Skip to main content
Notice2026-18923

Utility Scale Wind Towers From the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of 2021-2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 16, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, Court no. 24-00070, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on utility scale wind towers (wind towers) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the period August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk).

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58650-58651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-18923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-902]


Utility Scale Wind Towers From the Republic of Korea: Notice of 
Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of 2021-2022 Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade 
(CIT) issued its final judgment in Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United 
States, Court no. 24-00070, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce 
(Commerce)'s remand results pertaining to the administrative review of 
the antidumping duty (AD) order on utility scale wind towers (wind 
towers) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the period August 
1, 2021, through July 31, 2022. Commerce is notifying the public that 
the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final 
results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the 
final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Dongkuk 
S&C Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk).

DATES: Applicable September 14, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Riggs, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 7, 2024, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2021-
2022 AD administrative review of wind towers from Korea. Commerce 
calculated a weighted-average dumping

[[Page 58651]]

margin for Dongkuk based, in part, on Dongkuk's reported conversion 
costs.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Utility Scale Wind Towers from the Republic of Korea: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022, 
89 FR 16544 (March 7, 2024) (Final Results), corrected in Utility 
Scale Wind Towers from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022; Correction, 89 FR 
22372 (April 1, 2024) (Corrected Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Wind Tower Trade Coalition (the petitioner) appealed Commerce's 
Final Results. On December 2, 2025, the CIT remanded the Final Results 
to Commerce for further explanation and, if appropriate, 
reconsideration of its treatment of Dongkuk's conversion costs.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, Consol. 
Court No. 24-00070, Slip Op. 25-148 (CIT December 2, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its final remand redetermination, issued on February 27, 2026, 
Commerce reconsidered its decision to accept Dongkuk's reported 
conversion costs and recalculated Dongkuk's indirect conversion costs, 
while further explaining its basis for accepting Dongkuk's direct 
conversion costs.\3\ The CIT sustained Commerce's final 
redetermination.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, Slip Op. 25-148 
(CIT December 2, 2025), dated February 27, 2026 (Remand Results), 
available at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/FinalRemandRedetermination">https://access.trade.gov/FinalRemandRedetermination</a>.
    \4\ See Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, Consol. 
Court No. 24-00070, Slip Op. 26-104 (CIT September 4, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\5\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\6\ 
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant 
to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in 
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of 
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's September 4, 
2026, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in 
harmony with Commerce's Final Results. Thus, this notice is published 
in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \6\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United 
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending 
its Final Results with respect to Dongkuk as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                          Amended final results
                                                               Final results weighted-      weighted-average
                      Producer/exporter                        average dumping margin        dumping margin
                                                                    (percent) \7\             (percent) \8\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd........................................                     1.95                      1.90
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Corrected Final Results, 89 FR at 16544.
    \8\ See Remand Results at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because Dongkuk has a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there 
have been final results published in a subsequent administrative 
review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the 
current cash deposit rate.

Liquidation of Suspended Entries

    At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from 
liquidating entries that: were produced and exported by Dongkuk, and 
were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the 
period August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022. These entries will remain 
enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the pendency of 
any appeals process.
    In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, 
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of 
subject merchandise produced and exported by Dongkuk in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-
specific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Where an 
import-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,\9\ we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard 
to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: September 10, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2026-18923 Filed 9-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 16, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.