Skip to main content
Rule2026-16021

Credit Union Service Contracts

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 6, 2026
Effective
September 8, 2026

Issuing agencies

National Credit Union Administration

Abstract

The NCUA Board (Board) is revising its regulations governing the organization and operation of federal credit unions (FCUs) by eliminating a provision related to credit union service contracts. The Board intends to reduce administrative costs and compliance complexity with this revision, enabling FCUs to serve their members more efficiently.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50674-50677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-16021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 701 and 721

RIN 3133-AF83


Credit Union Service Contracts

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA Board (Board) is revising its regulations governing 
the organization and operation of federal credit unions (FCUs) by 
eliminating a provision related to credit union service contracts. The 
Board intends to reduce administrative costs and compliance complexity 
with this revision, enabling FCUs to serve their members more 
efficiently.

DATES: This final rule is effective on September 8, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Ackmann, Senior Attorney, 
Office of General Counsel, at (703) 518-6540 or at 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, VA 22314.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

A. Background

    NCUA originally issued rules related to FCUs entering service 
contracts in the 1970s.\1\ In 1982, the rules governing service centers 
and other FCU contracting activities were combined into one section to 
enhance the scope of FCU contractual agreements. Section 701.26 has 
remained largely unchanged since 1982 with one exception. A 1998 
amendment removed a provision that treated advance payments to a vendor 
for more than three \2\ months of service as an investment in a credit 
union service organization, a change made to reduce regulatory burden 
and provide FCUs with greater flexibility in managing vendor 
contracts.\3\ Section 701.26 has not been amended since 1998.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 39 FR 44422 (Dec. 24, 1974).
    \3\ 63 FR 10756 (Mar. 5, 1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Legal Authority

    Section 107(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act (FCU Act) gives an 
FCU the

[[Page 50675]]

power to enter into contracts.\4\ Additionally, the incidental powers 
provision of the FCU Act expressly grants FCUs the power ``to exercise 
such incidental powers as shall be necessary or requisite to enable it 
to carry on effectively the business for which it is incorporated.'' 
\5\ Accordingly, FCUs have broad authority to enter into contractual 
agreements to perform or engage in activities that are expressly 
authorized by the FCU Act or are incidental to the business of credit 
unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(1).
    \5\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the FCU Act includes a general grant of regulatory 
authority, and it authorizes the Board to prescribe regulations for the 
administration of the FCU Act.\6\ Therefore, the Board has authority to 
regulate FCU contractual agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 12 U.S.C. 1766(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Part 701 of NCUA's regulations codifies these FCU Act authorities 
and governs the organization and structure of FCUs, including a wide 
range of operational activities. The part establishes the framework for 
essential functions such as lending, governance, member services, and 
ensuring that FCUs operate in a safe and sound manner.
    Section 701.26 defines a FCU's authority to enter contracts for 
assets or services that relate to its daily operations. The regulation 
covers contracts with third-party vendors and other organizations, 
including credit unions, that offer services to credit unions. The 
regulation also allows one FCU to represent one or more other credit 
unions or organizations in contractual arrangements with a third party 
and authorizes the sharing of fixed assets.\7\ Agreements must be in 
writing and must advise all parties subject to the agreement that the 
goods and services provided are subject to examination by NCUA to the 
extent permitted by law. Section 701.26 does not give FCUs the 
authority to provide services directly to other credit unions but 
reflects authority to contract for assets or services that may be 
offered to credit unions through shared service arrangements. That is, 
Sec.  701.26 does not address FCUs directly offering services to other 
credit unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Examples of where an FCU may represent another credit union 
or organization include sharing of management services, loan 
operations, and negotiations with vendors for shared services or 
products. 47 FR 30460 (July 14, 1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 25, 2026, the Board issued a proposed rule to eliminate 
Sec.  701.26 because it is unnecessary. The authority for an FCU to 
enter contracts for operational services is inherent in its charter and 
its general powers under the FCU Act.\8\ Additionally, the regulation's 
principal requirement--that such agreements be in writing--is a 
standard business practice, which exists regardless of whether it is 
mentioned in NCUA's regulations. Accordingly, the Board proposed to 
rescind Sec.  701.26 to reduce administrative costs and compliance 
complexity, enabling FCUs to serve their members more efficiently.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 91 FR 9185 (Feb. 25, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Final Rule

A. Overview

    This final rule follows publication of the proposed rule and takes 
into consideration the comments received on the proposal. By the close 
of the public comment period on April 27, 2026, the Board received 12 
public comments. Comments were submitted by individuals, FCUs, state 
credit union leagues, and national credit union trade associations. 
After careful consideration of the issues raised by the commenters, the 
Board has decided to adopt the proposal with one change. The final rule 
amends NCUA's incidental powers rule to reflect FCU authority to 
represent one or more other credit unions or organizations in 
contractual arrangements with a third party and authorizes the sharing 
of fixed assets.

B. Discussion of Public Comments

    This section of the preamble discusses the significant issues 
raised by the commenters, and the Board's responses to the comments.
    One individual commenter opposed the proposed rule. This commenter 
generally raised concern about NCUA's deregulatory efforts and stated 
the proposal prioritized reducing regulatory obligations over 
maintaining the safeguards necessary to protect credit union members, 
but the commenter did not have comments specific to the proposed rule.
    Another commenter did not outrightly oppose the proposed rule but 
expressed substantial concerns. The commenter noted that service 
provider relationships remain operationally significant to many FCUs 
and can present third-party risk. The commenter was in favor of 
removing outdated prescriptive language only if maintaining sound risk 
management expectations, such as adopting clear guidance to replace it. 
The commenter reasoned that without a clear framework, contracts may 
omit essential provisions such as audit rights and information security 
obligations. The commenter also suggested that removal could lead to 
unclear expectations and inconsistent examiner interpretations across 
regions on what is standard business practice.
    The Board agrees with the commenter that third-party service 
provider relationships remain operationally significant, and sound due 
diligence related to contractual relationships is imperative to the 
success of these relationships. The Board notes that it continues to 
expect FCUs to adhere to standard business practices and maintain safe 
and sound practices regarding third-party contracts, including that all 
contracts should be written.\9\ However, Sec.  701.26 does not impose 
any minimum standards for contracts, outside of the requirement for 
contracts to be in writing. Therefore, while the Board agrees with the 
importance of managing third-party relationships, the removal of Sec.  
701.26 does not raise any concern regarding FCU management of third-
party relationships. The Board also does not believe that removal of 
Sec.  701.26 leads to unclear expectations regarding standard business 
practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ SL No. 07-01 (2007), available at <a href="https://ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/letters-credit-unions-other-guidance/evaluating-third-party-relationships-0">https://ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/letters-credit-unions-other-guidance/evaluating-third-party-relationships-0</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Most commenters supported removing Sec.  701.26. Commenters pointed 
to redundance with the FCU Act, which includes authority for FCUs to 
enter contracts for operational services. Other commenters stated that 
it is unnecessary to explicitly state that FCUs must execute contracts 
in writing, as that is standard business practice. One commenter noted 
that state law may require contracts to be in writing. Many commenters 
stated that removing Sec.  701.26 would streamline regulations, reduce 
administrative costs, and allow FCUs to operate more efficiently 
without compromising safety and soundness. The Board agrees with these 
commenters as outlined in the proposed rule.
    One commenter encouraged the Board to consider reaffirming, either 
in the preamble to the final rule or through supervisory guidance, that 
the removal of Sec.  701.26 does not alter existing expectations 
regarding written contracts, vendor oversight, or safe and sound third-
party risk management practices. The Board is reaffirming that the 
removal of Sec.  701.26 does not alter existing expectations regarding 
written contracts, vendor oversight, or safe and sound third-party risk 
management practices. To operate safely and soundly, FCUs must 
carefully consider the potential risks these relationships

[[Page 50676]]

may present and how to manage them. FCUs should consider how contracts 
address important terms, such as audit rights, information security 
obligations, business continuity expectations, indemnification, 
performance metrics, data ownership/return provisions, termination for 
cause or convenience language, and dispute resolution terms.
    The proposed rule specifically sought comments on whether part 721 
should be updated to explicitly recognize the authority of FCUs, in 
joint operations and other resource sharing situations, to act as a 
representative of another credit union or organization. Commenters were 
mixed. One commenter did not believe it was necessary as part 721 
provides sufficient flexibility to include this authority, but a few 
commenters recommended updating part 721. One commenter generally 
stated that the absence of clear regulatory text may create uncertainty 
for FCUs, examiners, and third-party partners. One commenter stated 
that NCUA should clarify whether a corporate credit union may act in 
such a representative capacity. Section 701.26 does not govern 
corporate credit unions permissible activities and permissible 
activities for corporate credit unions are subject to Sec.  704.12.
    In response to commenters, the final rule amends part 721 to 
explicitly recognize the authority of FCUs, in joint operations and 
other resource sharing situations, to act as a representative of 
another credit union or organization. The provision permits an FCU to 
represent another credit union in contractual arrangements, but does 
not authorize an FCU to provide any other services or activities to 
FCUs, only to act as a representative.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 66 FR 40845 (Aug. 6, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Regulatory Procedures

A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14192

    Pursuant to Executive Order 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and 
Review''), a determination must be made whether a regulatory action is 
significant and therefore subject to review by the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), within the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the 
Executive Order.\11\ Executive Order 13563 (``Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review'') supplements and reaffirms the principles, 
structures, and definitions governing contemporary regulatory review 
established in Executive Order 12866.\12\ This final rule was drafted 
and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866 and Executive 
Order 13563. OIRA has determined that this final rule is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' as defined by section 3(f) of 
Executive Order 12866.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993).
    \12\ 76 FR 3821 (Jan. 21, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Executive Order 14192 (``Unleashing Prosperity Through 
Deregulation'') requires that any new incremental costs associated with 
new regulations shall, to the extent permitted by law, be offset by the 
elimination of existing costs associated with at least 10 prior 
regulations.\13\ This final rule is considered an Executive Order 14192 
deregulatory action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 90 FR 9065 (Feb. 6, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act \14\ generally requires an agency to 
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice 
and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that 
the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. If the agency makes such a certification, it 
shall publish the certification at the time of publication of either 
the proposed rule or the final rule, along with a statement providing 
the factual basis for such certification.\15\ For purposes of this 
analysis, NCUA considers small credit unions to be those having under 
$100 million in assets.\16\ The Board fully considered the potential 
economic impacts of the regulatory amendments on small credit unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
    \15\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
    \16\ 80 FR 57512 (Sept. 24, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The final rule only removes an existing regulatory provision 
related to FCU contracting. The regulation's requirement--that such 
agreements be in writing--is a standard business practice, which exists 
regardless of whether it is mentioned in NCUA's regulations. The Board 
considers the regulation to be superfluous, and its removal streamlines 
NCUA's regulations, thereby reducing burden.
    Accordingly, NCUA certifies the final rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small credit 
unions.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) generally provides that 
an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and not withstanding any other 
provision of law, a person is not required to respond to, a collection 
of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control 
number. The PRA applies to rulemaking in which an agency creates a new 
or amends existing information collection requirements. For purposes of 
the PRA, an information collection requirement may take the form of a 
reporting, recordkeeping, or a third-party disclosure requirement. NCUA 
has determined that the changes in the rule do not create a new 
information collection or revise an existing information collection as 
defined by the PRA. Accordingly, no PRA submissions to OMB will be made 
with respect to this rule.

D. Executive Order 13132 on Federalism

    Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to 
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests.\17\ 
NCUA, an agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies 
with the executive order to adhere to fundamental federalism 
principles. The changes only apply to and affect FCUs and do not affect 
state-chartered credit unions. The final rule has no effect on states 
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government. Therefore, the Board affirms it will not affect 
the division of responsibilities between NCUA and state regulatory 
authorities with oversight of federally insured, state-chartered credit 
unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 4, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families

    NCUA has determined that this final rule will not affect family 
well-being within the meaning of Section 654 of the Treasury and 
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999.\18\ The final rule relates 
to FCUs' contractual requirements, and any effect on family well-being 
is expected to be indirect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Public Law 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

F. Congressional Review Act

    Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
Act of 1996, also known as the Congressional Review Act (CRA), 
generally provides for congressional review of agency rules.\19\ NCUA 
must submit a report to Congress and the Comptroller General when it 
issues a final rule, as defined by the CRA.\20\ An agency rule, in 
addition to being subject to congressional oversight, may also be 
subject to a delayed effective date if the rule is a ``major rule.'' 
OIRA has determined that this rule is not a ``major rule'' within the 
meaning of the relevant sections of the

[[Page 50677]]

CRA. NCUA will also file appropriate reports with Congress and the 
Comptroller General so this rule may be reviewed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 5 U.S.C. 801-808.
    \20\ 5 U.S.C. 804(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Subjects

12 CFR Part 701

    Advertising, Aged, Civil rights, Credit, Credit unions, Fair 
housing, Individuals with disabilities, Insurance, Marital status 
discrimination, Mortgages, Religious discrimination, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Sex discrimination, Signs and symbols, 
Surety bonds.

12 CFR Part 721

    Incidental powers, Credit unions.


    By the National Credit Union Administration Board, this 29th day 
of July, 2026.
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the NCUA Board amends 12 
CFR parts 701 and 721 as follows:

PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 701 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 1759, 
1761, 1761a, 1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782, 1784, 1785, 1786, 1787, 1788, 
1789. Section 701.6 is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 3717. Section 
701.31 is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1981 
and 3601-3610. Section 701.35 is also authorized by 12 U.S.C. 4311-
4312.


Sec.  701.26   [Removed and reserved]

0
2. Remove and reserve Sec.  701.26.

PART 721--INCIDENTAL POWERS

0
3. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  12 U.S.C. 1757(17), 1766 and 1789.


0
4. Amend Sec.  721.3, by adding paragraph (n) to read as follows:


Sec.  721.3   What categories of activities are preapproved as 
incidental powers necessary or requisite to carry on a credit union's 
business?

* * * * *
    (n) Representative activities. Acting as a representative of and 
entering into a contractual agreement with one or more credit unions or 
other organizations for the purpose of sharing, utilizing, renting, 
leasing, purchasing, selling, and/or joint ownership of fixed assets or 
engaging in activities and/or services which relate to the daily 
operations of credit unions.

[FR Doc. 2026-16021 Filed 8-5-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 6, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.