Notice2026-22764
Certain Wooden Fence Components From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
November 9, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 215 (Monday, November 9, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 215 (Monday, November 9, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70837-70840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-22764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
C-570-244]
Certain Wooden Fence Components From the People's Republic of
China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable November 3, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suresh Maniam, Office I, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0176.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On September 24, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)
received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of
certain wooden fence components \1\ from the People's Republic of China
(China), filed in proper form on behalf of the American Alliance of
Wooden Fence Producers (the petitioner),\2\ the members of which are
domestic producers of certain wooden fence components.\3\ The CVD
Petition was accompanied by an antidumping duty (AD) petition
concerning imports of certain wooden fence components from China.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Notice of Change in Case Name,''
dated November 2, 2026; see also Memorandum, ``Product Name
Change,'' dated November 3, 2026.
\2\ The individual members of the American Alliance of Wooden
Fence Producers (Alliance) are Alta Forest Products, Sierra Pacific
Industries, and Mendocino Forest Products.
\3\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated September 24, 2026
(Petition).
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 13, 2026, Commerce extended the initiation deadline by
20 days to further examine the issue of industry support, because it
was not clear from the Petition whether the industry support criteria
had been met.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Notice of Extension of the Deadline for Determining the
Adequacy of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions:
Certain Wooden Fence Pickets from China, 91 FR 66106 (October 19,
2026) (Initiation Extension Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Between September 29 and October 29, 2026, Commerce requested
supplemental information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petition
in supplemental questionnaires.\6\ Between October 4 and 30, 2026, the
petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for additional
information.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Commerce's Letters, ``General Issues Supplemental
Questions,'' dated September 29, 2026 (First General Issues
Supplemental Questionnaire); ``Second General Issues Supplemental
Questions,'' dated October 8, 2026 (Second General Issues
Supplemental Questionnaire); ``Third Supplemental Questions,'' dated
October 14, 2026 (Third General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire);
``CVD Supplemental Questions,'' dated October 5, 2026 (First CVD
Supplemental Questionnaire); and ``Second CVD Supplemental
Questions,'' dated October 29, 2026 (Second CVD Supplemental
Questionnaire).
\7\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Petitioner Response to the 1st
Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding Common Issues and Injury Volume
I of the Petition,'' dated October 4, 2026 (First General Issues
Supplement); ``Petitioner Response to the 2nd Supplemental
Questionnaire Regarding Common Issues and Injury Volume I of the
Petition,'' dated October 9, 2026 (Second General Issues
Supplement); ``Petitioner Response to the 3rd Supplemental
Questionnaire Regarding Common Issues and Injury Volume I of the
Petition,'' dated October 19, 2026; ``Petitioner Response to the 1st
Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding China CVD Volume III of the
Petition,'' dated October 8, 2026 (First CVD Supplement); and
``Petitioner Response to the 1st Supplemental Questionnaire
Regarding China CVD Volume III of the Petition,'' dated October 30,
2026 (Second CVD Supplement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of China
(GOC) is providing countervailable subsidies, within the meaning of
sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of certain wooden
fence components from China, and that such imports are materially
injuring, or threatening material injury to, the domestic industry
producing certain wooden fence components in the United States.
Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.202(b), for
those alleged programs on which we are initiating a CVD investigation,
the Petition was accompanied by information reasonably available to the
petitioner supporting its allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry, because the petitioner is an interested party,
as defined in section 771(9)(F) of the Act.\8\ Commerce also finds that
the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to
the initiation of the requested CVD investigation.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The members of the Alliance are interested parties within
the meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
\9\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation (POI)
Because the Petition was filed on September 24, 2026, the POI is
January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are certain wooden fence
components from China. For a full description of the scope of this
investigation, see the appendix to this notice.
Comments on the Scope of the Investigation
Between September 29 and October 14, 2026, Commerce requested
information and clarification from the petitioner regarding the
proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petition is an
accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is
seeking relief.\11\ Between October 4 and 19, 2026, the petitioner
provided clarifications and/or revised the scope.\12\ The description
of merchandise covered by this investigation, as described in the
appendix to this notice, reflects these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See First General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire; see
also Second General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire.
\12\ See First General Issues Supplement at 1-8 and Exhibits I-
Supp-2 through I-Supp-6; see also Second General Issues Supplement
at 1-2 and Third General Issues Supplement at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).\13\ Commerce will consider all scope
comments received from interested parties and, if necessary, will
consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the
preliminary determination. If scope comments include factual
information, all such factual information should be limited to public
information.\14\ Commerce requests that interested parties provide at
the beginning of their scope comments a public executive summary for
each comment or issue raised in
[[Page 70838]]
their submission. Commerce further requests that interested parties
limit their public executive summary of each comment or issue to no
more than 450 words, not including citations. Commerce intends to use
the public executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries
included in the analysis of scope comments. To facilitate preparation
of its questionnaires, Commerce requests that scope comments be
submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on November 23, 2026, which is
20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice. Any rebuttal
comments, which may include factual information, and should also be
limited to public information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on
December 3, 2026, which is 10 calendar days from the initial comment
deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble); see also 19 CFR
351.312.
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce requests that any factual information that parties
consider relevant to the scope of this investigation be submitted
during that period. However, if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent
AD and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception
applies.\15\ An electronically filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help">https://access.trade.gov/help</a> and a handbook can be
found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/ACCESS%20Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filing%20Procedures_March2026.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/ACCESS%20Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filing%20Procedures_March2026.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce
notified the GOC of the receipt of the Petition and provided an
opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petition.\16\ The GOC
filed consultation remarks in lieu of consultations on October 13,
2026.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultations to
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated September 24,
2026.
\17\ See GOC's Letter, ``Comments of the Government of the
People's Republic of China on the Countervailing Duty Petition
Concerning Certain Wooden Fence Pickets from China,'' dated October
13, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i)
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC),
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry''
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the
ITC apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like
product,\18\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\19\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F.Supp.2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688
F.Supp.639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation.\20\ Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that certain wooden fence
components, as defined in the scope, constitute a single domestic like
product, and we have analyzed industry support in terms of that
domestic like product.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to this case and information regarding industry support, see
Checklist, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist:
Certain Wooden Fence Components from the People's Republic of
China,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(China CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, Analysis of
Industry Support for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Petitions Covering Certain Wooden Fence Components from the People's
Republic of China (Attachment II). This checklist is on file
electronically via ACCESS.
\21\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the China CVD
Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, on October 13, 2026, Commerce extended the
initiation deadline by 20 days to further examine the issue of industry
support. In determining whether the petitioner has standing under
section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support
data contained in the Petition with reference to the domestic like
product as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in the
appendix to this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioner
provided the 2025 production of the domestic like product for the U.S.
producers that support the Petition and compared this to the estimated
total production of the domestic like product by the U.S. certain
wooden fence components industry.\22\ We relied on data provided by the
petitioner for purposes of measuring industry support.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Id.
\23\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review of the data provided in the Petition, the First General
Issues Supplement, and the Third General Issues Supplement, and other
information readily available to Commerce indicates that the petitioner
has established industry support for the Petition.\24\ First, the
Petition established support from domestic producers (or
[[Page 70839]]
workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of
the domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not required to
take further action in order to evaluate industry support (e.g.,
polling).\25\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have met the
statutory criteria for industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i)
of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers) who support the
Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total production of the
domestic like product.\26\ Finally, the domestic producers (or workers)
have met the statutory criteria for industry support under section
702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers)
who support the Petition account for more than 50 percent of the
production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the
industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petition.\27\
Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petition was filed on behalf
of the domestic industry within the meaning of section 702(b)(1) of the
Act.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Id.
\25\ Id.; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
\26\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
\27\ Id.
\28\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because China is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject merchandise from China materially
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner
alleges that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold
provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ For further discussion, see China CVD Initiation Checklist
at Attachment III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material
Injury and Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Petitions Covering Certain Wooden Fence Components from the People's
Republic of China.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by significant increase in the volume of subject imports;
significant market share by subject imports and reduced market share
for the domestic industry; underselling and price depression and
suppression; negative impact on financial performance; lost sales and
revenue; and decline in production, U.S. shipments, capacity
utilization, and employment variables.\30\ We assessed the allegations
and supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat of material
injury, causation, as well as negligibility, and we have determined
that these allegations are properly supported by adequate evidence, and
meet the statutory requirements for initiation.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Id.
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon the examination of the Petition and supplemental
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to determine
whether imports of certain wooden fence components from China benefit
from countervailable subsidies conferred by the GOC. In accordance with
section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless
postponed, we will make our preliminary determination no later than 65
days after the date of this initiation.
Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 37 programs
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our
decision to initiate on each program, see the China CVD Initiation
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this
investigation is available on ACCESS.
Respondent Selection
In the Petition, the petitioner identified 80 companies in
China.\32\ Commerce intends to follow its standard practice in CVD
investigations and calculate company-specific subsidy rates in the
investigation. In the event Commerce determines that the number of
companies is large, and it cannot individually examine each company
based upon Commerce's resources, Commerce intends to select mandatory
respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for
imports under the appropriate Harmonized tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) subheading(s) listed in the ``Scope of the
Investigation,'' in the appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See Petition at Volume I (pages 9-10 and Exhibit I-8); see
also First General Issues Supplement at 1 and Exhibit I-Supp-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 3, 2026, Commerce released CBP data on imports of
certain wooden fence components from China under administrative
protective order (APO) to all parties with access to information
protected by APO and indicated that interested parties wishing to
comment on CBP data and/or respondent selection must do so within three
days of the publication date of the notice of initiation of this
investigation.\33\ Comments must be filed electronically using ACCESS.
An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its
entirety via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. ET on the specified deadline. Commerce
will not accept rebuttal comments regarding the CBP data or respondent
selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Entry Data,'' dated November 3, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such
applications may be found on Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders">https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders</a>.
Distribution of a Copy of the Petition
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petition has been
provided to the GOC via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by
section 702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 25 days after the date
on which it receives notice of initiation of this investigation,
whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of certain wooden
fence components from China are materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, a U.S. industry.\34\ A negative ITC determination
will result in the investigation being terminated.\35\ Otherwise, this
CVD investigation will proceed according to statutory and regulatory
time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
\35\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR
[[Page 70840]]
351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v)
evidence other than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section
351.301(b) of Commerce's regulations requires any party, when
submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19
CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted \36\ and, if the
information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual
information already on the record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on the record that the factual
information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.\37\ Time limits for
the submission of factual information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301,
which provides specific time limits based on the type of factual
information being submitted. Interested parties should review the
regulations prior to submitting factual information in this
investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\37\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by
Commerce.\38\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to
submitting factual information in this investigation.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
\39\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits;
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final
Rule), available at <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\40\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\41\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\41\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2023) (Final Rule). Additional
information regarding the Final Rule is available at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/sites/default/files/2026-08/FAQ%20for%20Certifications.pdf?v=1787683944756">https://www.trade.gov/sites/default/files/2026-08/FAQ%20for%20Certifications.pdf?v=1787683944756</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate
in this investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of
19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of appearance).
Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining
to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: November 3, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation includes certain wooden fence
components (commonly referred to as wooden fence pickets), finished
and unfinished, whether assembled or unassembled. Wooden fence
pickets included in this scope are made of one or more wood species,
typically from Cryptomeria japonica (Japanese Cedar or Sugi), but
can also be made from other wood species, including but not limited
to Western Red Cedar, Redwood, Incense Cedar, Douglas Fir, Western
Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, and Cunninghamia lanceolata (Chinese Fir).
Wooden fence pickets are included within the scope of this
investigation regardless of form or shape, including, but not
limited to flat top (also known as square or square top), pointed,
dog ear, gothic (including but not limited to French gothic, French
gothic blunt point) and stockade.
Generally, assembled wooden fence pickets contain at least one
fence picket attached to one or more cross rails, framing lumber, or
other fencing materials, and can include fully pre-assembled fence
panels. Unassembled wooden fence pickets consist of one or more
wooden fence pickets, not attached to any framing lumber, whether
sold individually, bundled, or in a kit with framing lumber.
The finished products covered by the scope of this investigation
have the following dimensions: a thickness of no more than 1 inch, a
width of no more than 12 inches, and a length of at least 3 feet.
The products covered by the scope are typically a length of 5 feet,
6 feet, or 8 feet when finished.
Wooden fence pickets are included within the scope of this
investigation regardless of whether they have been painted, stained,
pressure-treated, or otherwise coated or treated. Subject
merchandise also includes wooden fence pickets that have been
further processed in a third country, including but not limited to
trimming, cutting, notching, sanding, planing or any other
processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the
scope of this investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the in-scope product.
Excluded from the scope of this investigation are wooden fence
pickets made exclusively of bamboo (including, but not limited to,
Phyllostachys edulis, Bambusa textilis, and Bambusa oldhamii),
Brazilian Pine (Paran[aacute] pine), or Southern Yellow Pine
(including Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata), Slash Pine (Pinus
ellioti), Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris), or Loblolly Pine (Pinus
taeda)).
Also excluded from the scope of this investigation are wood
mouldings and millwork products covered by the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on wood mouldings and millwork products
from the People's Republic of China. See Wood Mouldings and Millwork
Products from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order, 86FR 9486
(February 16, 2021) (amended final antidumping duty determination
and antidumping duty order); Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products
from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 86
FR 9484 (February 16, 2021) (countervailing duty order).
Imports of subject merchandise are typically classified under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) statistical
numbers 4404.10.0040, 4407.19.0092, 4421.99.7020, and 4421.99.7040.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this
investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2026-22764 Filed 11-6-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on November 9, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.