Notice2026-20698
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 8, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64342-64344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-20698]
[[Page 64342]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-878]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of
Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2024-2025
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales
of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period
of review (POR), July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.
DATES: Applicable October 8, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Noah Wetzel, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7466.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 22, 2025, based on timely requests for review, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain corrosion-
resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\
On March 20, 2026, Commerce selected KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (Dongbu)
and Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd./Aju Steel Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk) \2\ as
the mandatory respondents in this review.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 90 FR 41043 (August 22, 2025); see also
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the
People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan:
Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India and
Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25, 2016)
(Order); and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and
Taiwan: Notice of Correction to the Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR
58475 (August 25, 2016).
\2\ Commerce preliminarily determines that Dongkuk Coated Metal
Co., Ltd. and Aju Steel Co., Ltd. are a single entity. See
Memorandum, ``Preliminary Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum for
Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd.,'' dated concurrently with this
notice.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated March 20,
2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown,
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative
proceedings by 47 days. Additionally, due to a backlog of documents
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24,
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an
additional 21 days. On May 12, 2026, we extended the deadline for the
preliminary results of this review to no later than September 30,
2026.\4\ On September 25, 2026, we extended the deadline for the
preliminary results of this review to no later than October 5, 2026.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 12,
2026.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated September
25, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\
A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is attached as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
ACCESS, which is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/frnotices">https://access.trade.gov/frnotices</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of
Korea; 2024-2025,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order is CORE from Korea. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to
rescind an administrative review of an AD order where it concludes that
there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the
POR.\7\ Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the
suspended entries are liquidated at the AD assessment rate for the
review period.\8\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be
conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce
can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at
the AD assessment rate calculated for the POR.\9\ Commerce notified all
interested parties of its intent to rescind the instant review
regarding the companies listed in Appendix III because there were no
reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise from these
companies during the POR and invited interested parties to comment.\10\
No party commented on this memorandum. In the absence of any suspended
entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the POR, we
are rescinding this administrative review for the companies listed in
Appendix III, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\9\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States,
380 F.Supp.3d 1328, 1337 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section
751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that
``{w{time} hile the statute does not explicitly require that an
entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to
a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used
as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can
only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended''; see
also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 86 FR 36102, and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; and Solid
Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation:
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77
FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that ``for an administrative
review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry
to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate'').
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, in
Part,'' dated August 5, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act.
Rate for Non-Individually Examined Companies
The Act does not address the establishment of a rate to apply to
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section
777A(c)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce's regulation at 19 CFR
351.109(g) states that Commerce will determine the rate for non-
selected companies by following the process set
[[Page 64343]]
forth in 19 CFR 351.109(f)(1)-(2), which generally parallels the
process for determining the all-others rate in an investigation under
section 735(c)(5) of the Act.
Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.109(f)(1), the
all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of
the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any rates
that are zero, de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or determined
entirely on the basis of facts available. Where the weighted-average
dumping margin for each of the individually examined companies is zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.109(f)(2)(iii) provides that Commerce may use
``any reasonable method'' to establish the estimated all-others rate
for exporters and producers not individually investigated, including
averaging the estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined for
the exporters and producers individually investigated.
In this administrative review, we preliminarily calculated
weighted-average dumping margins for the mandatory respondents, Dongkuk
and Dongbu, that are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available. Accordingly, we are preliminarily assigning to the companies
under review that were not selected for individual examination a
weighted-average dumping margin equal to the estimated weighted-average
dumping margins calculated for Dongkuk and Dongbu, consistent with 19
CFR 351.109(g).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally
calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated
for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping
margins calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-
average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined
respondents using each company's publicly ranged U.S. sale
quantities for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. See
19 CFR 351.109(f)(2)(ii); see also Memorandum, ``Calculation of the
Dumping Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual
Examination,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results
We preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping
margins for the period July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.................................... 23.40
Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd./Aju Steel Co., Ltd........... 19.43
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review \12\........... 20.58
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The exporters or producers not selected for individual
review are listed in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance at a later date
specified by Commerce. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for
filing case briefs.\13\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents
listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\14\ All briefs must
be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Procedures).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we
request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their
briefs a public executive summary for each issue raised in their
briefs.\15\ Further, we request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not
including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as
the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for
relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note
that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\16\ See APO and Service Procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants,
and whether any participant is a foreign national; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is
made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the
hearing.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review. If Dongbu's and Dongkuk's weighted-average dumping margin
is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final
results of this review, Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total
entered value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for
all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-
specific, per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to
the total quantity of those sales.\18\ To determine whether an
importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an
importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values.
If Dongbu's or Dongkuk's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de
minimis, or where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is
zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
[[Page 64344]]
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice,
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Dongbu
and Dongkuk for which they did not know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate
those entries at the all-others rate calculated in the less-than-fair-
value (LTFV) investigation, as amended,\20\ if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Order; see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony with Final Determination of Investigation and Notice of
Amended Final Results, 83 FR 39054 (August 8, 2018) (Timken and
Amended Final Results).
\21\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies listed in Appendix II which were not selected for
individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the
review-specific rate, calculated as noted in the ``Rate for Non-
Individually Examined Companies'' section, above. The final results of
this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties
on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review
and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies listed in Appendix III for which the review is
being rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed
at rates equal to the cash deposit rate for estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce
intends to issue rescission instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days
after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade,
the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be that established in the final results of this
review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent, and therefore, de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed companies not covered by this review, the cash deposit will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review,
or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate
for all other manufacturers and exporters will continue to be 8.31
percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation (as
amended).\23\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Order, as amended by Timken and Amended Final Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the
amount of the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: October 5, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation and Single Entity Treatment
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for
Individual Review
1. Hyundai Steel Company
2. POSCO
3. POSCO International Corporation
4. SeAH Coated Metal
5. SeAH Steel Corporation
Appendix III
Companies With No Reviewable Entries
1. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd.
2. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.
3. POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd.
4. TCC Steel Corp.
[FR Doc. 2026-20698 Filed 10-7-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 8, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.