Skip to main content
Notice2026-21685

Clarification on Department of Justice and Department of Education Guidance Documents Regarding Federal Nondiscrimination Laws

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
October 23, 2026

Issuing agencies

Justice DepartmentEducation Department

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Department of Education (ED) (the Departments) are issuing this document to clarify that seven guidance documents issued jointly by the Departments are not enforceable. In addition, the Departments plan to revisit these guidance documents in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369, 400 (2024), to assess whether they are consistent with the single best meaning of the relevant statutory text. The Departments will not rely upon these guidance documents in their enforcement of federal civil rights laws, including Titles IV and VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title IV and Title VI), 42 U.S.C. 2000c et seq. and 2000d et seq., the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 (EEOA), 20 U.S.C. 1701-1720, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 29 U.S.C. 794.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 204 (Friday, October 23, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 204 (Friday, October 23, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Page 66840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-21685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Clarification on Department of Justice and Department of 
Education Guidance Documents Regarding Federal Nondiscrimination Laws

AGENCY: Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice; Office for Civil 
Rights, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice; clarification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Department of 
Education (ED) (the Departments) are issuing this document to clarify 
that seven guidance documents issued jointly by the Departments are not 
enforceable. In addition, the Departments plan to revisit these 
guidance documents in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Loper 
Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369, 400 (2024), to assess whether 
they are consistent with the single best meaning of the relevant 
statutory text. The Departments will not rely upon these guidance 
documents in their enforcement of federal civil rights laws, including 
Titles IV and VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title IV and Title 
VI), 42 U.S.C. 2000c et seq. and 2000d et seq., the Equal Educational 
Opportunities Act of 1974 (EEOA), 20 U.S.C. 1701-1720, the Americans 
with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq., and 
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 29 U.S.C. 
794.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Mertens, Acting Chief, 
Educational Opportunities Section, Civil Rights Division, 202-514-4092; 
Maria Litsakis, Acting Director, Program Legal Group, Office for Civil 
Rights, 800-421-3481.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the years 2015-2023, the Departments 
issued the following guidance documents regarding Title IV, Title VI, 
the EEOA, the ADA, and Section 504:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Date issued         Agencies          Guidance title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...........  January 7, 2015..  DOJ, ED.........  Dear Colleague
                                                    Letter: English
                                                    Learner Students and
                                                    Limited Proficient
                                                    Parents.\1\
2...........  January 7, 2015..  DOJ, ED.........  Fact Sheet: Ensuring
                                                    English Learner
                                                    Students Can
                                                    Participate
                                                    Meaningfully and
                                                    Equally in
                                                    Educational
                                                    Programs.\2\
3...........  January 7, 2015..  DOJ, ED.........  Information for
                                                    Limited English
                                                    Proficient (LEP)
                                                    Parents and
                                                    Guardians and for
                                                    Schools and School
                                                    Districts that
                                                    Communicate with
                                                    Them.\3\
4...........  May 10, 2021.....  DOJ, ED.........  Confronting COVID-19-
                                                    Related Harassment
                                                    in Schools.\4\
5...........  May 26, 2023.....  DOJ, ED.........  Resource on
                                                    Confronting Racial
                                                    Discrimination in
                                                    Student
                                                    Discipline.\5\
6...........  August 14, 2023..  DOJ, ED.........  Dear Colleague
                                                    Letter: Questions
                                                    and Answers
                                                    Regarding the
                                                    Supreme Court's
                                                    Decision in Students
                                                    for Fair Admissions,
                                                    Inc. v. Harvard
                                                    College and
                                                    University of North
                                                    Carolina.\6\
7...........  August 14, 2023..  DOJ, ED.........  Questions and Answers
                                                    Regarding the
                                                    Supreme Court's
                                                    Decision in Students
                                                    for Fair Admissions,
                                                    Inc. v. Harvard
                                                    College and
                                                    University of North
                                                    Carolina.\7\
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Each of the guidance documents discusses legal standards under 
federal civil rights laws enforced by the Departments. Some of the 
guidance documents assert that they do not have the force and effect of 
law, have no binding effect, and do not impose new legal requirements. 
The Departments' guidance documents, including these guidance 
documents, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities beyond 
what is required by the terms of the applicable statutes, regulations, 
or binding judicial precedent.\8\ This is consistent with Supreme Court 
jurisprudence, which has held that guidance documents ``do not have the 
force and effect of law.'' Perez v. Mortg. Bankers Ass'n, 575 U.S. 92, 
97 (2015) (quoting Shalala v. Guernsey Mem'l Hosp., 514 U.S. 87, 99 
(1995)). Regardless, the Departments are concerned about confusion over 
the non-enforceable nature of the guidance documents and issue this 
clarification that the guidance documents are not enforceable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ <a href="https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-el-201501.pdf">https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-el-201501.pdf</a>.
    \2\ <a href="https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-factsheet-el-students-201501.pdf">https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-factsheet-el-students-201501.pdf</a>.
    \3\ <a href="https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-factsheet-lep-parents-201501.pdf">https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-factsheet-lep-parents-201501.pdf</a>.
    \4\ <a href="https://www.ed.gov/media/document/confronting-covid-19-related-harassment-schools-112258.pdf">https://www.ed.gov/media/document/confronting-covid-19-related-harassment-schools-112258.pdf</a>.
    \5\ <a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/press-release/file/1585291/dl?inline">https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/press-release/file/1585291/dl?inline</a>.
    \6\ <a href="https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-questions-and-answers-regarding-students-fair-admissions-112306.pdf">https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-questions-and-answers-regarding-students-fair-admissions-112306.pdf</a>.
    \7\ <a href="https://www.ed.gov/media/document/colleague-20230814pdf-35094..pdf">https://www.ed.gov/media/document/colleague-20230814pdf-35094..pdf</a>.
    \8\ See U.S. Dep't of Just., Just. Manual Sec.  1-19.000 (last 
updated Apr. 2022), <a href="https://perma.cc/E35H-F7FF">https://perma.cc/E35H-F7FF</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, each of the guidance documents was issued prior to the 
Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright, which held that agency 
interpretations must be consistent with the ``single, best meaning'' of 
the statute authorizing them. 603 U.S. at 400. For these reasons, the 
Departments plan to revisit the guidance documents listed in this 
notice in light of Loper Bright to determine whether they are 
consistent with the ``single, best meaning'' of the relevant federal 
civil rights laws enforced by the Departments. The Departments will not 
rely upon the guidance documents listed in this notice in their 
enforcement of Titles IV and Title VI, the EEOA, the ADA, and Section 
504.

    Dated: October 20, 2026.
Harmeet K. Dhillon,
Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice.

Kimberly Richey,
Assistant Secretary, Office for Civil Rights, Department of Education.
[FR Doc. 2026-21685 Filed 10-22-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-13-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on October 23, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.