Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

Issuing agencies

Abstract

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that some passenger service unit (PSU)-mounted video monitors became detached from the PSU rails during a hard landing. This AD requires replacing PSU-mounted video monitors that do not have secondary retention lanyards. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 200 (Monday, October 19, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65941-65944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-21332]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2025-0004; Project Identifier AD-2024-00094-T; 
Amendment 39-23486; AD 2026-20-13]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and 
-900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that some 
passenger service unit (PSU)-mounted video monitors became detached 
from the PSU rails during a hard landing. This AD requires replacing 
PSU-mounted video monitors that do not have secondary retention 
lanyards. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on 
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective November 23, 2026.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of November 23, 
2026.

ADDRESSES: 
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-0004; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 
docket contains this final rule, any comments received, and other 
information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
    <bullet> For the material identified in this AD, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; 
telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
    <bullet> You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des 
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-0004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Linn, Aviation Safety Engineer, 
FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3584; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddb7a8b1b4b8f3b1b4b3b39dbbbcbcf3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92f8e7fefbf7bcfefbfcfcd2f4f3f3bcf5fde4">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing 
Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series 
airplanes. The NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 
17, 2025 (90 FR 5751). The NPRM was prompted by a report that some PSU-
mounted video monitors became detached from the PSU rails during a hard 
landing that did not exceed the emergency load requirements for the 
PSUs. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require replacing PSU-mounted 
video monitors that do not have secondary retention lanyards. The FAA 
is issuing this AD to address PSU-mounted video monitors that could 
become fully detached or be held at an unsafe height, which, if not 
addressed, could result in injury to passengers and impede passenger 
and crew egress during emergency evacuation.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received a comment from Boeing, who supported the NPRM 
without change.
    The FAA received additional comments from five commenters, 
including All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. (ANA), Aviation Partners Boeing, 
Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta), Panasonic Avionics Corporation 
(Panasonic), and an individual. The following presents the comments 
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Clarify Method for Determining Applicability

    Delta requested that the FAA clarify that they can accomplish 
either a physical inspection for the existence of PSU-mounted video 
monitors or accomplish a review of Delta's PSU Layouts (Delta's PSU 
drawing configuration) to determine if this AD applies.
    The FAA agrees to clarify that operators can determine if their 
airplanes are equipped with PSU-mounted video monitors by performing a 
physical inspection or a records check, provided the presence of PSU-
mounted video monitors can be conclusively

[[Page 65942]]

determined from that review; either method is acceptable to determine 
if this AD applies. The FAA did not change this AD in response to this 
comment.

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of blended or 
split scimitar winglets per supplemental type certificate (STC) 
ST00830SE does not affect compliance with the mandated actions in the 
proposed rule.
    The FAA agrees with the commenter that STC ST00830SE does not 
affect compliance with this AD. Therefore, the installation of STC 
ST00830SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions 
required by this AD. The FAA did not change this AD in response to this 
comment.

Request To Revise Paragraph (e) To Clarify Safety Concerns

    Panasonic requested that the FAA revise paragraph (e) of the 
proposed AD to include the statement, ``Although some models of PSU-
mounted video monitors have not become detached under such landings, we 
have determined that this AD is warranted due to relative motion 
between the PSU rails that drive forces exceeding the approved 
emergency landing conditions for the attached PSU-mounted monitors.'' 
Panasonic asserted that the improvement action for Panasonic monitors 
involves an enhancement to its fail-safe design and is not a result of 
correcting any defect or noncompliance in the PSU-mounted monitor 
assemblies themselves. Panasonic requested this change to avoid 
potentially misleading operators that Panasonic monitors have become 
detached because they did not meet the existing emergency landing 
requirements they were designed to meet.
    The FAA acknowledges the commenter's concern. The FAA is unaware of 
Panasonic monitors that have become detached during hard landings that 
did not exceed emergency landing requirements. However, paragraph (e) 
of this AD specifies that some, not all, PSU-mounted video monitors 
became detached. The FAA did not change this AD in response to this 
comment.

Request To Include Panasonic Service Bulletin SB141908-44-001 as an 
Accepted Method of Compliance

    Panasonic requested that the FAA include Panasonic Service Bulletin 
SB141908-44-001 as an accepted method of compliance for the proposed AD 
but did not provide the specified service bulletin to the FAA. 
Panasonic asserted that the effectivity of Boeing Special Attention 
Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB does not include airplanes with 
STCs that have identical parts that would be affected by the NPRM and 
suggested that adding this service bulletin as an accepted method of 
compliance would reduce the FAA's efforts to support alternative 
methods of compliance (AMOC) requests to address airplanes installed 
with FAA STC ST02908NY.
    The FAA disagrees. Paragraph (g)(3) of this AD requires airplanes 
not identified in the effectivity paragraph of either Boeing service 
bulletin to perform the required actions using an AMOC. At this time, 
the FAA does not have enough data to approve Panasonic Service Bulletin 
SB141908-44-001 as an accepted method of compliance for this AD. The 
FAA did not change this AD in response to this comment.

Requests To Refer to Later Revisions of the Service Information

    ANA requested that the FAA update the service information 
referenced in the proposed AD. The commenter noted that Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, dated December 15, 
2023, and Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 
RB, dated December 15, 2023, will be revised by Boeing to correct an 
error in the airplane effectivity and asked the FAA to include the 
revised service information in the AD when published.
    Delta requested that the FAA add the latest revisions of the 
Panasonic Service Bulletins referenced in Boeing Special Attention 
Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, dated December 15, 2023, as a 
method of compliance for the proposed AD. Delta stated that Boeing 
released a preliminary revision of the requirements bulletin that 
references the latest revisions of the Panasonic Service Bulletins.
    An individual noted that there are later revisions of the Burrana 
Service Bulletins referenced in Boeing Special Attention Requirements 
Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, dated December 15, 2023. The commenter did not 
make a specific request for FAA action.
    The FAA agrees to use the latest service information in this AD. 
Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 
1, dated July 15, 2025, and Boeing Special Attention Requirements 
Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025, add 
instructions for installing lanyard retention brackets at locations 
where there are no holes in the PSU inboard rail and at locations with 
oval-shaped holes for airplanes without a Boeing Sky Interior (BSI) in 
groups 1 and 2. The revised service information removes from the 
effectivity Model 737-800 airplanes that have been modified to a Boeing 
Converted Freighter; this information does not affect the applicability 
of this AD. The revised service information specifies later revisions 
of the Burrana and Panasonic service bulletins, as applicable. Boeing 
Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, 
dated July 15, 2025, specifies an additional inspection for airplanes 
in groups 1 and 2 that have a PSU-mounted video monitor installed at a 
cabin temperature sensor location and have accomplished the original 
issue of the service information, because the original issue could not 
be complied with to address the unsafe condition. Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, dated July 
15, 2025, also specifies credit for accomplishing the original issue of 
the service information for airplanes in groups 3 and 4.
    The FAA has revised this AD to mandate Boeing Special Attention 
Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025, 
and Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, 
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025. The FAA has revised paragraph (i)(1) 
of this AD to add credit for previous actions for airplanes that 
completed Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 
RB, dated December 15, 2023, and redesignated subsequent paragraphs 
accordingly. The FAA also added paragraph (i)(2) of this AD to add 
credit for previous actions for airplanes that completed Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, dated December 15, 
2023, for airplanes identified as groups 3 and 4 only.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments 
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as 
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe 
condition on these products. Except for minor editorial changes, and 
any other changes described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed 
in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on 
any operator.

Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 
737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025. This material 
specifies procedures

[[Page 65943]]

for replacing certain Burrana PSU-mounted video monitors that do not 
have secondary retention lanyards with PSU-mounted video monitors that 
have secondary retention lanyards.
    The FAA also reviewed Boeing Special Attention Requirements 
Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025. This material 
specifies procedures for replacing certain Panasonic PSU-mounted video 
monitors that do not have secondary retention lanyards with PSU-mounted 
video monitors that have secondary retention lanyards. This material 
specifies an additional inspection of the inboard PSU rail and 
applicable on-condition actions for airplanes in groups 1 and 2 that 
have a PSU-mounted video monitor installed at a cabin temperature 
sensor location and have accomplished the original issue of the service 
information. On-condition actions include attaching the secondary 
retention lanyard torsion spring to either the 1-inch hole found during 
inspection or the retention backet, as necessary.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested 
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by 
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 459 airplanes of U.S. 
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Cost per          Cost on U.S.
              Action                      Labor cost         Parts cost        monitor           operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement (Burrana monitors--     2 work-hours x $85             $2,734          $2,904  Up to $5,401,440 *
 airplanes identified Boeing         per hour = $170, per                                  (62 airplanes).
 Special Attention Requirements      monitor.
 Bulletin 737[dash]25[dash]1851
 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15,
 2025).
Replacement (Panasonic monitors--   2 work-hours x $85               $354            $524  Up to $5,376,240 *
 airplanes identified in Boeing      per hour = $170, per                                  (342 airplanes).
 Special Attention Requirements      monitor.
 Bulletin 737[dash]25[dash]1858
 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15,
 2025).
Replacement.......................  2 work-hours x $85       Up to $2,734    Up to $2,904  Up to $4,791,600 *
(monitors for airplanes not          per hour = $170, per                                  (55 airplanes).
 identified in the Boeing service    monitor.
 information).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* An airplane may have up to 30 monitors.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive:

2026-20-13 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-23486; Docket No. FAA-
2025-0004; Project Identifier AD-2024-00094-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective November 23, 
2026.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any 
category, equipped with passenger service unit (PSU)-mounted video 
monitors.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
furnishings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that some PSU-mounted video 
monitors became detached from the PSU rails during a hard landing 
that did not exceed the emergency load requirements for the PSUs. 
The FAA is issuing this AD to address PSU-mounted video monitors 
that could become fully detached or be held at an unsafe height, 
which, if not addressed, could result in

[[Page 65944]]

injury to passengers and impede passenger and crew egress during 
emergency evacuation.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) For airplanes identified in Boeing Special Attention 
Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 
2025: Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the 
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing 
Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, 
dated July 15, 2025, do all applicable actions identified in, and in 
accordance with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, dated 
July 15, 2025.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1):  Guidance for accomplishing the 
actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD can be found in 
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-25-1851, Revision 1, 
dated July 15, 2025, which is referred to in Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, dated 
July 15, 2025.

    (2) For airplanes identified in Boeing Special Attention 
Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 
2025: Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the 
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing 
Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, 
dated July 15, 2025, do all applicable actions identified in, and in 
accordance with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, dated 
July 15, 2025.

    Note 2 to paragraph (g)(2): Guidance for accomplishing the 
actions required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD can be found in 
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-25-1858, Revision 1, 
dated July 15, 2025, which is referred to in Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, dated 
July 15, 2025.

    (3) For airplanes not identified in paragraph (g)(1) or (2) of 
this AD: Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, 
replace all PSU-mounted video monitors that do not have secondary 
retention lanyards with PSU-mounted video monitors that have 
secondary retention lanyards, using a method approved in accordance 
with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where the Compliance Time columns of the tables in the 
``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing Special Attention Requirements 
Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025, refer to 
the original issue date of Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, 
this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where the Compliance Time columns of the tables in the 
``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing Special Attention Requirements 
Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025, refer to 
the original issue date of Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB or 
the Revision 1 date of Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, this AD 
requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (3) Where Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletins 737-
25-1851 RB, Revision 1, and 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, both dated 
July 15, 2025, specify contacting Boeing for alternative 
installation instructions and doing the installation: This AD 
requires doing the installation using a method approved in 
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this 
AD.

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) For airplanes identified in Boeing Special Attention 
Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 
2025: This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in 
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before 
the effective date of this AD using Boeing Special Attention 
Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 RB, dated December 15, 2023.
    (2) For airplanes in groups 3 and 4 as identified in Boeing 
Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, Revision 1, 
dated July 15, 2025: This paragraph provides credit for the actions 
specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, if those actions were 
performed before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Special 
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 RB, dated December 15, 
2023.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, AIR-520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or 
responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the certification office, 
send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph 
(k)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4504080a06052324246b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3f2fefcf0f3d5d2d29dd4dcc5">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation 
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, AIR-
520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, to make those 
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, 
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the 
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(k) Additional Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Julie Linn, 
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 
98198; phone: 206-231-3584; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99f3ecf5f0fcb7f5f0f7f7d9fff8f8b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b312e37323e75373235351b3d3a3a753c342d">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    (2) Material identified in this AD that is not incorporated by 
reference is available at the address specified in paragraph (l)(3) 
this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the material listed in this 
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions 
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1851 
RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025.
    (ii) Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1858 
RB, Revision 1, dated July 15, 2025.
    (3) For Boeing material identified in this AD, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; 
telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., 
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material 
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability 
of this material at NARA, visit <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations">www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations</a> or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a5c48145354494a5f594e5355547a545b485b145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="066074286f6875766365726f6968466867746728616970">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

    Issued on October 1, 2026.
Brian Knaup,
Acting Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2026-21332 Filed 10-16-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>