section 337 (``FID'') and a Recommendation on Remedy and
Bond (``RD''). With respect to the Helmet Patents, the FID finds that:
(i) Milwaukee infringed the '265 patent but not the '327 patent; (ii)
the asserted claims of the Helmet Patents are not invalid as obvious or
for failing the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112;
and (iii) Klein has satisfied both the technical and economic prongs of
the domestic industry requirement for both Helmet Patents. With respect
to the Glow Fish Tape Patents, the FID finds that: (i) Milwaukee did
not infringe the '209 patent or '573 patent; (ii) the asserted claims
of the Glow Fish Tape Patent are not invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C.
103 or for failing the written description requirement; and (iii) Klein
has satisfied the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement
with respect to claim 6 of each Glow Fish Tape Patent (to supplement
the CALJ's earlier summary determination that Klein has satisfied both
the economic and technical prongs with respect to claims 1 and 5 of the
Glow Fish Tape Patents in Order No. 17, supra). The FID concludes that
Milwaukee has violated section 337 with respect to the '265 patent (a
Helmet Patent) but not the '327 patent or either of the Glow Fish Tape
Patents.
The RD recommends that, if a violation is found, the Commission
issue an LEO and a CDO against Milwaukee. The RD also recommends that
the Commission set a bond in the amount of 100 percent of the entered
value of covered products that are imported during the 60-day period of
Presidential review.
On June 22, 2026, both Milwaukee and Klein filed petitions and/or
contingent petitions for review of certain adverse findings in the FID.
On June 30, 2026, each party filed its respective response to the
opposing party's petition.
On July 10, 2026, Klein's counsel submitted a letter to the
Commission identifying certain allegedly false statements in
Milwaukee's opposition to Klein's petition. On the same date,
Milwaukee's counsel submitted a response, to which it attached a copy
of a letter to Klein's counsel dated July 8, 2026, explaining why
Milwaukee's representations are allegedly correct. Upon review of the
letters, the Commission declined to consider them because they are not
permissible under the Commission's rules.
The parties did not submit statements concerning the public
interest pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4)(i), 19 CFR
210.50(a)(4)(i). The Commission also did not receive any submissions in
response to its request for submissions from interested third parties
or government agencies on remedy and the public interest factors. 91 FR
43402-03 (July 15, 2026).
On September 9, 2026, the Commission determined to review the FID
in part. 91 FR 57383 (Sept. 9, 2026). With respect to the Helmet
Patents, the Commission determined to review the FID's findings that:
(i) the asserted claims of the '265 patent and '327 patent are not
obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103; and (ii) Klein satisfied the economic
prong of the domestic industry requirement. With respect to the Glow
Fish Tape Patents, the Commission determined to review: (i) the
construction of the claim term ``wherein at least a portion of the case
is configured to allow the luminescent material to be energized by
light passing through the portion'' in the '573 patent and related
infringement and validity findings; (ii) the FID's finding of non-
infringement of the '209 and '573 patents, both literal and under the
doctrine of equivalents; and (iii) the FID's finding that the asserted
claims of the Glow Fish Tape Patents are not invalid as obvious. The
Commission determined not to review, and thereby adopted, the other
findings in the FID. The Commission directed the parties to brief
certain violation issues on review and remedy, the public interest, and
bond.
Pursuant to the Commission's directions, the parties filed their
initial responses to the Commission's questions on September 18, 2026,
and their respective replies to the opposing party's initial response
on September 25, 2026.
Having reviewed the FID, the parties' submissions, and the record
below, the Commission has determined to reverse the FID and find that
Milwaukee has violated section 337 by importing into the United States,
selling for importation, or selling in the United States after
importation certain glow fish tape products and components thereof that
infringe claim 6 of the '573 patent (a Glow Fish Tape Patent). As
further explained in the Commission Opinion issued concurrently
herewith, the Commission has also determined to adopt the FID's
findings that the asserted claims of the Glow Fish Tape Patents are not
invalid as obvious and to adopt, with modifications, the FID's
[[Page 70898]]
finding that claim 6 of the '209 patent is not infringed. With respect
to the Helmet Patents, the Commission has determined to reverse the
FID's finding that Milwaukee has violated section 337 with respect to
the '265 patent and to find instead that the asserted claims of the
'265 patent are invalid as obvious. The Commission, having previously
determined to adopt the FID's finding that the asserted claims of the
'327 patent are not infringed (91 FR at 57384), takes no position on
whether the '327 patent claims are also invalid as obvious or whether
Klein has satisfied the domestic industry requirement with respect to
the Helmet Patents.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is: (i)
an LEO prohibiting the importation of certain glow fish tape products
and components thereof that infringe claim 6 of the '573 patent; and
(ii) a CDO against Milwaukee. The Commission has determined that the
public interest factors do not preclude issuance of a remedy. The
Commission has set a bond in the amount of 100 percent (100%) of the
entered value of infringing products imported during the period of
Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)).
The Commission issues its opinion herewith setting forth its
determinations on certain issues. This investigation is hereby
terminated.
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President
and United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on November
4, 2026.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 4, 2026.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026-22768 Filed 11-6-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.