Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) proposes a new system of records titled, "Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration DOT/FAA 860, Unmanned Aircraft System Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations--Parts 108/146." This system of records allows the FAA to collect, use, and maintain information from operators, manufacturers and Automated Data Service Providers (ADSPs), to the extent the operator, manufacturer or ADSP is an individual, when requesting authorizations to conduct or support certain beyond visual line of sight operations in the United States national airspace (NAS).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 3, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69305-69309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-22436]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT-OST-2026-3862]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of a new system of records.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the United States
Department of Transportation (DOT) proposes a new system of records
titled, ``Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration
DOT/FAA 860, Unmanned Aircraft System Beyond Visual Line of Sight
Operations--Parts 108/146.'' This system of records allows the FAA to
collect, use, and maintain
[[Page 69306]]
information from operators, manufacturers and Automated Data Service
Providers (ADSPs), to the extent the operator, manufacturer or ADSP is
an individual, when requesting authorizations to conduct or support
certain beyond visual line of sight operations in the United States
national airspace (NAS).
DATES: Submit comments on or before December 3, 2026. The Department
may publish an amended Systems of Records Notice (hereafter ``Notice'')
in light of any comments received. This new system will be effective
immediately. The routine uses will be effective December 3, 2026.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number DOT-OST-
2026-3862 by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
<bullet> Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W58-213, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
<bullet> Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday
through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
<bullet> Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number
DOT-OST-2026-3862. All comments received will be posted without change
to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any personal information
provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received in any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions, please contact: Karyn
Gorman, Departmental Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department
of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1363617a6572706a53777c673d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3d3d1cad5c2c0dae3c7ccd78dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>; or 202-603-
8321.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Beyond Visual Line
of Sight (BVLOS) Operations final rule was issued under the authority
of 49 United States Code (U.S.C.). Section 106. The associated
rulemaking was issued under the authority described in 49 U.S.C. 44807,
Special authority for certain UAS, which permitted the FAA
Administrator \1\ to use a risk-based approach to determine if certain
UAS may operate safely in the NAS. Furthermore, the FAA Reauthorization
Act of 2024 (section 930 of Pub. L. 118-63) amended 49 U.S.C. chapter
448 by adding Sec. 44811 to require the FAA to establish performance-
based regulations for UAS to be used for BVLOS operations. The UAS
operations BVLOS regulations established acceptable risk levels for
BVLOS operations; standards for remote pilots or UAS operators; an
approval or acceptance process for UAS which leveraged special
airworthiness certificates (SAC) or a manufacturer declaration of
compliance (DOC); operating rules for UAS that were approved or
accepted; protocols of networked information; and safety of manned
aircraft operating in the NAS. Furthermore, section 932 of the FAA
Reauthorization Act of 2024 required procedures, including rulemaking,
to approve third-party service suppliers. This included suppliers of
UAS Traffic Management (UTM) services to support the safe integration
and commercial operations of UAS. The rulemaking and subsequent
regulations that are covered by this system of records are within the
scope of these authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See section 927 of FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, Public
Law 118-63.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rulemaking established parts 108 Operations of Unmanned
Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight, and 146 Automated Data
Service Providers. Part 108 established a comprehensive framework
enabling routine UAS Operations BVLOS without the need for case-by-case
waivers, setting standards for aircraft design, operators, and
operational safety. The operators and manufacturers covered by this
part can be individuals or businesses. Part 146 established a
certification structure for Automated Data Service Providers (ADSPs)
that supply the digital traffic management and safety data necessary to
support scalable BVLOS activity, including UTM. Like the other groups,
ADSPs can be individuals or businesses.
Part 108 introduced two tiers of operating authority: permits for
lower-risk, smaller-scale UAS operations and certificates for higher-
risk or enterprise UAS operations. To administer this system, the FAA
developed an information portal for manufacturers, operators, and
ADSPs. Operators must obtain permits or certificates based on
operational complexity and report certain data; manufacturers may be
required to submit compliance data, including noise and cybersecurity
information; and ADSPs must secure both organizational certificates and
service-specific authorizations. As a result, the FAA collects
identifying and technical data from all the aforementioned participants
within the BVLOS ecosystem.
To issue permits/certificates of authorization to conduct certain
BVLOS operations in the NAS, the FAA collects contact information
(names, physical addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers)
from operators, as well as UAS serial numbers and UAS registration
numbers. For a small subset of operators--those who perform package
delivery operations--citizenship information is collected and could
include birth certificate, passport, or naturalization document, which
could include name, parents' names, place of birth, date of birth,
certificate of naturalization number/passport number, marital status
and photograph. Once submitted, an application identification number
(ID) is generated for tracking purposes. If the FAA approves the
request, a permit/certificate is generated and includes a permit/
certificate number.
The application data for airworthiness acceptance from UAS
manufacturers submitting declarations of compliance to the FAA includes
manufacturers' contact information (names, physical addresses, email
addresses and telephone numbers) and aircraft information (serial
number and registration number), among other details. Once an
application is submitted, an application ID is generated for tracking
purposes. If the FAA approves the request, a waiver number is issued
for approved waiver applications. Airworthiness acceptance is tracked
by aircraft serial number, while registered manufacturers are tracked
by manufacturer's name.
Finally, part 146 introduces the mechanisms and requirements to
certify ADSPs and their automated data services. This process requires
ADSPs to obtain organizational-level certificates and subsequently
obtain authorizations for the individual services they provide. These
applicants would also provide their contact information (names,
physical addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers). When the
applicant initiates an application, an application ID is generated to
track it. If the FAA approves the application, a certification number
is generated.
[[Page 69307]]
Privacy Act
The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) governs how the Federal Government
collects, maintains, and uses personally identifiable information (PII)
in a System of Records. A ``System of Records'' is a group of any
records under the control of a federal agency from which information
about individuals is retrieved by name or other personal identifier.
The Privacy Act requires each agency to publish in the Federal Register
a System of Records Notice (SORN) identifying and describing each
System of Records the agency maintains, including the purposes for
which the agency uses PII in the system, the routine uses for which the
agency discloses such information outside the agency, and how
individuals to whom a Privacy Act record pertains can exercise their
rights under the Privacy Act (e.g., to determine if the system contains
information about them and to contest inaccurate information). In
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), DOT has provided a report of this
system of records to the Office of Management and Budget and to
Congress.
SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
DOT/FAA 860 Unmanned Aircraft System Beyond Visual Line of Sight
Operations--Parts 108/146.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
Unclassified
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Located in the FAA Cloud Services Amazon Web Services (FCS AWS)
East West Public Cloud.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S):
AVS Hub Owner, AFB-260, Federal Aviation Administration, 6961
Flight Road, Riverside, CA 92504; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#340d19756267197572760602041967607d79745255551a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="093024485f5a24484f4b3b3f39245a5d4044496f6868276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
49 U.S.C. Sect. 106 subtitle I; 49 U.S.C. 44807; 49 U.S.C. 44811;
and the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 (sections 930 and 932).
PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM:
To allow the FAA to collect, use, and maintain information from
individuals acting as or representing operators, manufacturers, and
ADSPs when they request authorizations to conduct or support certain
BVLOS operations in the NAS and/or airworthiness acceptance to
manufacture compliant UAS.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM:
For part 108, records cover individuals acting as or representing
UAS operators requesting a permit or certificate to conduct operations,
and individuals acting as or representing manufacturers seeking
airworthiness acceptance for UAS. For part 146, records cover
individuals acting as or representing the ADSPs, corporate stockholders
who own 5% or more of the corporation's total voting stock, non-
corporate persons with a financial interest in the entity, and
accountable executives.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Categories of records in this system apply to individuals acting as
or representing operators, manufacturers, and ADSPs as follows:
Operators
These records include name, physical address, email address, and
telephone number, the address of the principal base of operations, if
different from the address provided for contact information, name of
the individual who serves as operations supervisor, application ID,
permit/certificate number, UAS serial number and UAS registration
number. For a small subset of operators who perform package delivery
operations, citizenship information is collected and could include
birth certificate, passport, or naturalization document, which could
include name, parents' names, place of birth, date of birth,
certificate of naturalization number/passport number, marital status
and photograph.
Manufacturers
These records include the manufacturer's name, physical address,
telephone number, email address, application ID, and waiver number; the
unmanned aircraft make, model, series, serial number, and date of
manufacture.
Automated Data Service Providers
These records include name, physical address, mailing address,
telephone number, email address, application ID, certification number
and service authorization number; for corporate applicants: name and
physical address of each stockholder who owns 5% or more of the total
voting stock of the corporation; for non-corporate applicants: name and
physical address of each person having a financial interest in the
entity; name, mailing address, telephone number and email address of
each accountable executive.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Records are obtained from individuals authorized to operate UAS,
manufacture UAS, or offer automated data services to UAS operators, as
well as FAA personnel logging actions associated with various
activities, including, but not limited to, certification,
authorization, oversight, and enforcement.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES
OF USERS AND THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
In addition to other disclosures generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
552a(b) of the Privacy Act, all or a portion of the records or
information contained in this system may be disclosed outside DOT as a
routine use pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows:
System-Specific Routine Uses:
1. To the public, in the case of part 108, waiver applications and
decisions, including any history of previous, pending, existing, or
denied requests for waivers applicable to the UAS at issue for purposes
of the waiver, and special provisions applicable to the UAS operation
that is the subject of the request. Individual or business names will
be shared as needed. Email addresses and telephone numbers will not be
disclosed pursuant to this Routine Use. Airspace authorizations that
the FAA issues will also not be disclosed pursuant to this Routine Use,
except to the extent that an airspace authorization is listed or
summarized in the terms of a waiver.
2. To the public, in the case of part 146, the FAA manages a
public-facing web page that provides the following information
associated with each part 146 certification: (1) the service provider
name, (2) the service type of the certification, and (3) the service
type and category for each authorized part 146 service associated with
the certification.
3. To law enforcement, when necessary and relevant to an FAA
enforcement activity.
4. To the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in connection
with its investigation responsibilities.
5. To government agencies, whether Federal, State, Tribal, local or
foreign, information necessary or relevant to an investigation of a
violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or
regulatory, that the agency is charged with investigating or enforcing;
as well as, to government agencies responsible for threat detection in
connection with critical infrastructure protection.
6. To the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), when
necessary
[[Page 69308]]
and relevant to the execution of TSA's duty to impose security measures
on related operations, assess security risks, enforce compliance,
conduct security threat assessments, and for the purpose of vetting
individuals and operators.
Departmental Routine Uses:
7. In the event that a system of records maintained by DOT to carry
out its functions indicates a violation or potential violation of law,
whether civil, criminal or regulatory in nature, and whether arising by
general statute or particular program pursuant thereto, the relevant
records in the system of records may be referred, as a routine use, to
the appropriate agency, whether Federal, State, local or foreign,
charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such
violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or
rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto.
8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a
routine use, to a Federal, State, or local agency maintaining civil,
criminal, or other relevant enforcement information or other pertinent
information, such as current licenses, if necessary to obtain
information relevant to a DOT decision concerning the hiring or
retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the
letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant or other
benefit.
9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a
routine use, to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in
connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of
a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an employee,
the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or
other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that the
information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency's
decision on the matter.
10a. Routine Use for Disclosure for Use in Litigation. It shall be
a routine use of the records in this system of records to disclose them
to the Department of Justice or other Federal agency conducting
litigation when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of
DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard), in
his/her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency
thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard), in his/her individual
capacity where the Department of Justice has agreed to represent the
employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT
determines that litigation is likely to affect the United States, is a
party to litigation or has an interest in such litigation, and the use
of such records by the Department of Justice or other Federal agency
conducting the litigation is deemed by DOT to be relevant and necessary
in the litigation, provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines
that disclosure of the records in the litigation is a use of the
information contained in the records that is compatible with the
purpose for which the records were collected.
10b. Routine Use for Agency Disclosure in Other Proceedings. It
shall be a routine use of records in this system to disclose them in
proceedings before any court or adjudicative or administrative body
before which DOT or any agency thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any
agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof in
his/her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency
thereof in his/her individual capacity where DOT has agreed to
represent the employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof,
where DOT determines that the proceeding is likely to affect the United
States, is a party to the proceeding or has an interest in such
proceeding, and DOT determines that use of such records is relevant and
necessary in the proceeding, provided, however, that in each case, DOT
determines that disclosure of the records in the proceeding is a use of
the information contained in the records that is compatible with the
purpose for which the records were collected.
12. Disclosure may be made to a Congressional office from the
record of an individual in response to an inquiry from the
Congressional office made at the request of that individual. In such
cases, however, the Congressional office does not have greater rights
to records than the individual. Thus, the disclosure may be withheld
from delivery to the individual where the file contains investigative
or actual information or other materials which are being used, or are
expected to be used, to support prosecution or fines against the
individual for alleged violations of a statute, or of regulations of
the Department based on statutory authority. No such limitations apply
to records requested for Congressional oversight or legislative
purposes; release is authorized under 49 CFR 10.35(9).
13. One or more records from a system of records may be disclosed
routinely to the National Archives and Records Administration in
records management inspections being conducted under the authority of
44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.
14. It shall be a routine use of the information in any DOT system
of records to provide to the Attorney General of the United States, or
his/her designee, information indicating that a person meets any of the
disqualifications for receipt, possession, shipment, or transport of a
firearm under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. In case of a
dispute concerning the validity of the information provided by DOT to
the Attorney General, or his/her designee, it shall be a routine use of
the information in any DOT system of records to make any disclosures of
such information to the National Background Information Check System,
established by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, as may be
necessary to resolve such dispute.
15a. To appropriate agencies, entities, and persons when (1) DOT
suspects or has confirmed that there has been a breach of the system of
records; (2) DOT has determined that as a result of the suspected or
confirmed breach there is a risk of harm to individuals, DOT (including
its information systems, programs, and operations), the Federal
Government, or national security; and (3) the disclosure made to such
agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to assist in
connection with DOT's efforts to respond to the suspected or confirmed
breach or to prevent, minimize, or remedy such harm.
15b. To another Federal agency or Federal entity, when DOT
determines that information from this system of records is reasonably
necessary to assist the recipient agency or entity in (1) responding to
a suspected or confirmed breach or (2) preventing, minimizing, or
remedying the risk of harm to individuals, the recipient agency or
entity (including its information systems, programs, and operations),
the Federal Government, or national security, resulting from a
suspected or confirmed breach.
16. DOT may disclose records from this system, as a routine use, to
the Office of Government Information Services for the purpose of (a)
resolving disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies and (b)
reviewing agencies' policies, procedures, and compliance in order to
recommend policy changes to Congress and the President.
17. DOT may disclose records from this system, as a routine use, to
contractors and their agents, experts, consultants, and others
performing or working on a contract, service, cooperative agreement, or
other assignment for DOT, when necessary to accomplish an agency
function related to this system of records.
[[Page 69309]]
18. DOT may disclose from this system, as a routine use, records
consisting of, or relating to, terrorism information (6 U.S.C.
485(a)(5)), homeland security information (6 U.S.C. 482(f)(1)), or Law
enforcement information (Guideline 2 Report attached to White House
Memorandum, ``Information Sharing Environment, November 22, 2006) to a
Federal, State, local, tribal, territorial, foreign government and/or
multinational agency, either in response to its request or upon the
initiative of the Component, for purposes of sharing such information
as is necessary and relevant for the agencies to detect, prevent,
disrupt, preempt, and mitigate the effects of terrorist activities
against the territory, people, and interests of the United States of
America, as contemplated by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-458) and Executive Order 13388
(October 25, 2005).
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF RECORDS:
Records in this system are stored in electronic form. Electronic
records are stored in a database with appropriate security and access
limitation.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF RECORDS:
Records can be accessed by both internal and external users to the
FAA upon authentication into the system. Based on their business need,
users can retrieve records by application ID, service authorization
number, waiver number, certificate/certification number, permit number,
name, and email address.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
FAA is actively working on drafting the appropriate records
retention schedule(s) to be submitted to NARA by the latter part of
fiscal year 2027. Until these schedules are approved by NARA, all
records in this system will be treated as permanent.
ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDS:
Records in this system are safeguarded in accordance with
applicable rules and policies, including all applicable DOT and FAA
automated systems security and access policies. Strict controls have
been imposed to minimize the risk of compromising the information that
is being stored. Access to the computer system containing the records
in this system is limited to individuals who have a need to know the
information for the performance of their official duties and who have
appropriate clearances or permissions.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking notification of whether this system of records
contains information about them may contact the System Manager at the
address provided in the section ``System Manager''. When seeking
records about yourself from this system of records or any other
Departmental system of records, your request must conform to the
Privacy Act regulations set forth in 49 CFR part 10. You must sign your
request, and your signature must either be notarized or submitted under
28 U.S.C. 1746, a law that permits statements to be made under penalty
of perjury as a substitute for notarization. If your request is seeking
records pertaining to another living individual, you must include a
statement from that individual certifying his/her agreement for you to
access his/her records.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking to contest the content of any record pertaining
to them in the system of records may contact the System Manager and
follow the Privacy Act procedures in 49 CFR part 10, subpart E,
Correction of Records. You must sign your request, and your signature
must either be notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C. 1746, a law that
permits statements to be made under penalty of perjury as a substitute
for notarization. If your request contests the content of records
pertaining to another living individual, you must include a statement
from that individual certifying his/her agreement for you to access
his/her records.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
See ``Record Access Procedures'' above.
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
No exemptions claimed.
HISTORY:
None.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Karyn Gorman,
Departmental Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. 2026-22436 Filed 11-2-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.