Notice2026-20383
Melamine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 5, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on melamine from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Review" section of this notice.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 191 (Monday, October 5, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63272-63273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-20383]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-020]
Melamine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on melamine from the
People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the
``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable October 5, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Saba, AD/CVD Operations, Office
III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5849.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 28, 2015, Commerce published the Order in the Federal
[[Page 63273]]
Register.\1\ On June 1, 2026, Commerce published the Notice of
Initiation of this second sunset review of the Order, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\ On
June 12, 2026, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent
to participate from the domestic interested party \3\ within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\4\ The domestic
interested party claimed the interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer of a domestic like product in
the United States.\5\ On June 22, 2026, Commerce notified the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC) that it had received a notice of
intent to participate from a domestic interested party.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Melamine from the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 80 FR 80751
(December 28, 2015) (Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 91 FR 32376
(June 1, 2026) (Notice of Initiation).
\3\ The domestic interested party is Cornerstone Chemical
Company (Cornerstone).
\4\ See Cornerstone's Letter, ``Domestic Interested Party Notice
of Intent to Participate,'' dated June 12, 2026.
\5\ Id.
\6\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1,
2026,'' dated June 22, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 1, 2026, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i), the domestic
interested party filed a timely and adequate substantive response.\7\
Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent
interested party. On July 27, 2026, Commerce notified the ITC that it
did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested
parties.\8\ As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is conducting an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Cornerstone's Letter, ``Domestic Interested Party
Substantive Response,'' dated July 1, 2026 (Substantive Response).
\8\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1,
2026,'' dated July 27, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this Order is melamine from China. For the
full description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Melamine
from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review,
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in
the event of revocation of the Order and the magnitude of the margins
likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\10\ A list of the topics
discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached in the
appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System, which is available to registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed at https://access.trade.gov/
frnotices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act,
Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude
of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-average
dumping margins up to 363.31 percent.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: September 29, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
FR Doc. 2026-20383 Filed 10-2-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 5, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.