Skip to main content
Notice2026-17818

Notice of Adoption of Categorical Exclusion Under Section 109 of the National Environmental Policy Act

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 1, 2026
Effective
September 1, 2026

Issuing agencies

Defense DepartmentArmy Department

Abstract

The Department of the Army (DA) is adopting a categorical exclusion (CATEX) established by the Department of Energy (DOE) (42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 4336c). This notice identifies the types of actions to which DA will apply the CATEX, the considerations that DA will use in determining the applicability of the CATEX, and the consultation between DOE on the use of the CATEX, including screening for extraordinary circumstances that would preclude use of the CATEX.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 168 (Tuesday, September 1, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56135-56137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-17818]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Adoption of Categorical Exclusion Under Section 109 of 
the National Environmental Policy Act

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Adoption of Categorical Exclusion pursuant to Section 
109 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4336c.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army (DA) is adopting a categorical 
exclusion (CATEX) established by the Department of Energy (DOE) (42 
United States Code (U.S.C.) 4336c). This notice identifies the types of 
actions to which DA will apply the CATEX, the considerations that DA 
will use in determining the applicability of the CATEX, and the 
consultation between DOE on the use of the CATEX, including screening 
for extraordinary circumstances that would preclude use of the CATEX.

DATES: The adoption is effective September 1, 2026 and is available for 
DA use effective immediately.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. David Guldenzopf, Director for 
Environmental Compliance, Office of

[[Page 56136]]

the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and 
Environment, (571) 256-7822, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1175706778753f733f76647d75747f6b7e61773f7278675170637c683f7c787d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f7b7e69767b317d31786a737b7a7165706f79317c76695f7e6d726631727673">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Congress enacted the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 
U.S.C. 4321-4347 (NEPA) to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony 
between humans and the environment, recognizing the profound impact of 
human activity and the critical importance of restoring and maintaining 
environmental quality to the overall welfare of humankind. (42 U.S.C. 
4321, 4331). NEPA seeks to ensure that agencies consider the 
environmental effects of their proposed major actions in their 
decision-making processes and inform and involve the public in that 
process. To comply with NEPA, agencies determine the appropriate level 
of review of any major Federal action--an environmental impact 
statement (EIS), environmental assessment (EA), or categorical 
exclusion (CATEX) (42 U.S.C. 4336). If a proposed action is likely to 
have significant environmental effects, the agency must prepare an EIS 
and document its decision in a record of decision (42 U.S.C. 4336). If 
the proposed action is not likely to have significant environmental 
effects or the effects are unknown, the agency may instead prepare an 
EA, which involves a more concise analysis and process than an EIS (42 
U.S.C. 4336). Following the EA, the agency may conclude that the action 
will have no significant effects and document that conclusion in a 
finding of no significant impact. If the analysis concludes that the 
action is likely to have significant effects, then an EIS is required.
    Under NEPA, a Federal agency may establish categorical exclusions--
categories of actions that the agency has determined normally do not 
significantly affect the quality of the human environment--in its 
agency NEPA procedures. 42 U.S.C. 4336e(1). If an agency determines 
that a categorical exclusion covers a proposed action, the agency will 
then evaluate the proposed action for any extraordinary circumstances 
in which a normally excluded action may have a significant adverse 
effect. DA considers extraordinary circumstances pursuant to Department 
of War DoW NEPA Implementing Procedures dated 30 April 2026 Part 1.4(d) 
Applying Categorical Exclusions and will concurrently use the agency 
extraordinary circumstances for the adopted CATEXs as identified below. 
If an extraordinary circumstance exists, the agency nevertheless may 
apply the categorical exclusion if the agency conducts an analysis and 
determines that the proposed action does not in fact have the potential 
to result in significant effects notwithstanding the extraordinary 
circumstance or the agency modifies the proposed action to avoid or 
otherwise mitigate significant effects. If no extraordinary 
circumstances are present or if further analysis determines that the 
extraordinary circumstances do not involve the potential for 
significant environmental impacts, the agency may rely on the 
categorical exclusion to approve the proposed action without preparing 
an EA or EIS. 42 U.S.C. 4336(a)(2). If the extraordinary circumstances 
have the potential to result in significant effects, the agency is 
required to prepare an EA or EIS.
    Section 109 of NEPA, enacted as part of the Fiscal Responsibility 
Act of 2023, allows a Federal agency to adopt another Federal agency's 
CATEX (42 U.S.C. 4336c). To use another agency's CATEX under section 
109, the adopting agency must identify the relevant CATEX listed in 
another agency's (``establishing agency'') NEPA procedures that covers 
the adopting agency's category of proposed actions or related actions; 
consult with the establishing agency to ensure that the proposed 
adoption of the CATEX is appropriate for a category of actions; 
identify to the public the CATEX that the adopting agency plans to use 
for its proposed actions; and document adoption of the CATEX (42 U.S.C. 
4336c).
    This notice documents the DA's adoption of one DOE CATEX for DA use 
and provides public notice of the adoption. The DA NEPA procedures are 
contained within DoW NEPA Implementing Procedures dated 30 April 2026. 
The DoW NEPA Implementing Procedures include a list of categorical 
exclusions available to all DoW Components. After adoption of any 
CATEX, including this CATEX, it would be available to all DoW 
Components.

II. DOE Categorical Exclusion

    DA is adopting the following DOE CATEX:
    DOE CATEX B5.26: Advanced Nuclear Reactors.
    Authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, 
and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors, provided DOE 
determines that:
    (1) the project's attributes, including potential fission product 
inventory, fuel type, reactor design, and operational plans, reduce 
sufficiently the risk of adverse offsite consequences from the release 
of radioactive or hazardous materials, and
    (2) the project demonstrates that any hazardous waste, radioactive 
waste, or spent nuclear fuel generated by the project can be managed in 
accordance with applicable requirements.
    For the purposes of this category, a project may include multiple 
reactors within a nuclear facility. This CATEX is listed in DOE's NEPA 
Implementing Procedures, Appendix B, available at <a href="https://energy.gov/nepa">https://energy.gov/nepa</a>.

III. DA's Use of Adopted CATEX

    DA expects to use the listed CATEX for authorization of the 
construction and operation of advanced reactors on Army installations 
that would enhance mission capabilities and effectiveness, improve 
safety, and increase operational efficiencies. DA has identified 
multiple Army installations as potential locations for deployments of 
microreactor nuclear power plants (MNPs) for installation energy. This 
CATEX would allow DA to execute construction and operation of MNPs on 
Army installations. DA's use of this DOE CATEX would not be limited to 
this example and could be used in other circumstances for which its use 
is appropriate.

IV. Consideration of Extraordinary Circumstances and Applicable 
Criteria

    The DoW's NEPA Implementing Procedures guides its consideration of 
extraordinary circumstances. Further, DA will apply the originating 
agency's extraordinary circumstances as described in DOE's 
extraordinary circumstances listed at DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures, 
Section 5.4(c)(3). If an extraordinary circumstance is present, the DA 
will determine whether it is possible to modify the action to avoid 
significant adverse effects. If the action cannot be modified, DA will 
consider whether the application of the CATEX is still appropriate 
notwithstanding the presence of extraordinary circumstances, because 
even with the extraordinary circumstance, the proposed action does not 
have the potential to result in significant impacts. If DA determines 
that it cannot apply a CATEX to the proposed action, a particular 
proposed action due to extraordinary circumstances, DA will prepare an 
EA or EIS, consistent with DoW NEPA Implementing Procedures dated 30 
April 2026 Part 1.4 Categorical exclusions.
    Additionally, when applying this CATEX, DA will evaluate the 
proposed action to ensure consideration of

[[Page 56137]]

``Integral Elements'' described in Appendix B of DOE's NEPA 
Implementing Procedures. DA will document each application of the 
above-listed CATEX and its consideration of extraordinary circumstances 
and integral elements within a Record of Environmental Consideration 
(REC).

V. Consultation With Establishing Agencies and Determination of 
Appropriateness

    DA worked with DOE to identify the CATEX that could apply to DA 
proposed actions and consulted with DOE representatives on 29 July 
2026. During the consultation, the agencies discussed whether the 
categories of DA proposed actions would be appropriately covered by the 
CATEX; the extraordinary circumstances that DA should consider before 
applying this CATEX to DA's proposed actions; the requirement to 
evaluate conditions listed as integral elements in DOE's NEPA 
Implementing Procedures; and what documentation DA should complete when 
applying this CATEX. The agencies also considered past use of the CATEX 
by DOE. At the conclusion of that process, the agencies determined that 
DA's proposed use of the CATEX as described in this notice would be 
appropriate.

VI. Notice to the Public and Documentation of Adoption

    This notice serves to identify to the public the CATEX DA plans to 
use for its proposed actions, subject to the limitations described 
above (42 U.S.C. 4336c(3) and document DA's adoption of the CATEX 
listed in Section II in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 4336c(4), and 
identifies the types of actions to which DA contemplates applying the 
CATEX to at this time. In adopting this categorical exclusion, DA will 
make an administrative change to remove ``DOE'' from the categorical 
exclusion text, in alignment with recent Council on Environmental 
Quality (CEQ) guidance on categorical exclusions \1\. Upon issuance of 
this notice, the adopted CATEX is available for use by DA, effective 
immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CEQ's April 2026 guidance on ``Establishing, Revising, 
Adopting, and Applying Categorical Exclusions Under the National 
Environmental Policy Act'' provides for non-substantive changes when 
adopting another agency's categorical exclusion. Specifically, CEQ 
guidance states: ``[i]f an agency needs to clarify that an adopted 
categorical exclusion applies to its proposed action despite non-
substantive language in the categorical exclusion referencing the 
establishing agency, it may explain this in the public notice 
adopting the categorical exclusion.''

James W. Satterwhite Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2026-17818 Filed 8-31-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3711-CC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 1, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.