Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Pursuant to Court Decision
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in China Cornici Co., Ltd. and Raoping Hongrong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court nos. 23-00216 & 23-00217, sustaining the first remand results issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on wood mouldings and millwork products from the People's Republic of China (China), covering the period of review (POR) August 12, 2020, through January 31, 2022. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the rescission of the administrative review for China Cornici Co. Ltd. (China Cornici) and the corresponding cash deposit rate assigned to the company.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65522-65523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-21045]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-117]
Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People's Republic
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
Pursuant to Court Decision
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade
(CIT) issued its final judgment in China Cornici Co., Ltd. and Raoping
Hongrong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court nos. 23-00216 &
23-00217, sustaining the first remand results issued by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on wood mouldings and
millwork products from the People's Republic of China (China), covering
the period of review (POR) August 12, 2020, through January 31, 2022.
Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not
in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review,
and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the
rescission of the administrative review for China Cornici Co. Ltd.
(China Cornici) and the corresponding cash deposit rate assigned to the
company.
DATES: Applicable October 5, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Barton, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
[[Page 65523]]
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-0012.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 12, 2023, Commerce published the Final Results of the
2020-2022 AD administrative review of wood mouldings and millwork
products from China.\1\ In the Final Results, Commerce rescinded the
review with respect to China Cornici because it had no suspended
entries of subject merchandise during the POR, and did not grant a
separate rate to Chen Chiu Global Corp. (Chen Chiu), a third-country
reseller of merchandise exported by RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co.
(RaoPing HongRong).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; Final Determination of No Shipments; and Partial Rescission;
2020-2022, 88 FR 62539 (September 12, 2023) (Final Results), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
\2\ Id. at Comments 12 and 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
China Cornici and RaoPing HongRong appealed Commerce's Final
Results. On September 5, 2025, the CIT remanded the Final Results to
Commerce, directing Commerce to (1) reconsider its determination to
rescind the administrative review for China Cornici; (2) consider under
what circumstances, and how, to adjust its proceedings when prior
disclosure and deposits of duties are made in an attempt to remedy
mistakes on entry papers, addressing all the statutes at play, not just
unfair trade statutes and practices; and (3) reconsider its
determination not to grant Chen Chiu a separate rate in the review.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See China Cornici Co., Ltd., and RaoPing HongRong
Handicrafts Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court Nos. 23-00216 and 23-
00217, Slip Op. 25-118 (CIT September 5, 2025) (Remand Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its final results of redetermination, issued in May 2026,
Commerce determined not to rescind the review of China Cornici, not to
grant China Cornici a separate rate, and not to grant Chen Chiu a
separate rate.\4\ The CIT sustained Commerce's Final
Redetermination.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand, China Cornici Co., Ltd., and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts
Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court Nos. 23-00216 and 23-00217, dated
May 1, 2026 (Final Redetermination).
\5\ See China Cornici Co., Ltd., and RaoPing HongRong
Handicrafts Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court Nos. 23-00216 and 23-
00217, Slip Op. 26-118 (September 23, 2026) (China Cornici II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\6\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\7\
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant
to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's September
23, 2026, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not
in harmony with Commerce's Final Results. Thus, this notice is
published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\7\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
In accordance with the CIT's September 23, 2026, final judgment,
Commerce is amending its Final Results and finds that China Cornici is
subject to the 2020-2022 administrative review. As a result, we are
assigning to China Cornici the following cash deposit rate assigned to
non-selected companies subject to the review: \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Final Results, 88 FR at 62540
\9\ Consistent with Commerce practice, the assigned cash deposit
rate in the first administrative review is the most recent rate
calculated, i.e., the subsidy rate calculated for the period August
12, 2020, through January 31, 2022.
\10\ Because Commerce determined that China Cornici is not
eligible for a separate rate, we are assigning it the China-wide
entity rate calculated in the underlying investigation. See Wood
Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's Republic of China:
Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty
Order, 86 FR 9486, 9488 (February 16, 2021) (Order).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash deposit
Producer/exporter rate \9\
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
China Cornici Co. Ltd.................................. 220.87 \10\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with respect to China Cornici.
Because we continue to find that Chen Chiu is not eligible for a
separate rate, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions with
respect to Chen Chiu.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
Commerce, pursuant to the CIT's judgment, determined in the Final
Redetermination that it lacks the authority to reliquidate entries, and
that only the CIT can order reliquidation of entries.\11\ The CIT
affirmed that the entries in question have been liquidated, and that
Commerce could not order reliquidation of the entries. Moreover, the
CIT found that none of the circumstances delineated in the Act and
chapter 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations in which the CBP may
reliquidate entries are applicable to the instant case. Therefore, in
the event that the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or is upheld by a
final and conclusive court decision, Commerce will not issue assessment
instructions to CBP instructing CBP to assess antidumping duties on
China Cornici's entries of subject merchandise for the period August
12, 2020, through January 31, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Final Redetermination at 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 8, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2026-21045 Filed 10-14-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.