Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2024-2025
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. We are also rescinding the review with respect to certain companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 200 (Monday, October 19, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66095-66098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-21293]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-824]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and
Rescission of Review, in Part; 2024-2025
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that certain producers and/or exporters subject to this
administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2024, through
June 30, 2025. We are also rescinding the review with respect to
certain companies. Interested
[[Page 66096]]
parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable October 19, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Saude, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0981.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 30, 2025, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from
India.\1\ On August 22, 2025, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an administrative review of Cosmo
First Ltd. India (Cosmo), Chiripal Poly Films Limited (Chiripal), Ester
Industries Ltd. (Ester), Garware Hight-Tech Films. (Garware),\2\ JPFL
Films Private Limited (JPFL); Polyplex Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex
Corp), SRF Limited (SRF),\3\ and Vacmet India Limited (Vacmet).\4\
Commerce selected Polyplex Corp and SRF for individual examination as
mandatory respondents.\5\ On November 20, 2025, the petitioner withdrew
its request for Ester, Garware, Polyplex Corp, JPFL, and Vacmet.\6\ As
a result, only SRF is subject to this administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR
44175 (July 1, 2002) (Order).
\2\ On May 21, 2024, Commerce published its final results of the
changed circumstances review (CCR) for Garware Polyester, in which
we found that Garware Hi-Tech Films Limited (Garware Hi-Tech) is the
successor-in-interest to Garware Polyester. See Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 89 FR 44638 (May 21,
2024). Because the effective date of the CCR was after the POR of
this administrative review, Commerce has continued to refer to the
company as Garware Polyester in this review.
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 90 FR 41043 (August 22, 2025) (Initiation
Notice).
\4\ See Initiation Notice.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated September
30, 2025.
\6\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated November 20, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown,
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative
proceedings by 47 days.\7\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24,
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an
additional 21 days.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated
November 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Commerce extended the deadline for the preliminary
results until September 30, 2026.\9\ Further, on September 29, 2026, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2), Commerce extended the deadline to issue the preliminary
results by seven days, until October 7, 2026.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memoranda, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023,''
dated March 19, 2024; and ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated July 9,
2024.
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Second Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-
2025,'' dated September 29, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a detailed description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\11\
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is available via ACCESS, which is
available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition,
a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be
accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/frnotices">https://access.trade.gov/frnotices</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Memorandum, ``D Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India; 2024-
2025,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order is PET film from India. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation. All requests for an
administrative review of Cosmo, Chiripal, Ester, Garware, Vacmet, and
Polyplex Corp were timely withdrawn.\12\ As a result, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this administrative review
with respect to these companies. Accordingly, the company that remains
subject to the instant review is SRF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Chiripal's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for Anti-
Dumping Duty Admin Review of Chiripal Poly Films Limited
(Chiripal),'' dated November 20, 2025; DuPont Teijin Films,
Mitsubishi Chemical America, Inc.--Polyester Film Division's and
Microworks America, Inc.'s Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated November 20, 2025;
Polyplex USA LLC's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for Review for
Polyplex USA LLC,'' dated November 20, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with sections
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act. We calculated export price in
accordance with section 772(a) of the Act. We calculated normal value
in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying these preliminary results, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of the Review
We preliminarily determine the following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2024, through June 30,
2025:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter/producer dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SRF Limited........................................ 0.61
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations performed to
interested parties for these preliminary results within five days of
any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within
five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we have modified the deadline for interested parties
to submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days after the
date of the publication of this notice.\13\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days
after the date for filing case briefs.\14\ Interested
[[Page 66097]]
parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding
must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a
table of authorities.\15\ All briefs must be filed electronically using
ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully
in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established
deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 351.303 for
general filing requirements.
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Procedures).
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we
request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their
briefs a public executive summary for each issue raised in their
briefs.\16\ Further, we request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not
including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as
the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for
relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note
that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\17\ See APO and Service Procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants,
and whether any participant is a foreign national; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is
made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the
hearing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised by the parties in any written briefs, no
later than 120 days after the date of publication of these preliminary
results.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), upon issuing the final results, Commerce will determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance
with the final results of this review.
If SRF's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review,
Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each
importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those sales.
Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a particular
importer, we will calculate an importer-specific, per-unit assessment
rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total quantity of
those sales.\19\ To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit
assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2),
we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on
estimated entered values. If SRF's weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis or where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment
rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\20\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice,
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by SRF for
which the respondent did not know that the merchandise was destined for
the United States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate those entries
at the all-others rate in the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation (i.e., 5.71 percent) if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\21\ The final
results of this administrative review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review
and for future cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where
applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies for which we are rescinding this administrative
review, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry,
or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period of
review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). For these
companies, Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these preliminary
results in the Federal Register.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP regarding
SRF no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the company-specific cash deposit rate for
SRF will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin for each
company established in the final results of this review (except, if
that rate is de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1),
then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for producers or
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently-completed segment of this
proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or a prior segment of the proceeding but
the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for
all other producers or exporters will continue to be 5.71 percent, the
all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\22\ These cash
deposit requirements, when
[[Page 66098]]
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the
amount of countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: October 7, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Currency Conversion
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2026-21293 Filed 10-16-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.