Notice2026-21133
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule To Modify the Priority Customer Rebate Program Table for Certain Transactions in Complex Orders
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 16, 2026
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 199 (Friday, October 16, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65806-65809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-21133]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-106654; File No. SR-MIAX-2026-40]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule To Modify the Priority
Customer Rebate Program Table for Certain Transactions in Complex
Orders
October 13, 2026.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'' or ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on September 30, 2026, Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the MIAX Options Exchange Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'') to amend the Priority Customer Rebate
Program (``PCRP'') table to modify the calculation used to determine
the alternative rebates applicable to certain transactions in Complex
Orders (all terms described below).
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/miax-options/rule-filings">https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/miax-options/rule-filings</a>, and at the Exchange's principal office.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Section (1)(a)(iii) of the Fee
Schedule to amend the PCRP table to modify the calculation used to
determine the alternative rebates applicable to certain transactions in
Complex Orders.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A ``complex order'' is any order involving the concurrent
purchase and/or sale of two or more different options in the same
underlying security (the ``legs'' or ``components'' of the complex
order), for the same account, in a conforming or non-conforming
ratio for the purposes of executing a particular investment
strategy. A complex order can also be a ``stock-option order'' with
a conforming or non-conforming ratio, and subject to the limitations
set forth, in Interpretation and Policy .01 of Rule 518. A stock-
option order is an order to buy or sell a stated number of units of
an underlying security (stock or Exchange Traded Fund Share
(``ETF'')) or a security convertible into the underlying stock
(``convertible security'') coupled with the purchase or sale of
options contract(s) on the opposite side of the market representing
either (i) the same number of units of the underlying security or
convertible security, or (ii) the number of units of the underlying
stock necessary to create a delta neutral position where the ratio
represents the total number of units of the underlying security or
convertible security in the option leg to the total number of units
of the underlying security or convertible security in the stock leg.
Only those stock-option orders in the classes designated by the
Exchange and communicated to Members via Regulatory Circular with no
more than the applicable number of legs as determined by the
Exchange on a class-by-class basis and communicated to Members via
Regulatory Circular, are eligible for processing. See Exchange Rule
518(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
Pursuant to the PCRP, the Exchange credits each Member \4\ the per
contract amount set forth in the PCRP table in Section (1)(a)(iii) of
the Fee Schedule, as applicable, resulting from each Priority Customer
\5\ order transmitted by that Member which is executed electronically
on the Exchange in all multiply-listed option classes (with certain
exclusions described below), provided the Member meets certain
percentage thresholds in a month as described in the PCRP table. The
volume thresholds are calculated based on the percentage of national
customer volume in multiply-listed options classes listed on MIAX
entered and executed over the course of the month but does not include,
in simple or complex as applicable, QCC \6\ and cQCC Orders,\7\
Priority Customer-to-Priority Customer Orders, C2C \8\ and cC2C
Orders,\9\ PRIME \10\ and cPRIME \11\ AOC Responses, PRIME and cPRIME
Contra-side Orders, PRIME and cPRIME Orders for which both the Agency
and Contra-side Order are Priority Customers, and executions related to
contracts that are routed to one or more exchanges in connection with
the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan referenced
in MIAX Rule 1400 (referred to as ``national customer volume'').\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
\5\ The term ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that
(i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place
more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). See Exchange Rule
100.
\6\ A Qualified Contingent Cross Order is comprised of an
originating order to buy or sell at least 1,000 contracts, that is
identified as being part of a qualified contingent trade, as that
term is defined in Interpretations and Policies .01, coupled with a
contra-side order or orders totaling an equal number of contracts.
See Exchange Rule 516(j).
\7\ A Complex Qualified Contingent Cross or ``cQCC'' Order is
comprised of an originating complex order to buy or sell where each
component is at least 1,000 contracts that is identified as being
part of a qualified contingent trade, as defined in Rule 516,
Interpretations and Policies .01, coupled with a contra-side complex
order or orders totaling an equal number of contracts. Trading of
cQCC Orders is governed by Rule 515(h)(4). See Exchange Rule
518(b)(6).
\8\ A Customer Cross Order is comprised of a Priority Customer
Order to buy and a Priority Customer Order to sell at the same price
and for the same quantity. See Exchange Rule 516(i).
\9\ A Complex Customer Cross or ``cC2C'' Order is comprised of
one Priority Customer complex order to buy and one Priority Customer
complex order to sell at the same price and for the same quantity.
Trading of cC2C Orders is governed by Rule 515(h)(3). See Exchange
Rule 518(b)(5).
\10\ PRIME is a process by which a Member may electronically
submit for execution (``Auction'') an order it represents as agent
(``Agency Order'') against principal interest, and/or an Agency
Order against solicited interest. See Exchange Rule 515A(a).
\11\ A Complex Prime or ``cPRIME'' Order is a complex order (as
defined in Rule 518(a)(5)) that is submitted for participation in a
cPRIME Auction. See Exchange Rule 518(b)(7).
\12\ See Fee Schedule, Section (1)(a)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the PCRP, Priority Customer volume for transactions in
simple, PRIME Agency, complex, and
[[Page 65807]]
cPRIME Agency are aggregated to determine the appropriate volume tier
threshold applicable to each transaction. Volume is recorded for, and
credits are delivered to, the Member that submits the order to the
Exchange. All fees and rebates are per contract per leg. MIAX
aggregates the contracts resulting from Priority Customer Orders \13\
transmitted and executed electronically on MIAX from Members and
Affiliates \14\ for purposes of the thresholds described in the PCRP
table.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The term ``Priority Customer Order'' means an order for the
account of a Priority Customer. See Exchange Rule 100.
\14\ For purposes of the MIAX Options Fee Schedule, the term
``Affiliate'' means (i) an affiliate of a Member of at least 75%
common ownership between the firms as reflected on each firm's Form
BD, Schedule A, (``Affiliate''), or (ii) the Appointed Market Maker
of an Appointed EEM (or, conversely, the Appointed EEM of an
Appointed Market Maker). An ``Appointed Market Maker'' is a MIAX
Market Maker (who does not otherwise have a corporate affiliation
based upon common ownership with an EEM) that has been appointed by
an EEM and an ``Appointed EEM'' is an EEM (who does not otherwise
have a corporate affiliation based upon common ownership with a MIAX
Market Maker) that has been appointed by a MIAX Market Maker,
pursuant to the following process. A MIAX Market Maker appoints an
EEM and an EEM appoints a MIAX Market Maker, for the purposes of the
Fee Schedule, by each completing and sending an executed Volume
Aggregation Request Form by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#660b030b040314150e0f16260b0f071e010a0904070a4805090b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1dcd4dcd3d4c3c2d9d8c1f1dcd8d0c9d6ddded3d0dd9fd2dedc">[email protected]</span></a> no
later than 2 business days prior to the first business day of the
month in which the designation is to become effective. Transmittal
of a validly completed and executed form to the Exchange along with
the Exchange's acknowledgement of the effective designation to each
of the Market Maker and EEM will be viewed as acceptance of the
appointment. The Exchange will only recognize one designation per
Member. A Member may make a designation not more than once every 12
months (from the date of its most recent designation), which
designation shall remain in effect unless or until the Exchange
receives written notice submitted 2 business days prior to the first
business day of the month from either Member indicating that the
appointment has been terminated. Designations will become operative
on the first business day of the effective month and may not be
terminated prior to the end of the month. Execution data and reports
will be provided to both parties. See Fee Schedule, Section
(1)(a)(i), note 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective beginning September 1, 2026, the Exchange established
alternative rebates for certain transactions in non-paired Complex
Order volume based on a Member's Priority Customer total monthly non-
paired Complex Order volume as a percent of the Member's Priority
Customer total monthly volume aggregated to the PCRP.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 106317 (September
11, 2026), 91 FR 58723 (September 16, 2026) (SR-MIAX-2026-37). See
also Fee Schedule, Section (1)(a)(iii) (last two columns in the PCRP
table).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend the PCRP table to modify the
calculation used to determine the alternative rebates applicable to
certain transactions in non-paired Complex Orders.
Currently, the PCRP table provides the following volume thresholds
applicable to Priority Customer Orders, which are based on a percentage
of national customer volume in multiply-listed options classes listed
on MIAX during the relevant month: 0.00% to 0.50% in tier 1; above
0.50% to 1.50% in tier 2; above 1.50% to 1.90% in tier 3; above 1.90%
to 3.50% in tier 4; and above 3.50% in tier 5. Currently, for Priority
Customer orders in the PCRP, the Exchange provides a per contract
credit for non-paired Complex Orders based on a Member's Priority
Customer total monthly non-paired Complex Order volume as a percent of
the Member's Priority Customer total monthly volume aggregated to the
PCRP. In particular, if the Member's Priority Customer non-paired
Complex Orders account for less than 50% of the Member's Priority
Customer total monthly PCRP volume, that Member's Priority Customer
executed non-paired complex volume qualifies for the following rebates:
(i) $0.20 per contract in tier 1; (ii) $0.21 per contract in tier 2;
(iii) $0.26 \16\ or $0.27 \17\ per contract in tier 3 depending on
whether the executing buyer and seller are the same Member or
Affiliates; and (iv) $0.27 \18\ or $0.28 \19\ per contract in tiers 4
and 5 depending on whether the executing buyer and seller are not the
same Member or Affiliates. If the Member's Priority Customer non-paired
Complex Orders account for 50% or more of the Member's Priority
Customer total monthly PCRP volume, that Member's Priority Customer
executed non-paired complex volume qualifies for higher rebates as
follows: (i) $0.23 per contract in tier 1; (ii) $0.27 per contract in
tier 2; and (iii) $0.28 per contract in tiers 3, 4, or 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ This rebate is for executed Priority Customer non-paired
Complex Orders when the executing buyer and seller are the same
Member or Affiliates. See Fee Schedule, Section (1)(a)(iii), note K.
\17\ This rebate is for executed Priority Customer non-paired
Complex Orders when the executing buyer and seller are not the same
Member or Affiliates. See Fee Schedule, Section (1)(a)(iii), note
[squf].
\18\ See supra note 16.
\19\ See supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To calculate whether Members qualify for the alternative, higher
rebates for their Priority Customer Complex Order volume, the Exchange
compares the Member's monthly Priority Customer non-paired Complex
Order volume to its total monthly Priority Customer volume aggregated
for the PCRP. The aggregated PCRP volume includes simple, PRIME Agency,
complex, and cPRIME Agency orders transmitted by that Priority Customer
which are executed electronically on the Exchange in all multiply-
listed option classes, with certain exclusions. The Exchange excludes
the following orders from the calculation of Priority Customer Complex
Order credits and from the calculation of the volume thresholds set
forth in the PCRP table: QCC and cQCC Orders, Priority Customer-to-
Priority Customer Orders, C2C and cC2C Orders, PRIME and cPRIME AOC
Responses, PRIME and cPRIME Contra-side Orders, PRIME and cPRIME Orders
for which both the Agency and Contra-side Order are Priority Customers,
and executions related to contracts that are routed to one or more
exchanges in connection with the Options Order Protection and Locked/
Crossed Market Plan referenced in MIAX Rule 1400.\20\ For purposes of
calculating the Member's monthly Priority Customer non-paired Complex
Order volume for the alternative PCRP rebates, the Exchange counts the
volume of the option legs of a Complex Order and excludes the stock
portion if the Complex Order is a stock-option order, as defined in
Exchange Rule 518(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Fee Schedule, Section (1)(a)(iii) (explanatory
paragraphs below the tables).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend the PCRP table to modify the
calculation used to determine the alternative rebates applicable to
certain transactions in non-paired Complex Orders. In particular, the
Exchange proposes to include the Member's Priority Customer cPRIME
Agency order volume in the calculation that currently compares the
Member's monthly Priority Customer non-paired Complex Order volume to
its total monthly Priority Customer volume aggregated for the PCRP.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Section (1)(a)(iii) of the
Fee Schedule to amend the last two column headings to insert the words
``and cPRIME Agency'' following the phrase ``Per Contract Credit for
Complex Orders, Priority Customer Non-Paired Complex Orders. . . .''
With the proposed changes, the last two columns in the table in Section
(1)(a)(iii) of the Fee Schedule will read as follows: ``Per Contract
Credit for Complex Orders, Priority Customer Non-Paired Complex Orders
and cPRIME Agency Volume <50% of Member's PCRP Volume'' and ``Per
Contract Credit for Complex Orders, Priority Customer Non-Paired
Complex Orders and cPRIME Agency Volume >=50% of Member's PCRP
Volume''. Accordingly, to determine the alternative rebates applicable
to certain transactions in Complex Orders for the
[[Page 65808]]
PCRP, the Exchange will compare the Member's monthly Priority Customer
non-paired Complex Orders and cPRIME Agency order volume to its total
monthly Priority Customer volume aggregated for the PCRP, which
aggregated volume includes simple, PRIME Agency, complex, and cPRIME
Agency orders transmitted by that Priority Customer that are executed
electronically on the Exchange in all multiply-listed option classes.
The Exchange will continue to exclude the following from the
calculation of Priority Customer Complex Order credits and from the
calculation of the volume thresholds set forth in the PCRP table: QCC
and cQCC Orders, Priority Customer-to-Priority Customer Orders, C2C and
cC2C Orders, PRIME and cPRIME AOC Responses, PRIME and cPRIME Contra-
side Orders, PRIME and cPRIME Orders for which both the Agency and
Contra-side Order are Priority Customers, and executions related to
contracts that are routed to one or more exchanges in connection with
the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan referenced
in MIAX Rule 1400.\21\ The Exchange does not propose to amend any of
the volume threshold percentages or credit amounts with this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ For purposes of calculating the Member's monthly Priority
Customer non-paired Complex Order volume for the alternative PCRP
rebates, the Exchange will continue to count the volume of the
option legs of a Complex Order and exclude the stock portion if the
Complex Order is a stock-option order, as defined in Exchange Rule
518(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this proposed change is for business and competitive
reasons. With the proposed change to include Priority Customer cPRIME
Agency order volume in the calculation used to determine the
alternative rebates applicable to certain transactions in Complex
Orders, Members may be able to more easily qualify for the higher PCRP
rebates for their Complex Orders. The Exchange believes this may
encourage market participants to submit more Priority Customer Complex
Orders and therefore increase Priority Customer order flow, resulting
in increased liquidity which benefits all Exchange participants by
providing more trading opportunities and tighter spreads. The Exchange
notes that at least one competing equity options exchange similarly
provides for higher customer rebates based on the ratio of simple order
volume to complex order volume, with certain segments and/or symbols
excluded from the calculation.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Cboe Exchange Inc. (``Cboe'') Fee Schedule, Volume
Incentive Program, page 4, available at <a href="https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/Cboe_FeeSchedule.pdf">https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/Cboe_FeeSchedule.pdf</a> (last visited September
28, 2026). The Cboe Volume Incentive Program provides, in part, that
``[a] TPH will only receive the Complex credit rates for Complex
volume if at least 32% for Tiers 1, 2, and 3 or 38% for Tiers 4 and
5 of that TPH's qualifying VIP volume in the previous month was
comprised of Simple volume. If not, then the TPH's Customer (C)
Complex volume will receive credits at the applicable Simple credit
rate only.'' Cboe excludes certain segments and symbols from this
calculation. See Cboe Fee Schedule, note 36.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation
The proposed changes are effective beginning October 1, 2026.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \23\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \24\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons
using its facilities. The Exchange also believes the proposal furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \25\ in that it is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS,
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are currently 19 registered options exchanges competing for
order flow.\27\ Based on publicly-available information, and excluding
index-based and singly-listed options, no single exchange had more than
approximately 10-11% of the multiply-listed equity options market share
for the month of August 2026.\28\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power. More specifically, the Exchange had a market
share of approximately 10.22% of executed volume of multiply-listed
equity options for the month of August 2026.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ MX2 Options launched electronic equity options trading in a
limited number of symbols on September 14, 2026. See MEMX Press
Release, dated September 14, 2026, available at <a href="https://memx.com/insights/memx-group-successfully-launches-mx2-options">https://memx.com/insights/memx-group-successfully-launches-mx2-options</a>.
\28\ See the ``Market Share'' section of the Exchange's website,
available at <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/">https://www.miaxglobal.com/</a> (last visited September 28,
2026).
\29\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes its proposal to amend the PCRP to include
Priority Customer cPRIME Agency order volume in the calculation used to
determine the alternative rebates applicable to certain transactions in
Complex Orders is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because Members may be able to more easily qualify for the higher PCRP
rebates for their Complex Orders. The Exchange believes this change is
reasonable because it may encourage market participants to submit more
Priority Customer Complex Orders, both non-paired Complex Orders and
cPRIME orders, and therefore increase Priority Customer order flow,
resulting in increased liquidity which benefits all Exchange
participants by providing more trading opportunities and tighter
spreads. The Exchange believes the proposed change to the PCRP is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will apply equally
to all market participants who provide Priority Customer cPRIME Agency
order volume. The Exchange believes the proposed change is reasonable
because at least one competing equity options exchange similarly
provides for higher customer rebates based on the ratio of simple order
volume to complex order volume, with certain segments and/or symbols
excluded from the calculation.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See supra note 22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes that the proposed change will not impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intra-Market Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposal will impose any
burden on intra-market competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange believes its proposal to amend the PCRP to include
cPRIME Agency order volume in the calculation used to determine the
alternative rebates applicable to certain transactions in Complex
Orders will not impose any burden on intra-market competition. Instead,
the Exchange believes this
[[Page 65809]]
proposed change will promote competition because it would encourage
market participants to submit more Priority Customer cPRIME Agency
order volume and therefore increase Priority Customer order flow,
resulting in increased liquidity which benefits all Exchange
participants by providing more trading opportunities and tighter
spreads.
Inter-Market Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impose
any burden on inter-market competition and the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. There are currently 19 registered
options exchanges competing for order flow. Based on publicly-available
information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange had
more than approximately 10-11% of the multiply-listed equity options
market share for the month of August 2026.\31\ Therefore, no exchange
possesses significant pricing power. More specifically, the Exchange
had a market share of approximately 10.22% of executed volume of
multiply-listed equity options for the month of August 2026.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See supra note 28.
\32\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its
rebates and tiers to remain competitive with other options exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify their own fees and tiers in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes
reflect this competitive environment because they modify the Exchange's
rebates in a manner that encourages market participants to continue to
provide liquidity and to send order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange
notes that at least one competing equity options exchange similarly
provides for higher customer rebates based on the ratio of simple order
volume to complex order volume, with certain segments and/or symbols
excluded from the calculation.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See supra note 22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\34\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \35\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#295b5c454c044a4644444c475d5a695a4c4a074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a787f666f27696567676f647e794a796f69246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-MIAX-2026-40 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-MIAX-2026-40. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions
should refer to file number SR-MIAX-2026-40 and should be submitted on
or before November 6, 2026.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-21133 Filed 10-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 16, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.