Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Japan: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
On April 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Nippon Steel Corporation vs the United States, Consol. Court no. 21-00533, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan covering the period October 1, 2018, through September 30, 2019. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Nippon Steel Corporation (Nippon Steel).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 166 (Friday, August 28, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55513-55514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-17619]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-874]
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Japan: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping
Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT)
issued its final judgment in Nippon Steel Corporation vs the United
States, Consol. Court no. 21-00533, sustaining the U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to the
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan covering the period October
1, 2018, through September 30, 2019. Commerce is notifying the public
that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final
results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the
final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Nippon
Steel Corporation (Nippon Steel).
DATES: Applicable April 18, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Duffeck, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3524.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On Augst 26, 2021, Commerce published its Final Results in the
2018-2019 AD administrative review of
[[Page 55514]]
certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan. Commerce calculated
a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.70 percent.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 86 FR 47615 (August 26,
2021) (Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nippon Steel challenged Commerce's Final Results, regarding
Commerce's application of partial adverse inference to Nippon Steel's
home market affiliates' unreported downstream sales and Commerce's
decision to deduct section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 duty
payments from the U.S. price of subject merchandise. On August 1, 2022,
Commerce completed a partial voluntary remand, granted by the CIT, to
add certain separately-reported service-related revenue to the U.S.
price and revised Nippon Steel's rate of dumping for the POR to 10.12
percent.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Final Results of Remand Redetermination Pursuant to
Court Remand, Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States, Consol.
Court No. 21-00533, dated August 1, 2022 (First Remand
Redetermination).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 10, 2024, the CIT affirmed, in part, and remanded, in
part, Commerce's Final Results as amended by the First Remand
Redetermination.\3\ The CIT remanded Commerce to reconsider or further
explain Commerce's decision to apply facts available with an adverse
inference to certain Nippon Steel home market affiliates' unreported
downstream sales.\4\ On October 10, 2024, Commerce issued its Second
Remand Redetermination, in which Commerce further explained its
decision to continue to apply an adverse inference to Nippon Steel's
home market affiliates' unreported downstream sales and the CIT
sustained Commerce's second redetermination.\5\ On April 8, 2026, the
CIT issued its final judgement sustaining Commerce's Final Results, as
amended by the First Remand Redetermination and Second Remand
Redetermination.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States, 732 F.Supp.3d
1353 (CIT 2024).
\4\ Id.
\5\ See Final Results of Remand Redetermination Pursuant to
Court Remand, Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States, Consol.
Court No. 21-00533, Slip Op. 24-112 (CIT October 10, 2024), dated
January 8, 2025 (Second Remand Redetermination).
\6\ See Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States, 829 F.Supp.3d
1274 (CIT 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\7\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\8\
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant
to sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's April 8,
2026, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in
harmony with Commerce's Final Results. Thus, this notice is published
in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\8\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending
its Final Results with respect to Nippon Steel as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Company dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nippon Steel Corporation/Nippon Steel Nisshin Co., Ltd./ 10.12
Nippon Steel Trading Corporation..........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because Nippon Steel has a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e.,
there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative
review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the
current cash deposit rate for Nippon Steel. For all exporters/producers
that do not have a superseding cash deposit rate, Commerce will issue
revised cash deposit instructions to CBP.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
As no parties have appealed the CIT's ruling and the appeals period
is now lapsed, the Court's decision is final and conclusive. Commerce
intends to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated
entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Nippon Steel
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review
when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis. Where an import-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or
de minimis,\9\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 26, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2026-17619 Filed 8-27-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.