Attainment Date Extension for the South Coast, California 2012 Annual PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or "Agency") is granting an extension of the "Serious" area attainment date for the Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin ("South Coast Air Basin" or "South Coast") nonattainment area for the 2012 annual fine particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 [micro]m in diameter (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) from December 31, 2025, to December 31, 2030, based on a determination that the State has satisfied the statutory criteria for this extension.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62316-62319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-20097]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2026-3664; FRL-13379-02-R9]
Attainment Date Extension for the South Coast, California 2012
Annual PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or ``Agency'')
is granting an extension of the ``Serious'' area attainment date for
the Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin (``South Coast Air Basin'' or
``South Coast'') nonattainment area for the 2012 annual fine
particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 [micro]m in diameter
(PM<INF>2.5</INF>) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) from
December 31, 2025, to December 31, 2030, based on a determination that
the State has satisfied the statutory criteria for this extension.
DATES: This action is effective November 2, 2026.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2026-3664. All documents in the docket are
listed on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with a
disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Graham, Geographic Strategies
and Modeling Section (AIR-2-2), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105; telephone number: (415) 972-3877; email address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9afde8fbf2fbf7b4fbe9f2f6ffe3e8daffeafbb4fdf5ec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="650217040d04084b04160d09001c17250015044b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the use of ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is intended to refer to the EPA. We use multiple
abbreviations and terms in this action. While this list may not be
exhaustive, for ease of reading and for reference purposes, the EPA
defines the following terms and acronyms here:
CAA or Act Clean Air Act
CARB California Air Resources Board
EPA or Agency Environmental Protection Agency
MSM most stringent measures
NAAQS national ambient air quality standards
PM2.5 particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 [micro]m in
diameter
SCAQMD or District South Coast Air Quality Management District
SIP State implementation plan
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
A. What Action is the EPA Taking?
B. What is the Legal Authority and What are the Requirements?
II. Background and Summary of the Proposed Action
III. Public Comments and Responses
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Executive Summary
A. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is granting an extension of the Serious area attainment
date for the South Coast Air Basin nonattainment area for the 2012
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS from December 31, 2025, to December 31, 2030,
based on a determination that the State has satisfied the statutory
criteria for this extension.
B. What is the Legal Authority and what are the requirements?
The EPA is granting the State's request for an attainment date
extension pursuant to CAA section 188(e).
Under section 188(e) of the Act, a State may apply to the EPA for
an extension of the Serious area attainment date by up to five years,
which the EPA may grant if the State satisfies certain conditions.
Before the EPA may extend the attainment date for a Serious area under
CAA section 188(e), the State must:
(1) Demonstrate that attainment by the Serious area attainment date
is impracticable;
(2) Demonstrate that it has complied with all requirements and
commitments
[[Page 62317]]
pertaining to the area in the implementation plan;
(3) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the
plan for the area includes the ``most stringent measures'' (MSM) that
are included in the implementation plan of any State or are achieved in
practice in any State, and can feasibly be implemented in the area;
(4) Submit a modeled attainment demonstration showing attainment of
the NAAQS in the area by the most expeditious alternative date
practicable; and
(5) Apply for an extension of the attainment date beyond the
Serious area attainment date.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CAA section 188(e) and 40 CFR 51.1005(b). For a discussion
of the EPA's interpretation of the requirements of CAA section
188(e), see 81 FR 58010, 58094 through 58097 (Aug. 24, 2016), and 59
FR 41998, 42002 (Aug. 16, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background and Summary of the Proposed Action
On June 11, 2026,\2\ the EPA proposed to grant a request from the
State of California, submitted to the EPA on August 6, 2024,\3\ for an
extension of the Serious area attainment date for the 2012 annual
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS for the South Coast Air Basin from December 31,
2025, to December 31, 2030. We proposed to grant the State's request
for an extension of the area's attainment date based on a proposed
determination that the State has satisfied the requirements for such
extensions in Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') section 188(e). In our
proposed rule, we provided background information on the
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS, area designations and related State
implementation plan (SIP) revision requirements under the CAA, relevant
EPA guidance, and the EPA's implementing regulations for the
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS, referred to as the ``PM<INF>2.5</INF> SIP
Requirements Rule.'' \4\ The proposed rule also provided a detailed
discussion of the rationale for our proposed action.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 91 FR 35445 (June 11, 2026).
\3\ Letter dated August 5, 2024, from Steven S. Cliff, Executive
Officer, California Air Resources Board (CARB), to Martha Guzman,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, with enclosures (submitted
electronically on August 6, 2024). Among the enclosures included
with the State's request for an attainment date extension was the
``South Coast Air Basin Attainment Plan for the 2012 Annual
PM<INF>2.5</INF> Standard'' (``2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF>
Plan'' or ``Plan''), adopted by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD or ``District'') on June 7, 2024, and by
CARB on June 27, 2024. SCAQMD is the local air district with primary
responsibility for developing a plan to attain the 2012 annual
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS in the South Coast nonattainment area. The
District works cooperatively with CARB in preparing these plans. The
2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF> Plan addresses the Serious area
nonattainment plan requirements for the 2012 annual PM<INF>2.5</INF>
NAAQS in the South Coast nonattainment area.
\4\ ``Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality
Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements.'' 81 FR 58010
(Aug. 24, 2016).
\5\ 91 FR 35445 (June 11, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Public Comments and Responses
The public comment period for the proposed rulemaking opened on
June 11, 2026, the date of its publication in the Federal Register, and
closed on July 13, 2026.\6\ During this period, the EPA received two
comment submissions from individual members of the public
<SUP>7 8</SUP> and a comment submission from SCAQMD.\9\ Additionally,
SCAQMD notified the EPA via email of a typographical error in the
proposed action.\10\ The three comment submissions and email from
SCAQMD are included in the docket for this action. The comment
submission from SCAQMD is supportive of the EPA's proposal to grant the
attainment date extension and does not require a response.
Additionally, one of comments received from the public is not germane
to our action and also does not require a response.\11\ A summary of
the remaining comment submissions and our responses thereto follow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id.
\7\ Comment submission received July 9, 2026, from Steven
Singleton to Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2026-3664.
\8\ Comment submission received July 13, 2026, from Silvio
Mazzella Jr. to Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2026-3664. This comment fails
to identify any specific issue that is germane to our proposed
action.
\9\ Comment submission received July 10, 2026, to Docket ID No.
EPA-R09-OAR-2026-3664, attaching a letter dated July 9, 2026, from
Wayne Nastri, Executive Officer, South Coast Air Quality Management
District, to Mike Martucci, Acting Regional Administrator, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Subject: ``Re: EPA
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2026-3664.''
\10\ Email dated June 10, 2026, from Sang-Mi Lee, SCAQMD, to
Ashley Graham, EPA Region IX, Subject: ``Attainment Date
Extension.''
\11\ See footnote 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment 1: The commenter states that the ``population-exposed''
factor under CAA section 188(e) ``does not receive comparable treatment
in the preamble'' to the other discretionary CAA section 188(e) factors
and that such factor ``warrants an explicit finding.'' The commenter
asserts that the monitoring data in Table 2 of the EPA's proposal
``shows the highest design values [are] concentrated at sites
historically associated with environmental justice communities. .
.[and] the record would benefit from an affirmative statement of who is
exposed at the highest concentrations and for how long the extension
leaves them there.'' The commenter acknowledges that this factor is
discretionary but asserts that ``its omission from the preamble leaves
no basis in the record for evaluating the extension's distributional
impact,'' and requests that the EPA supplement the record.
Response 1: As discussed in our proposal, the ``population exposed
to concentrations in excess of the standard'' is among five factors
identified in CAA section 188(e) that ``the Administrator may
consider'' when determining whether to grant an attainment date
extension for a Serious PM<INF>2.5</INF> nonattainment area.\12\ The
proposal details the nature and extent of the nonattainment problem in
the South Coast nonattainment area and the technological and economic
feasibility of additional measures given the measures already adopted
by CARB and the District. We concluded that ``[t]hese factors generally
support a longer time frame for attainment.'' Because consideration of
these additional factors in approving an attainment date extension
under CAA section 188(e) is discretionary, we believe that the record
in our proposal is sufficient to approve the extension.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 91 FR 35445, 35454 (June 11, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonetheless, as discussed in the EPA's proposal and as required
pursuant to CAA section 188(e), California's request for an attainment
date extension for the South Coast Air Basin for the 2012
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS was accompanied by a revised attainment plan for
the area, referred to herein as the 2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF>
Plan. To meet the attainment planning requirements of the Act, the Plan
includes, among other things, information on the spatial distributions
of PM<INF>2.5</INF> concentrations across the nonattainment area, both
historically and as projected in the future.\13\ Additionally, although
not required, Chapter 7 of the Plan, includes the State's analysis of
the distribution of air quality impacts across the South Coast Air
Basin on various communities.\14\ The 2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF>
Plan is included in the docket and is therefore
[[Page 62318]]
part of the record for this action. Thus, this information has been
publicly available as the Agency has considered the State's extension
request. It was also publicly available during the State's public
process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF> Plan, Chapter 2 (``Air
Quality'') and Chapter 5 (``Future Air Quality'').
\14\ Note that on January 21, 2025, President Trump issued
Executive Order (E.O.) 14173, ``Ending Illegal Discrimination and
Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity'', directing Federal agencies to
end illegal preferences in agency decision-making (90 FR 8633, Jan.
31, 2025). One of the effects of E.O. 14173 is that it revoked E.O.
12898 of February 11, 1994, ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations,'' which had previously directed Federal agencies to
identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects of their actions on minority and
low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment 2: The commenter requests clarification regarding the
connection between the EPA's action on the extension request and the
pending review of the attainment demonstration. The commenter notes
that the EPA's proposed rule does not provide a docket number or
expected timeline for action on the Plan and asserts that the record
would be strengthened by providing such information ``so the public can
track whether the underlying 2030 demonstration is confirmed before the
extension period elapses.''
Response 2: As noted in the EPA's proposed action, the CAA does not
require the EPA to act on the submitted attainment demonstration as a
precondition to granting the extension, and we intend to act on the
2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF> Plan in a future action.\15\ The EPA
is reviewing the submitted attainment plan for the South Coast for the
2012 annual PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS. We will solicit public comment on
our proposed action on the Plan, and the EPA's proposed action will be
made available at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and will include a docket
number for submitting and tracking public comment submissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 91 FR 35445, 35449 and 35453 (June 11, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment 3: Noting that the four measures adopted by the District to
meet the MSM requirement must be fully implemented by January 1, 2030,
the commenter asserts that there is limited time between when the
measures must be implemented and when the effects of these measures
will be assessed (i.e., the proposed December 31, 2030 extended
attainment deadline). The commenter asks that the EPA ``consider
requesting or committing to an interim reporting checkpoint, such as a
2028 progress update, so that emissions performance data can inform
course correction well before the extension period closes rather than
only at its end.''
Response 3: As discussed in the EPA's proposed action, the EPA has
interpreted the Act to require implementation of MSM as expeditiously
as practicable and no later than one year before the extended Serious
area attainment date identified by the State in its extension
request.\16\ In this case, the State requested an extension of the
attainment date under CAA section 188(e) to December 31, 2030. Thus,
the State must provide for implementation of MSM no later than January
1, 2030.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 81 FR 58010, 58097 (Aug. 24, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To that end, we note that all four of the measures identified as
MSM in the Plan are in effect in the South Coast Air Basin as the
SCAQMD began implementing and enforcing the measures following approval
by its Governing Board on September 5, 2025.\17\ Specifically,
amendments to Rule 445 and the Rule 1133 series, amended to achieve
additional PM<INF>2.5</INF> reductions pursuant to control measures
BCM-18 and BCM-10, respectively, are already being fully implemented.
Amendments to Rules 223 and 1138, amended to achieve additional
PM<INF>2.5</INF> reductions pursuant to control measures BCM-08 and
BCM-12, respectively, do include future compliance dates; however, all
future compliance dates in these rules occur before the January 1, 2030
MSM implementation deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ CARB subsequently adopted the rule amendments in February
2026. As noted in footnote 63 of the EPA's proposal, these measures
include BCM-08, ``Emissions Reductions from Livestock Waste at
Confined Animal Facilities;'' BCM-10, ``Emission Reductions from
Direct Land Application of Chipped and Ground Uncomposted
Greenwaste;'' BCM-12, ``Further Emission Reductions from Commercial
Cooking;'' and BCM-18, ``Further Emission Reductions from Wood
Burning Fireplaces and Wood Stoves.'' 91 FR 35445, 35453 (June 11,
2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, where the rule amendments include future compliance
dates, SCAQMD's staff reports accompanying the rule amendments explain
the District's justification for the later deadline. For example,
SCAQMD explains that Rule 223 establishes a separate compliance
timeline for the newly affected dairy facilities to allow sufficient
time for these facilities to prepare and submit a permit application
per the requirement in the rule,\18\ and that the 12-month grace period
extending the exemption thresholds in Rule 1138 was included to provide
owners or operators of chain-driven charbroilers time to acquire
compliant equipment.\19\ We find these justifications to be reasonable
and that the Plan provides for implementation of MSM as expeditiously
as practicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ SCAQMD, ``Final Staff Report, Proposed Amended Rule 223--
Requirements For Confined Animal Facilities, September 2025,'' p. 2-
2.
\19\ SCAQMD, ``Final Staff Report, Proposed Amended Rule 1138--
Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations, September 2025,''
p. 2-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent that the commenter is concerned about the emissions
reductions from these measures being achieved as envisioned, we note
that CAA section 189(c) requires that the State's attainment plan for
the South Coast for the 2012 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS contain
quantitative milestones which are to be achieved every three years
until the area is redesigned attainment and which demonstrate
reasonable further progress toward attainment by the applicable
attainment date. Quantitative milestones are required to provide an
objective means to evaluate progress toward attainment. The CAA also
requires a State to submit, within 90 days after each three-year
quantitative milestone date, a milestone report that includes technical
support sufficient to document completion statistics for appropriate
milestones.
The State discusses its quantitative milestones to demonstrate
continued compliance with the SIP for the South Coast for the 2012
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS in Chapter 6 (``Federal Clean Air Act
Requirements'') of the 2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF> Plan. The plan
includes quantitative milestones for the years 2025, 2028, and 2031.
With regard to a progress update in 2028 requested by the commenter, we
note that SCAQMD has committed to report on the ``[a]doption and
implementation of applicable PM<INF>2.5</INF> Plan measures according
to the schedule specified in Chapter 4,'' which includes the four MSM
measures listed in Table 4-2 and discussed in greater detail elsewhere
in Chapter 4 (``Control Strategy'') of the Plan. Thus, the District has
already committed to a 2028 interim checkpoint as requested by the
commenter.
Comment 4: The commenter requests clarification on whether the EPA
independently evaluated the State's choice of a December 31, 2030
attainment date as opposed to an earlier date or if the maximum
extension was granted solely on the basis of the State's evaluation.
Response 4: As discussed in the EPA's proposal, CAA section 188(e)
requires that at the time of its application for an attainment date
extension, the State must submit a demonstration of attainment by the
most expeditious alternative date practicable.\20\ For the purposes of
evaluating the State's extension request for the South Coast for the
2012 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS, we reviewed the 2024 South Coast
PM<INF>2.5</INF> Plan to ensure that it contains the requisite
demonstration, including the State's demonstration of attainment by
2030 and analysis concluding that attainment by 2029 would not be
possible. Based on our review of the 2024 South Coast PM<INF>2.5</INF>
Plan, we find that the State had made such a submission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 91 FR 35445, 35449 (June 11, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment 5: In its email dated June 10, 2026, SCAQMD notes that the
proposed rule contains a typographical error when referring to the
Moderate
[[Page 62319]]
area plan commitment for the 2012 annual PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS.
Specifically, the EPA's proposal indicates that the EPA had approved
the District's commitment to achieve 7 tpd of direct PM<INF>2.5</INF>
emissions reductions by the 2022 reasonable further progress year,
whereas SCAQMD notes that the proposal should have indicated 7 tpd of
NO<INF>X</INF> emissions reductions.
Response 5: The commenter correctly identifies a mistake in the
proposal. While in several instances the EPA's June 11, 2026 proposal
correctly refers to the commitment as having been for 7 tpd of
NO<INF>X</INF> emissions reductions, in one instance, the proposal
indicates that the commitment was for 7 tpd of direct PM<INF>2.5</INF>
emissions reductions.\21\ The reference to direct PM<INF>2.5</INF>
instead of NO<INF>X</INF> was in error.\22\ The EPA's evaluation of
whether the State had complied with all requirements and commitments in
the implementation plan was appropriately based on our analysis of the
NO<INF>X</INF> emissions reductions achieved in relation to the State's
7 tpd NO<INF>X</INF> emissions reduction commitment. Thus, this error
is harmless in that it did not have an impact on our determination. We
appreciate the commenter bringing this mistake to our attention.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Id. at 35451. The language in the proposal referred to by
the commenter is as follows: ``As part of the EPA's November 9, 2020
final action on the 2016 PM<INF>2.5</INF> Plan, the EPA approved,
among other things, the District's commitment to achieve 7 tpd of
direct PM<INF>2.5</INF> emission reductions from these or substitute
measures by the 2022 RFP milestone year.''
\22\ See 85 FR 40026, 40040 (July 2, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Final Action
For the reasons discussed in this final action, the EPA is granting
the State's request for an extension of the Serious area attainment
date from December 31, 2025, to December 31, 2030, based on a
conclusion that the State has satisfied the requirements for such an
extension in CAA section 188(e).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders">https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders</a>.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
This action is not an Executive Order 14192 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those
imposed by State law.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or Tribal governments, or to the private sector, will
result from this action.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have Tribal implications. It will neither
impose substantial direct costs on federally recognized Tribal
governments nor preempt Tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions that Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 30, 2026. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final action does not
affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review,
nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review
may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see CAA section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ammonia,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 22, 2026.
Michael Martucci,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2026-20097 Filed 9-30-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.