Skip to main content
Rule2026-18429

Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices; Classification of the Cooperative Powered Surgical Assist Device for ENT Surgery

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 10, 2026
Effective
September 10, 2026

Issuing agencies

Health and Human Services DepartmentFood and Drug Administration

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the cooperative powered surgical assist device for ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for classification of the cooperative powered surgical assist device for ENT surgery. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II will provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57502-57504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-18429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 874

[Docket No. FDA-2026-N-9902]


Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices; Classification of 
the Cooperative Powered Surgical Assist Device for ENT Surgery

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final amendment; final order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the 
cooperative powered surgical assist device for ear, nose, and throat 
(ENT) surgery into class II (special controls). The special controls 
that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be 
part of the codified language for classification of the cooperative 
powered surgical assist device for ENT surgery. We are taking this 
action because we have determined that classifying the device into 
class II will provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance 
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing 
regulatory burdens.

DATES: This order is effective September 10, 2026. The classification 
was applicable on July 19, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vasant Dasika, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1206, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5365, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96c0f7e5f7f8e2b8d2f7e5fffdf7d6f0f2f7b8fefee5b8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a4c7b697b746e345e7b6973717b5a7c7e7b34727269347d756c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Upon request, FDA (the Agency or we) has classified the cooperative 
powered surgical assist device for ENT surgery into class II (special 
controls), which we have determined will provide a reasonable assurance 
of the safety and effectiveness of the device. In addition, we believe 
this action will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in 
part by reducing regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower 
device class than the automatic class III assignment.
    The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law 
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by 
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution 
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified into, and remains 
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA 
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (21 U.S.C. 
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices'' 
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of 
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
    FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to 
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an 
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that 
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device 
is

[[Page 57503]]

substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of the 
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C 
Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
    FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification, 
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the 
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D (21 CFR part 860, subpart D)). 
Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 
1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De Novo 
classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety 
and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo 
classification process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor 
may utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
    Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket 
notification (510(k)) for a device that has not previously been 
classified. After receiving an order from FDA classifying the device 
into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person then 
requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).
    Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) 
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that 
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination 
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under 
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
    Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required 
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The 
classification will be according to the criteria under section 
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed 
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the 
initial classification of the device.
    We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients' 
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory 
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De 
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of 
that type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the 
FD&C Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a 
De Novo request or premarket approval application to market a 
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, 
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the 
less burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.

II. De Novo Classification

    On July 22, 2022, FDA received Galen Robotics' request for De Novo 
classification of the Galen ES Robotic Surgical Assistant Platform. FDA 
reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria 
for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
    We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves 
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device, but there is sufficient information to 
establish special controls that, in combination with the general 
controls, provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness 
of the device for its intended use (see section 513(a)(1)(B) of the 
FD&C Act). After review of the information submitted in the request, we 
determined that the device can be classified into class II with the 
establishment of special controls. FDA has determined that these 
special controls, in addition to the general controls, will provide 
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
    Therefore, on July 19, 2023, FDA issued an order to the requester 
classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is 
codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 
874.4460.\1\ We have named the generic type of device ``cooperative 
powered surgical assist device for ENT surgery,'' and it is identified 
as a device that facilitates ENT surgical procedures, including 
instrument placement. The device works in conjunction with the 
surgeon's movements to assist with precise and stable positioning of an 
instrument while maintaining the surgeon's direct physical control of 
the instrument.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order 
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final 
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made 
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal 
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of 
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act 
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and 
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has identified the risks to health associated with this type of 
device and the measures required to mitigate these risks in table 1.

Table 1--Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures for Cooperative Powered
                 Surgical Assist Devices for ENT Surgery
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Identified risks to health              Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury to anatomic structures resulting  Simulated use testing; Human
 in bleeding or loss of function.         factors evaluation; Non-
                                          clinical performance testing;
                                          Software verification,
                                          validation, and hazard
                                          analysis; Labeling;
                                          Electromagnetic compatibility
                                          testing; Electrical safety
                                          testing; Thermal safety
                                          testing; and Biocompatibility
                                          evaluation.
Inability to remove the device           Simulated use testing; Non-
 expeditiously (e.g., if device becomes   clinical performance testing;
 sluggish or frozen) resulting in:        Software verification,
<bullet> Lack of sufficient control of    validation, and hazard
 bleeding.                                analysis; Labeling;
<bullet> Prolonged time for removal and   Electromagnetic compatibility
 delayed access to critical structures.   testing; and Electrical safety
                                          testing.
Infection..............................  Labeling; Simulated-use
                                          testing; Sterilization
                                          validation; and Shelf-life
                                          testing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the 
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable 
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. For a device 
to fall within this classification, and thus avoid automatic 
classification in class III, it would have to comply with the special 
controls named in this final order. The necessary special controls 
appear in the regulation codified by this final order.
    Under the FD&C Act, submission of a premarket notification under 
section 510(k) is required to reasonably assure the safety and 
effectiveness of class II devices unless FDA determines that the device 
type should be exempt under

[[Page 57504]]

section 510(m) of the FD&C Act. At this time FDA has not made this 
determination for cooperative powered surgical assist devices for ENT 
surgery. This device is therefore subject to premarket notification 
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.

III. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is 
of a type that does not normally have a significant effect on the human 
environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an 
environmental impact statement is required.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final order establishes special controls that refer to 
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA 
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject 
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections 
of information in part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo classification 
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections 
of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding 
premarket approval have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding 
premarket notification submissions have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 820 
regarding quality management system regulation have been approved under 
OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 
CFR part 801 regarding labeling have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0485.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 874

    Medical devices.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
874 is amended as follows:

PART 874--EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT DEVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 874 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.


0
2. Add Sec.  874.4460 to subpart E to read as follows:


Sec.  874.4460  Cooperative powered surgical assist device for ENT 
surgery.

    (a) Identification. A cooperative powered surgical assist device 
for ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery is a device that facilitates 
ENT surgical procedures, including instrument placement. The device 
works in conjunction with the surgeon's movements to assist with 
precise and stable positioning of an instrument while maintaining the 
surgeon's direct physical control of the instrument.
    (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special 
controls for this device are:
    (1) Simulated-use testing must demonstrate that the device performs 
as intended under anticipated conditions of use to successfully assist 
in the indicated surgery, including:
    (i) Testing in a simulated hospital environment with an 
anatomically relevant model;
    (ii) Compatibility testing of all indicated instruments;
    (iii) Human factors/usability evaluation; and
    (iv) Validation of device use by surgeons, including:
    (A) The user interface and controller(s);
    (B) Compatibility with the ranges of surgeon-applied forces, 
torques, speeds, and motion; and
    (C) Time required for emergency removal of the device and 
associated instruments in the event of power loss or device failure.
    (2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate hardware and 
system verification, including verification of critical parameters 
(including minimum and maximum forces, torques, speeds, and range of 
motion).
    (3) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be 
performed for any software components of the device.
    (4) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic 
compatibility, electrical safety, and thermal safety of the device.
    (5) All parts or components of the device that enter the sterile 
field must be demonstrated to be sterile.
    (6) Performance testing must support the shelf life of device 
components provided sterile by demonstrating continued sterility, 
package integrity, and device functionality over the labeled shelf 
life.
    (7) All patient-contacting components of the device must be 
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
    (8) Labeling must include:
    (i) Identification of compatible instruments;
    (ii) A statement about any training needed prior to use of the 
device;
    (iii) A summary of all relevant performance testing, including 
simulated-use testing; and
    (iv) Reprocessing instructions for reusable device components.

Grace R. Graham,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2026-18429 Filed 9-9-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 10, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.