Notice2026-20259
Melamine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 2, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on melamine from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Review" section of this notice.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 190 (Friday, October 2, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 190 (Friday, October 2, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62700-62701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-20259]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-021]
Melamine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on melamine from the
People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this
notice.
DATES: Applicable October 2, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexander Cipolla, Office III, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4956.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 28, 2015, Commerce published the Order in the Federal
Register.\1\ On July 9, 2021, following the first five-year sunset
review, Commerce published the notice of continuation of the Order.\2\
On June 1, 2026, Commerce
[[Page 62701]]
published the notice of initiation of this second sunset review of the
Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.218(c).\3\ On June 12, 2026, Commerce
received a notice of intent to participate in this review from
Cornerstone Chemical Company (the domestic interested party), within
the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\4\ The domestic
interested party claims that it has interested party status within the
meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a manufacturer in the United
States of the domestic like product.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Melamine from the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 80 FR 80751
(December 28, 2015) (Order).
\2\ See Melamine from the People's Republic of China:
Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR
36252 (July 9, 2021).
\3\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 91 FR 32377
(June 1, 2026).
\4\ See Cornerstone's Letter, ``Domestic Interested Party Notice
of Intent to Participate,'' dated June 12, 2026.
\5\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 1, 2026, Commerce received an adequate substantive response
from the domestic interested party, within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\6\ Commerce did not receive a
substantive response from either the Government of China or a
respondent interested party to this proceeding. On June 22, 2026,
Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it
did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent
interested parties.\7\ As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is conducting an
expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Cornerstone's Letter, '' Domestic Interested Party
Substantive Response,'' dated July 1, 2026.
\7\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1,
2026,'' dated June 22, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this Order is melamine from China. For the
full description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Melamine from the People's Republic of
China,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review,
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization
and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Order
were to be revoked, is contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\9\ A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS),
which is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In
addition, complete versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/frnotices">https://access.trade.gov/frnotices</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the
following net countervailable subsidy rates.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net
countervailable
Producers/exporters subsidy rate
(percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Far-Reaching Chemical Co., Ltd....................... 154.00
M and A Chemicals Corp China......................... 154.00
Qingdao Unichem International Trade Co., Ltd......... 154.00
Shandong Liaherd Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.......... 156.90
Zhongyuan Dahua Group Co., Ltd....................... 154.00
All Others........................................... 154.58
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APOs)
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: September 29, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable
Subsidy
2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail
3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2026-20259 Filed 10-1-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 2, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.