Notice2026-18700
Certain Quartz Surface Product From India: Preliminary Results, Intent To Rescind, in Part, and Rescission, in Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
September 14, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Cuarzo and Beyyond Rocks Private Limited (Beyyond) (collectively, Cuarzo/Beyyond) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025. Additionally, Commerce preliminarily determines that Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited (PESL) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than NV during the POR. Furthermore, we are rescinding the review with respect to 53 companies and intend to rescind the review with respect to four companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 176 (Monday, September 14, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58082-58086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-18700]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-889]
Certain Quartz Surface Product From India: Preliminary Results,
Intent To Rescind, in Part, and Rescission, in Part of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2024-2025
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that Cuarzo and Beyyond Rocks Private Limited (Beyyond)
(collectively, Cuarzo/Beyyond) made sales of subject merchandise at
less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), June 1,
2024, through May 31, 2025. Additionally, Commerce preliminarily
determines that Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited (PESL) did not make
sales of subject merchandise at less than NV during the POR.
Furthermore, we are rescinding the review with respect to 53 companies
and intend to rescind the review with respect to four companies.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results
of review.
DATES: Applicable September 14, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Doss, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 25, 2025, based on timely requests for review, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on certain quartz surface products
(QSP) from India.\1\ On March 3, 2026, Commerce selected Cuarzo and
PESL as the mandatory respondents in this review.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 90 FR 35268 (July 25, 2025) (Initiation
Notice); see also Certain Quartz Surface Products from India and
Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 FR 37422 (June 22, 2020)
(Order).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection Sampling Meeting,''
dated March 3, 2026 (Respondent Selection Memorandum). We are
preliminarily treating Cuarzo and its affiliate Beyyond as a single
entity. We hereinafter refer to the single entity, collectively, as
Cuarzo/Beyyond. For further details, see Memorandum, ``Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review
of the Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Quartz Surface Products from
India; 2024-2025,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown,
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative
proceedings by 47 days.\3\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24,
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an
additional 21 days.\4\ On April 23, 2026, we extended the preliminary
results of this review to no later than August 28, 2026.\5\ On August
28, 2026, Commerce further extended the deadline for preliminary
results by nine days, to September 8, 2026.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated
November 24, 2025.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated April 23,
2026.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated August
28, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A
list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached in Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/frnotices">https://access.trade.gov/frnotices</a>.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order is QSP from India. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested a
review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication
of notice of initiation. As noted above, Commerce received a timely-
filed withdrawal request with respect to the following companies for
which no other party requested an administrative review: (1) Global
Stones Pvt Ltd.; (2) Global Surfaces Ltd.; (3) Pacific Industries
Limited; (4) Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP; and (5) Quartzkraft LLP.
Therefore, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to
these companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to
rescind an administrative review of an antidumping duty order where it
concludes that there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise
during the POR.\7\ Normally, upon completion of an administrative
review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the antidumping duty
assessment rate for the review period.\8\ Therefore, for an
administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable,
suspended entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the AD assessment rate calculated for
the POR.\9\ Commerce notified all interested parties of its
[[Page 58083]]
intent to rescind the instant review regarding the companies listed in
Appendix III because there were no reviewable, suspended entries of
subject merchandise from these companies during the POR and invited
interested parties to comment.\10\ No party commented on this
memorandum. In the absence of any suspended entries of subject
merchandise from these companies during the POR, we are rescinding this
administrative review for the companies listed in Appendix III, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\9\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States,
380 F.Supp.3d 1328, 1337 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section
751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that
``{w{time} hile the statute does not explicitly require that an
entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to
a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used
as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can
only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended''; see
also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 86 FR 36102, and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; and Solid
Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation:
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77
FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that ``for an administrative
review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry
to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate'').
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In
Part,'' dated September 26, 2025 (Intent to Rescind Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part
It is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of an
antidumping duty order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there
are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for
which liquidation is suspended. As noted above, normally, upon
completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are
liquidated at the AD assessment rate calculated for the POR.\11\
Therefore, for an administrative review of a company to be conducted,
there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct
CBP to liquidate at the AD assessment rate calculated for the POR.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2).
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the CBP data on the record, the following four
companies subject to this review did not have reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended:
(1) Glossy Imp. & Exp. Private Ltd; (2) Inani Marble Industries; (3) PM
Quartz Surfaces Private Ltd.; and (4) Stone Imp. & Exp. (India) Private
Ltd.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Memorandum, ``Release of Customs and Border Protection
Data,'' dated August 7, 2025 (CBP Data Release). These companies
were not previously identified by Commerce's previous notice, see
Intent to Rescind Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, in the absence of reviewable, suspended entries of
subject merchandise during the POR, we intend to rescind this
administrative review with respect to these four companies, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Commerce is providing interested
parties with an opportunity to submit comments, including factual
information, on this intent to rescind the administrative review with
respect to these four companies. Comments, including factual
information, from interested parties are due to Commerce no later than
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on September 15, 2026. Rebuttal comments,
including rebuttal factual information, are due seven days thereafter,
by 5:00 p.m. ET on September 22, 2026. All submissions must be filed
electronically at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a> in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303.
On July 30, 2025, Jyothi Granite Exports India Pvt. Ltd. (Jyothi
Granite) timely filed a statement reporting that it made no shipments
of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\14\
However, based on the existing CBP data on the record, we preliminarily
determine that Jyothi Granite made shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, and we do not intend to rescind the administrative
review with respect to Jyothi Granite at this time.\15\ Commerce
intends to request additional information from CBP regarding certain
entries during the POR following these preliminary results regarding
Jyothi Granite's no-shipments claim.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Jyothi Granite's Letter, ``Notice of No Sales/
Shipments,'' dated July 20, 2025.
\15\ See CBP Data Release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price
and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the
Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Individually Examined Companies
The Act does not address the establishment of a rate to apply to
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section
777A(c)(2) of the Act. However, 19 CFR 351.109(g) states that Commerce
will determine the rate for non-selected companies by applying the
methodology set forth in 19 CFR 351.109(f)(1)-(2), which generally
parallels the methodology for determining the all-others rate in an
investigation under section 735(c)(5) of the Act.
Under 19 CFR 351.109(f)(1) and section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the
all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of
the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any rates
that are zero, de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or determined
entirely on the basis of facts available. Where the weighted-average
dumping margin for each of the individually examined companies is zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, 19 CFR
351.109(f)(2)(iii) and section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that
Commerce may use ``any reasonable method'' to establish the estimated
all-others rate for exporters and producers not individually
investigated, including averaging the estimated weighted-average
dumping margins determined for the exporters and producers individually
investigated.
Because we used a sampling methodology for respondent selection in
this review, the rate for companies not selected for individual
examination is assigned using a calculated sample rate, based upon the
average of the rates for the selected respondents, weighted by the
import share of their sampling pool.\16\ For these preliminary results,
because the rate calculated for PESL is de minimis, we are
preliminarily calculating a sample rate based upon an average of the
rates for selected respondents that are not zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available. While we have relied on rates that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available in the
calculation of previous sample rates, we have reexamined this practice
and find excluding such rates from the sampling calculation is more
consistent with 19 CFR 351.109(g) and our practice in administrative
reviews where respondent companies are not selected using the sampling
methodology.\17\ Thus, the companies under review that were not
selected for individual examination will receive a sample rate equal to
the rate calculated for Cuarzo/Beyyond.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Respondent Selection Memorandum.
\17\ See Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018, 84
FR 55906 (October 18, 2019), unchanged in Certain Steel Nails from
the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017-
2018, 85 FR 22399 (April 22, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the
following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the
period June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The exporters or producers not selected for individual
review are listed in Appendix II.
[[Page 58084]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuarzo; Beyyond Rocks Private Limited....................... 4.91
Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited............................ 0.00
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review \18\........... 4.91
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to
verify the information relied upon in issuing its final results with
respect to Cuarzo/Beyyond.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven
days after the date on which the last verification report is issued in
this review. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.\19\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing
each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\20\ All briefs must be
filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Procedures).
\20\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we
request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their
briefs a public executive summary for each issue raised in their
briefs.\21\ Further, we request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not
including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as
the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for
relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note
that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\22\ See APO and Service Procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the
hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request
for a hearing is made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled
date for the hearing.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review.
If the weighted-average dumping margin for Cuarzo/Beyyond or PESL
is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final
results of this review, Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total
entered value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for
all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-
specific, per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to
the total quantity of those sales.\24\ To determine whether an
importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an
importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values.
If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis
or where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\25\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice,
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Cuarzo/
Beyyond or PESL for which they did not know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate
those entries at the all-others rate calculated in the less-than-fair-
value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies listed in Appendix II which were not selected for
individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the
review-specific rate, calculated as noted in the ``Rate for Non-
Individually Examined Companies'' section, above. The final results of
this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties
on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review
and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies listed in Appendix III for which the review is
being rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed
at rates equal to the cash deposit rate for estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce
intends to issue rescission instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days
after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP regarding
Cuarzo/Beyyond, PESL, and the companies listed in Appendix II no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a
[[Page 58085]]
statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be that established in the final results of this
review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed companies not covered by this review, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific cash deposit rate published
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the
company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent
segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to
be 1.02 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV
investigation.\28\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Unless extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of
this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after
the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the
amount of the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: September 8, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation and Single Entity Treatment
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for
Individual Review
1. Advantis Quartz Ll
2. Aequitas Estones Pvt., Ltd.
3. Aequitas Exp. Pvt., Ltd.
4. Agarwal Techstone
5. Agl Stones LLP
6. Alkara Stones Private Ltd.
7. Amazoone Ceramic Ltd.
8. Anish Hospitality Manufacturers Pvt., Ltd.
9. Aqs Rock Surfaces LLP
10. Argil Ceramics
11. Arl Infratech Ltd.
12. ARO Granite Industries Ltd.
13. Artino Quartz Private Ltd.
14. Asher Stone LLP
15. Asian Granito India Ltd.
16. Aura Granite
17. Baba Super Minerals Private Ltd.
18. Camrola Quartz Limited
19. Chariot International Pvt., Ltd.
20. Citta Surfaces India LLP
21. Classic Marble Co. Pvt., Ltd.
22. Creative Quartz LLP
23. Divyashakti Ltd.
24. Eelq Stone Llp
25. Emcer Tiles Private Ltd.
26. Engistone India Private Ltd.
27. Esprit Stones Private Ltd.
28. Evetis Stone India Private
29. Future Stone Works Private Ltd.
30. Gallery Of Marble
31. Geetanjali Quartz Pvt., Ltd.
32. Glowstone Industries Private Ltd.
33. Granite Mart Limited
34. Hi Elite Quartz LLP
35. Hilltop Stones Pvt., Ltd.
36. Igm Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
37. Imperiaal Granimarmo Private Ltd.
38. International Stones India Private Limited
39. Jbb Stones India Pvt., Ltd.
40. Jyothi Granite Exp. India Pvt. Lt
41. Jyothi Quartz Surfaces
42. Keros Stone LLP
43. Krishna Sai Exp.
44. La Rubino Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
45. Magmatic Stone International
46. Mahi Granites Pvt., Ltd.
47. Malbros Marbles & Granites Industries
48. Marudhar Rocks International Pvt Ltd; Marudhar Quartz Surfaces
Pvt Ltd.
49. Mpg Stone Pvt., Ltd.
50. Mpg Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
51. Mq Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
52. Nice Quartz and Stones Private Ltd.
53. Oceanic 6 Solutionz
54. Paradigm Granite Pvt., Ltd.
55. Paradigm Stone India Private Ltd.
56. Pearl Quartz Stone Private Ltd.
57. Pelican Quartz Stone
58. Petros Stone LLP
59. Plutus Marbles LLP p
60. PM Quartz Surfaces Private Ltd.
61. Prakash Marble Industries
62. Prasheel International Private Ltd.
63. Pristine Quartz Pvt., Ltd.
64. Qrox Surfaces
65. Radiant Rocks Private Ltd.
66. Raj Kesari Rocks Private Ltd.
67. Ravileela Granites Ltd.
68. Renshou Industries
69. Rocks Forever
70. Safayar Ceramics Private Ltd.
71. Sati Exp. India Private Ltd.
72. Shivam Surface India LLP
73. Sketch Quartz Private Ltd.
74. Stone Empire Private Ltd.
75. Stoneby India Llp
76. Svg Exports Private Limited
77. Tab India Granites Pvt., Ltd.
78. Tripura Stones Private Ltd.
79. Universal Quartz & Natural Stone Pvt Ltd.
80. Upsurfaces Corporations Llp
81. Variety Art Stones Ltd.
82. Venkata Sri Balaji Quartz Surfaces
83. Yalavarthi Granites And Furniture Private Ltd.
84. Yash Gems
Appendix III
Companies With No Reviewable Entries
1. Aarks Exp.
2. Acromont Corp.
3. Ajit Marbles Pvt., Ltd.
4. Ajr Quartz Private Ltd.
5. Anisha Interiors & Imp. & Exp. Llp
6. Arklite Speciality Lamps Ltd.
7. Ava Stones Private Ltd.
8. Bajaj And Mehta Imp. & Exp. Pvt., Ltd.
9. Crystal Surface
10. Dazzling Stones
11. Divya Gem Stonex
12. Enigma Exim
13. Eternal Surfaces Private Ltd.
14. Fairdeal Surfaces
15. Flex Stone Inc.
16. Flipspaces Technology Labs Pvt., Ltd.
17. Forms And Surfaces India Pvt., Ltd.
18. G Rocks and Resources
19. Galaxy Gem Stone
20. Galaxy Overseas
21. Gcl Stones
22. Gita Hospitality Pvt., Ltd.
23. Global Quartz Pvt. Ltd.
24. Gorbandh Marbles Pvt., Ltd.
25. Haique Stones Private Ltd.
26. Iraj Evolution Design Co. Pvt., Ltd.
27. J T Enterprisess Exim Private Ltd.
28. Jagson India
29. Kgk Artistic Stones LLP
[[Page 58086]]
30. Lakshmi Galaxy Enterprises
31. M And G Imp. & Exp. (India) Private Ltd.
32. M.B. Granites Private Ltd.
33. Moon Rock & Surfaces Private Ltd.
34. Quartzart Stones LLP
35. R S G Stones
36. Raj Chatra Granites
37. Rakman Stone Exp. Pvt., Ltd.
38. Ramesh Slate Works
39. Roar Stonex
40. Rsg Fabrications LLP
41. Rsg Stones
42. Rudra Quartz LLP
43. S N K Granite Exp.
44. Shree Sai Enterprises
45. Singhaniya Stones
46. Snk Granite Exp.
47. Stone India Ltd.
48. Stone Planet Exp.
49. Suvraj Quartz
50. Virgos International
51. Welspun Global Brands Ltd.
52. Yamuna Slate Industries
53. Zinith Surfaces
[FR Doc. 2026-18700 Filed 9-11-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on September 14, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.