Skip to main content
Rule2026-19751

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 28, 2026
Effective
November 2, 2026

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation Administration

Abstract

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of an overheated alternating current motor pump (ACMP) that caused a fire in the main landing gear (MLG) wheel well. This AD requires a records check or inspection for any installed ACMP with a certain part number and applicable on-condition actions. This AD also prohibits the installation of affected parts. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 186 (Monday, September 28, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61127-61133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-19751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2025-3997; Project Identifier AD-2025-01471-T; 
Amendment 39-23471; AD 2026-19-04]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 
The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, -300ER, and 777F series 
airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of an overheated 
alternating current motor pump (ACMP) that caused a fire in the main 
landing gear (MLG) wheel well. This AD requires a records check or 
inspection for any installed ACMP with a certain part number and 
applicable on-condition actions. This AD also prohibits the 
installation of affected parts. The FAA is issuing this AD to address 
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective November 2, 2026.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 2, 
2026.

[[Page 61128]]


ADDRESSES: 
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-3997; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 
docket contains this final rule, any comments received, and other 
information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
    <bullet> For Boeing material identified in this AD, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; 
telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
    <bullet> You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des 
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-3997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Baek, Aviation Safety Engineer, 
FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 562-627-6725; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff95908c978a9ed186d19d9e9a94bf999e9ed1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d27223e25382c6334632f2c28260d2b2c2c632a223b">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company 
Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes. The 
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 17, 2025 (90 FR 
51216). The NPRM was prompted by a report from an operator of a fire in 
the MLG wheel well on a Model 777 airplane. A subsequent investigation 
found that the cause of the fire was an overheated ACMP. Further 
investigation found that a lock washer and nut were missing from a 
moving contact in the related electrical load control unit (ELCU). The 
missing lock washer and nut left the main contact operator bar 
unrestrained and in a position that let two-phase power go to the ACMP, 
which caused the ACMP to overheat, leak hydraulic fluid, and 
subsequently start a fire in the MLG wheel well. As a result, the 
design of the ACMP has been modified to include fusible links as a new 
feature to prevent the ACMP overheat if one of the electrical phases 
fails. Additionally, the manufacturer has determined that part number 
(P/N) 731966 on continuous two-phase power application may cause the 
pump to overheat and ignite a fire in the wheel well. P/N 731966 can be 
subjected to a single failure of the ELCU that results in continuous 
two-phase power application with no ability to remove power. In the 
NPRM, the FAA proposed to require a records check or inspection for any 
installed ACMP with a certain part number and applicable on-condition 
actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address a single failure of the 
ELCU in the ACMP. This condition, if not addressed, could result in the 
ACMP overheating and igniting a fire in the wheel well and consequent 
damage to the airplane, loss of continued safe flight and landing and/
or personnel injury.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received comments from Boeing and the Air Line Pilots 
Association, International (ALPA) who supported the NPRM without 
change.
    The FAA also received comments from Air Canada, American Airlines 
(American), FedEx, the Citizens Rulemaking Alliance, and United 
Airlines (United). The following presents those comments and the FAA's 
response.

Request To Delay Issuance of the AD

    United requested that the FAA either delay issuance of the proposed 
AD until related ADs for the Boeing Model 757 and Model 767 airplanes 
are ready for publication or assist Boeing with expediting the release 
of the applicable service bulletins for those airplane models, which 
United said were scheduled to be released in the second quarter of 
2026. United stated it operates Boeing Model 757, 767, and 777 
airplanes that all utilize ACMP P/N 731966, and that the new ACMP P/N 
3033115-100 is currently applicable only to the Model 767 and Model 777 
airplanes, while the Model 757 airplanes are limited to ACMP P/N 
731966. United Airlines stated this could create an internal compliance 
challenge due to the inability to fully transition away from ACMP P/N 
731966 since that part is required for the Model 757 airplanes.
    The FAA acknowledges the commenter's concern but disagrees with the 
request. The FAA has determined that it is necessary to prohibit 
installation of any affected part on any Model 777 airplane as of the 
effective date of this AD, and that delaying issuance of this AD would 
allow affected parts installed on affected airplanes before the 
effective date of this AD to remain on those airplanes longer, which 
could affect the safety of the affected fleet. Further, the FAA does 
not consider it appropriate to delay issuance while awaiting new 
service information for other airplane models that are not applicable 
to this AD. However, Boeing recently released the service bulletins for 
the Model 757 and Model 767, including the Model 747, airplanes in 
March 2026 allowing operators to bring their entire fleet into 
compliance. The FAA may issue additional rulemaking mandating these 
service bulletins. The FAA did not change this AD as a result of this 
comment.

Request To Add Grace Period for Part Installation Prohibition

    American requested that the FAA revise paragraph (i) of the 
proposed AD to include a 6-month grace period before the parts 
installation prohibition becomes effective. American stated that a 6-
month grace period, representing approximately 10 percent of the total 
compliance time, would allow operators to obtain sufficient inventory 
of upgraded ACMPs to support airplane operational requirements and 
reduce the risk of part shortages in the event of in-service failures. 
American also noted that Boeing Fleet Team Digest (FTD) 777 FTD-29-
21001, referenced in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-29A0047, dated 
September 11, 2025, incorporates steps into the aircraft maintenance 
manual requiring an ELCU installation test at all locations where an 
ELCU is removed or installed, which would validate the integrity and 
safe operation of the ELCU providing power to ACMP P/N 731966.
    The FAA acknowledges American's concern but disagrees with the 
request. ACMP P/N 731966 can be modified to the new acceptable ACMP 
configuration in accordance with the Eaton Aerospace service 
information referenced in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 777-
29A0047 RB, dated September 11, 2025. Therefore, the FAA has determined 
that sufficient parts should be available to support compliance with 
the requirements of this AD. In addition, including a grace period 
increases the possibility that an affected part could be installed on 
an airplane after the effective date of this AD. The FAA did not change 
this AD as a result of this comment.

Request To Use an Alternative Part Number

    FedEx requested that the FAA revise paragraph (h)(2) of the 
proposed AD to include ACMP P/N 66133-04 as an

[[Page 61129]]

acceptable replacement part for P/N 3033115-100. FedEx stated that the 
Boeing 777 illustrated parts catalog (IPC) identifies multiple ACMP 
part numbers as eligible for installation, including P/N 66133-04, 
which is an earlier version of P/N 66133-06. FedEx noted P/N 66133-04 
has been installed on several of its affected airplanes because the IPC 
shows it is an eligible alternative.
    The FAA disagrees with the request. Although ACMP P/N 66133-04 is 
not subject to the identified unsafe condition, the FAA has determined 
that installation of that part is not acceptable for compliance with 
this AD. In a separate investigation that was not determined to be a 
safety issue, P/N 66133-04 was found not to comply with certain 
certification requirements. P/N 66133-06 is the redesigned ACMP that 
complies with those certification requirements. Boeing has informed the 
FAA that references to the interchangeability of P/N 3033115-100 with 
P/N 66133-04 will be removed from future revisions of the IPC. Although 
the FAA has not mandated the removal of, or prohibited the installation 
of, P/N 66133-04, it is not appropriate to specify that part as an 
acceptable replacement for compliance with this AD. The FAA did not 
change this AD as a result of this comment.

Request To Revise the Applicability of the Parts Installation 
Prohibition

    FedEx requested that the FAA revise paragraph (i) of the proposed 
AD to state that ACMP P/N 731966 may not be installed on any ``Boeing 
Model 777 series'' airplane, instead of ``any airplane.'' FedEx stated 
the phrase ``on any airplane'' could be interpreted as prohibiting the 
installation of P/N 731966 on all airplane models. FedEx noted there 
are currently 433 ACMPs having P/N 731966 installed on its fleet of 
Boeing Model 757 and Model 767 airplanes, and it does not have 
sufficient spare P/N 3033115-100 or approved alternatives available for 
replacement on those airplanes.
    The FAA disagrees with the request. No change is necessary because 
the requirements of this AD, including the parts prohibition in 
paragraph (i), apply only to the airplanes identified in paragraph (c) 
of this AD.

Request To Clarify Compliance Time for the Parts Installation 
Prohibition

    Air Canada requested clarification as to whether paragraph (i) of 
the proposed AD would require replacement of an already installed ACMP 
having P/N 731966 as of the effective date of the AD, or whether the 
prohibition would apply only to new installations occurring after the 
effective date. As an example, the commenter asked whether a 
serviceable P/N 731966 may be installed on an airplane if there is a 
maintenance emergency that requires replacement of an ACMP after the AD 
is effective but before the 60-month compliance time required by the 
AD.
    The FAA provides the following response. If an ACMP having P/N 
731966 has been installed on an airplane identified in paragraph (c) of 
this AD before the effective date of this AD, it must be replaced 
within 60 months after the effective date of this AD. However, any ACMP 
installed on any airplane after the effective date of this AD must be 
an acceptable part number. In the commenter's example, a serviceable P/
N 731966 may not be installed on the airplane.

Request To Justify Forgoing Notice and Comment or Issue an NPRM

    The Citizens Rulemaking Alliance requested that the FAA either 
provide its justification for finding good cause to bypass notice and 
comment procedures, or convert this action to an NPRM with a 30- to 60-
day comment and delay the effective date for airplanes not at immediate 
risk. The commenter asserted the FAA has not adequately justified use 
of the good cause exemption to bypass notice and comment and the 30-day 
delayed effective date.
    The FAA notes the comment was submitted in response to an NPRM for 
which the FAA provided a 45-day comment period. This final rule is 
effective 35 days after its publication in the Federal Register. 
Therefore, no change to this AD is necessary.

Request To Make Incorporation by Reference (IBR) Materials Reasonably 
Available

    The Citizens Rulemaking Alliance requested that the FAA make IBR 
material available and free to the public during the comment period and 
add the IBR materials to the AD docket.
    In the preamble of the NPRM, the FAA notified the public that the 
IBR material would be available for review under Docket No. FAA-2025-
3997 at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>. This material was posted to the AD docket on 
November 17, 2025. Therefore, no change to this AD is necessary.

Request To Comply With the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    The Citizens Rulemaking Alliance requested that the FAA revise the 
AD to confirm that the AD complies with the PRA. If the AD does not 
comply with the PRA, the commenter requested that the FAA remove or 
stay any reporting requirements until the AD complies with the PRA.
    The FAA notes this AD does not require reporting. If an AD were to 
require reporting, the preamble of the AD would include a paragraph 
titled ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' that would provide the applicable 
OMB control number, required PRA statements, and the estimated time to 
collect the required information (burden). Any costs associated with 
the reporting requirement would be included in the Costs of Compliance 
section in the preamble of the AD. Therefore, the FAA did not change 
this AD as a result of this comment.

Request To Consider Impact on Small Entities

    The Citizens Rulemaking Alliance requested that the FAA either 
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis, or provide the 
factual basis for its conclusion that the AD will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    The FAA has considered the AD's impact on small businesses and 
provides the following factual basis for its RFA certification.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 
1164 (5 U.S.C. 601-612), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory 
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857, Mar. 
29, 1996) and the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-240, 124 
Stat. 2504, Sept. 27, 2010), requires Federal agencies to consider the 
effects of the regulatory action on small business and other small 
entities and to minimize any significant economic impact. The term 
``small entities'' comprises small businesses and not-for-profit 
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not 
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with 
populations of less than 50,000.

Need for and Objectives of the Rule

    The FAA is adopting a new AD for all The Boeing Company Model 777-
200, -200LR, -300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes. This AD was 
prompted by a report of an overheated ACMP that caused a fire in the 
MLG wheel well. This AD requires a records check or inspection for any 
installed ACMP with a certain part number and applicable on-condition 
actions. This AD also prohibits the installation of affected parts. The 
FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these 
products.

[[Page 61130]]

Small Entities to Which the Rule Will Apply

    The FAA used the definition of small entities in the RFA for this 
analysis. The RFA defines small entities as small businesses, small 
governmental jurisdictions, or small organizations. In 5 U.S.C. 601(3), 
the RFA defines ``small business'' to have the same meaning as ``small 
business concern'' under section 3 of the Small Business Act. The Small 
Business Act authorizes the Small Business Administration (SBA) to 
define ``small business'' by issuing regulations.
    The SBA (2023) has established size standards for various types of 
economic activities, or industries, under the North American Industry 
Classification System (NAICS). These size standards generally define 
small businesses based on the number of employees or annual receipts. 
The following table shows the SBA size standards for all industries 
with at least one (1) impacted entity.\1\ Note that the SBA definition 
of a small business applies to the parent company and all affiliates as 
a single entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The FAA does not have entity data, or the entity was 
identified as a foreign business on 17 of the 290 affected 
airplanes. Those airplanes are excluded from this analysis.

                     Small Business Size Standards *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      NAICS code           NAICS description            Threshold
------------------------------------------------------------------------
336411................  Aircraft Manufacturing  1,500 employees.
336413................  Other Aircraft Part     1,500 employees.
                         and Auxiliary
                         Equipment
                         Manufacturing.
481111................  Scheduled Passenger     1,500 employees.
                         Air Transportation.
481112................  Scheduled Freight Air   1,500 employees.
                         Transportation.
481211................  Nonscheduled Chartered  1,500 employees.
                         Passenger Air
                         Transportation.
481219................  Other Nonscheduled Air  1,500 employees.
                         Transportation.
532411................  Commercial Air, Rail,   $40,000,000.
                         and Water
                         Transportation
                         Equipment Rental and
                         Leasing.
541614................  Process, Physical       $20,000,000.
                         Distribution and
                         Logistics Consulting
                         Services.
927110................  Federal Agency........  50,000 employees.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Source: SBA (2023).

    To identify small entities, the FAA first identified the primary 
NAICS of the entity or parent company, and then used data from 
different sources (e.g., company annual reports, Bureau of 
Transportation Statistics) to determine whether the entity meets the 
applicable size standard. The following table provides a summary of the 
results.

                                       Estimated Number of Small Entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Small                    Percent
          NAICS code                 NAICS description         Number of     business     Effected      small
                                                                entities     entities     aircraft     entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
336411.......................  Aircraft Manufacturing.......            1            0            0         0.00
336413.......................  Other Aircraft Part and                  1            1           34       100.00
                                Auxiliary Equipment
                                Manufacturing.
481111.......................  Scheduled Passenger Air                  5            1            2        20.00
                                Transportation.
481112.......................  Scheduled Freight Air                    4            0            0         0.00
                                Transportation.
481219.......................  Other Nonscheduled Air                   2            0            0         0.00
                                Transportation.
532411.......................  Commercial Air, Rail, and                7            2           16        28.57
                                Water Transportation
                                Equipment Rental and Leasing.
541614.......................  Process, Physical                        1            1            1       100.00
                                Distribution and Logistics
                                Consulting Services.
927110.......................  Federal Agency...............            1            0            0         0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance Requirements

    The FAA estimates affected entities will incur an inspection cost 
of $170 per airplane. Based upon the results of the inspection, 
operators could incur replacement costs of $77,099. If an operator were 
to incur all inspection and replacement costs, the FAA estimates each 
operator would incur $77,269 per airplane. The FAA analyzes the cost of 
inspection costs as the low case for each small entity. The high case 
includes both inspection and replacement costs for each small entity. 
The following table displays the small entity case burdens percentage 
for compliance based on annual revenue for each operator and their 
associated NAICS industry.

                      Number of Small Entities Affected by Industry and Cost Significance *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Number of
    NAICS code **           Description        affected small   Number of      Annual      Low cost    High cost
                                                  entities       aircraft      revenue        (%)         (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
336413...............  Other Aircraft Part                  1           34   $56,000,000        0.01        4.69
                        and Auxiliary
                        Equipment
                        Manufacturing.
481111...............  Scheduled Passenger                  1            2     7,470,000        0.00        2.07
                        Air Transportation.
532411...............  Commercial Air, Rail,                1            1    26,040,000        0.00        0.30
                        and Water
                        Transportation
                        Equipment Rental and
                        Leasing.
532411...............  Commercial Air, Rail,                1           15    12,200,000        0.02        9.50
                        and Water
                        Transportation
                        Equipment Rental and
                        Leasing.

[[Page 61131]]

 
541614...............  Process, Physical                    1            1     4,800,000        0.00        1.61
                        Distribution and
                        Logistics Consulting
                        Services.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Sources: SBA (2023); Dun & Bradstreet. D&B Hoovers. Retrieved April 28, 2024. <a href="http://app.hoovers.dnb.com">app.hoovers.dnb.com</a>.; ZoomInfo.
  ZoomInfo Technologie Inc. Retrieved April 28, 2024. <a href="http://zoominfo.com">zoominfo.com</a>.
** Note: NAICS codes with only one entity would be the number of aircraft. Average aircraft affected are
  rounded.

Significant Alternatives Considered

    The FAA is adopting a new AD for all The Boeing Company Model 777-
200, -200LR, -300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes. This AD was 
prompted by a report of an overheated ACMP that caused a fire in the 
MLG wheel well. This AD requires a records check or inspection for any 
installed ACMP with a certain part number and applicable on-condition 
actions. This AD also prohibits the installation of affected parts. No 
alternatives were considered as the FAA is issuing this AD to address 
the unsafe condition on these products.

Request To Provide Additional Cost Information

    The Citizens Rulemaking Alliance requested that the FAA add to the 
docket the economic analysis underlying the FAA's determination that 
the AD is not significant under Executive Order 12866 and not 
applicable to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. The commenter stated 
the cost analysis should include the number of affected U.S.-registered 
airplanes, labor hour assumptions, parts costs, expected airplane 
downtime, and aggregate costs.
    In the Costs of Compliance section of the proposed AD, the FAA 
disclosed the number of affected airplanes on the U.S. registry, 
estimated number of work hours and parts costs provided by the 
manufacturer, and the aggregate costs. Additionally, the FAA considered 
the impact that this AD will have on affected operators and determined 
this AD will not trigger any downtime costs because the requirements of 
this AD can be performed during regularly scheduled maintenance.
    Further, the FAA has determined that the current labor rate of $85 
per hour remains accurate for this AD. The FAA evaluates this rate 
periodically, based on U.S. Department of Labor Statistic (BLS) data 
found at <a href="https://data.bls.gov/oes">https://data.bls.gov/oes</a>, and will change the rate when 
appropriate. The FAA used a blended wage rate to estimate the labor 
rate for this AD, where the FAA assumes 60 percent weight for aircraft 
mechanics (at a fully burdened mean wage rate of $69.85 per hour) and 
40 percent for general and operations managers (at a fully burdened 
mean wage rate of $108.15 per hour). To calculate the blended wage 
rate, the FAA multiplied each wage rate by its corresponding weight and 
added up the products to obtain a wage rate of $85.17, which the FAA 
rounded down to $85.
    Since the FAA has assessed and disclosed all known costs of the AD 
requirements in the Costs of Compliance section of the proposed AD, and 
the commenter did not provide additional cost data for the FAA to 
consider in its cost analysis, the FAA determined that the existing 
analysis is complete. Based upon the analysis provided throughout the 
proposed AD and in the previous comment response, the FAA certifies 
that this AD is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866. The FAA did not change this AD as a result of this 
comment.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments 
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as 
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe 
condition on these products. Except for minor editorial changes, this 
AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM.

Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 777-29A0047 RB, 
dated September 11, 2025. This material specifies procedures for a 
records check or inspection for any installed ACMP with P/N 731966 and 
applicable on-condition actions. On-condition actions include replacing 
any ACMP P/N 731966 with ACMP P/N 3033115-100 or later approved ACMP 
part number at affected locations. This material is reasonably 
available because the interested parties have access to it through 
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the 
ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 334 airplanes of U.S. 
registry, and that the inspection/records review is required for 290 of 
those airplanes. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with 
this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection/Records review..........  2 work-hours x $85 per hour              $0            $170         $49,300
                                      = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary 
replacements that would be required based on the results of the 
inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of aircraft 
that might need this replacement:

[[Page 61132]]



                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Action                        Labor cost                  Parts cost            Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement.....................  5 work-hours x $85 per hour   Up to $76,674..........  Up to $77,099.
                                   = $425.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. 
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of 
this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact 
on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866, and
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive:

2026-19-04 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-23471; Docket No. FAA-
2025-3997; Project Identifier AD-2025-01471-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective November 2, 2026.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, 
-300, -300ER, and 777F series airplanes, certificated in any 
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29, Hydraulic 
Power.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of an overheated alternating 
current motor pump (ACMP) that caused a fire in the main landing 
gear (MLG) wheel well. A subsequent investigation found that the 
cause of the fire was an overheated ACMP. Further investigation 
found that a lock washer and nut were missing from a moving contact 
in the related electrical load control unit (ELCU). The FAA is 
issuing this AD to address a single failure of the ELCU in the ACMP. 
The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in the ACMP 
overheating and igniting a fire in the wheel well and consequent 
damage to the airplane, loss of continued safe flight and landing 
and/or personnel injury.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the 
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing 
Alert Requirements Bulletin 777-29A0047 RB, dated September 11, 
2025, do all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance 
with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements 
Bulletin 777-29A0047 RB, dated September 11, 2025.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g): Guidance for accomplishing the actions 
required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
777-29A0047, dated September 11, 2025, which is referred to in 
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 777-29A0047 RB, dated September 
11, 2025.

(h) Exceptions to Requirements Bulletin Specifications

    (1) Where the Compliance Time column of the table in the 
``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 777-
29A0047 RB, dated September 11, 2025, refer to the original issue 
date of Requirements Bulletin 777-29A0047 RB, this AD requires using 
the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 777-29A0047 RB, 
dated September 11, 2025, refers to part number 3033115-100 as a 
replacement part, for this AD, part numbers 66133-06 or 66068-08 are 
also acceptable replacement parts.

(i) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install any 
ACMP, having part number 731966, on any airplane.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, AIR-520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or 
responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the Continued Operational 
Safety Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in 
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eaaba7a5a9aa8c8b8bc48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a5b5755595a7c7b7b347d756c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your 
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, 
the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation 
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, AIR-
520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, to make those 
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, 
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the 
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(k) Additional Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Joshua Baek, 
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 
98198; phone: 562-627-6725; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#03696c706b76622d7a2d61626668436562622d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c66637f64796d2275226e6d69674c6a6d6d226b637a">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 61133]]

    (2) Material identified in this AD that is not incorporated by 
reference is available at the address specified in paragraph (l)(3) 
this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference of the material listed in this paragraph 
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions 
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 777-29A0047 RB, dated 
September 11, 2025.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For Boeing material identified in this AD, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; 
telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., 
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material 
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability 
of this material at NARA, visit <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations">www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations</a> or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#573125793e3924273234233e3839173936253679303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c5a4e1255524f4c595f485553527c525d4e5d125b534a">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

    Issued on September 16, 2026.
Brian Knaup,
Acting Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2026-19751 Filed 9-25-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 28, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.