Skip to main content
Notice2026-18495

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Malaysia: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 10, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025. In addition, we are rescinding the review with respect to Southern Steel Sdn. Bhd. (Southern Steel). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57542-57545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-18495]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-557-819]


Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Malaysia: Preliminary 
Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2024-2025

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales 
of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period 
of review (POR), June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025. In addition, we 
are rescinding the review with respect to Southern Steel Sdn. Bhd. 
(Southern Steel). Interested parties are invited to comment on these 
preliminary results of review.

DATES: Applicable September 10, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colin Thrasher, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3004.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 25, 2025, based on timely requests for review, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on prestressed concrete wire 
strand (PC strand) from Malaysia.\1\ On August 26, 2025, Commerce 
selected Kiswire Sdn. Bhd. (Kiswire) and Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd. 
(Southern) as the mandatory respondents in this review.\2\ This review 
covers four producers/exporters of subject merchandise.\3\ Commerce is 
rescinding the review in part with respect to Southern Steel because it 
had no entries in the CBP data during the POR.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 90 FF 35268 (July 25, 2025) (Initiation 
Notice); see also Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from 
Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, South Africa, Spain, Tunisia, and 
Ukraine: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 29998 (June 4, 2021) 
(Order).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated August 26, 
2025.
    \3\ See Initiation Notice.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In 
Part,'' dated August 26, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, 
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative 
proceedings by 47 days.\5\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents 
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an 
additional 21 days.\6\ On March 31, 2026, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce extended the preliminary results of 
this review by 111 days.\7\ On August 28, 2026, we extended the 
preliminary results of this review by an additional nine days.\8\ 
Accordingly, the deadline for these preliminary results is now 
September 8, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated 
November 24, 2025.
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 31, 
2026.
    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated August 
28, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a full description of the methodology underlying these 
preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\9\ A list 
of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
attached as the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
ACCESS, which is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/frnotices">https://access.trade.gov/frnotices</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 
on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Malaysia and Partial 
Rescission; 2024-2025,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted 
by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the Order is PC strand from Malaysia. 
For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

[[Page 57543]]

Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to 
rescind an administrative review of an antidumping duty order where it 
concludes that there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise 
during the POR.\10\ Normally, upon completion of an administrative 
review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the antidumping duty 
assessment rate for the review period.\11\ Therefore, for an 
administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, 
suspended entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the antidumping duty assessment rate 
calculated for the POR.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length 
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023).
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \12\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States, 
380 F.Supp.3d 1328, 1337 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section 
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the U.S. 
Court of International Trade held that ``{w{time} hile the statute 
does not explicitly require that an entry be suspended as a 
prerequisite for establishing entitlement to a review, it does 
explicitly state the determined rate will be used as the liquidation 
rate for the reviewed entries. This result can only obtain if the 
liquidation of entries has been suspended''; see also Certain Frozen 
Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of 
No Shipments; 2018-2019, 86 FR 36102, and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; and Solid Fertilizer Grade 
Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 
2012) (noting that ``for an administrative review to be conducted, 
there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the 
newly calculated assessment rate'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce notified all interested parties of its intent to rescind 
the instant review for Southern Steel because there were no reviewable, 
suspended entries of subject merchandise from it during the POR and 
invited interested parties to comment.\13\ No party commented on this 
memorandum. In the absence of any suspended entries of subject 
merchandise from this company during the POR, we are rescinding this 
administrative review for Southern Steel, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In 
Part,'' dated August 26, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Act. Export price is calculated in accordance with 
section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 
of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusion, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Rate for Non-Individually Examined Company

    The Act does not address the establishment of a rate to apply to 
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits 
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 
777A(c)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce's regulation at 19 CFR 
351.109(g) states that Commerce will determine the rate for non-
selected companies by following the process set forth in 19 CFR 
351.109(f)(1)-(2), which generally parallels the process for 
determining the all-others rate in an investigation under section 
735(c)(5) of the Act.
    Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.109(f), the 
all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of 
the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for 
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any rates 
that are zero, de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or determined 
entirely on the basis of facts available. Where the weighted-average 
dumping margin for each of the individually examined companies is zero, 
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.109(f)(2)(iii) provide that Commerce may use 
``any reasonable method'' to establish the estimated all-others rate 
for exporters and producers not individually investigated, including 
averaging the estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined for 
the exporters and producers individually investigated.
    In this administrative review, we preliminarily calculated 
weighted-average dumping margins for the mandatory respondents, Kiswire 
and Southern, that are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts 
available. Accordingly, we are preliminarily assigning to Wei Dat Steel 
Wire Sdn. Bhd. (Wei Dat), the company under review that was not 
selected for individual examination, a weighted-average dumping margin 
equal to the simple average of the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins calculated for Kiswire and Southern, consistent with 19 CFR 
351.109(g).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally 
calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated 
for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping 
margins calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-
average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined 
respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sale values 
for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then compares (B) 
and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most 
appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. See 19 CFR 
351.109(f)(2)(ii); see also Memorandum, ``Calculation of the 
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for the Companies Not Selected for 
Individual Examination,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the 
following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the 
period June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kiswire Sdn. Bhd............................................        1.29
Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd..................................        1.42
Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd.................................        1.36
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis 
performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within 
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public 
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Public Comment

    Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.\15\ Pursuant to 19 
CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we have modified the deadline for interested 
parties to submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days 
after the date of the publication of this notice.\16\ Rebuttal briefs, 
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later 
than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\17\ Interested 
parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding 
must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a 
table of authorities.\18\ All briefs must be filed electronically using 
ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully 
in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established 
deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for 
general filing requirements).
    \16\ See 19 CFR 351.309.
    \17\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective 
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 
2023) (APO and Service Procedures).
    \18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we

[[Page 57544]]

request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their 
briefs a public executive summary for each issue raised in their 
briefs.\19\ Further, we request that interested parties limit their 
public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not 
including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as 
the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision 
memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative 
review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for 
relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note 
that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the 
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that 
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \20\ See APO and Service Procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's 
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants, 
and whether any participant is a foreign national; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be 
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is 
made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the 
hearing.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.
    If Kiswire and Southern's weighted-average dumping margin are not 
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results 
of this review, Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific 
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total 
entered value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for 
all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-
specific, per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the 
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to 
the total quantity of those sales.\22\ To determine whether an 
importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an 
importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values. 
If Kiswire and Southern's weighted-average dumping margin are zero or 
de minimis or where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is 
zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \23\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding: 
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment 
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice, 
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Kiswire 
and Southern for which they did not know that the merchandise was 
destined for the United States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 
those entries at the all-others rate calculated in the less-than-fair-
value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For Wei Dat, we will assign an assessment rate based on the review-
specific rate, calculated as noted in the ``Rate for Non-Individually 
Examined Companies'' section, above. The final results of this review 
shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries 
of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for 
future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\25\ Commerce 
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP regarding Kiswire, 
Southern, and Wei Dat no earlier than 35 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For Southern Steel, the company for which the review is being 
rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates 
equal to the cash deposit rate for estimated antidumping duties 
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce 
intends to issue rescission instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days 
after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
    If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International 
Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate 
relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a 
statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies 
listed above will be that established in the final results of this 
review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the 
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or 
reviewed companies not covered by this review, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific cash deposit rate published 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the 
company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent 
segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to 
be 5.13 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV 
investigation.\26\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review 
in

[[Page 57545]]

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(4).

     Dated: September 8, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
V. Rate For The Non-Selected Company
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2026-18495 Filed 9-9-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 10, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.