Skip to main content
Notice2026-19726

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change by the Options Clearing Corporation Concerning Amendments to Its Rules To Establish a Procedures-Based Approach for Determining Product Eligibility During Overnight or Extended Trading Sessions Utilizing Its Current ETH Risk Management Framework

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 28, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 186 (Monday, September 28, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 186 (Monday, September 28, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61257-61260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-19726]



[[Page 61257]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-106469; File No. SR-OCC-2026-008]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; 
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change by the Options Clearing 
Corporation Concerning Amendments to Its Rules To Establish a 
Procedures-Based Approach for Determining Product Eligibility During 
Overnight or Extended Trading Sessions Utilizing Its Current ETH Risk 
Management Framework

September 23, 2026.

I. Introduction

    On July 30, 2026, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange 
Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
establish a procedures-based approach for determining product 
eligibility during overnight or extended trading sessions (hereinafter, 
the ``Proposed Rule Change'').\3\ The Proposed Rule Change was 
published for public comment in the Federal Register on August 17, 
2026.\4\ The Commission has not received public comment regarding. For 
the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the Proposed 
Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Notice infra note 4, 91 FR 53294.
    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 106080 (Aug. 12, 2026), 91 FR 
53294 (Aug. 17, 2026) (File No. SR-OCC-2026-008) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Background

    OCC is a central counterparty (``CCP''), which means that, as part 
of its function as a clearing agency, it interposes itself as the buyer 
to every seller and the seller to every buyer for financial 
transactions. As the CCP for the listed options markets in the United 
States,\5\ as well as for certain futures and stock loans, OCC is 
exposed to various risks arising from providing clearance and 
settlement services to its Clearing Members.\6\ OCC's risk management 
framework is designed to accommodate the specific products and trading 
hours its participant exchanges support. Expanded trading into new 
extended or overnight sessions would rely on OCC's core clearing and 
risk management functions. This proposed rule change would establish a 
procedures-based framework enabling OCC to determine whether products 
proposed for trading outside of regular trading hours can be 
appropriately risk-managed under its existing Extended Trading Hours 
framework for managing risk outside of regular trading hours 
(``Extended Trading Hours'' or ``ETH'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ OCC describes itself as ``the sole clearing agency for 
standardized equity options listed on a national securities exchange 
registered with the Commission (`listed options').'' See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 96533 (Dec. 19, 2022), 87 FR 79015 (Dec. 
23, 2022) (File No. SR-OCC-2022-012).
    \6\ Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the 
meanings specified in OCC's Rules and By-Laws, available at <a href="https://www.theocc.com/company-information/documents-and-archives/by-laws-and-rules">https://www.theocc.com/company-information/documents-and-archives/by-laws-and-rules</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the only products that OCC clears during Extended 
Trading Hours are index options listed by Cboe Global Markets, Inc. 
(``Cboe'') and index futures listed by Cboe Futures Exchange, LLC 
(``CFE'').\7\ OCC first established its ETH risk management framework 
in 2015 in connection with the clearance of these products.\8\ OCC has 
received requests from Exchanges to expand the scope of products and 
trading sessions supported under its ETH framework.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Exchange Act Release No. 74241 (Feb. 10, 2015), 80 FR 
8383 (Feb. 17, 2015) (File No. SR-OCC-2014-812) (Notice of No 
Objection to Advance Notice concerning Extended and Overnight 
Trading Sessions).
    \8\ See Exchange Act Release No. 74268 (Feb. 12, 2015), 80 FR 
8917 (Feb. 19, 2015) (File No. SR-OCC-2014-24) (Order approving 
Proposed Rule Change concerning Extended and Overnight Trading 
Sessions, establishing the framework now being expanded).
    \9\ See Notice, 91 FR 53295.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rather than filing a separate proposed rule change with the 
Commission each time an Exchange seeks to expand ETH products or 
trading sessions, OCC proposes to amend its Rules and its Extended 
Trading Hours Set-Up and Monitoring Procedure (the ``ETH Procedure'') 
to establish a procedures-based framework governing OCC's determination 
of product eligibility for trading outside of regular trading hours. As 
discussed below, OCC believes its existing ETH risk management 
framework is sufficient to accommodate the currently proposed 
expansion,\10\ and OCC believes the procedures-based framework will 
similarly permit it to evaluate future Exchange requests without the 
need for a rule filing addressed to each individual product or 
session.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Notice, 91 FR 53294.
    \11\ See Notice, 91 FR 53302.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Proposed Rule 402

    OCC proposes to amend its Rule 402, which is currently reserved, to 
establish OCC's authority over the treatment of products traded outside 
of regular trading hours. As proposed, Rule 402 would provide that 
products executed on an Exchange outside of regular trading hours, as 
determined by OCC, will be subject to OCC's established ETH risk 
management procedures.\12\ Under Proposed Rule 402 OCC determines 
whether a given trading session constitutes ``regular trading hours'' 
or ``extended trading hours'' for purposes of OCC's operations and risk 
management.\13\ OCC states that this determination is necessary because 
Exchange classifications of trading sessions are not always 
determinative of the operational and risk management considerations 
relevant to OCC.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Notice, 91 FR 53299.
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ See Notice, 91 FR 53300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 402 further provides that OCC will determine whether 
the risk presented by a product that an Exchange proposes to trade 
during extended trading hours may be managed under OCC's existing ETH 
procedures.\15\ Finally, proposed Rule 402 provides that, to the extent 
OCC determines that an Exchange's proposal would require changes to 
OCC's existing ETH procedures, any such changes will be made in a 
manner consistent with (i) OCC's regulatory obligations, including its 
obligation to file proposed rule changes with the Commission pursuant 
to Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, and 
(ii) OCC's agreements with the Exchanges, including the Participant 
Exchange Agreement or any comparable agreement entered into with a 
futures market pursuant to Article XII, Section 1 of OCC's By-Laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Proposed Amendment to Rule 307B

    OCC also proposes to amend Rule 307B, which sets forth the 
restrictions that may be imposed on a Clearing Member's transactions, 
positions, and activities in circumstances warranting protective 
measures. As amended, Rule 307B(a) would add a new paragraph 5 
expressly authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating 
Officer, or a Designated Officer of OCC to revoke a Clearing Member's 
authorization to participate in extended trading hours where such 
officer deems it necessary or appropriate under the circumstances. OCC 
believes that adding an express reference to the revocation of ETH 
authorization will eliminate interpretive ambiguity regarding the scope 
of OCC's authority in this context. Any revocation of ETH authorization 
under new Rule 307B(a)(5) would remain subject to the existing 
procedural protections set forth

[[Page 61258]]

in Rule 307B(b) and (c), including the affected Clearing Member's right 
to request review by OCC's Risk Committee, to receive advance notice of 
any hearing, to be heard and present evidence, and to be represented by 
counsel.

C. Proposed Changes to the ETH Procedure

    OCC also proposes to revise its internal ETH Procedure and to adopt 
the procedure as a rule governing OCC's management of trading outside 
of regular trading hours.\16\ With regard to monitoring outside of 
regular trading hours, OCC proposes revising the ETH Procedure to 
clarify that ETH credit risk monitoring and Clearing Member eligibility 
validation will occur throughout the same monitoring window. Such 
monitoring would occur over the full duration of any ETH session, 
continuing without interruption until the start of regular trading 
hours at 8:30 a.m. Central Time. OCC states that this revision is 
intended to make OCC's monitoring extend to cover the proposed early 
morning ETH session, from 6:30 a.m. to 8:25 a.m. Central Time.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ OCC established the ETH Procedure in its current form in 
2015. As described herein, OCC proposes several substantive and 
organizational changes to the ETH Procedure.
    \17\ See Notice, 91 FR 53301.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC proposes to publish the ETH Procedure, together with a list of 
ETH-eligible products and their associated clearing sessions, on OCC's 
public website, and to issue an Information Memorandum whenever the ETH 
Procedure is amended or the list of eligible products is revised.\18\ 
OCC also proposes to remove certain header information from the ETH 
Procedure identifying the procedure owner, version number, and revision 
history, on the basis that such information does not constitute a rule 
and will continue to be maintained in OCC's internal policy governance 
system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Notice, 91 FR 53301.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC proposes revising the process by which Clearing Members are 
approved to participate in ETH sessions. Under the proposed procedure a 
Clearing Member's participation must be approved by an Executive 
Director or above within Financial Risk Management (``FRM''). Market 
Risk will assess a Clearing Member's suitability for ETH participation 
based on the Clearing Member's financial condition, operational 
readiness, and risk profile, and will present its recommendation to the 
FRM officer, whose approval or denial will be documented via email.\19\ 
OCC proposes to clarify that, when an Exchange proposes a new product 
or trading session for ETH clearing, the proposal will be evaluated 
pursuant to OCC's existing New Product Procedure, taking into account 
operational, financial risk, regulatory, and trading-session-
designation factors applicable to new products generally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Notice, 91 FR 53301.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC proposes adding provisions to the ETH Procedure clarifying that 
not all credit risk monitoring alerts generated during ETH sessions 
reflect losses attributable to ETH trading activity. Under the revised 
procedure, Core Clearing or Market Operations will review trade logs to 
confirm whether a given exceedance resulted from actual ETH trade 
activity, as distinguished from non-trade-related causes such as 
position transfers, erroneous file submissions, or price smoothing 
calculations. Exceedances confirmed to result from non-trade activity 
will be documented in the ETH Turnover Log as false positives and will 
not require further escalation.
    OCC also proposes certain non-substantive, conforming, and 
administrative changes to the ETH Procedure, including updated 
departmental references and organizational titles, and grammatical 
corrections.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Exchange Act requires the Commission to 
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it 
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements 
of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable 
to the organization.\20\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice, the 
``burden to demonstrate that a proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations issued thereunder . . . 
is on the self-regulatory organization [`SRO'] that proposed the rule 
change.'' \21\ The description of a proposed rule change, its purpose 
and operation, its effect, and a legal analysis of its consistency with 
applicable requirements must all be sufficiently detailed and specific 
to support an affirmative Commission finding,\22\ and any failure of an 
SRO to provide this information may result in the Commission not having 
a sufficient basis to make an affirmative finding that a proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Exchange Act and the applicable rules and 
regulations.\23\ Moreover, ``unquestioning reliance'' on an SRO's 
representations in a proposed rule change is not sufficient to justify 
Commission approval of a proposed rule change.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \21\ Rule 700(b)(3), Commission Rules of Practice, 17 CFR 
201.700(b)(3).
    \22\ Id.
    \23\ Id.
    \24\ Susquehanna Int'l Group, LLP v. Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 866 F.3d 442, 447 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After carefully considering the Proposed Rule Change, the 
Commission finds that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent with the 
requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder applicable to OCC. More specifically, the Commission finds 
that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 
of the Exchange Act \25\ and Rules 17ad-22(e)(1) and (21) thereunder, 
as described in detail below.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(1) and (21)(ii) and (iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Consistency With 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act

    Under Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act, OCC's rules, among 
other things, must be designed to promote the prompt and accurate 
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent 
applicable, derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions.\27\ 
Based on a review of the record, and for the reasons discussed below, 
the Proposed Rule Change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the Proposed Rule Change would establish a 
procedures-based framework governing OCC's evaluation of products and 
trading sessions proposed by Exchanges for clearance outside of regular 
trading hours. This framework is designed to promote the prompt and 
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and 
derivatives contracts by ensuring that OCC's risk management framework 
remains appropriately calibrated as ETH clearing activity expands.
    Proposed Rule 402 would establish OCC's authority to determine 
``regular trading hours'' and ''extended trading hours,''. This 
authority promotes the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of 
transactions because it enables OCC to apply consistent operational and 
risk management standards based on the actual characteristics of a 
trading session rather than relying on an Exchange's own 
classification, which could vary by Exchange for cross-listed products.
    The proposed amendment to Rule 307B authorizes OCC to revoke a

[[Page 61259]]

Clearing Member's ETH participation authorization where OCC's Chief 
Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, or a Designated Officer 
deems it necessary or appropriate. This change promotes the prompt and 
accurate clearance and settlement of transactions by ensuring that OCC 
retains a clear and unambiguous mechanism to limit or terminate a 
Clearing Member's participation in ETH sessions where circumstances 
warrant protective action. This authority is subject to the procedural 
protections including the affected Clearing Member's right to request 
review by OCC's Risk Committee, advance notice of any hearing, the 
opportunity to be heard and present evidence, and the right to be 
represented by counsel. These protections appropriately balance OCC's 
need to act promptly to address risks arising from ETH participation 
against the interests of affected Clearing Members.
    With respect to the proposed changes to the ETH Procedure, the 
proposed extension of continuous credit risk monitoring and Clearing 
Member eligibility validation through the start of regular trading is 
designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of 
transactions by ensuring that OCC's risk monitoring capabilities extend 
to cover the full duration of ETH trading activity without 
interruption. Further, the proposed approval process for Clearing 
Member ETH participation, under which Market Risk assesses a Clearing 
Member's financial condition, operational readiness, and risk profile 
and presents a recommendation to an Executive Director or above within 
Financial Risk Management, is reasonably designed to ensure that only 
Clearing Members with adequate risk management and operational 
capabilities participate in ETH sessions, thereby supporting the prompt 
and accurate clearance and settlement of transactions executed during 
such sessions.
    The proposed provisions clarifying the treatment of new products or 
trading sessions proposed by Exchanges for ETH clearing are designed to 
promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of 
transactions by ensuring that OCC applies a consistent and 
comprehensive risk evaluation process to new ETH products, comparable 
to the process OCC applies to new products generally.
    Finally, the proposed provisions addressing the review and 
documentation of credit risk monitoring alerts generated during ETH 
sessions are designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and 
settlement of transactions. By enabling OCC to distinguish alerts 
attributable to actual ETH trading activity from those resulting from 
other causes, this provision should allow OCC to focus its risk 
management resources on responding to genuine indicia of risk arising 
from ETH trading, thereby supporting the prompt and accurate clearance 
and settlement of transactions cleared during ETH sessions. 
Accordingly, and for the reasons stated above, the Proposed Rule Change 
promotes the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities 
transactions.

B. Consistency With Rule 17ad-22(e)(1)

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(1) under the Exchange Act requires, in part, that 
OCC establish, implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and 
procedures reasonably designed to, as applicable, provide for a well-
founded, clear, transparent, and enforceable legal basis for each 
aspect of its activities in all relevant jurisdictions.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 402 would provide OCC with express rule-based 
authority to determine which trading sessions constitute ``regular 
trading hours'' or ``extended trading hours'' for purposes of OCC's 
clearance and risk management functions, and to determine whether the 
risk presented by a product proposed for trading during extended 
trading hours may be accommodated under OCC's existing ETH risk 
management framework. By establishing this authority directly in OCC's 
Rules, rather than relying on informal practice, the proposed rule 
change would provide market participants with clear and transparent 
notice of the legal basis for OCC's determinations regarding ETH-
eligible products and sessions.
    Adopting the revised ETH Procedure as a rule enhances the 
transparency and enforceability of the legal framework governing OCC's 
ETH risk management activities. The revised ETH Procedure governs 
material aspects of OCC's risk management of ETH clearing activity, and 
any future amendments to the procedure will be subject to the 
requirements of Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act \29\ and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder.\30\ This change would provide Clearing Members and other 
market participants with clear notice of such changes and further 
support the legal basis for the scope of, and requirements applicable 
to, OCC's ETH risk management framework. Accordingly, the proposed 
changes are consistent with Rule 17ad-22(e)(2)(i).\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \30\ 17 CFR 240.19(b).
    \31\ 17 CFR 240.17ad22(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Consistency With Rule 17ad-22(e)(21)

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(21) requires that OCC establish, implement, 
maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably 
designed to be efficient and effective in meeting the requirements of 
its participants and the markets it serves, and have the covered 
clearing agency's management regularly review the efficiency and 
effectiveness of its operating structure, including risk management 
policies, procedures, and systems and scope of products cleared or 
settled.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(21)(ii) and (iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed procedures-based framework would allow OCC to evaluate 
future Exchange requests to expand ETH-eligible products and sessions 
under its existing risk management infrastructure, without requiring a 
separate rule filing for each request, thereby providing OCC with a 
scalable process for managing its operating structure, including its 
management of risks associated with anticipated growth in ETH trading 
activity. This would also allow OCC to operate more efficiently and 
review its product scope without having to file rule filing for each 
request.
    The proposed revisions to the ETH Procedure are also designed to 
efficiently and effectively review the effectiveness of its risk-
management policies. The proposed extension of continuous credit risk 
monitoring and Clearing Member eligibility validation through the start 
of regular trading hours would ensure that OCC's monitoring controls 
appropriately cover the proposed early morning ETH session. The 
proposed process for reviewing credit risk monitoring exceedances would 
help ensure that OCC's operational resources are directed toward 
exceedances presenting genuine risk. Finally, the proposed 
formalization of the Clearing Member ETH approval process, requiring 
review by Market Risk and approval by an Executive Director or above 
within Financial Risk Management, would support risk management 
policies through consistent controls over Clearing Member eligibility 
for ETH participation. Accordingly, the proposed changes are consistent 
with Rule 17ad-22(e)(21) under the Exchange Act.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(21)(ii) and (iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
Proposed

[[Page 61260]]

Rule Change is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act, 
and in particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act,\34\ and 
Rules 17ad-22(e)(1) and (21), thereunder.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \35\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(1) and (21)(ii) and (iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Exchange Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-OCC-2026-008) be, and 
hereby is, approved.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission 
considered the proposal's impacts on efficiency, competition, and 
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-19726 Filed 9-25-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 28, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.