Notice2026-22047
Request for Information
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 29, 2026
Issuing agencies
Education Department
Abstract
NCES seeks comment on the strategic redesign of its portfolio of studies, including administrative data collections and sample surveys, both cross-sectional and longitudinal.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 208 (Thursday, October 29, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 208 (Thursday, October 29, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68118-68120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-22047]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED-2027-XXX-XXXX]
Request for Information
AGENCY: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Institute of
Education Sciences (IES), Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Request for Information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCES seeks comment on the strategic redesign of its portfolio
of studies, including administrative data collections and sample
surveys, both cross-sectional and longitudinal.
DATES: We must receive your comments by December 3, 2026.
[[Page 68119]]
ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>. However, if you require accommodation or
cannot otherwise submit your comments via <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>, please
contact the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The Department will not accept comments by email or by fax. To
ensure that the Department does not receive duplicate copies, please
submit your comments only once. Additionally, please include the Docket
ID at the top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> to submit
your comments electronically. Information on using Regulations.gov,
including instructions for accessing agency documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site under the
``FAQ'' tab.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy for comments received from
members of the public is to make these submissions available for public
viewing in their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include
in their comments only information that they wish to make publicly
available. We encourage, but do not require, that each respondent
includes their name, title, institution or affiliation, and the name,
title, mailing and email addresses, and telephone number of a contact
person for the institution or affiliation, if any. IES will not
directly respond to comments.
This is a request for information only. This RFI is not a request
for proposals (RFP) or a promise to issue an RFP. This RFI does not
commit the Department to contract for any supply or service whatsoever.
Further, we are not seeking proposals for evaluation and will not
accept unsolicited proposals. The Department will not pay for any
information or administrative costs that you may incur in responding to
this RFI. The documents and information submitted in response to this
RFI will not be returned.
Accessible Format: By request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will
provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich
Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file,
braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or another accessible
format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at <a href="http://www.govinfo.gov">www.govinfo.gov</a>. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free on
the site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Soldner, Acting NCES
Commissioner. You may email your questions to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3ede0e6f0e0cccececad0d0cacccdc6d1e3c6c78dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6b8b5b3a5b5999b9b9f85859f99989384b69392d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>,
but as described above, comments must be submitted via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>. If you are deaf, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access
telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The mission of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) is to:
``Provide national leadership in expanding fundamental knowledge and
understanding of education from early childhood through postsecondary
study, in order to provide parents, educators, students, researchers,
policymakers, and the general public with reliable information about,
including the condition and progress of education in the United States,
including early childhood education and special education; educational
practices that support learning and improve academic achievement and
access to educational opportunities for all students; and the
effectiveness of Federal and other education programs.'' (See: 20
U.S.C. Sec. 9511).
IES carries out that mission through four centers, including the
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). NCES is specifically
responsible for collecting and analyzing education-related statistical
data. ESRA requires NCES to ``collect, report, analyze, and disseminate
statistical data related to education in the United States and in other
nations, including--(1) collecting, acquiring, compiling (where
appropriate, on a State-by-State basis), and disseminating full and
complete statistics (disaggregated by the population characteristics
described [below]) on the condition and progress of education, at the
preschool, elementary, secondary, postsecondary, and adult levels in
the United States . . .'' (See: 20 U.S.C. 9543).
Like its fellow Centers, NCES is seeking to align its priorities
more closely with state and local education needs, accelerate the speed
at which high-quality data and evidence are produced, and increase the
use of those data and evidence by educators and policymakers so that
student outcomes can be dramatically improved. This RFI seeks public
comment on how it might do each.
The Challenge
The task of comprehensively describing the condition of education
is daunting. The statutory remit that Congress has established for
NCES, which spans multiple levels of education and topics in both the
domestic and international context, is already an ambitious one.
Further complicating its work is the breadth of stakeholders that NCES
seeks to serve. The Center considers state and federal policymakers,
students and families, educators, researchers, business leaders, and
the media to be key constituents for its products--and is cognizant
that each has its own information needs. As evidenced by the multiple
observers who have commented as such, the need for NCES to prioritize
what it collects, for whom, and for what purpose is a well-understood
concern.
Perhaps less well understood is the role of time in NCES's work.
When time is considered as a factor in NCES work, it is most often
operationalized as ``the speed with which data are collected and
released.'' This is neither unsurprising nor wrong: the production of
statistics in a timely manner is a core function of a statistical
agency because the timeliness of data directly impacts its utility. But
time and its passage is more than just a metric by which NCES's
operational efficiency can be judged (though it should be that, too).
As time passes, the conditions that surround education change--
sometimes profoundly--and stakeholders' information needs can change in
turn. NCES has not, to date, adopted a process of strategic foresight
designed to systematically envision potential futures and the
information needs they demand. Over time, this has the potential to
minimize the value of the data NCES produces because, due to changing
conditions, data products may not be maximally responsive to the issue
of the day. Honing this skill and leveraging its outcomes as NCES
considers its portfolio of work is a critical element in any strategic
redesign effort.
Purpose of This RFI
NCES seeks to develop a framework that can guide the strategic
redevelopment of its portfolio of work. To do so, NCES is soliciting
insights
[[Page 68120]]
from experts and innovators in state and local education policy and
practice, federal statistics, data collection methods, and other
interested stakeholders to address questions such as:
1. What data do states and districts, educators, and families
currently most need to inform their efforts to improve outcomes for all
learners?
2. How can we prepare data collections for future data needs
reflecting the potential for changed educational conditions and
challenges?
3. What data collection methods are best suited to meet current and
evolving information needs?
4. How might data collection and dissemination be optimized for
future Super Intelligence or SI (formerly referred to as Artificial
Intelligence or AI) applications and uses?
5. What dissemination methods are best suited to meet the
information needs of NCES's diverse audiences?
6. Which data collection and dissemination methods are most
efficient, optimizing the value of the outputs generated by those
activities and the resources needed to execute them?
7. What federal, state, local, and industry partnerships are needed
to enable those methods and make the most of the data NCES collects?
Additional Areas of Interest
We also welcome comments on the two issues below.
1. NCES is particularly interested in minimizing burden on
respondents, particularly in the context of declining survey response
rates. However, NCES is committed to the utility of the data it
provides to the public. How might NCES prioritize and streamline its
data collections to balance respondent burden and benefit?
2. Historically, NCES has sought to maximize the potential value of
its data by developing data assets and products for non-technical
audiences. This has included extensive derivation of analytic variables
drawing across multiple study data sources, imputation designed to
maximize data's analytic utility, and the development of extensive user
documentation. These activities necessarily compete with NCES's
timeliness goals. How might NCES resolve this tension in a way
consistent with its responsibilities as statistical agency serving the
public?
Matthew Soldner,
Acting Commissioner, National Center for Education Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2026-22047 Filed 10-28-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 29, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.