Skip to main content
Proposed Rule2026-17501

Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Louisville Area Limited Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 27, 2026

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky through the Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District) via a letter dated June 3, 2024. The SIP revision consists of a Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP) for the Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana 1997 8- hour ozone maintenance area (the "bi-state Louisville Area"). The Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville Area includes the Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham Counties of Kentucky (the "Louisville Area"). The EPA is proposing to approve the Louisville Area's LMP because it provides for the maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) within the bi-state Louisville Area through the end of the second 10-year portion of the maintenance period. The effect of this proposed action would be to make certain commitments related to maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Louisville Area federally enforceable as part of the Kentucky SIP.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55294-55299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-17501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2024-0295; FRL-13322-01-R4]


Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Louisville Area Limited Maintenance 
Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is 
proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky through the Energy and 
Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air 
Pollution Control District (District) via a letter dated June 3, 2024. 
The SIP revision consists of a Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP) for the 
Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana 1997 8-
hour ozone maintenance area (the ``bi-state Louisville Area''). The 
Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville Area includes the Bullitt, 
Jefferson, and Oldham Counties of Kentucky (the ``Louisville Area''). 
The EPA is proposing to approve the Louisville Area's LMP because it 
provides for the maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient 
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) within the bi-state Louisville Area 
through the end of the second 10-year portion of the maintenance 
period. The effect of this proposed action would be to make certain 
commitments related to maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in 
the Louisville Area federally enforceable as part of the Kentucky SIP.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 17, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2024-0295 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA 
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nelsha Athauda, Multi-Air Pollutant 
Coordination Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and 
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is 
(404)-562-9360. Ms. Athauda can also be reached via electronic mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7514011d140011145b1b1019061d14351005145b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e9889d81889c8d88c7878c859a8188a98c9988c78e869f">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this proposed rule, the use of 
``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is intended to refer to the EPA. We use 
multiple abbreviations and terms in this proposed rule. While this list 
may not be exhaustive, for ease of reading and for reference purposes, 
the EPA defines the following terms and acronyms here:

AQS Air Quality System
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI Confidential Business Information
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CO Carbon Monoxide
DV Design Value
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FR Federal Register
KIPDA Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency
LMP Limited Maintenance Plan
MOVES EPA's MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard
NEI National Emissions Inventory
NO<INF>X</INF> Nitrogen Oxides
PM<INF>10</INF> Particulate Matter with an aerodynamic diameter less 
than 10 microns
ppm Parts per million
RACT Reasonably Available Control Technology
SIP State Implementation Plan
TDM Travel Demand Model
tpsd tons per summer day
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

Table of Contents

I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Kentucky's SIP Submittal
IV. The EPA's Evaluation of Kentucky's SIP Submittal
    A. Attainment Emissions Inventory
    B. Maintenance Demonstration
    C. Monitoring Network and Verification of Continued Attainment
    D. Contingency Plan

[[Page 55295]]

V. Transportation Conformity
VI. Proposed Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Executive Summary

    In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), the EPA is 
proposing to approve the Louisville Area's second 10-year LMP for the 
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, adopted on June 3, 2024, and submitted to the 
Agency as a revision to the Kentucky SIP under a letter dated June 3, 
2024.
    On April 30, 2004, the bi-state Louisville Area, which is composed 
of Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham Counties in Kentucky and Clark and 
Floyd Counties in Indiana, was designated as nonattainment for the 1997 
8-hour ozone NAAQS.\1\ Subsequently, on September 29, 2006, the Cabinet 
submitted a redesignation request and the first 10-year maintenance 
plan for the Louisville Area. In 2007, the EPA approved the maintenance 
plan and redesignated the Louisville Area to attainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 69 FR 23857 (Apr. 30, 2004).
    \2\ See 72 FR 36601 (July 5, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Louisville Area LMP for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, submitted 
by the Cabinet on June 3, 2024, is designed to maintain the 1997 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS within the Louisville Area through the end of the second 
10-year portion of the maintenance period beyond redesignation (through 
2027). The EPA is proposing to approve the plan because it meets all 
applicable requirements under CAA sections 110 and 175A.

II. Background

    In 1979, under CAA section 109, the EPA established primary and 
secondary NAAQS for ozone at 0.12 parts per million (ppm), averaged 
over a 1-hour period.\3\ On July 18, 1997, the EPA revised the primary 
and secondary NAAQS for ozone \4\ to set the acceptable level of ozone 
in the ambient air at 0.08 ppm, averaged over an 8-hour period.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 44 FR 8202 (Feb. 8, 1979).
    \4\ See 62 FR 38856 (July 18, 1997).
    \5\ In March 2008, the EPA completed another review of the 
primary and secondary ozone NAAQS and lowered the level for both to 
0.075 ppm. See 73 FR 16436 (Mar. 27, 2008). Additionally, in October 
2015, the EPA completed another review of the primary and secondary 
ozone NAAQS and further lowered the level for both to 0.070 ppm. See 
80 FR 65292 (Oct. 26, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the EPA is 
required by the CAA to designate areas throughout the nation as 
attaining or not attaining the NAAQS. On April 30, 2004, the EPA 
designated the bi-state Louisville Area, which consists of the Kentucky 
counties of Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham and the Indiana counties of 
Clark and Floyd, as nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 
Those designations became effective on June 15, 2004.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 69 FR 23858 (Apr. 30, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA has revised the ozone NAAQS twice since the 1997 standards 
were finalized. On July 20, 2012, the EPA designated areas as 
unclassifiable/attainment or nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS. The Louisville Area was designated as attainment for that 
standard with an effective date of July 20, 2012.\7\ On November 16, 
2017, the EPA designated areas for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The bi-
state Louisville Area was designated as nonattainment for the 2015 8-
hour ozone NAAQS with an effective date of August 3, 2018.\8\ The EPA 
redesignated the Indiana portion of the bi-state Louisville Area to 
attainment for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS with an effective date of 
July 5, 2022.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012).
    \8\ See 83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018).
    \9\ See 87 FR 39750 (July 5, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A State may submit a request that the EPA redesignate a 
nonattainment area that is attaining a NAAQS to attainment, and, if the 
area has met the criteria described in CAA section 107(d)(3)(E), the 
Agency may approve the redesignation request.\10\ One of the criteria 
for redesignation is for the area to have an approved maintenance plan 
under CAA section 175A. The maintenance plan must demonstrate that the 
area will continue to maintain the NAAQS for the period extending ten 
years after redesignation, and it must contain such additional measures 
as necessary to ensure maintenance and such contingency provisions as 
necessary to assure that violations of the NAAQS will be promptly 
corrected. Eight years after the effective date of redesignation, the 
State must also submit a second maintenance plan to ensure ongoing 
maintenance of the NAAQS for an additional ten years pursuant to CAA 
section 175A(b) (i.e., ensuring maintenance for 20 years after 
redesignation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) sets out the requirements for 
redesignating a nonattainment area to attainment. They include 
attainment of the NAAQS, full approval of the applicable SIP 
pursuant to CAA section 110(k), determination that improvement in 
air quality is a result of permanent and enforceable reductions in 
emissions, demonstration that the State has met all applicable 
section 110 and part D requirements, and a fully approved 
maintenance plan under CAA section 175A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA has published long-standing guidance for States on 
developing maintenance plans. The Calcagni memo \11\ provides that 
States may generally demonstrate maintenance by either performing air 
quality modeling to show that the future mix of sources and emission 
rates will not cause a violation of the NAAQS or by showing that 
projected future emissions of a pollutant and its precursors will not 
exceed the level of emissions during a year when the area was attaining 
the NAAQS (i.e., attainment year inventory).\12\ The EPA clarified in 
three subsequent guidance memos that certain areas can meet the CAA 
section 175A requirement to provide for maintenance by showing that 
they are unlikely to violate the NAAQS in the future, using information 
such as the area design values \13\ when the design values are well 
below the standard and have been historically stable.\14\ The EPA 
refers to a maintenance plan containing this streamlined demonstration 
as an LMP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, 
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), 
``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to 
Attainment,'' September 4, 1992 (Calcagni memo).
    \12\ See Calcagni memo at page 9.
    \13\ The ozone design value for a monitoring site is the 3-year 
average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average 
ozone concentrations. The design value for an ozone area is the 
highest design value of any monitoring site in the area.
    \14\ See ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Nonclassifiable 
Ozone Nonattainment Areas'' from Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated 
November 16, 1994; ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for 
Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas'' from Joseph Paisie, OAQPS, 
dated October 6, 1995; and ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for 
Moderate PM<INF>10</INF> Nonattainment Areas'' from Lydia Wegman, 
OAQPS, dated August 9, 2001. Copies of these guidance memoranda can 
be found in the docket for this proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA has interpreted CAA section 175A as permitting the LMP 
option because CAA section 175A does not define how areas may 
demonstrate maintenance, and in the Agency's experience implementing 
the various NAAQS, areas that qualify for an LMP and have approved LMPs 
have rarely, if ever, experienced subsequent violations of the NAAQS. 
As noted in the LMP guidance memoranda, States seeking an LMP must 
still submit the maintenance plan elements outlined in the Calcagni 
memo, including an attainment emissions inventory, provisions for the 
continued operation of the ambient air quality monitoring network, 
verification of continued attainment, and a contingency plan in the 
event of a future violation of the NAAQS. Moreover, a State seeking an 
LMP must still submit its section 175A maintenance plan as a revision 
to its SIP, with all attendant notice and comment procedures. While the 
LMP guidance memoranda were originally written with respect to certain

[[Page 55296]]

NAAQS,\15\ the EPA has extended the LMP interpretation of section 175A 
to other NAAQS and pollutants not specifically covered by the previous 
guidance memos.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The prior memos addressed: unclassifiable areas under the 
1-hour ozone NAAQS, nonattainment areas for the PM<INF>10</INF> 
(particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 
microns) NAAQS, and nonattainment areas for the carbon monoxide (CO) 
NAAQS.
    \16\ See, e.g., 79 FR 41900 (July 18, 2014) (approval of the 
second ten-year LMP for the Grant County 1971 sulfur dioxide 
maintenance area).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this case, the EPA is proposing to approve the Louisville Area's 
LMP because the Commonwealth has shown that ozone concentrations in the 
bi-state Louisville Area are well below the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, 
have been historically stable, and that the Commonwealth has met the 
other maintenance plan requirements. The Cabinet submitted the LMP for 
the Louisville Area to fulfill the CAA's second maintenance plan 
requirement. The EPA's evaluation of the Louisville Area's LMP is 
presented in section IV of this notice of proposed rulemaking, below.
    On September 29, 2006, the Cabinet submitted a request to the EPA 
to redesignate the Louisville Area, to attainment for the 1997 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS. This submittal included a plan, for inclusion in the 
Kentucky SIP, to provide for maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 
in the bi-state Louisville Area through 2017. The EPA approved the 
Louisville Area maintenance plan and the Commonwealth's request to 
redesignate the Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville Area to 
attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective August 6, 
2007.\17\ Kentucky's June 3, 2024, submittal contains the second 10-
year maintenance plan for the 20-year maintenance period of the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS to ensure continued maintenance for the bi-state 
Louisville Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 72 FR 36601 (July 5, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CAA section 175A(b) requires States to submit a revision to the 
first maintenance plan eight years after redesignation to provide for 
maintenance of the NAAQS for ten additional years following the end of 
the first 10-year period. However, the EPA's final implementation rule 
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS revoked the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and 
stated that one consequence of revocation was that areas that had been 
redesignated to attainment (i.e., maintenance areas) for the 1997 NAAQS 
no longer needed to submit second 10-year maintenance plans under CAA 
section 175A(b).\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See 80 FR 12264, 12315 (Mar. 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In South Coast Air Quality Management District v. EPA, the United 
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated 
the EPA's interpretation that, because of the revocation of the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS, second maintenance plans were not required for 
``orphan maintenance areas,'' i.e., areas that had been redesignated to 
attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance areas and were 
designated attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.\19\ Thus, States with 
these ``orphan maintenance areas'' under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 
must submit maintenance plans for the second maintenance period. 
Accordingly, on June 3, 2024, Kentucky submitted a second 10-year 
maintenance plan for the Louisville Area that shows that the Area is 
expected to remain in attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through 
2027.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ South Coast II, 882 F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In recognition of the continuing record of relatively stable air 
quality monitoring data showing ambient 8-hour ozone concentrations in 
the Louisville Area well below the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the Cabinet 
chose the LMP option for the development of the second 1997 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS maintenance plan.

III. Kentucky's SIP Submittal

    As mentioned above, on June 3, 2024, KDAQ submitted the Louisville 
Area LMP for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS to the EPA as a revision to 
the Kentucky SIP. The submittal includes the LMP, air quality data, 
emissions inventory information, and appendices. Appendices to the plan 
include monitoring data; documentation of public notice and statement 
of consideration; and public hearing minutes.

IV. The EPA's Evaluation of Kentucky's SIP Submittal

    The EPA has reviewed the Louisville Area's LMP, which is designed 
to maintain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS within the Louisville Area 
through the end of the 20-year period beyond redesignation, as required 
under CAA section 175A(b). The following is a summary of the EPA's 
interpretation of the section 175A requirements \20\ and the Agency's 
evaluation of how each requirement is met for the Louisville Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Calcagni memo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Attainment Emissions Inventory

    The June 3, 2024, submittal includes an ozone attainment inventory 
for the Louisville Area that reflects typical summer day emissions in 
2019. The submittal also includes a comparison of the 2019 attainment 
emissions inventory to the 2003 attainment inventory developed for the 
first 10-year maintenance plan.\21\ Comparing these inventories shows 
an overall decrease in emissions. Table 1 presents a summary of these 
inventories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ For more information on the development of the 2003 
emissions inventory, see 72 FR 20966 (Apr. 27, 2007).

 Table 1--Attainment Emissions Inventory for 2003 and 2019 in Tons Per Summer Day (tpsd) for the Louisville Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            NOX                     VOC
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                                                     2003        2019        2003        2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullitt Total:                                                         10.04        5.77       16.95       19.74
    Nonpoint....................................................        0.11        0.33        3.34        5.03
    Nonroad.....................................................        1.81        0.26        1.77        0.55
    Onroad......................................................        7.52        3.67        3.74        1.26
    Point.......................................................        0.60        1.51        8.10       12.90
Jefferson Total:                                                      170.76       62.59       80.61       63.05
    Nonpoint....................................................        0.75        6.88       17.33       30.53
    Nonroad.....................................................       31.94        3.39       14.31        3.66
    Onroad......................................................       63.29       19.97       25.34        8.41
    Point.......................................................       74.78       32.35       23.63       20.45
Oldham Total:                                                           6.22        2.61        7.01        2.80

[[Page 55297]]

 
    Nonpoint....................................................        0.07        0.41        2.46        1.56
    Nonroad.....................................................        1.63        0.35        1.54        0.51
    Onroad......................................................        4.43        1.67        2.29        0.61
    Point.......................................................        0.09        0.18        0.72        0.12
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
Kentucky Total                                                        187.02       70.97      104.57       85.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Attainment Inventory portion of the June 3, 2024, submittal 
describes the methods, models, and assumptions used to develop the 2019 
attainment inventory and indicates that this inventory was developed 
using the following combination of sources: (1) Data from the 2017 
National Emissions Inventory (NEI); \22\ (2) Data required to be 
submitted by sources to the District \23\ and the Division; \24\ (3) 
Mobile source modeling, using the Kentuckiana Regional Planning and 
Development Agency's (KIPDA's) most recent travel demand model (TDM) 
along with EPA's MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) version 
3.0.3, which was conducted by KIPDA and the District for the Area; and 
(4) EPA's 2016v2 modeling platform.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Documentation and data for the 2017 NEI is available at: 
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2017-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data">https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2017-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data</a>.
    \23\ District Regulation 1.06, available at <a href="https://louisvilleky.gov/air-pollution-control-district/document/regulation106-version-11">https://louisvilleky.gov/air-pollution-control-district/document/regulation106-version-11</a>.
    \24\ 401 KAR 52:020, available at <a href="https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/401/052/020.pdf">https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/401/052/020.pdf</a> and 401 KAR 52:030, 
available at <a href="https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/401/052/030.pdf">https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/401/052/030.pdf</a>.
    \25\ Documentation and data for EPA's 2016v2 modeling platform 
available at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/2016v2-platform">https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/2016v2-platform</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the review of the methods, models, and assumptions used by 
Kentucky to develop the volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of 
nitrogen (NO<INF>X</INF>) estimates, the EPA proposes to find that the 
June 3, 2024, submittal includes a comprehensive, reasonably accurate 
inventory of actual ozone precursor emissions in attainment year 2019 
and proposes to conclude that the plan's inventories are acceptable for 
the purposes of a subsequent maintenance plan under CAA section 
175A(b).

B. Maintenance Demonstration

    The maintenance demonstration requirement is considered to be 
satisfied in an LMP if the air monitoring data for the area that is 
well below the level of the NAAQS, that past air quality trends have 
been shown to be stable, and that the probability of the area 
experiencing a violation over the second 10-year maintenance period is 
low.\26\ These criteria are evaluated below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Nonclassifiable 
Ozone Nonattainment Areas'' from Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated 
November 16, 1994; ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for 
Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas'' from Joseph Paisie, OAQPS, 
dated October 6, 1995; and ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for 
Moderate PM<INF>10</INF> Nonattainment Areas'' from Lydia Wegman, 
OAQPS, dated August 9, 2001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Evaluation of Ozone Concentrations
    To attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the three-year average of 
the fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations 
(design value) at each monitor within an area must not exceed 0.08 ppm. 
Based on the rounding convention described in 40 CFR part 50, Appendix 
I, the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS is attained if the design value is 0.084 
ppm or below.
    There are currently seven ozone monitors in the bi-state Louisville 
Area, one in Bullitt County, Kentucky; one in Oldham County, Kentucky; 
three in Jefferson County, Kentucky; one in Clark County, Indiana; and 
one in Floyd County, Indiana. Data for four air monitoring sites in 
Jefferson County are reported in the table below due to the relocation 
of a monitor from Bates Elementary (Air Quality System (AQS) ID: 21-
111-0027) to Carrithers Middle School (AQS ID: 21-111-0080) in 
2018.\27\ Table 2 presents the design values (in ppm) for each monitor 
in the bi-state Louisville Area over the 2012-2025 period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Page 66 of the 2024 Kentucky Annual Ambient Air Monitoring 
Network Plan describes the purpose and details behind the relocation 
of the monitor.

                                                  Table 2--1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Design Values (DV) (ppm) for Monitors in the Bi-State Louisville Area for the 2012-2025 Time Period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                2010-2012  2011-2013  2012-2014  2013-2015  2014-2016  2015-2017  2016-2018  2017-2019  2018-2020  2019-2021  2020-2022  2021-2023  2022-2024  2023-2025
                             County                                AQS Site ID      DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV         DV
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clark, IN.......................................................   18-019-0008     0.081      0.078      0.072      0.069      0.070      0.071      0.070      0.067      0.065      0.063      0.063       0.066      0.069     0.071
Bullitt, KY.....................................................   21-029-0006     0.075      0.072      0.069      0.065      0.066      0.065      0.066      0.064      0.065      0.064      0.064       0.067      0.067     0.068
Jefferson, KY...................................................   21-111-0027     0.080      0.077      0.071      0.066      0.069      0.069        (*)        (*)   .........  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........
Jefferson, KY...................................................   21-111-0051     0.079      (* *)      (* *)      (* *)      0.069      0.068      0.068      0.066      0.065      0.065      0.065       0.068      0.067     0.067
Jefferson, KY...................................................   21-111-0067     0.085      (* *)      (* *)      (* *)      0.074      0.074      0.073      0.071      0.070      0.069      0.070       0.072      0.075     0.075
Oldham, KY......................................................   21-185-0004     0.086      0.082      0.074      0.068       0.07      0.068      0.067      0.066      0.065      0.063      0.063       0.065      0.067     0.069
Jefferson, KY...................................................   21-111-0080  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........       (*)        (*)      0.067      0.068      0.069       0.070      0.070     0.070
Floyd, IN.......................................................   18-043-0008     0.079      0.078      0.073      0.066      0.068      0.070      0.073      0.070      0.067      0.064      0.064       * * *      * * *     0.070
                                                                                                                                                                                                             0.066      0.066
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The Jefferson County, Kentucky, monitor (AQS Site ID: 21-111-0027) was relocated to a new site (AQS ID: 21-111-0080) before the ozone monitoring season in 2018. As a result, neither site had a valid three-year design value during
  2016-2018 and 2017-2019.
** Two Jefferson County, Kentucky, monitors (AQS Site ID: 21-111-0051 and AQS Site ID: 21-111-0067) did not meet completeness criteria in 2013. As a result, neither site had a valid three-year design value during 2011-2013, 2012-
  2014, and 2013-2015.
*** The Floyd County, Indiana, monitor (formerly AQS Site ID: 18-043-1004) was relocated to a new site (AQS Site ID: 18-043-0008) before the ozone monitoring season in 2023. The EPA approved the combination of data from both sites
  into a single site data record for the purpose of calculating design values. The design values shown include data from both monitoring sites before and after the relocation.


[[Page 55298]]

    In the bi-state Louisville Area, all current design values are 
below 85 percent of the ozone NAAQS,\28\ with the exception of one 
Jefferson County monitor (AQS ID: 21-111-0067). The Jefferson County 
monitor's 2025 design value is 0.075 ppm, which is 89 percent of the 
exceedance levels of the ozone NAAQS. All other monitors in the bi-
state Louisville Area are below this 85 percent threshold. Based on the 
weight of evidence in support of Kentucky's submittal, the EPA is 
proposing to approve this LMP. No design values in the bi-state 
Louisville Area have exceeded the 1997 ozone NAAQS during the 2013-2025 
time period depicted in Table 2. The design value data shown in Table 2 
illustrates an overall downward trend in ozone levels at each monitor 
over this timeframe, and the 20-year maintenance period beyond 
redesignation ends in 2027, which leaves only a relatively short amount 
of remaining time during which significant increases in ozone levels 
are unlikely based on the data in Table 2. Thus, the probability of the 
area experiencing a violation during this second maintenance period is 
low. These aspects of the EPA's proposed approval are discussed in more 
detail below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Nonclassifiable 
Ozone Nonattainment Areas'' from Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated 
November 16, 1994.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Stability of Ozone Levels
    As discussed above, the bi-state Louisville Area has maintained 
ozone concentrations below the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS over the past 
twelve 3-year design value periods. Additionally, the design value data 
shown in Table 2 illustrates an overall downward trend in ozone levels 
at each monitor over this timeframe. Over the past eight years, the 
maximum design value increase was 0.008 ppm, which occurred at the 
Clark, Indiana, ozone monitor (AQS ID: 18-019-0008) from 0.063 ppm in 
the 2019-2021 DV and 2020-2022 DV, to 0.071 in the 2023-2025 DV. After 
adding the maximum design value increase of 0.008 ppm to the maximum 
most recent design value (0.075 ppm), the resulting 0.083 ppm remains 
below the 0.084 ppm threshold to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 
Additionally, the 20-year maintenance period beyond redesignation ends 
in 2027, which leaves only a short amount of remaining time during 
which significant increases in ozone levels are unlikely based on the 
data in Table 2. As a result, the EPA finds that there is a low 
probability of the Area violating the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS during 
this second maintenance period.

C. Monitoring Network and Verification of Continued Attainment

    The EPA annually reviews the ozone monitoring network that the 
Cabinet operates and maintains in accordance with 40 CFR part 58. This 
network is described in the ambient air monitoring network plan that is 
developed by the Cabinet and submitted to the EPA annually, following a 
public notification and comment process. For further details on 
monitoring, the reader is referred to Kentucky's 2025 Ambient Air 
Monitoring Network Plan. The Cabinet submitted the 2025 Network Plan on 
July 1, 2025, and it received approval from the EPA on October 28, 
2025.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ Kentucky's 2025 Annual Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 
(submitted to the EPA on July 1, 2025) and the EPA's Approval Letter 
(transmitted by October 28, 2025) are both available in the docket 
for this proposed action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the Cabinet's monitoring network in the Louisville 
Area has been approved by the EPA in accordance with 40 CFR part 58, 
and the Cabinet has committed to continue to maintain a network in 
accordance with the EPA requirements. The EPA proposes to find that the 
Cabinet's monitoring network is adequate to verify continued attainment 
of the 1997 ozone NAAQS in the bi-state Louisville Area.

D. Contingency Plan

    CAA section 175A(d) requires that a maintenance plan include 
contingency provisions. The purpose of such contingency provisions is 
to prevent future violations of the NAAQS or to promptly remedy any 
NAAQS violations that might occur during the maintenance period.
    The Louisville Area LMP contingency plan includes tracking and 
triggering mechanisms to determine when control measures are needed, 
and a process for developing and adopting appropriate control measures. 
Specifically, any 8-hour ozone monitoring reading of 0.085 ppm or 
greater in the bi-state Louisville Area or periodic emissions inventory 
updates \30\ that reveal excessive or unanticipated growth greater than 
10 percent in either NO<INF>X</INF> or VOC emissions over the 
attainment inventory for the bi-state Louisville Area will cause the 
Division to evaluate existing control measures to see if any further 
emission reduction measures should be implemented at that time. 
Implementation of necessary controls in response to an initial 
``indicator'' will take place as expeditiously as possible, but no 
later than twelve months from the conclusion of the most recent ozone 
season (October 31) in which the annual fourth-highest monitored value 
of 0.085 ppm or greater occurred.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ The Air Emissions Reporting Rule requires State and local 
agencies to collect and submit criteria pollutant emissions data to 
EPA's Emissions Inventory System according to the schedule in 40 CFR 
51.30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If a three-year average of annual fourth-highest monitored values 
of 0.085 ppm or greater (i.e., a violation of the standard) occurs 
within the bi-state Louisville Area, an action level response will take 
effect. The Division and the District, in conjunction with the 
metropolitan planning organization or regional council of governments, 
will determine additional control measures needed to ensure future 
attainment of the NAAQS for ozone. Appropriate contingency measures 
will be selected to be in place within twenty-four months of a 
monitored violation.
    The contingency measures chosen will be selected based on their 
ability to bring the bi-state Louisville Area back into attainment. The 
LMP contains the following list of potential contingency measures.
    <bullet> Implementation of a program to require additional emission 
reductions on stationary sources, including Reasonably Available 
Control Technology (RACT) for point sources of VOC and NO<INF>X</INF>, 
and, specifically, the adoption of new and revised RACT rules based on 
Groups II, III, and IV Control Techniques Guidelines;
    <bullet> Implementation of a program to enhance inspection of 
stationary sources;
    <bullet> Implementation of fuel programs, including incentives for 
alternative fuels;
    <bullet> Restriction of certain roads or lanes to, or construction 
of such roads or lanes for use by, passenger buses or high-occupancy 
vehicles;
    <bullet> Trip-reduction ordinances;
    <bullet> Employer-based transportation management plans, including 
incentives;
    <bullet> Programs for new construction and major reconstructions of 
paths or tracks for use by pedestrians or by non-motorized vehicles 
when economically feasible and in the public interest;
    <bullet> Implementation of a modern vehicle inspection/maintenance 
program;
    <bullet> Implementation of diesel retrofit programs, including 
incentives for performing retrofits for fleet vehicle operations;
    <bullet> Additional engine idling reduction programs.
    The Louisville Area's LMP includes updates to the list of potential 
contingency measures in the first 10-year maintenance plan. New 
potential

[[Page 55299]]

contingency measures include additional engine idling reduction 
programs and the implementation of diesel retrofit programs with 
incentives for retrofitting fleet vehicles. The second 10-year LMP no 
longer identifies programs to limit or restrict vehicle use in downtown 
areas or other high-emission zones during peak periods as potential 
contingency measures.
    The EPA proposes to find that the contingency provisions in 
Kentucky's second maintenance plan for the Louisville Area for the 1997 
8-hour ozone NAAQS meet the requirements of the CAA section 175A(d).

V. Transportation Conformity

    Transportation conformity is required by CAA section 176(c). 
Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not 
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or 
delay timely attainment of the NAAQS.\31\ The EPA's transportation 
conformity rule at 40 CFR part 93, subpart A, requires that 
transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to SIPs and 
establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether they 
conform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See CAA 176(c)(1)(A) and (B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the decision in South Coast Air Quality Management v. EPA, 
transportation conformity is not required for the Louisville Area for 
the 1997 NAAQS as the entire 1997 Area is encompassed by the 
nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Therefore, a 
demonstration for the less stringent 1997 ozone NAAQS is unnecessary.
    The Louisville 2015 NAAQS Area needs to continue to meet all 
applicable requirements of the transportation conformity regulations, 
including the need for a regional emissions analysis and comparison of 
the results of the regional emissions analysis to the applicable motor 
vehicle emissions budgets for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The approved 1997 
ozone NAAQS budgets will be used to demonstrate conformity for the 2015 
ozone NAAQS until budgets for the 2015 ozone NAAQS are deemed adequate 
or approved for the Kentucky portion of the Louisville 
Area.<SUP>32 33</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ Budgets for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS were deemed 
adequate and approved for the Indiana portion of the Louisville 
Area. See 87 FR 39750.
    \33\ See 40 CFR 93.109(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Proposed Action

    Under CAA sections 110(k) and 175A and for the reasons set forth 
above, the EPA is proposing to approve the Louisville Area LMP for the 
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, submitted by the Cabinet on June 3, 2024, as a 
revision to the Kentucky SIP. The EPA is proposing to approve the 
Louisville Area LMP because it includes an acceptable update of the 
various elements of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance plan 
approved by the Agency for the first 10-year period (including 
emissions inventory, assurance of adequate monitoring and verification 
of continued attainment, and contingency provisions).
    The EPA also finds that the Louisville Area qualifies for the LMP 
option and that, therefore, the Louisville Area LMP adequately 
demonstrates maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through 
documentation of monitoring data showing design values well below the 
NAAQS and continuation of existing control measures. The EPA believes 
that the Louisville Area LMP is sufficient to provide for maintenance 
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the bi-state Louisville Area over the 
remainder of the second 10-year maintenance period, through 2027, and 
thereby satisfies the requirements for such a plan under CAA section 
175A(b).

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations.\34\ Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's 
role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria 
of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to 
approve State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose 
additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that 
reason, this proposed action:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Is not an Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 
2025) regulatory action because this action is not significant under 
Executive Order 12866;
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe 
has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: August 20, 2026.
Kristy Eubanks,
Deputy Regional Administrator performing the functions and duties of 
the Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2026-17501 Filed 8-26-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 27, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.