Skip to main content
Notice2026-18707

Certain Linear Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China, India, and Mexico: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 14, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 176 (Monday, September 14, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58067-58071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-18707]



[[Page 58067]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-241, C-533-953, C-201-871]


Certain Linear Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts Thereof From the 
People's Republic of China, India, and Mexico: Initiation of 
Countervailing Duty Investigations

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


DATES: Applicable September 8, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Natasia Byrd at (202) 482-1240 or 
Andrew Hart at (202) 482-1058 (People's Republic of China (China)), 
Stefan Smith at (202) 482-4342 (India); and Howard Smith at (202) 482-
5193 (Mexico), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Petitions

    On July 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
received countervailing duty (CVD) petitions concerning imports of 
certain linear hydraulic cylinders and parts thereof (linear hydraulic 
cylinders) from China, India, and Mexico, filed in proper form on 
behalf of the Hydraulic Cylinders Fair Trade Coalition and its 
individual members, Aggressive Hydraulics Inc., Hol-Mac Corporation, 
Ligon Hydraulics, Prince Manufacturing Corporation, PTC Alliance LLC, 
Rosenboom Machine and Tool Inc., Scot Industries Inc., Stillwell Inc., 
and Texas Hydraulics Inc. (collectively, the petitioners), domestic 
producers of hydraulic cylinders.\1\ The Petitions were accompanied by 
antidumping duty (AD) petitions concerning imports of linear hydraulic 
cylinders from Canada, China, India, the Republic of Korea, and 
Mexico.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated July 29, 2026 
(Petitions).
    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Between August 3 and September 2, 2026, Commerce requested 
supplemental information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petitions 
in supplemental questionnaires.\3\ Between August 6 and September 4, 
2026, the petitioners filed timely responses to these requests for 
additional information.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``General Issues Supplemental 
Questions,'' dated August 3, 2026 (First General Issues 
Questionnaire); First Country-Specific CVD Supplemental 
Questionnaires: China CVD Supplemental and Mexico CVD Supplemental, 
dated August 4, 2026; India CVD Supplemental, dated August 20, 2026; 
Second Country-Specific CVD Supplemental Questionnaires: Second 
India CVD Supplemental, dated September 1, 2026; ``Second General 
Issues Supplemental Questionnaire,'' dated September 2, 2026 (Second 
General Issues Questionnaire)
    \4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Petitioners' Response to the 
Department's Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding the Petition for 
the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports from China,'' 
dated August 7, 2026; ``Petitioners' Response to the Department's 
Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding the Petition for the Imposition 
of Countervailing Duties on Imports from Mexico,'' dated August 7, 
2026; ``Response to the General Issues Supplemental Questions,'' 
dated August 11, 2026 (First General Issues Supplement); 
``Petitioners' Response to the Department's Supplemental 
Questionnaire Regarding the Petition for the Imposition of 
Countervailing Duties on Imports from India,'' dated August 24, 
2026; ``Petitioners' Response to the Department's Supplemental 
Questionnaire Regarding the Petition for the Imposition of 
Countervailing Duties on Imports from India,'' dated September 2, 
2026; and ``Response to the General Issues Supplemental Questions,'' 
dated September 4, 2026 (Second General Issues Supplement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 18, 2026, Commerce extended the initiation deadline by 20 
days to poll the domestic industry in accordance with subsections 
702(c)(1)(B) and (4)(D) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), because ``it is not clear from the Petitions whether the industry 
support criteria have been met. . . .'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Notice of Extension of the Deadline for Determining the 
Adequacy of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions: 
Certain Linear Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts Thereof from Canada, 
the People's Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, and 
Mexico, 91 FR 53848 (August 20, 2026) (Initiation Extension Notice). 
After extending the initiation deadline by 20 days, the new deadline 
for initiation falls on September 7, 2026, which is a federal 
holiday. Commerce's practice dictates that where a deadline falls on 
a weekend or federal holiday, the appropriate deadline is the next 
business day (in this instance, September 8, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Act, the petitioners 
allege that the Government of China (GOC), the Government of India 
(GOI), and the Government of Mexico (GOI) are providing countervailable 
subsidies, within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to 
producers of linear hydraulic cylinders in the respective countries and 
that such imports are materially injuring, or threatening material 
injury to, the domestic industry producing linear hydraulic cylinders 
in the United States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are 
initiating CVD investigations, the Petitions were accompanied by 
information reasonably available to the petitioners supporting their 
allegations.
    Commerce finds that the petitioners filed the Petitions on behalf 
of the domestic industry, because the petitioners are interested 
parties, as defined in sections 771(9)(C) and (F) of the Act. Commerce 
also finds that the petitioners demonstrated sufficient industry 
support with respect to the initiation of the requested CVD 
investigations.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the 
Petitions,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Periods of Investigation (POI)

    Because the Petitions were filed on July 29, 2026, the POI for each 
of the CVD investigations is January 1, 2025, through December 31, 
2025.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The products covered by these investigations are linear hydraulic 
cylinders from China, India, and Mexico. For a full description of the 
scope of these investigations, see the appendix to this notice.

Comments on the Scope of the Investigations

    Between August 3 and September 2, 2026, Commerce requested 
information and clarification from the petitioners regarding the 
proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petitions is an 
accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is 
seeking relief.\8\ Between August 11 and September 4, 2026, the 
petitioners provided clarifications and revised the scope.\9\ The 
description of merchandise covered by these investigations, as 
described in the appendix to this notice, reflects these 
clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See First General Issues Questionnaire; see also Second 
General Issues Questionnaire.
    \9\ See First General Issues Supplement at 3-20; see also Second 
General Issues Supplement at 3-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce has concerns related to the administrability of certain 
provisions in the proposed scope. For example, we find that language 
pertaining to the definition of covered steel barrels (i.e., 
``{c{time} overed steel barrels . . . have otherwise been processed to 
the point of having as their sole or predominant use a barrel for an 
in-scope hydraulic cylinder'' and ``the addition of any part of a 
hydraulic cylinder to a barrel has thereby been processed to the point 
of having its sole or predominant use as a barrel for an in-scope 
hydraulic cylinder'') remains an outstanding issue. While Commerce has 
adopted this language for purposes of initiation, we intend to continue 
evaluating the scope of these investigations, with the possibility of 
making additional modifications to further clarify what products are 
covered or not covered by the scope of these investigations. We

[[Page 58068]]

invite parties to this proceeding to comment on this language along 
with their scope comments (as detailed below).
    As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are 
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding 
product coverage (i.e., scope).\10\ Commerce will consider all scope 
comments received from interested parties and, if necessary, will 
consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the 
preliminary determinations. If scope comments include factual 
information, all such factual information should be limited to public 
information.\11\ Commerce requests that interested parties provide at 
the beginning of their scope comments a public executive summary for 
each comment or issue raised in their submission. Commerce further 
requests that interested parties limit their public executive summary 
of each comment or issue to no more than 450 words, not including 
citations. Commerce intends to use the public executive summaries as 
the basis of the comment summaries included in the analysis of scope 
comments. To facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce 
requests that scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 
(ET) on September 28, 2026, which is 20 calendar days from the 
signature date of this notice. Any rebuttal comments, which may include 
factual information, and should also be limited to public information, 
must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on October 8, 2026, which is 10 calendar 
days from the initial comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble); see also 19 CFR 
351.312.
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual 
information'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce requests that any factual information that parties 
consider relevant to the scope of these investigations be submitted 
during that period. However, if a party subsequently finds that 
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the 
investigations may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and 
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope 
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent 
AD and CVD investigations.

Filing Requirements

    All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception 
applies.\12\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by the date and time it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and 
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing 
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS 
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help">https://access.trade.gov/help</a> and a handbook can be 
found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/ACCESSHandbookonElectronicFilingProcedures_March2026.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/ACCESSHandbookonElectronicFilingProcedures_March2026.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations

    Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce 
notified the GOC, GOI, and GOM of the receipt of the Petitions and 
provided an opportunity for consultations with respect to the 
Petitions.\13\ Commerce held consultations with the GOI on August 12, 
2026,\14\ with the GOC on August 13, 2026,\15\ and with the GOM on 
August 14, 2026.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultations to 
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated July 29, 2026.
    \14\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of 
India,'' dated August 12, 2026; see also GOI's Letter, ``Pre-
Initiation Comments and Consultation Note on behalf of the 
Government of India,'' dated August 13, 2026.
    \15\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of 
China,'' dated August 13, 2026; see also GOC's Letters, ``Comments 
on the Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain Linear Hydraulic 
Cylinders and Parts Thereof from China,'' dated August 17, 2026, and 
``Comments on the Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain Linear 
Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts Thereof from Mexico: Alleged 
Transnational Subsidy Programs,'' dated August 17, 2026.
    \16\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of 
Mexico,'' dated August 18, 2026; see also GOM's Letter, ``Certain 
Linear Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts Thereof from Mexico,'' dated 
August 14, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions

    Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic 
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least 
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and 
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like 
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support 
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of 
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of 
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i) 
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if 
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or 
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling 
method to poll the ``industry.''
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine 
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute 
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the 
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), 
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' 
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like 
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the 
ITC apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like 
product,\17\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a 
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination 
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may 
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences 
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
    \18\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F.Supp.2d 1, 8 (CIT 
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.Supp. 
639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United 
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
petition).
    With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioners do not 
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope 
of the investigations.\19\ Based on our analysis of the information 
submitted on the

[[Page 58069]]

record, we have determined that linear hydraulic cylinders, as defined 
in the scope, constitute a single domestic like product, and we have 
analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as 
applied to these cases and information regarding industry support, 
see Checklists, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation 
Checklists: Certain Linear Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts Thereof 
from the People's Republic of China, India, and Mexico,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Country-
Specific CVD Initiation Checklists), at Attachment II, Analysis of 
Industry Support for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Petitions Covering Certain Linear Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts 
Thereof from Canada, the People's Republic of China, India, the 
Republic of Korea, and Mexico (Attachment II). These checklists are 
on file electronically via ACCESS.
    \20\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the Country-
Specific CVD Initiation Checklists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 18, 2026, after considering comments regarding industry 
support filed by several interested parties,\21\ Commerce extended the 
initiation deadline by 20 days to poll the industry in accordance with 
section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act, because it was ``not clear from the 
Petitions whether the industry support criteria have been met. . . .'' 
\22\ On August 20, 2026, Commerce issued polling questionnaires to all 
known producers identified in the Petitions.\23\ We requested that the 
companies complete the polling questionnaire and certify their 
responses by the due date specified in the cover letter to the 
questionnaire.\24\ The petitioners provided comments on the polling 
questionnaire responses on August 31, 2026.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Id.
    \22\ See Initiation Extension Notice, 91 FR at 53848.
    \23\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Polling Questionnaire,'' dated 
August 20, 2026.
    \24\ Id.
    \25\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitioners' Comments on 
Responses to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Polling 
Questionnaire,'' dated August 31, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our analysis of the data we received in the polling questionnaire 
responses indicates that the domestic producers and workers who support 
the Petitions account for at least 25 percent of the total production 
of the domestic like product and more than 50 percent of the production 
of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry 
expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petitions.\26\ 
Accordingly, Commerce determines that the industry support requirements 
of section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act have been met and that the Petitions 
were filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of 
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Attachment II of the Country-Specific AD Initiation 
Checklists.
    \27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Injury Test

    Because China, India, and Mexico are ``Subsidies Agreement 
Countries'' within the meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 
701(a)(2) of the Act applies to these investigations. Accordingly, the 
ITC must determine whether imports of the subject merchandise from 
China, India, and/or Mexico materially injure, or threaten material 
injury to, a U.S. industry.

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    The petitioners allege that imports of the subject merchandise are 
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are 
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry 
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioners 
allege that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold provided 
under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Country-Specific CVD Initiation Checklists at 
Attachment III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material 
Injury and Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Petitions Covering Certain Linear Hydraulic Cylinders and Parts 
Thereof from Canada, the People's Republic of China, India, the 
Republic of Korea, and Mexico.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The petitioners contend that the industry's injured condition is 
illustrated by a significant increase in the volume of subject imports; 
reduced market share; underselling and price depression and 
suppression; lost sales and revenues; decline in U.S. shipments, 
production, capacity utilization; and negative impact on financial 
performance.\29\ We assessed the allegations and supporting evidence 
regarding material injury, threat of material injury, causation, as 
well as negligibility, and we have determined that these allegations 
are properly supported by adequate evidence, and meet the statutory 
requirements for initiation.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ Id.
    \30\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initiation of CVD Investigations

    Based upon the examination of the Petitions and supplemental 
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of 
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating CVD investigations to determine 
whether imports of linear hydraulic cylinders from China, India, and 
Mexico benefit from countervailable subsidies conferred by the GOC, 
GOI, and GOM. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our preliminary 
determinations no later than 65 days after the date of this initiation.

China

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 21 programs 
alleged by the petitioners. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the China CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

India

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 33 programs 
alleged by the petitioners. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the India CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

Mexico

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 23 programs 
alleged by the petitioners. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the Mexico CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

Respondent Selection

    In the Petitions, the petitioners identified 38 companies in China, 
42 companies in India, and 55 companies in Mexico as producers/
exporters of linear hydraulic cylinders.\31\ Commerce intends to follow 
its standard practice in CVD investigations and calculate company-
specific subsidy rates in these investigations. In the event that 
Commerce determines that the number of companies is large, and it 
cannot individually examine each company based upon Commerce's 
resources, Commerce intends to select mandatory respondents based on 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports of 
linear hydraulic cylinders from China, India, and Mexico during the POI 
under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
subheading(s) listed in the ``Scope of the Investigations'' in the 
appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Petitions at Volume I (Exhibit GEN-5); see also First 
General Issues Supplement at 3 and Exhibit GEN-5-Supp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 8, 2026, Commerce released CBP data on imports of 
linear hydraulic cylinders from China, India, and Mexico under 
administrative protective order (APO) to all parties with access to 
information protected by APO and indicated that interested parties 
wishing to comment on CBP data and/or respondent selection must do so 
within three business days of the publication date of the notice of 
initiation of these investigations.\32\ Comments must be filed 
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed

[[Page 58070]]

document must be received successfully in its entirety via ACCESS by 
5:00 p.m. ET on the specified deadline. Commerce will not accept 
rebuttal comments regarding the CBP data or respondent selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See Country-Specific Memoranda, ``Release of U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection Entry Data,'' dated September 8, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such 
applications may be found on Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders">https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders</a>.

Distribution of Copies of the Petitions

    In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petitions have been 
provided to the GOC, GOI, and GOM via ACCESS. To the extent 
practicable, we will attempt to provide a copy of the public version of 
the Petitions to each exporter named in the Petitions, as provided 
under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).

ITC Notification

    Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by 
section 702(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determinations by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 25 days after the date 
on which the ITC receives notice from Commerce of initiation of the 
investigations, whether there is a reasonable indication that imports 
of linear hydraulic cylinders from China, India, and/or Mexico are 
materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. 
industry.\33\ A negative ITC determination for any country will result 
in the investigation being terminated with respect to that country.\34\ 
Otherwise, these CVD investigations will proceed according to statutory 
and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
    \34\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submission of Factual Information

    Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) 
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence 
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available 
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or 
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); 
(iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other 
than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of 
Commerce's regulations requires any party, when submitting factual 
information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) 
the information is being submitted \35\ and, if the information is 
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on 
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information 
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, 
clarify, or correct.\36\ Time limits for the submission of factual 
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific 
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. 
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting 
factual information in these investigations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
    \36\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extensions of Time Limits

    Parties may request an extension of time limits before the 
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as 
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will 
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time 
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by 
Commerce.\37\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties 
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it 
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain 
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by 
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions 
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we 
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline 
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed 
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a 
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will 
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where 
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances 
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the 
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to 
submitting factual information in these investigations.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
    \38\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits; 
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final 
Rule), available at <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certification Requirements

    Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding 
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\39\ 
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 
351.303(g).\40\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the 
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
    \40\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import 
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also 
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 
<a href="https://www.trade.gov/sites/default/files/2026-08/FAQ%20for%20Certifications.pdf?v=1787683944756">https://www.trade.gov/sites/default/files/2026-08/FAQ%20for%20Certifications.pdf?v=1787683944756</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate 
in these investigations should ensure that they meet the requirements 
of 19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of 
appearance). Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements 
pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other 
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and 
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).

    Dated: September 8, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigations

    The scope of these investigations covers certain linear acting 
hydraulic cylinders (also known as hydraulic power engines) and 
certain components thereof. Covered linear acting hydraulic 
cylinders have barrels made of steel, a bore size (inner diameter) 
of 25.4 mm (one inch) or more, and a return (retracted) length of 
101.6 mm (four inches) or more (hydraulic cylinders). For purposes 
of this scope, the return (retracted) length is the overall end-to-
end measurement of the hydraulic cylinder unit when in the retracted 
position. The scope covers all hydraulic cylinders meeting the 
physical description above, including but not limited to the 
following hydraulic cylinder designs: tie-rod, welded body, 
telescopic, plunger, rodless, differential, position sensing, single 
acting, double acting, displacement, ram type, piggy-back, double 
rod, rod-fed, and spring return hydraulic cylinders. All hydraulic 
cylinders are hydraulically activated. The incorporation of a spring 
into the design of a hydraulic cylinder otherwise meeting the 
description above does not exclude a product from the scope.

[[Page 58071]]

    The scope also covers the following components of hydraulic 
cylinders: (1) steel barrels, (2) steel piston rods, and (3) any 
part or component of a hydraulic cylinder that is attached to, 
assembled with or shipped with a covered steel barrel or a covered 
piston rod.
    Covered steel barrels include processed welded or seamless steel 
tubes four inches (101.6 mm) or more in length with an inner 
diameter of one inch (25.4 mm) or more, that have had their inner 
diameter precision machined (such as through honing or skiving and 
burnishing), and have otherwise been processed to the point of 
having as their sole or predominant use a barrel for an in-scope 
hydraulic cylinder. Such processing may include but is not limited 
to cutting-to-length, end finishing (e.g., machine-threading, 
chamfering, etc.), port drilling, and the addition of any weldments, 
ports, valves, sensors, end caps, gaskets, seals, rings, or any 
other part, component or attachment for a hydraulic cylinder, or any 
combination thereof. The addition of any part of a hydraulic 
cylinder to a barrel has thereby been processed to the point of 
having as its sole or predominant use as a barrel for an in-scope 
hydraulic cylinder.
    Covered piston rods are solid or hollow steel bars or steel 
tubes at least four inches (101.6 mm) in length that have been hard 
chrome plated or chrome coated, cut to length, and machined to be a 
piston rod.
    Included in the scope are any other attachments, parts, or 
components that are imported with, attached to, or invoiced with a 
hydraulic cylinder or covered barrel or rod, including but not 
limited to cylinder mounting parts (e.g., flanges, trunnions, 
clevises, lugs, etc.), connectors attached to pistons or piston 
rods, pistons, rings, gaskets, seals, valves, sensors or hydraulic 
tubing or hydraulic lines (regardless of material) such as for 
connections to a hydraulic pump. The scope does not cover such 
attachments, parts, or components when imported or invoiced 
separately from a hydraulic cylinder.
    Also included in the scope are any hydraulic cylinders and parts 
meeting the physical description above attached to or imported with 
any equipment or parts of equipment classified in Chapter 84 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). When a 
hydraulic cylinder is attached to or imported with any equipment or 
parts of equipment classified in Chapter 84 of the HTSUS, only the 
hydraulic cylinder is covered by the scope. The covered hydraulic 
cylinder in that regard includes everything in between and including 
the mounting pins (e.g., cylinder pin and rod pin) on either end of 
the cylinder.
    Subject merchandise also includes covered hydraulic cylinders, 
barrels and rods that undergo assembly or minor processing in a 
third country in any manner that would not otherwise remove the 
merchandise from the scope of these investigations if performed in 
the country of manufacture of the in-scope hydraulic cylinder. 
Subject merchandise also includes covered hydraulic cylinders, 
barrels and rods that are attached to any imported equipment or 
parts of equipment classified in Chapter 84, as discussed in the 
immediately preceding paragraph, if such attachment occurs in a 
third country.
    The products subject to these investigations are currently 
classified in the HTSUS under statistical reporting numbers 
8412.21.0015, 8412.21.0030, 8412.21.0045, 8412.21.0060, 
8412.21.0075, and 8412.90.9005. The HTSUS subheadings above are 
provided for convenience and Customs purposes only. The written 
description of the scope of these investigations is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2026-18707 Filed 9-11-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 14, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.