Spartan Fire, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
Spartan Fire, LLC (Spartan) has determined that certain model year (MY) 2015-2023 Spartan Fire Gladiator and Spartan Fire Metro Star emergency vehicles do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment. Spartan filed a noncompliance report dated January 28, 2025, and subsequently petitioned NHTSA (the "Agency") on February 18, 2025, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This document announces receipt of Spartan's petition.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 165 (Thursday, August 27, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55431-55432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-17469]
[[Page 55431]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2025-0014; Notice 1]
Spartan Fire, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Spartan Fire, LLC (Spartan) has determined that certain model
year (MY) 2015-2023 Spartan Fire Gladiator and Spartan Fire Metro Star
emergency vehicles do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and
Associated Equipment. Spartan filed a noncompliance report dated
January 28, 2025, and subsequently petitioned NHTSA (the ``Agency'') on
February 18, 2025, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This document
announces receipt of Spartan's petition.
DATES: Send comments on or before September 28, 2026.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
<bullet> Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a>. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
<bullet> Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelley Adams-Campos, Safety Compliance
Engineer, NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (202) 366-7479.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Spartan determined that certain MY 2015-2023 Spartan
Fire Gladiator and Spartan Fire Metro Star do not fully comply with
paragraph S7.6.13 and Table XII of FMVSS No. 108, Lamps, Reflective
Devices, And Associated Equipment (49 CFR 571.108) and filed a
noncompliance report on January 28, 2025, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. Spartan petitioned
NHTSA on February 18, 2025, for an exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
This notice of receipt of Spartan's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
another exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 35 MY 2015-2023 Spartan Fire
Gladiator and Spartan Fire Metro Star emergency vehicles, manufactured
between April 25, 2016, and February 29, 2024, were reported by the
manufacturer.
III. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S7.6.13 of FMVSS No. 108 includes
the requirements relevant to this petition. Paragraph S7.6.13 requires
each backup lamp to conform to the photometry requirements of Table
XII. Table XII limits each backup lamp to 300 candela (cd), in a
multiple lamp system, and to 600 cd in a single lamp system.
IV. Noncompliance: Spartan states that the subject vehicles are
equipped with ``scene lights'' installed as backup lamps which are not
designed as backup lamps and may be too bright, exceeding the maximum
photometric intensity allowed for backup lamps by Table XII of FMVSS
108.
V. Summary of Spartan's Petition: The following views and arguments
presented in this section, ``V. Summary of Spartan's Petition,'' are
the views and arguments provided by Spartan. They have not been
evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency.
Spartan describes the subject noncompliance and contends that the
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
Spartan gives two reasons why this noncompliance is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety:
1. Spartan states that emergency vehicles are frequently operated
in environments with limited visibility due to inclement weather or
smoke. Spartan states that compliant backup lamps do not provide enough
light in such conditions for the vehicle operator to have enough
visibility when backing up. In support of these claims, Spartan states
that its customers and/or dealers specified the subject ``scene
lights'' be installed ``for backup lamps.''
2. Spartan states that emergency vehicles benefit from ``maximum
conspicuity'' during emergency situations. Spartan asserts that the
subject ``backup lamps,'' which exceed the maximum allowed photometric
intensity, serve to provide additional conspicuity for bystanders and
passing vehicles at the scene when the subject vehicles are backing up.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
[[Page 55432]]
file petitions for a determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a
defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance.
Therefore, any decision on this petition only applies to the subject
vehicles that Spartan no longer controlled at the time it determined
that the noncompliance existed. However, any decision on this petition
does not relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions
on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant vehicles
under their control after Spartan notified them that the subject
noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2026-17469 Filed 8-26-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.