Denali National Park and Preserve; Vehicle Use

Issuing agencies

Abstract

The National Park Service (NPS) amends special regulations for Denali National Park and Preserve to conform the regulations regarding the number of vehicles that can travel on the restricted section of the Denali Park Road (miles 15-90) to a Vehicle Management Plan that the NPS has been implementing since 2012. This rule implements the plan's limit that no more than 160 vehicles may travel on the restricted section of the road per 24-hour period during the visitor season (also referred to as the "allocation season"), defined in the park's General Management Plan as beginning on the Saturday before Memorial Day and ending on the second Thursday after Labor Day. This limit allows the NPS to meet growing visitor demand while maintaining a high- quality experience for visitors.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 199 (Friday, October 16, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65690-65694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-21222]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

36 CFR Part 13

[NPS-DENA-NPS0043926; PPAKDENAS0, PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
RIN 1024-AF11


Denali National Park and Preserve; Vehicle Use

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) amends special regulations for 
Denali National Park and Preserve to conform the regulations regarding 
the number of vehicles that can travel on the restricted section of the 
Denali Park Road (miles 15-90) to a Vehicle Management Plan that the 
NPS has been implementing since 2012. This rule implements the plan's 
limit that no more than 160 vehicles may travel on the restricted 
section of the road per 24-hour period during the visitor season (also 
referred to as the ``allocation season''), defined in the park's 
General Management Plan as beginning on the Saturday before Memorial 
Day and ending on the second Thursday after Labor Day. This limit 
allows the NPS to meet growing visitor demand while maintaining a high-
quality experience for visitors.

DATES: This rule is effective November 16, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Comments received on the proposed rule are available on 
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> in Docket No. NPS-2026-0067. A copy of the 
Denali Park Road Vehicle Management Plan and Environmental Impact 
Statement and related Record of Decision provide information and 
context for this rule and are available online at <a href="https://parkplanning.nps.gov/dena">https://parkplanning.nps.gov/dena</a> by clicking the link titled ``Denali Park 
Road Vehicle Management Plan'' and then the link titled ``Document 
List.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brooke Merrell, Superintendent, Denali 
National Park and Preserve; (907) 683-9581; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e6c7c6161656b51636b7c7c6b62624e607e7d20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c4e5e434347497341495e5e4940406c425c5f024b435a">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. 
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of 
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or 
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals 
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within 
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in 
the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Denali Park Road and Vehicle Management Plan

    In 1917, Congress established Mount McKinley National Park as a 
``game refuge'' with the intent that it be ``set apart as a public park 
for the benefit and enjoyment of the people'' (39 Stat. 938). In 1980, 
Congress passed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act 
(ANILCA, Pub. L. 96-487), which enlarged and renamed the park Denali 
National Park and Preserve. A general purpose of all ANILCA lands is to 
preserve them for the benefit, use, education and inspiration of 
present and future generations. 16 U.S.C. 3101(a). The Denali Park Road 
(``park road'') serves both of these purposes. Built over 16 years 
(1922-1938), the historic 92-mile park road is an important means of 
access to the park and is one of the best places in the world for the 
public to observe large northern mammals in their natural habitat. 
Visitors traveling the park road often observe Dall sheep, caribou, 
wolves, grizzly bears, moose, and foxes. Nowhere else in America can 
visitors observe such concentrations of these large species of wildlife 
in such an accessible natural setting. Visitors traveling the road also 
have many opportunities to observe smaller mammals and birds, some of 
which are rarely seen elsewhere in North America. Alaska Range 
features, such as glacially carved mountains, Mount McKinley, and the 
open views of dynamic alpine landscapes, also are a source of visitor 
enjoyment and inspiration. The park road facilitates wilderness 
recreational opportunities and supports freedom of discovery, a sense 
of adventure, and a connection to nature.
    The NPS's ability to balance the protection of park resources while 
offering quality visitor experiences is exemplified in the management 
of the park road. Road crews use graders and haul gravel to maintain 
it, rangers patrol it, and commercial services staff manage the 
transportation concession contract for it, so visitors can ride buses 
to view wildlife and access the park's wilderness. In 2012, planning 
staff, with

[[Page 65691]]

public input, worked to create the Denali Park Road Vehicle Management 
Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (VMP), which adopted an 
adaptive management strategy that includes measurable indicators and 
standards for visitor experience and resource protection.\1\ These 
include crowding standards for the number of vehicles at wildlife 
stops, in a viewscape, and at a rest area; the spacing of vehicles to 
ensure time for sheep crossings; restrictions to night-time traffic 
volumes; and restrictions to large (construction-related) vehicle 
traffic. On September 27, 2012, the Regional Director, Alaska signed a 
Record of Decision (ROD) selecting the preferred alternative in the VMP 
for implementation. One standard in the selected alternative limits the 
maximum level of vehicle use on the restricted section of the park road 
(miles 15-90) to 160 vehicles per 24-hour period in the visitor season, 
defined in the park's General Management Plan (GMP) as the season 
beginning on the Saturday before Memorial Day and ending on the second 
Thursday after Labor Day. This standard allows the NPS to meet growing 
visitor demand while maintaining a high-quality experience. The NPS has 
been managing vehicle use on the park road consistent with the VMP 
since 2012. Resources staff monitor this and other indicators in the 
VMP to ensure the road is managed according to the plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Adaptive management is a system of management practices 
based on clearly identified outcomes, monitoring to determine if 
management actions are meeting outcomes, and, if not, facilitating 
management changes that will best ensure that outcomes are met or to 
re-evaluate the outcomes. Departmental Manual 516 DM 4.16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Rule

    This rule conforms the park's special regulations to reflect how 
the NPS has managed the park road since adoption of the VMP in 2012. 
The current version of the special regulations authorizes the NPS to 
issue no more than 10,512 motor vehicle permits for travel on the 
restricted section of the park road during the visitor season. This 
regulatory text will be revised to provide that no more than 160 
vehicles may travel on the restricted section of the road per 24-hour 
period during the visitor season. The rule also makes a minor change to 
the regulatory text by deleting text that departs from the visitor 
season, as it is defined in the GMP, by ending the season on September 
15 if that comes before the second Thursday after Labor Day. The rule 
provides that the season always ends on the second Thursday after Labor 
Day, providing additional opportunities for recreation and access by 
lengthening the season in some years. By stating the cap in terms of 
the number of vehicles, rather than the number of permits, the rule 
also clarifies that any vehicle traveling on the park road counts 
toward the vehicle limit, not just vehicles operating under a permit. 
The VMP evaluated impacts from all motor vehicle use on the road, 
permitted or not, and the NPS has been managing vehicle use on the park 
road in this way since 2012. Some vehicles that use the road do not 
have a permit, such as tour buses that operate under concession 
contracts and vehicles used by the NPS for administrative purposes.

Summary of Public Comments

    The NPS published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on May 
18, 2026 (91 FR 28461). The NPS accepted public comments for 60 days 
via the mail, hand delivery, and the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Comments were accepted through July 17, 
2026. The NPS received 161 comments on the proposed rule. Overall, 
commenters broadly supported adaptive management as a tool for managing 
vehicle use on the park road. Commenters supported adaptive management 
as a means of ensuring protection of park resources and values in 
accordance with desired conditions while providing flexibility for 
managers to adjust operations based on science-driven modeling, 
monitoring, and observed resource or visitor-use issues. Commenters 
supported regulatory flexibility that allows the NPS to respond to 
changing conditions, monitoring results, and evolving resource needs.
    After considering public comments and additional review of the 
proposed rule, the NPS is making several minor changes in the final 
rule. Two changes better reflect how the NPS has managed vehicle access 
on the park road under the VMP since 2012. The first change removes 
language held over from the existing regulations that each permit 
allows one vehicle one entry onto the restricted portion of the park 
road. The NPS issues some permits, such as construction permits, that 
allow for more than one entry as needed for the authorized use. The 
sentence in the proposed rule that followed, which stated that other 
forms of written authorization may have different terms and conditions, 
was in reference to the sentence before and therefore also has been 
removed. The second change reflects that vehicle counts are made when a 
vehicle passes westward through the gate into the restricted section of 
the park road. The statement in the proposed rule that no more than 160 
vehicles may travel on the restricted section was imprecise and has 
been replaced with a statement that no more than 160 vehicles may enter 
the restricted section of the park road. A similar change has been made 
to the title of Sec.  13.932. If the same vehicle passes through the 
gate more than once per day, each passage through the gate counts 
toward the 160 vehicle per day limit. Finally, the titles of Sec.  
13.930 and Sec.  13.932 and the definition of the restricted section 
Sec.  13.930 have been revised to clarify that the regulations in those 
sections only apply to vehicle use on the restricted section of the 
park road during the visitor season. The restricted section of the park 
road outside of the visitor season is determined by the NPS. As stated 
in Sec.  13.936 of the existing regulations, travel on the restricted 
section of the park road at any time requires a permit.
    A summary of the pertinent issues raised by commenters is provided 
below.
    1. Comment: Many commenters asked the NPS to publish vehicle 
management and monitoring data that can be measured against the 
indicators and standards in the VMP before finalizing the rule. 
Commenters requested information about wildlife movement and viewing, 
road capacity analysis and modeling, completion of a Before-After-
Control-Impact (BACI) study, release of long-term monitoring datasets, 
impacts to wilderness character, and detailed traffic analyses (e.g., 
daily counts, GPS vehicle tracking data, peak hour patterns, road 
corridor crowding, vehicle type allocation). Commenters stated that 
changed visitor use patterns and resource conditions since 2012, 
including changes caused by the closure and reopening of a large 
section of the park road, warrant additional review that allows the NPS 
to collect and analyze updated monitoring data to determine appropriate 
levels of vehicle use, such as through the preparation of a 
supplemental environmental impact statement. One commenter encouraged 
the NPS to regularly reassess its vehicle management framework to 
ensure that it uses empirical evidence to inform management decisions 
for more or less access.
    NPS Response: The NPS expects the visitor conditions that will 
exist when the park road is fully accessible to vehicle traffic in 2027 
will be substantially similar to visitor conditions that existed when 
the scientific studies that led to the VMP were completed. Monitoring 
data are

[[Page 65692]]

published for 2013-2019,\2\ which can be measured against the 
indicators and standards in the VMP. Monitoring data for 2020-2022 also 
are published but are not suitable for comparison to the conditions 
studied and tested for the VMP due to changes to visitor use patterns 
caused by the global pandemic and the Pretty Rocks landslide that 
closed the road to all vehicle traffic at mile 43 in August of 2021. 
The NPS is working to publish monitoring data for 2023-2025, however 
these data are not comparable to pre-pandemic data due to the landslide 
closure. The Pretty Rocks Bridge was completed in August 2026. Upon 
completion of the Eielson Visitor Center, the NPS monitors the 
indicators under ``normal'' traffic conditions. As resources allow, and 
if appropriate, the NPS may complete a BACI to affirm the selection of 
key indicators and to distinguish impacts due to changes in current 
traffic patterns and traffic levels. To the extent that future 
monitoring data suggest the NPS should reconsider any aspect of the 
adaptive management framework in the VMP, or the 160 vehicles per day 
cap, it will undertake all compliance and planning actions necessary to 
do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Monitoring data are published at <a href="https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Collection/Profile/5498">https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Collection/Profile/5498</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Comment: Several commenters asked how the rule would affect 
access to private property within the park. Specifically, commenters 
requested that access to private property under ANILCA Sections 1110(a) 
and 1110(b) be exempt from vehicle caps. They also asked the NPS to 
clarify it cannot restrict or supersede statutory access by giving 
other users a transit priority, and to ensure the adaptive management 
framework allows for increased inholder access in response to 
demonstrated needs and changing conditions.
    NPS Response: The NPS will not take any action in conflict with 
statutory rights of access provided under Section 1110 of ANILCA. 16 
U.S.C. 3170. The NPS will ensure that its management of vehicle use on 
the park road, including through permit requirements or vehicle limits, 
will not go beyond reasonable regulation of those rights of access in 
accordance with Sections 1110(a) and (b).
    3. Comment: Several commenters requested that the NPS revise the 
rule by replacing the 160-day cap with a statement that the NPS will 
adaptively manage vehicle use on the park road, adjusting vehicle 
numbers up or down based upon monitoring data. Commenters opposed a 
fixed cap as unable to accommodate long-term resource conditions or 
evolving access needs. One commenter suggested the rule indicate that 
daily vehicle use is governed by the indicators and standards in the 
VMP and that 160 vehicles should not be a management target or baseline 
for use. One commenter asked the NPS to codify specific aspects of 
adaptive management, including requirements to publish daily vehicle 
counts and VMP indicator results, and to automatically reduce vehicle 
allocations if wildlife-stop, sheep-gap, nighttime traffic, viewscape, 
rest-stop, hiker-wait, or large-vehicle standards are not met.
    NPS Response: The daily vehicle cap in the rule is consistent with 
the VMP and will not interfere with the NPS's use of adaptive 
management to respond to monitoring data that indicates desired 
conditions are not being met. Adaptive management consistent with the 
VMP does not set the cap as a management goal or a desired outcome; it 
represents the upper bound of traffic that is allowable under the 
selected alternative. The NPS's experience with implementing adaptive 
management since adoption of the VMP in 2012 has led it to conclude 
that, at least as of now, it is unnecessary to codify adaptive 
management concepts in NPS regulations.
    4. Comment: Commenters proposed various changes to the vehicle cap 
in the rule, including changes that would set a seasonal rather than a 
daily maximum, differentiate between daytime and nighttime use, limit 
use to one entry and one exit on the restricted portion of the road per 
24-hour period, reserve specific access opportunities for Alaska 
residents, and limit use to commercial tour buses. Commenters suggested 
changes to the number of vehicles that could travel on the park road 
per day, ranging from a complete prohibition on vehicle use to 
increasing the cap as high as 240 vehicles per day.
    NPS Response: The 160-vehicle cap is a specific standard that was 
selected for implementation in the ROD. The VMP includes desired 
conditions for daytime and nighttime use. Seasonal considerations were 
not a part of the scientific study leading to the VMP. However, 
historically and currently, there the concessionaire bus schedule is 
based on demand pattern which naturally creates a seasonality for the 
largest road user group. The bus schedule peaks in July and August. 
Some road permits, such as Teklanika Campground buses and 
concessionaire buses, are for one entry and one exit trips. Other 
permits, such as for construction or research projects, allow for 
travel back and forth along the road. Recognizing the special access 
provisions already provided for in ANILCA, the NPS declines to reserve 
additional specific access opportunities for Alaska residents in this 
rule.
    5. Comment: One commenter asked the NPS to consider providing 
additional access outside of the defined visitor season when conditions 
permit.
    NPS Response: The NPS already allows additional access outside the 
defined visitor season as conditions allow. Personal vehicles can 
travel on maintained portions of the park road outside of the defined 
visitor season between February 15 and October 15.
    6. Comment: Commenters raised concerns about potential impacts to 
park resources and visitors from increasing vehicle use on the park 
road, expressing concern that additional traffic could diminish 
bicycling opportunities, affect wildlife and wildlife viewing 
opportunities, increase pollution, degrade wilderness character, and 
increase the risk of accidents. One commenter stated that increased 
traffic would require additional road maintenance and cited studies 
demonstrating that heavy equipment, such as gravel-hauling trucks, can 
disturb wildlife and significantly reduce wildlife-viewing 
opportunities compared to regular vehicular traffic.
    NPS Response: The NPS will continue to monitor impacts to resources 
and visitor experience from vehicle use as required by the VMP. The 
adaptive management framework in the VMP accounts for potential impacts 
to a broad range of park resources and visitor experiences, including 
the topics raised by the commenters. The flexibility provided by 
adaptive management allows the NPS to adjust management actions to 
protect resources and visitors based upon indicators and desired 
conditions.
    7. Comment: Commenters raised concerns about potential impacts to 
NPS infrastructure and operations from increasing vehicle use on the 
park road, expressing concern that additional traffic would increase 
maintenance needs by accelerating wear on the park road, strain waste 
management systems, particularly the park's sewage lagoon, and require 
the NPS to hire or reallocate staff to support increased visitation, 
which would weaken the NPS's ability to ensure visitor safety, provide 
education, and conduct essential monitoring.
    NPS Response: There will not be impacts to the condition of the 
park road and infrastructure resulting from this rule such that it 
would require additional maintenance needs. The NPS expects that 
existing resources for road maintenance and wastewater will be

[[Page 65693]]

sufficient to accommodate increased visitor use given visitation trends 
in the park.

Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders, and Department Policy

Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 14192)

    This rule has been determined to be significant for purposes of 
Executive Order 12866. This rule will generate benefits for the public 
by providing greater clarity and transparency about the NPS's 
management of the park road, and by providing additional opportunities 
for recreation and access by lengthening the visitor season by several 
days in certain years. Because this rule expands recreational 
consumption opportunities, it is considered an ``enabling regulatory 
action.'' As a result, it is an Executive Order 14192 deregulatory 
action. Compared to baseline conditions, this rule does not involve any 
fees or other measures that would increase costs to visitors, 
businesses, communities, or the broader public.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a 
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on information 
contained in the economic analyses found in the report entitled 
``[INSERT].'' The report may be viewed on <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> 
in Docket No. NPS-2026-0067.

Congressional Review Act

    This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule:
    (a) Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million 
or more.
    (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government 
agencies, or geographic regions.
    (c) Will not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) 
requires that agencies assess whether a rule would impose a Federal 
mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of 
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any 1 year. 
As of 2025, that threshold is approximately $206 million (2024 
dollars). This rule will not result in expenditures by State, local, or 
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, in 
excess of the threshold. Thus, no written assessment of unfunded 
mandates is required.

Takings (Executive Order 12630)

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have takings implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings 
implication assessment is not required.

Federalism (Executive Order 13132)

    Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule 
will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. This rule will 
only affect use of federally administered lands and waters. It will 
have no direct effects on other areas. A federalism summary impact 
statement is not required.

Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)

    This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988. 
This rule:
    (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all 
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be 
written to minimize litigation; and
    (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all 
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal 
standards.

Consultation With Alaska Native Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations 
(Executive Order 13175 and Department Policy)

    The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its 
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a 
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their 
right to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. NPS staff communicated 
with local tribal groups regarding the VMP. The planning alternatives 
were developed with consideration that project actions would avoid or 
minimally disturb resources or values important to affiliated Alaska 
Native Tribes. The planning alternatives did not entail new 
construction or ground disturbance and are not anticipated to impede 
access to places of traditional religious, ceremonial, or other 
customary activities. NPS has evaluated this rule under the criteria in 
Executive Order 13175 and under the Department's consultation policy 
and has determined this rule will have no substantial direct effect on 
Alaska Native Tribes or Alaska Native Corporation lands, water areas, 
or resources. However, the NPS remains available to consult with Alaska 
Native Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations upon request. Doyon, 
Limited requested consultation as part of its comments on the proposed 
rule. The NPS will continue to meet regularly with Doyon, Limited and 
engage with them on various issues related to park management, 
including vehicle use on the park road.

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)

    This rule contains no new information collections. All information 
collections require approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The NPS may not conduct or sponsor, and 
you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless 
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.)

    The NPS prepared an environmental impact statement as part of the 
VMP in compliance with NEPA. This rule merely conforms the regulatory 
text to the ROD as it has been implemented for over a decade, which 
identifies the limits for vehicle use that are stated in the rule. 
Copies of these documents are available online at <a href="https://parkplanning.nps.gov/dena">https://parkplanning.nps.gov/dena</a> by clicking the link titled ``Denali Park 
Road Vehicle Management Plan,'' then the link titled ``Document List.''

Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)

    This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition 
in Executive Order 13211; this rule is not likely to have a significant 
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, and this 
rule has not otherwise been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. A Statement of Energy Effects in not required.

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 13

    Alaska, National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service amends 
36 CFR part 13 as set forth below:

PART 13--NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM UNITS IN ALASKA

0
1. The authority citation for part 13 continues to read as follows:


[[Page 65694]]


    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.; 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 
320102; Sec. 13.1204 also issued under Pub. L. 104-333, Sec. 1035, 
110 Stat. 4240, November 12, 1996.


0
2. Revise Sec.  13.930 to read as follows:


Sec.  13.930   Do I need a permit to operate a motor vehicle on the 
Denali Park road west of Savage River during the visitor season?

    Yes, you must obtain a permit or other form of written 
authorization from the superintendent to operate a motor vehicle on the 
restricted section of the Denali Park road during the visitor season. 
During the visitor season, the restricted section begins at the west 
end of the Savage River Bridge (mile 14.8) and continues to the former 
Mt. McKinley National Park boundary north of Wonder Lake (mile 87.9). 
The visitor season begins on the Saturday of Memorial Day weekend and 
ends on the second Thursday following Labor Day.

0
3. Revise Sec.  13.932 to read as follows:


Sec.  13.932  How many motor vehicles may enter the restricted section 
of the Denali Park road during the visitor season?

    No more than 160 motor vehicles may enter the restricted section of 
the Denali Park road per 24-hour period during the visitor season.

    Dated: October 14, 2026.
Kevin J. Lilly,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2026-21222 Filed 10-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>