Skip to main content
Rule2026-19403

Amendment to the Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 23, 2026
Effective
September 23, 2026

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Abstract

This action amends the uniform procedures implementing the State Highway Safety Grant Program to waive, for fiscal year (FY) 2027, the requirement that targets for the common performance measures be identical to targets in the Federal Highway Administration State Highway Safety Improvement Program.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60300-60303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-19403]



[[Page 60300]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

23 CFR Part 1300

RIN 2127-AN12


Amendment to the Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety 
Grant Programs

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the uniform procedures implementing the 
State Highway Safety Grant Program to waive, for fiscal year (FY) 2027, 
the requirement that targets for the common performance measures be 
identical to targets in the Federal Highway Administration State 
Highway Safety Improvement Program.

DATES: This final rule is effective on September 23, 2026.

ADDRESSES: This document may be viewed online through the Federal 
eRulemaking portal at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> using the RIN number listed 
above. Electronic retrieval help and guidelines are available on the 
website. An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded by 
accessing the Office of the Federal Register's website at: 
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov">www.federalregister.gov</a> and the U.S. Government Publishing Office's 
website at: <a href="http://www.GovInfo.gov">www.GovInfo.gov</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Program issues: Barbara Sauers, Associate Administrator, Regional 
Operations and Program Delivery, National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c5e5d4e5e5d4e5d124f5d49594e4f7c585348125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b191a09191a091a55081a0e1e09083b1f140f551c140d">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    Legal issues: Megan Brown, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief 
Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#462b232127286824342931280622293268212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="325f5755535c1c50405d455c72565d461c555d44">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Waiver of Identical Targets for Common Performance Measures
III. Waiver of Notice and Comment
IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices

I. Background

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) State 
Highway Safety Grant Program has used a performance-based planning 
process for many years. Initially, some States used performance 
measures as part of program planning on a voluntary basis. In 2012, 
Congress mandated the use of performance measures for all States.\1\ 
The statute authorizing NHTSA's State Highway Safety Grant Program 
currently requires States to submit performance measures in the 
triennial Highway Safety Plan (HSP). 23 U.S.C. 402(k)(4)(A). NHTSA's 
regulation governing the grant program requires that the targets for 
three of the required performance measures--total fatalities, rate of 
fatalities, and total serious injuries--be identical to the targets 
that States report to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in the 
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) annual report. See 23 CFR 
1300.11(b)(3)(ii)(C). In 2021, the ``Infrastructure Investment and Jobs 
Act'' (IIJA) \2\ amended the performance measure provisions to require 
that all performance targets submitted to NHTSA in the triennial HSP 
demonstrate constant or improved performance. 23 U.S.C. 
402(k)(4)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, Public 
Law 112-141, 31102, 126 Stat. 405, 736-737 (July 6, 2012).
    \2\ Public Law 117-58, 135 Stat. 429 (Nov. 15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA published a final rule implementing the Highway Safety Grant 
Program under IIJA on February 6, 2023, at 88 FR 7780. The rule 
provides direction to States on procedures for meeting the statutory 
requirements governing their highway safety grant programs and 
applications. In addition to changing performance targets submitted to 
NHTSA in an annual HSP to a triennial HSP, the rule implemented the 
statutory requirement that States submit constant or improved targets 
for the common performance measures and continued the long-standing 
regulatory requirement that these targets be identical to the targets 
that are reported by the State DOT in the HSIP annual report. See 23 
CFR 1300.11(b)(3)(ii)(B).
    On June 5, 2023, NHTSA and FHWA issued a rulemaking in which NHTSA 
amended the uniform procedures implementing the State Highway Safety 
Grant Program to waive, for fiscal year 2024, the requirement that 
targets for common performance measures in the triennial HSP be 
identical to targets in the HSIP. 88 FR 36472. On January 25, 2024, 
FHWA released a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning its 
performance measures that addressed and sought comment on this issue. 
89 FR 4857. On May 6, 2024, NHTSA and FHWA issued another joint 
regulation to address the identical targets requirement. 89 FR 37113. 
In that rulemaking, NHTSA amended the requirements for the Annual Grant 
Application to provide that States may amend common performance targets 
in the years between submission of their triennial HSPs only if 
necessary to submit identical performance targets to FHWA. Id.

II. Waiver of Identical Targets for Common Performance Measures

    In this rulemaking, in response to stakeholder questions, NHTSA 
amends 23 CFR 1300.11 to waive the requirement that the targets for 
common performance measures submitted in the State's FY 2027 triennial 
HSP be identical to those in the HSIP annual report submitted August 
31, 2026. Although this action affords States flexibility to continue 
to use non-identical targets for FY 2027, NHTSA encourages State 
Highway Safety Offices (HSOs) and State DOTs to continue to collaborate 
as they work together to implement a Safe System Approach and reduce 
deaths and serious injuries on our roadways.

III. Waiver of Notice and Comment

    NHTSA finds good cause to issue, without notice and comment, and to 
make effective immediately, this waiver of the requirement for 
identical targets, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 5 U.S.C. 
553(d)(3). The Administrative Procedure Act provides that when an 
agency, for good cause, finds that notice and public comment are 
impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the 
agency may issue a final rule without providing notice and an 
opportunity for public comment (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)). For the same 
reason, the rule can become effective immediately (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)). 
The safety programs of NHTSA and FHWA are governed by different 
statutory provisions. IIJA requires States, for purposes of NHTSA's 
highway safety grant program, to submit performance targets that 
demonstrate constant or improved performance. 23 U.S.C. 
402(k)(4)(A)(ii). FHWA's statute establishing safety performance 
measures for the purpose of carrying out the HSIP, 23 U.S.C. 150, and 
its corresponding regulation, 23 CFR 490, do not require constant or 
improved performance. NHTSA's regulations currently require that this 
performance target be identical to FHWA's performance target. FHWA is 
currently undertaking notice and comment rulemaking on the National 
Performance Management Measures since the passage of IIJA. NHTSA 
recognizes the importance of allowing

[[Page 60301]]

time for States to provide comments on the FHWA program, but also 
recognizes that HSOs must meet the statutory July 1 deadline to submit 
their triennial HSPs for the NHTSA program. NHTSA further recognizes 
that State DOTs must meet the August 31 deadline to submit their safety 
performance targets in their HSIP annual reports. State efforts to 
develop their FY 2027 triennial HSPs are underway at this time, and it 
is critical that States be provided certainty about application 
criteria. With these considerations in mind, NHTSA finds it 
impracticable and not in the public interest to provide prior notice 
and opportunity for comment on this amendment to the regulation to 
clarify that NHTSA waives, for FY 2027, the requirement that the 
targets be identical. For these same reasons, NHTSA finds good cause to 
make this amendment effective immediately.

IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices

A. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)

    NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action under 
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.\3\ This rulemaking does not meet the 
criteria of a ``significant regulatory action'' under E.O. 12866. 
Therefore, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed 
this proposed rule under that E.O.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    States must submit performance measures in the triennial HSP to 
receive a highway safety grant. The revisions made by this rule do not 
remove the requirement to provide performance measures; instead, it 
merely allows States to submit performance measures that are not 
identical to the performance measures submitted to the FHWA. As a 
result, this action is not expected to impose any costs.

B. Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)

    This rulemaking is an E.O. 14192 \4\ deregulatory action. The 
rulemaking provides increased flexibility and decreases administrative 
burden for States by removing the requirement that certain performance 
measures submitted in the triennial HSP be identical to measures 
submitted to FHWA in the HSIP annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Unleashing Prosperity through Deregulation, 90 FR 9065 (Feb. 
6, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601, et 
seq.) requires agencies to evaluate the potential effects of their 
proposed and final rules on small businesses, small organizations, and 
small governmental jurisdictions. Section 605 of the RFA allows an 
agency to certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis, if the 
proposed rulemaking is not expected to have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-21, 110 Stat. 
857) amended the RFA to require Federal Agencies to provide a statement 
of the factual basis for certifying that an action would not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    This final rule makes limited revisions to the uniform procedures 
implementing State highway safety grant programs, which were previously 
determined to not have a significant impact on a substantial number of 
small entities. The grant programs impacted by this rule will affect 
only State governments, which are not considered to be small entities 
as that term is defined by the RFA. Therefore, NHTSA certifies that 
this action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number 
of small entities and finds that the preparation of a Regulatory 
Flexibility Analysis is unnecessary.

D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

    E.O. 13132, ``Federalism,'' requires NHTSA to develop an 
accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State 
and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have 
federalism implications.'' 64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999). ``Policies 
that have federalism implications'' are defined in the E.O. to include 
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on 
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels 
of government.'' Under E.O. 13132, an agency may not issue a regulation 
with federalism implications that imposes substantial direct compliance 
costs not required by statute unless the Federal Government provides 
the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by 
State and local governments or the agency consults with State and local 
governments in the process of developing the proposed regulation. An 
agency also may not issue a regulation with federalism implications 
that preempts a State law without consulting with State and local 
officials.
    NHTSA analyzed this rulemaking action in accordance with the 
principles and criteria set forth in E.O. 13132. The limited revisions 
made in this rulemaking provide flexibility to State applicants. NHTSA 
has therefore determined that this final rule would not have sufficient 
federalism implications as defined in the E.O. to warrant formal 
consultation with State and local officials or the preparation of a 
federalism summary impact statement.

E. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)

    With respect to the review of the promulgation of a new regulation, 
section 3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform'' (61 FR 4729, 
Feb. 7, 1996), requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable 
effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) clearly specifies the 
preemptive effect; (2) clearly specifies the effect on existing Federal 
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for affected 
conduct, while promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) 
clearly specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately 
defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting 
clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the 
Attorney General.
    NHTSA has reviewed this rulemaking action and determined that it 
conforms to the applicable standards in section 3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. The issue of preemption is discussed above in 
connection with E.O. 13132 (Federalism). NHTSA believes that this final 
rule specifies clearly the waiver of the requirement that certain 
performance measures submitted to NHTSA in the triennial HSP be 
identical to those submitted to FHWA in the HSIP annual report and the 
related technical changes to the regulatory text to reflect the change 
to the triennial HSP. The amendments do not take effect retroactively. 
NHTSA notes further that there is no requirement that a recipient 
submit a petition for reconsideration before they may file suit in 
court.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

    Under the procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), Federal agencies must obtain 
approval from the OMB for each collection of information they conduct, 
sponsor, or require through regulations. A person is not required to 
respond to a collection of information by a Federal agency unless the 
collection displays a valid OMB control number. NHTSA has an existing 
information collection that covers State submissions under the Highway 
Safety Grant Program. The OMB Control Number for the information 
collection is 2127-0760. This rulemaking does not

[[Page 60302]]

impact existing burden or cost estimates or establish any new 
information collection requirements.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires 
agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits, and 
other effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate 
likely to result in expenditures by State, local or tribal governments, 
in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than $100 million 
annually (in 2025, $206 million adjusted for inflation with base year 
of 1995). This rulemaking would not result in annual State expenditures 
exceeding the minimum threshold. Further, this rulemaking action 
updates NHTSA's State highway safety grant program, a voluntary 
program, and States become eligible in part based on the choice to 
submit an application.

H. National Environmental Policy Act

    The Department has analyzed the environmental impacts of this final 
rule pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) 
(42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.). NHTSA has determined that this rule is 
categorically excluded pursuant to 23 CFR 771.118(c)(4). Categorical 
exclusions are categories of actions that the agency has determined 
normally do not significantly affect the quality of the human 
environment and therefore do not require either an environmental 
assessment (EA) or environmental impact statement (EIS). See DOT Order 
5610.1D Sec.  9. In analyzing the applicability of a categorical 
exclusion (CE), the agency must also consider whether extraordinary 
circumstances are present that would warrant the preparation of an EA 
or EIS. Id. Sec.  9(b). A DOT Operating Administration (OA) may apply 
CEs established in another OA's procedures. Id. Sec.  9(f). To do so, 
the OA ``must evaluate the action for extraordinary circumstances 
identified in the OA procedures in which the CE is established to 
determine if a normally excluded action may have a significant impact 
and coordinate with the originating OA to ensure that the CE is being 
applied correctly.'' Id.
    This rulemaking, which waives the requirement for certain identical 
performance measures from the triennial HSP, is categorically excluded 
pursuant to 23 CFR 771.118(c)(4), ``Planning and administrative 
activities not involving or leading directly to construction, such as: 
Training, technical assistance and research; promulgation of rules, 
regulations, directives, or program guidance; approval of project 
concepts; engineering; and operating assistance to transit authorities 
to continue existing service or increase service to meet routine 
demand.'' NHTSA has coordinated with the Federal Transit Administration 
to ensure that this CE is being applied correctly. NHTSA does not 
anticipate any environmental impacts, and there are no extraordinary 
circumstances present in connection with this rulemaking.

I. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribes)

    E.O. 13175 (65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000) requires Federal agencies to 
consult and coordinate with Tribes on a government-to-government basis 
on policies that have Tribal implications, including regulations, 
legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy 
statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or 
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government 
and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. NHTSA has assessed 
the impact of this rule on Indian Tribes and determined that this 
action would not have Tribal implications that require consultation 
under E.O. 13175.

J. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by 
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
of the rule to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
General of the United States. NHTSA will submit a report containing 
this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. 
House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United 
States prior to publication of this rule in the Federal Register. 
Because this rule does not meet the criteria in 5 U.S.C. 804(2) for a 
major rule, it will be effective upon publication in the Federal 
Register.

K. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)

    DOT assigns a regulation identifier number (RIN) to each regulatory 
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The 
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda 
twice a year. You may use the RIN contained in the heading at the 
beginning of this document to find this action in the Unified Agenda.

L. Privacy Act

    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the 
public to inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, 
without edit, to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>, as described in the system of 
records notice, DOT/ALL-14 FDMS, accessible through <a href="http://www.dot.gov/privacy">www.dot.gov/privacy</a>. To facilitate comment tracking and response, NHTSA encourages 
commenters to provide their name, or the name of their organization; 
however, submission of names is optional. Anyone is able to search the 
electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the 
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, 
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, or 
other entity). For information on DOT's compliance with the Privacy 
Act, please visit <a href="https://www.transportation.gov/privacy">https://www.transportation.gov/privacy</a>.

List of Subjects

23 CFR Part 490

    Bridges, Highway safety, Highways and roads, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

23 CFR Part 1300

    Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse, 
Grant programs--transportation, Highway safety, Intergovernmental 
relations, Motor vehicles--motorcycles, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 
1.81 and 1.95.
Jonathan Morrison,
Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
    In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA amends title 23, Code of 
Federal Regulations, part 1300 as follows:

PART 1300--UNIFORM PROCEDURES FOR STATE HIGHWAY SAFETY GRANT 
PROGRAMS

0
1. The authority citation for part 1300 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  23 U.S.C. 402; 23 U.S.C. 405; Sec. 1906, Pub. L. 
109-59, 119 Stat. 1468, as amended by Sec. 25024, Pub. L. 117-58, 
135 Stat. 879; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95.

Subpart B--Triennial Highway Safety Plan and Annual Grant 
Application

0
2. Amend Sec.  1300.11 by revising paragraph (b)(3)(iv) to read as 
follows:
* * * * *
    (b) * * *

[[Page 60303]]

    (3) * * *
    (iv) For fiscal year 2027 only, the performance targets submitted 
for common performance measures under paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(C) of this 
section are not required to be identical to the State DOT targets 
reported in the HSIP annual report.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2026-19403 Filed 9-22-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 23, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.