Withdrawal of International Airport Designation of Chalk Seaplane Base

Issuing agencies

Abstract

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is proposing to withdraw the international airport designation of Chalk Seaplane Base, now operating as Miami Seaplane Base. This proposal is based on evidence that the facility at this location has not been in compliance with CBP regulatory and security standards and the amount of business clearing through the airport does not justify continued maintenance of inspection equipment and personnel. The proposed change is part of CBP's continued efforts to use its personnel, facilities, and resources more efficiently and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the public.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 161 (Friday, August 21, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54249-54252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-17108]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2026 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 54249]]



DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

8 CFR Part 100

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

19 CFR Part 122

[Docket No. USCBP-2026-0892]
RIN 1651-AB51


Withdrawal of International Airport Designation of Chalk Seaplane 
Base

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is proposing to 
withdraw the international airport designation of Chalk Seaplane Base, 
now operating as Miami Seaplane Base. This proposal is based on 
evidence that the facility at this location has not been in compliance 
with CBP regulatory and security standards and the amount of business 
clearing through the airport does not justify continued maintenance of 
inspection equipment and personnel. The proposed change is part of 
CBP's continued efforts to use its personnel, facilities, and resources 
more efficiently and to provide better service to carriers, importers, 
and the public.

DATES: Send comments on or before October 20, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Please submit comments, identified by docket number [USCBP-
2026-0892], by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be 
posted without change to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any 
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting 
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the 
``Public Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section of this document.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Serian, Special Advisor, 
Facilities and Tech Division, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection, by phone at 202-713-8649 or email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95dffae6fde0f4bbc6f0e7fcf4fbd5f6f7e5bbf1fde6bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3f9dcc0dbc6d29de0d6c1dad2ddf3d0d1c39dd7dbc09dd4dcc5">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

    Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by 
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the 
notice of proposed rulemaking. CBP also invites comments that relate to 
the economic, environmental, or federalism effects that might result 
from this proposal. Comments that will provide the most assistance to 
CBP will reference a specific portion of the proposed rule, explain the 
reason for any recommended change, and include data, information, or 
authority that support such recommended change.

II. Background

A. Legal Authority

    Section 402 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-
296, 116 Stat. 2142, as amended (HSA) (6 U.S.C. 202), sets forth the 
responsibilities of the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary), 
including, in pertinent part, securing the borders, ports, and air 
transportation systems of the United States, including managing and 
coordinating those functions transferred to the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) at ports of entry; carrying out certain immigration 
enforcement functions transferred to DHS; and administering the customs 
laws of the United States.\1\ Section 403 of the HSA, codified at 6 
U.S.C. 203, transferred to the Secretary of DHS the functions of the 
United States Customs Service, including functions of the Secretary of 
the Treasury relating thereto. See 6 U.S.C. 203(1). Although section 
412 of the HSA, codified at 6 U.S.C. 212, retained certain customs 
revenue functions with the Secretary of the Treasury, the authority 
under 19 U.S.C. 1644a was not among the functions retained. See 6 
U.S.C. 212(a). Accordingly, the Secretary may designate ports of entry 
in the United States for civil aircraft arriving in the United States 
from a place outside the United States and for property transported on 
that aircraft, and may, by regulation, apply to civil air navigation, 
the laws and regulations on carrying out the customs laws, to the 
extent and under conditions the Secretary considers necessary. See 
section 2 of the Act of July 5, 1994, Public Law 103-272, 108 Stat. 
745, 1358 (19 U.S.C. 1644a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 1512 of the HSA (6 U.S.C. 552) contains savings 
provisions governing completed administrative actions, pending 
proceedings and civil actions, references, employment provisions, 
and statutory reporting requirements following the transfer of 
functions to DHS. Section 1517 of the HSA (6 U.S.C. 557) provides 
that, with respect to transferred functions, references in Federal 
law to a department, commission, agency, officer, or office are 
deemed to refer to the Secretary, other official, or component of 
DHS to which the function is transferred.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Secretary is charged with the administration and 
enforcement of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and all other 
laws relating to the immigration and naturalization of aliens, except 
insofar as those laws relate to the powers, functions, and duties 
conferred upon the President, the Attorney General, the Secretary of 
State, officers of the Department of State, or diplomatic consular 
officers. See section 103(a)(1) of the INA, Public Law 82-414, 66 Stat. 
163, 173 (1952)), as amended (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(1)).\2\ Pursuant 
to the HSA, the immigration functions previously exercised by the 
Attorney General through the Immigration and Naturalization Service 
were transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security. Section 402 of 
the HSA (6 U.S.C. 202) further provides that the Secretary is 
responsible for securing the borders, territorial waters, ports, 
waterways, and air, land, and sea transportation systems, including 
managing and coordinating those functions transferred to the Department 
at ports of entry. Accordingly, the Secretary is authorized by 
regulation to designate as ports of entry for aliens arriving by 
aircraft any of the ports of entry for civil aircraft designated as 
such in accordance with law. See INA sec. 234 (8 U.S.C. 1224).

[[Page 54250]]

B. Current Regulations

    The airports designated for arriving aircraft under the authorities 
described above are known as ``international airports.'' See sections 
234.1 and 234.4 of title 8 and section 122.1(e) of title 19 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations (CFR). Such international airports are so 
designated for the entry of aircraft arriving in the United States from 
any place outside thereof and for the merchandise carried on such 
aircraft, that is, for administration of the customs laws of the United 
States; as well as for the entry of aliens arriving on such aircraft, 
that is, for administration of the immigration laws of the United 
States. See 8 CFR 234.1, 234.4 (immigration); 19 CFR 122.1(e) 
(customs). Generally, the first landing of an aircraft entering the 
United States from a foreign area will be at a designated international 
airport unless the aircraft has been exempted or permission to land 
elsewhere has been granted. See 8 CFR 234.2; 19 CFR 122.33.
    For purposes of the administration of the customs laws, such 
designated international airports are listed in 19 CFR 122.13 and are 
open to all aircraft for entry and clearance at no charge by CBP, as 
detailed in 19 CFR 122.12, along with other operational requirements. 
Each designated international airport must provide, without cost to the 
Federal Government, proper office and other space as detailed in 19 CFR 
122.11(c). The following reasons for withdrawal of the designation as 
an international airport are set forth in 19 CFR 122.11(b): (1) the 
amount of business clearing through the airport does not justify 
maintenance of inspection equipment and personnel; (2) proper 
facilities are not provided or maintained by the airport; (3) the rules 
and regulations of the Federal Government are not followed; or (4) some 
other location would be more useful.
    For purposes of the administration of immigration laws, such 
designated international airports are described in 8 CFR 234.4 and 
listed in 8 CFR 100.4(b). Each designated international airport must 
provide adequate facilities at such airport without cost to the Federal 
Government for the proper inspection and disposition of aliens, 
including office space and such temporary detention quarters as may be 
found necessary, as detailed in 8 CFR 234.4. Pursuant to 8 CFR 234.4, 
the designation of an airport as an international airport for the entry 
of aliens may be withdrawn whenever, in the judgment of the 
Commissioner of CBP, there appears just cause for such action.

IV. Purpose of the Rule and Proposed Amendments

    DHS and CBP are proposing to remove Chalk Seaplane Base, now 
operating as Miami Seaplane Base (CSB),\3\ from the lists of designated 
international airports in both title 8 and title 19 of the CFR.\4\ 8 
CFR 100.4(b) and 19 CFR 122.13. As detailed below, this proposal is 
based on the judgment of the Commissioner of CBP that there is just 
cause for the withdrawal of the designation for immigration purposes. 
See 8 CFR 234.4. Separately, the proposal is based on airport 
management's failure to maintain proper CBP facilities and an 
insufficient volume of business at the airport for customs purposes. 
See 19 CFR 122.11(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ While the airport is now commonly known as ``Miami Seaplane 
Base,'' the regulations refer to it as ``Chalks Flying Service 
Seaplane Base'' and ``Chalk Seaplane Base.'' (8 CFR 100.4 and 19 CFR 
122.13.) For ease, this document will use the abbreviation ``CSB'' 
when referring to the seaplane base.
    \4\ CBP ports of entry are also listed, along with a citation to 
their geographic boundaries in most cases, in 19 CFR 101.3. The 
geographic boundaries listed in 19 CFR 101.3 for the Miami port of 
entry include the location of CSB (as described in T.D. 53514). 
However, withdrawing the designation of CSB as an international 
airport will not affect the geographic boundaries of the Miami port 
of entry. Therefore, DHS is not proposing to amend 19 CFR 101.3 with 
regard to the Miami port of entry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. History of Operations at Chalk Seaplane Base

    In 1926, Chalks Airline built CSB on Watson Island, in Biscayne 
Bay, near the city of Miami, Florida, and was authorized to operate CSB 
by the City of Miami. CSB was added to the list of international 
airports for arriving aliens then codified at the former 8 CFR 231.6 on 
December 19, 1952 (17 FR 11469, 11501), and to the list of customs 
international airports in 19 CFR 122.13, on March 22, 1988 (53 FR 9292, 
9295). Beginning in approximately 1929, Chalks Airline and other 
airlines operated flights to and from CSB, including international 
flights. Chalks Airline ceased flight operations in 2007 when the U.S. 
Department of Transportation revoked the airline's flight authority due 
to safety issues, and Chalks Airline has not operated flights since 
that time. However, Chalks Airline still possessed the rights to 
operate CSB. In 2012, Nautilus Enterprises purchased Chalks Airline 
and, with it, the rights to operate CSB. Until May 2021, CBP processed 
passengers for customs and immigration purposes for up to 11 flights at 
CSB, on a weekly basis. The flights typically originated from the 
Bahamas and contained about five passengers each. During that time, CBP 
officers traveled from the Miami Seaport, located three miles away from 
CSB, to process passengers at CSB. Beginning in 2013, CBP engaged in 
several rounds of communication with CSB management regarding CSB's 
facilities that did not meet CBP's regulatory criteria for safety and 
security relating to inspectional activities and low passenger volume. 
Due to CSB's continued failure to provide a compliant facility, CBP 
began denying all aircraft traveling from foreign areas permission to 
land at CSB starting in May 2021, as discussed below. The airport still 
exists and operates for non-international flights. All international 
flights use nearby aviation facilities such as Fort Lauderdale-
Hollywood International and Miami International airports for CBP 
processing.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Information provided by CBP's Office of Field Operations' 
subject matter expert on July 8, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Noncompliant CBP Processing Facility

    The facilities at CSB do not meet CBP's compliance standards as 
required in 8 CFR 234.4 and 19 CFR 122.11(b), despite repeated requests 
by CBP to the President of Chalks Airline, as the manager in charge of 
operations at CSB, to provide adequate space. After multiple rounds of 
communication between Chalks Airline and CBP regarding the noncompliant 
facility, on August 6, 2019, CBP sent the President of Chalks Airline a 
formal notice stating that CSB must provide a compliant facility within 
12 months. CBP explained that if a compliant facility was not provided 
during this time, all passengers and crewmembers would be transported 
under safeguard to Port of Miami facilities for processing, at the 
expense of the operator. Chalks Airline confirmed receipt of this 
notice in October 2019, during conversations with CBP, but ultimately 
did not commit to providing compliant facilities. On March 2, 2020, CBP 
notified Chalks Airline that the transportation of passengers and 
crewmembers to Port of Miami facilities under safeguard would not be 
allowed after November 4, 2020, citing ongoing safety and security 
concerns. CBP stated that, after this date, CBP would deny permission 
to land to all aircraft operators seeking to land at CSB from any 
foreign area, until CSB provides and maintains a compliant facility. 
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this deadline was not enforced until 
2021. On April 15, 2021, CBP sent Chalks Airline a

[[Page 54251]]

formal notice that CBP would begin denying permission to all aircraft 
operators seeking to land at CSB from any foreign area, on May 15, 
2021. Since May 15, 2021, CBP has denied permission to land to all 
aircraft operators at CSB from foreign areas and has directed these 
flights to land at Miami International Airport or Fort Lauderdale-
Hollywood International Airport, for CBP customs and immigration 
processing.
    In April 2022, Chalks Airline stated that it had not started 
constructing a compliant facility and that it would be about two years 
until the facility would be complete. No progress has been made to 
date. Chalks Airline has repeatedly provided to CBP over the past five 
years an artistic rendition of the proposed new terminal. However, CBP 
has continued to state that the layout of this facility is still not 
compliant with the 2021 CBP Airport Terminal Design Standard. 
Therefore, CSB continues to violate the requirements of 8 CFR 234.4 and 
19 CFR 122.11(b)(2) and (c).

C. Insufficient Passenger Volume

    Even if Chalks Airline provided a compliant facility for CBP 
processing, there are not enough passengers traveling through CSB to 
warrant an international airport designation. The applicable customs 
regulations for the designation of international airports state that 
the designation may be withdrawn because the amount of business 
clearing through the airport does not justify maintenance of inspection 
equipment and personnel. 19 CFR 122.11(b)(1). As stated above, before 
2021, CBP was only processing about 55 passengers weekly at CSB from 
only one international destination: the Bahamas. Furthermore, Miami 
International Airport is only three miles from CSB, offering a 
reasonable alternative to flights that would have otherwise been 
processed at CSB. Further, as noted above, designation as an 
international airport for entry of aliens may be withdrawn if the 
Commissioner of CBP finds just cause for such withdrawal. See 8 CFR 
234.4. The Commissioner has recommended to the Secretary that the 
international airport designation for CSB should be withdrawn.

D. Proposed Amendments

    For the aforementioned reasons, CBP is proposing to amend the 
regulations to remove ``Chalk Seaplane Base'' from the lists of 
designated international airports for immigration and customs purposes 
in 8 CFR 100.4(b) and 19 CFR 122.13. Revocation of the international 
airport designation would not result in any significant reduction in 
CBP services in the area, as there are two suitable international 
airports nearby, Miami International Airport and Fort Lauderdale-
Hollywood International Airport.

V. Congressional Notification

    On November 25, 2025, the Secretary of DHS notified Congress of 
DHS's intention to remove the designation of Chalk Seaplane Base, 
fulfilling the congressional notification requirements of 19 U.S.C. 
2075(g)(2) and section 417 of the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. 217).

VI. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements

A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14192

    Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 
Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) 
direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available 
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select 
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 
emphasizes the importance of quantifying costs and benefits, of 
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. 
Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation) 
directs agencies to significantly reduce the private expenditures 
required to comply with Federal regulations and provides that ``any new 
incremental costs associated with new regulations shall, to the extent 
permitted by law, be offset by the elimination of existing costs 
associated with at least 10 prior regulations.''
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this 
rule a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of 
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it.
    This rule is an Executive Order 14192 deregulatory action because 
this rule clarifies the regulations by removing a CBP port of entry 
from the codified lists of designated airports that has not been in use 
for CBP processing of international arrivals as of May 2021. Doing so 
eliminates public confusion for those who consult the regulations for a 
list of ports they may use. As this port has not been in use for 
several years, CBP believes the savings from eliminating the rule to be 
negligible and does not estimate any monetized savings associated with 
this deregulatory action. See OMB Memorandum M-25-20, ``Guidance 
Implementing Section 3 of Executive Order 14192, titled `Unleashing 
Prosperity Through Deregulation' '' (Mar. 26, 2025).
    As of May 2021, CBP has stopped the processing of arrivals at CSB 
due to the noncompliant nature of the facility and insufficient 
traveler volume. Instead, seaplanes now land at either Miami 
International Airport or Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International 
Airport. Both Miami International and Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood 
International airports have facilities that meet CBP safety and 
inspection criteria. CBP is proposing to remove CSB from the lists of 
international airports in 8 CFR 100.4(b) and 19 CFR 122.13 and continue 
the processing of arrivals associated with Chalks Airline at the nearby 
facilities. CBP will not process any future arrivals at CSB, even in 
the absence of this rule, as the facility is not safe for CBP's 
operations, and the seaplane base operator had more than five years to 
correct the deficiencies and did not do so.
    Since CSB does not meet safety and security requirements for safe 
CBP operations, CBP will continue to process seaplane arrivals at 
either Miami International Airport or Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood 
International Airport. The effect of this proposed rule would be simply 
to update the CFR to reflect the current list of international airports 
in operation. CBP thus does not anticipate that this proposed rule 
would have any costs. Passengers will continue to land and disembark at 
either Miami International Airport or Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood 
International Airport for processing and will be unaffected by this 
rule. Since airplanes already land at Miami International Airport and 
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, there is no change 
from the baseline for these facilities either. Therefore, the economic 
cost on all parties is expected to be zero.
    This proposed rule would remove an airport not used for 
international flights for several years from the lists of international 
airports in the regulations. To the extent that this alleviates public 
confusion, this proposed rule would have a minor transparency benefit.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended 
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 
requires agencies to assess the impact of regulations on small entities 
when the agency is required to publish a general notice of proposed 
rulemaking for a rule. A small entity may be a small business (defined 
as any independently owned and operated business not dominant in its 
field that qualifies as a small business

[[Page 54252]]

per the Small Business Act); a small not-for-profit organization; or a 
small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer than 50,000 
people). Because this proposed rule would merely remove an airport not 
used for international flights for several years from the lists of 
international airports, the proposed rule does not have a significant 
economic impact. As the proposed rule would affect only one party, the 
rule does not affect a substantial number of small entities. 
Accordingly, CBP certifies that this proposed rule does not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This proposed rule would not result in the expenditure by state, 
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private 
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it would not 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no 
actions are necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).

D. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires 
that CBP consider the impact of paperwork and other information 
collection burdens imposed on the public. There is no new collection of 
information required in this document; therefore, the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act are inapplicable.

VII. Authority

    The amendment to part 100 of title 8 of the CFR is proposed under 
the authority of 8 U.S.C. 1103, 8 U.S.C. 1185 note (section 7209 of 
Pub. L. 108-458), and 8 CFR part 2.
    The amendment to part 122 of title 19 of the CFR is proposed under 
the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66, 1415, 1431, 1433, 
1436, 1448, 1459, 1590, 1594, 1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a, and 2071 note.

VIII. Signing Authority

    The signing authority for the proposed amendment to an immigration 
port of entry under title 8 of the CFR is governed by Section 441 of 
the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended (6 U.S.C. 251).
    The signing authority for the proposed amendment to a customs port 
of entry under title 19 of the CFR falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a).
    Accordingly, this notice of proposed rulemaking is signed by the 
Secretary of Homeland Security.

List of Subjects

8 CFR Part 100

    Organization and functions (Government agencies).

19 CFR Part 122

    Administrative practice and procedure, Air carriers, Aircraft, 
Airports, Alcohol and alcoholic beverages, Cigars and cigarettes, Cuba, 
Drug traffic control, Freight, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Security measures.

IX. Proposed Regulatory Amendments

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend 8 CFR 
part 100 and 19 CFR part 122 as set forth below:

Title 8--Aliens and Nationality

PART 100--STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION

SUBCHAPTER B--IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1185 note (section 7209 of 
Pub. L. 108-458); 8 CFR part 2.

0
2. Amend section 100.4 by removing the entry ``Miami, FL, Chalks Flying 
Service Seaplane Base'' under District No. 6--Miami, Florida, in 
paragraph (b).

Title 19--Customs Duties

PART 122--AIR COMMERCE REGULATIONS

Subpart B--Classes of Airports

0
 1. The authority citation for part 122 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66, 1415, 1431, 1433, 
1436, 1448, 1459, 1590, 1594, 1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a, 2071 note.
    Section 122.22 is also issued under 46 U.S.C. 60105.
    Section 122.48b also issued under 49 U.S.C. 44901 note.
    Section 122.49a also issued under 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1221, 19 U.S.C. 
1431, 49 U.S.C. 44909.
    Section 122.49b also issued under 8 U.S.C. 1221, 19 U.S.C. 1431, 
49 U.S.C. 114, 44909.
    Section 122.49c also issued under 8 U.S.C. 1221, 19 U.S.C. 1431, 
49 U.S.C. 114, 44909.
    Section 122.49d also issued under 49 U.S.C. 44909(c)(3).
    Section 122.75a also issued under 8 U.S.C. 1221, 19 U.S.C. 1431.
    Section 122.75b also issued under 8 U.S.C. 1221, 19 U.S.C. 1431, 
49 U.S.C. 114.

0
2. Amend section 122.13 by removing the entry ``Miami, Fla.--Chalk 
Seaplane Base'' from the list of international airports.

Markwayne Mullin,
Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2026-17108 Filed 8-20-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>