Skip to main content
Notice2026-16116

Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for Comment; Best Practices for Integrating Crash and Injury Surveillance Data Systems

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 7, 2026

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Abstract

NHTSA invites public comments about our intention to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a new information collection. Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it must receive approval from OMB. Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of information, including new collections, extensions, and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This document describes a proposed collection of information that would allow NHTSA to obtain structured information on States' and territories' practices related to linking or integrating motor vehicle crash data with injury surveillance and medical data (e.g., emergency medical services (EMS), emergency department, hospital inpatient discharge, trauma registry, and vital statistics). The collection includes virtual stakeholder meetings, an online survey, and follow-up in-depth interviews with a subset of States to document current practices, challenges, and best practices in crash and injury surveillance data linkage and integration.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 151 (Friday, August 7, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51218-51220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-16116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2026-1420]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for 
Comment; Best Practices for Integrating Crash and Injury Surveillance 
Data Systems

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a request for approval of a 
new information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA invites public comments about our intention to request 
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a new 
information collection. Before a Federal agency can collect certain 
information from the public, it must receive approval from OMB. Under 
procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before 
seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on 
proposed collections of information, including new collections, 
extensions, and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This 
document describes a proposed collection of information that would 
allow NHTSA to obtain structured information on States' and 
territories' practices related to linking or integrating motor vehicle 
crash data with injury surveillance and medical data (e.g., emergency 
medical services (EMS), emergency department, hospital inpatient 
discharge, trauma registry, and vital statistics). The collection 
includes virtual stakeholder meetings, an online survey, and follow-up 
in-depth interviews with a subset of States to document current 
practices, challenges, and best practices in crash and injury 
surveillance data linkage and integration.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 6, 2026.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Docket No. NHTSA-
2026-1420 through any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Electronic submissions: Go to the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online instructions 
for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Fax: (202) 493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management, U.S. Department 
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Suite W58-
213, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help 
you, please call (202) 366-9826 or (202) 366-9317 before coming.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and 
docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be 
posted without change to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>, including any 
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading 
below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all 
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit <a href="https://www.transportation.gov/privacy">https://www.transportation.gov/privacy</a>.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> or to the street 
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the 
dockets via the internet.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access 
to background documents, contact Beau Burdett, National Center for 
Statistics and Analysis (NSA-221), (202) 236-1959, National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration, West Building Suite W43-480, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency submits a proposed 
collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a 
document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and 
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies 
concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has 
promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a 
document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must 
ask for public comment on the following: (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) how to enhance 
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; 
and (d) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic 
submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA 
asks for public comments on the following proposed collection of 
information for which the agency is seeking approval from OMB.
    Title: Best Practices for Integrating Crash and Injury Surveillance 
Data Systems.
    OMB Control Number: New.
    Form Number(s): NHTSA Form 2261, NHTSA Form 2262.
    Type of Request: New information collection.

[[Page 51219]]

    Type of Review Requested: Regular.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from date of 
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: NHTSA is authorized by 23 
U.S.C. 403 to collect and analyze data on motor vehicle traffic crashes 
and related injuries to support the identification of safety issues and 
the development, implementation, and evaluation of effective motor 
vehicle and highway safety countermeasures.
    For decades, NHTSA has supported efforts to improve the quality, 
completeness, and integration of traffic records, including linking 
police-reported crash data with injury surveillance and clinical data 
(e.g., EMS, trauma registries, emergency departments, hospital 
discharge, vital records). Programs such as the Crash Outcome Data 
Evaluation System (CODES) and, more recently, the introduction of the 
Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) in the Model Minimum Uniform Crash 
Criteria (MMUCC) have encouraged States to integrate crash and injury 
surveillance data to better understand crash outcomes, especially 
serious injuries.
    NHTSA seeks to conduct a one-time information collection to obtain 
structured, comparable information on States' and territories' current 
practices related to crash and injury surveillance data linkage and 
integration.
    The collection has three components:
    1. Virtual stakeholder meetings: NHTSA, through a contractor, will 
facilitate virtual stakeholder meetings. NHTSA will request that State 
Highway Safety Offices provide information from the meeting 
participants acting in their official capacity, i.e., names and work 
email addresses, so that NHTSA can send virtual meeting invitations to 
the identified participants. These meetings will gather qualitative 
information about States' current efforts, successes, and challenges in 
linking crash and injury surveillance data and will help identify 
relevant stakeholders for the subsequent survey and interviews.
    2. Online survey of State stakeholders: Following the virtual 
stakeholder meetings, the contractor will distribute individualized 
links to an online survey to crash and injury surveillance data systems 
stakeholders from the States and territories. The survey will collect 
information on:

<bullet> Availability and types of injury surveillance datasets;
<bullet> Use and formats of crash and injury surveillance data;
<bullet> Staffing, skills, and training related to data analysis and 
data linkage/integration;
<bullet> Current crash-injury data linkage/integration activities 
(including data sources, methods, tools, frequency, and use of UUID or 
other unique identifiers);
<bullet> Data governance, data sharing, and data quality control 
practices; and
<bullet> Use of linked/integrated data to support traffic safety 
decision-making.

    The survey employs primarily checkbox, matrix, and multiple-choice 
questions and includes only two open-ended questions to limit burden. 
The survey will not collect personally identifiable information (PII) 
about individual respondents.

    3. Follow-up in-depth interviews: Based on the information gathered 
from the stakeholder meetings and the survey, NHTSA will select up to 
nine States for follow-up structured virtual interviews to obtain more 
detailed qualitative information on their data linkage and integration 
processes, use of UUID, challenges, and best practices.
    The information collection is intended to provide NHTSA with a 
clearer picture of the ``state of the practice'' across States and 
territories regarding crash and injury surveillance data linkage and 
integration, including both CODES-like programs and other data linkage 
efforts. The results will inform NHTSA's technical assistance, program 
planning, and development of best practice guidance to support States 
in initiating, sustaining, or enhancing their data linkage and 
integration activities.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the 
Information: Linked crash and injury surveillance data are critical for 
understanding crash outcomes (particularly serious injuries), 
evaluating countermeasures, and guiding investment decisions in traffic 
safety. While NHTSA has long supported data integration through 
programs such as CODES and MMUCC, the agency currently lacks 
comprehensive, up-to-date information on how States and territories are 
linking or integrating crash and injury surveillance data, what methods 
and tools are being used, how UUID and other unique identifiers are 
being implemented, and what challenges and successes States are 
experiencing.
    This information collection will provide:

    <bullet> A descriptive, national-level picture of state practices 
in crash-injury data linkage and integration;
    <bullet> Insight into barriers (e.g., legal, technical, resource-
related) and opportunities for improving linkage and data quality;
<bullet> Documentation of emerging technologies and methods, including 
use of the UUID introduced in the National Emergency Medical Services 
Information System (NEMSIS) and MMUCC; and
<bullet> Examples of effective practices, governance structures, and 
data use that can inform NHTSA's technical assistance and guidance to 
States.
    NHTSA will use the findings to:
<bullet> Identify needs for targeted technical assistance, training, or 
guidance to States;
<bullet> Inform the development or refinement of best practices and 
tools to support crash-injury data linkage and integration; and
<bullet> Support broader Federal and state efforts to improve the use 
of linked data for problem identification, resource allocation, program 
evaluation, and performance management in traffic safety.

    NHTSA does not intend to use the information collected to produce 
statistical estimates that are generalizable to a broader population in 
the sense of a probability-based survey. Instead, the collection is a 
one-time, descriptive assessment of identified state-level stakeholders 
and their practices.
    Affected Public: State and territorial crash and injury 
surveillance data systems stakeholders who manage, link, integrate, or 
use these data as part of their professional responsibilities. This 
includes staff from State Highway Safety Offices, Departments of 
Transportation, Departments of Public Safety or Police, Departments of 
Motor Vehicles, Departments of Health, hospital associations, trauma 
systems, and related organizations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: NHTSA estimates a total of 129 
respondents participating in all three project components, broken down 
as follows:

<bullet> Virtual stakeholder meetings: 10 virtual meetings with an 
average of 20 participants per meeting, for an estimated total of 200 
respondents (participants are counted once, although some may also 
complete the survey or interviews).
<bullet> Online survey: Approximately 100 respondents, including 
participants from the meetings and additional relevant stakeholders 
identified by NHTSA Regions and State partners.
<bullet> Follow-up in-depth interviews: Up to nine States, with an 
average of four stakeholders per State, for an estimated total of 36 
interview respondents.


[[Page 51220]]


    Because some individuals will participate in more than one activity 
(e.g., a stakeholder may attend a virtual meeting, complete the survey, 
and participate in a follow-up interview), the total number of unique 
individuals will be somewhat less than the sum of activity-specific 
counts.
    Frequency: This is a one-time collection of information.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 378 hours.
    This information collection includes three components: virtual 
stakeholder meetings, an online survey, and follow-up interviews.

Virtual Stakeholder Meetings

<bullet> Number of virtual stakeholder meetings: 10.
<bullet> Estimated participants per meeting: 20.
<bullet> Duration per meeting: 1.5 hours.
<bullet> Total burden hours: 300 hours (10 meetings x 20 participants/
meeting x 1.5 hours).

Online survey

<bullet> Based on the number and type of questions, skip logic, and 
instrument review, NHTSA estimates that it will take an average of 25 
minutes (0.42 hours) for each respondent to complete the survey.
<bullet> Estimated number of survey respondents: 100.
<bullet> Burden per response: 0.42 hours.
<bullet> Total burden hours: 42 hours (100 respondents x 0.42 hours = 
42 hours).

Follow-Up in-Depth Interviews

<bullet> NHTSA estimates that each follow-up interview will last 
approximately 60 minutes and that an average of four stakeholders will 
participate per State.
<bullet> Number of States: up to nine.
<bullet> Participants per State: four.
<bullet> Duration per interview session: one hour.
<bullet> Total burden hours: 36 hours (9 States x 4 participants x 1 
hour = 36 hours).

    Estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) were used to 
estimate the labor costs for each component \1\. The BLS estimates that 
wages represent an average 61.5 percent of total compensation for State 
and local government workers. To determine the fully loaded hourly 
labor cost, which encompasses both base wages and fringe benefits, the 
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration divides the BLS 
estimated average hourly wage rate by 0.615. Based on an estimated 
average hourly wage of $40.00, dividing this rate by 0.615 results in a 
total estimated fully loaded hourly labor cost of approximately $65.04 
per hour.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Employer Costs for Employee Compensation-June 2025,<a href="https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf">https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf</a>. Accessed 2/17/2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Using this hourly labor cost, the estimated labor cost for each 
component is:
    1. Virtual meetings: $19,512.00 (300 burden hours x $65.04 hourly 
labor cost).
    2. Online survey: $2,731.68 (42 burden hours x $65.04 hourly labor 
cost).
    3. Follow-up in-depth interviews: $2,341.44 (36 burden hours x 
$65.04 hourly labor cost).
    The total labor cost is approximately $24,585.12. Table 1 provides 
a summary of the estimated burden hours and labor costs associated with 
those respondents.

                                                                Table 1--Burden Estimates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Number of
             Activity                   Annual       responses per  Annual  number  Estimated burden per   Total burden     Avg. hourly     Total labor
                                      respondents     respondent     of  responses        response             hours        labor cost         costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtual regional stakeholder                    20              10             200  1.5 hours...........           300.0          $65.04      $19,512.00
 meetings.
Online survey.....................             100               1             100  0.42 hours (25                  42.0           65.04        2,731.68
                                                                                     minutes).
Follow-up in-depth virtual                       9               4              36  1 hour..............            36.0           65.04        2,341.44
 interviews (up to 9 States).
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.........................             129  ..............             336  ....................           378.0  ..............       24,585.12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because this is a one-time collection, these burden and cost 
estimates represent the total (and thus annual) burden associated with 
this effort.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: This collection is not expected 
to result in any additional costs to respondents beyond the opportunity 
cost of their time, which is captured in the burden hour estimates 
above. Respondents are professionals who already possess the 
information needed to participate, and the collection does not require 
the purchase of any equipment or services, the development of new data 
systems, or the retention or submission of records beyond what agencies 
already maintain for their own purposes.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of 
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Department, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate 
of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A.

Rajesh Subramanian,
Acting Associate Administrator, The National Center for Statistics and 
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2026-16116 Filed 8-6-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 7, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.