Notice2026-12028

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Amend Cboe Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index Options (“CBTX”) and Cboe Mini Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index Options (“MBTX”) Standard Transaction Fees

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
June 16, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36178-36181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-12028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-105663; File No. SR-CBOE-2026-051]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Amend 
Cboe Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index Options (``CBTX'') and Cboe Mini Bitcoin 
U.S. ETF Index Options (``MBTX'') Standard Transaction Fees

June 11, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on May 29, 2026, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe 
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes 
to amend Cboe Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index options (``CBTX'') and Cboe Mini 
Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index options (``MBTX'') standard transaction fees. 
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Commission's website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>), the 
Exchange's website (<a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/cone/">https://www.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/cone/</a>), and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

[[Page 36179]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change, among 
other changes, on April 1, 2026 (SR-CBOE-2026-031) (the ``Original 
Filing''). On May 29, 2026, the Exchange withdrew that filing and 
submitted this proposal. The Exchange notes that subsequent to the 
Original Filing that proposed these changes, the Exchange amended 
its Fees Schedule to make changes in connection with the fees 
related to certain orders executed in Automated Improvement 
Mechanism (``AIM'') Auctions and to amend the Customer Volume 
Incentive Program and Affiliated Volume Plan; such changes are 
incorporated Exhibit 5 to this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CBTX
    The Exchange proposes to amend and adopt certain fees related to 
transactions in CBTX. Specifically, the proposed rule change amends and 
adopts certain fees for CBTX in the Rate Table for All Products 
Excluding Underlying Symbol List A, as follows:
    <bullet> Amends fee code B2, currently appended to all Market-Maker 
(capacity ``M''), Clearing TPHs (capacity ``F''), Non-Clearing TPH 
Affiliates (capacity ``L''), Broker-Dealer (capacity ``B''), Joint 
Back-Office (capacity ``J''), Non-TPH Market-Maker (capacity ``N''), 
and Professional (capacity ``U'') (collectively, ``Non-Customer'') 
orders in CBTX and assesses a fee of $1.00 per contract, to apply to 
all Non-Customer orders in CBTX that are executed manually (i.e., open 
outcry).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ For avoidance of doubt, there are no practical changes to 
fee rates assessed for Non-Customer orders in CBTX that are executed 
manually as a result of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Adopts fee code B3, appended to all Non-Customer orders in 
CBTX contra to non-customers that remove liquidity and that are 
executed electronically and assesses a fee of $1.50 per contract.
    <bullet> Adopts fee code B4, appended to all Market-Maker (capacity 
``M'') orders in CBTX contra to non-customers that add liquidity and 
that are executed electronically and provides a rebate of $0.75 per 
contract.
    <bullet> Adopts fee code B5, appended to all electronically 
executed Non-Customer orders in CBTX contra to customers and all 
electronically executed Non-Customer, Non-Market Maker orders in CBTX 
contra to non-customers that add liquidity, and assesses a fee of $1.00 
per contract.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For avoidance of doubt, there are no practical changes to 
fee rates assessed for electronically executed Non-Customer orders 
in CBTX contra to customers and electronically executed Non-
Customer, Non-Market Maker orders in CBTX contra to non-customers 
that add liquidity as a result of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

MBTX
    The Exchange proposes to amend and adopt certain fees related to 
transactions in MBTX. Specifically, the proposed rule change amends and 
adopts certain fees for MBTX in the Rate Table for All Products 
Excluding Underlying Symbol List A, as follows:
    <bullet> Amends fee code M2, currently appended to all Non-Customer 
orders in CBTX and assesses a fee of $0.50 per contract, to apply to 
all Non-Customer orders in MBTX that are executed manually (i.e., open 
outcry).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For avoidance of doubt, there are no practical changes to 
fee rates assessed for Non-Customer orders in MBTX that are executed 
manually as a result of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Adopts fee code M3, appended to all Non-Customer orders in 
MBTX contra to non-customers that remove liquidity and that are 
executed electronically and assesses a fee of $1.00 per contract.
    <bullet> Adopts fee code M4, appended to all Market-Maker (capacity 
``M'') orders in MBTX contra to non-customers that add liquidity and 
that are executed electronically and provides a rebate of $0.50 per 
contract.
    <bullet> Adopts fee code M5, appended to all electronically 
executed Non-Customer orders in MBTX contra to customers and all 
electronically executed Non-Customer, Non-Market Maker orders in MBTX 
contra to non-customers that add liquidity, and assesses a fee of $0.50 
per contract.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For avoidance of doubt, there are no practical changes to 
fee rates assessed for electronically executed Non-Customer orders 
in MBTX contra to customers and electronically executed Non-
Customer, Non-Market Maker orders in MBTX contra to non-customers 
that add liquidity as a result of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, 
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule 
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\11\ which 
requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of 
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its TPHs and other 
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposal to amend fee codes for 
transactions in CBTX and MBTX is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory. The proposed changes differentiate rates based on 
capacity, execution method, capacity of contra-party, and whether the 
order adds or removes liquidity. The Exchange notes that it is not 
novel to charge different fees for different market participants based 
such on these differences and notes that options exchanges have 
routinely recognized such differences in their fee schedules.\12\ 
Moreover, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable to assess lower 
fees for MBTX options orders (as compared to CBTX options orders), 
because of the relation between CBTX options and MBTX options, wherein 
MBTX options overlie an index with 1/10th the value of the index that 
underlies CBTX options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See, e.g., Exchange Fees Schedule, fee code XF, appended to 
electronic Non-Customer, Non-Market Maker orders in XSP, MRUT, or 
DJX, Contra Customer or Contra Non-Customer, which add liquidity, 
and fee code XB, appended to electronic Non-Customer, Non-Market 
Maker orders in XSP, MRUT, or DJX, Contra Customer or Contra Non-
Customer, which remove liquidity. See also EDGX Options Fee 
Schedule, fee code PM, which is specific to Market-Maker orders in 
Penny Securities that add liquidity, and fee code PT, which is 
specific to Market-Maker orders in Penny Securities that remove 
liquidity. See also Exchange Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed rebate for Market-Maker orders 
in CBTX and MBTX that add liquidity contra a non-customer, and the 
corresponding fee assessed on non-customer orders that remove liquidity 
contra a non-customer in those products are reasonable, equitably 
allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. Market-Makers on the 
Exchange are obligated to post continuous two-sided quotes, which 
represent standing commitments to trade at stated prices. In some 
instances identified by the Exchange, these resting quotes are accessed 
by non-bona fide non-customer order activity, which seek

[[Page 36180]]

to put that passive Market-Maker at a disadvantage (via an identified 
price discrepancy or informational advantage, for example). The 
Exchange has observed that this activity has, over time, led to these 
Market-Makers widening quotes to avoid repeatedly being ``picked off.'' 
Wider quotes result in less competitive markets for all market 
participants.
    The proposed fee structure addresses this problem in two ways. By 
assessing a fee on non-customer orders that remove liquidity contra a 
non-customer, the Exchange makes the opportunistic behavior described 
above less attractive, as any perceived advantage being obtained is 
offset by higher transaction fees. Further, by providing a rebate to 
Market-Makers whose resting quotes are accessed by a non-customer, the 
Exchange seeks to offset a portion of the adverse selection risk that 
these passive Market-Makers may bear, thereby reducing the incentive to 
widen quotes defensively. Overall, Market-Makers are encouraged to 
maintain tight quotes, and potential aggressors face a pricing 
disincentive that is calibrated to the market quality harm their 
behavior produces.
    The Exchange believes the proposed fee structure reasonably 
addresses a recognized pattern of trading that impairs market quality, 
namely opportunistic non-customer aggression against passive Market-
Maker quotes. The Exchange believes the proposed fee structure is 
reasonable because the removal fee is a targeted and proportionate 
response to a recognized form of market quality degradation, set at a 
level designed to discourage opportunistic aggression without 
penalizing legitimate trading activity. Further, the rebate is 
calibrated to compensate passive Market-Makers for the adverse 
selection risk which may lead to wider spreads and reduced market depth 
to the detriment of all market participants.
    The Exchange believes the proposed fee structure is equitably 
allocated and not unfairly discriminatory. The rebate is available to 
all CBTX and MBTX Market-Maker orders that meet the applicable 
criteria. The removal fee applies uniformly to all non-customer orders 
removing liquidity contra a non-customer in those products. The 
differential treatment between these categories reflects meaningful and 
well-recognized distinctions in market function. Market-Makers are 
subject to affirmative quoting obligations, including requirements to 
maintain continuous two-sided markets, that impose ongoing regulatory 
and financial burdens not shared by other participants. Compensating 
Market-Makers for those obligations through a rebate is equitable 
because the liquidity they provide benefits the entire market. 
Conversely, the Exchange believes assessing a fee on non-customer 
removal flow may disincentivize opportunistic aggression against 
passive Market-Makers, which imposes potential costs on the market that 
are allocated to contra-parties whose trading behavior generates such 
potential costs.
    The Exchange believes the proposed rates, including the $1.50 per 
contract fee assessed on non-customer orders removing liquidity contra 
a non-customer in CBTX, are reasonable and consistent with fees charged 
by other options exchanges for comparable order flow in Non-Penny 
products. The Exchange notes that multiple registered options exchanges 
currently assess standard transaction rates for non-customer orders in 
Non-Penny classes at or above $1.20 per contract.\13\ The proposed CBTX 
fee for non-customer orders that remove liquidity contra a non-customer 
of $1.50 per contract is therefore within the range of fees currently 
assessed by competing venues for comparable activity. The Exchange 
further notes that the $1.50 per contract rate applies only in the 
specific circumstance where a non-customer order removes liquidity 
contra another non-customer in CBTX, which is a targeted application 
reflecting the market quality rationale described above. The Exchange 
acknowledges that CBTX and MBTX are proprietary products available 
exclusively on the Exchange. However, the Exchange notes that market 
participants retain the ability to migrate activity to economically 
similar products available at other venues,\14\ and that the proposed 
rates must therefore be set at levels that reflect the value of trading 
these products, not at levels that would drive participants toward 
substitutes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See NYSE Arca Options Fees and Charges, TRANSACTION FEE FOR 
ELECTRONIC EXECUTIONS--PER CONTRACT, which assesses a standard 
transaction fee of $1.20 per contract for Non-Customer Electronic 
Executions in Non-Penny Issues that Take Liquidity; MEMX Options Fee 
Schedule, which assesses a standard transaction fee of $1.21 per 
contract for Non-Customer Executions in Non-Penny Issues that Remove 
Liquidity; and The Nasdaq Stock Market Rules, Options 7 Pricing 
Schedule, which assesses a standard transaction fee of $1.25 per 
contract for Non-Customer orders that remove liquidity in Non-Penny 
Symbols. See also MEMX Options Fee Schedule, which assesses a 
Routing Fee of $1.63 per contract for Non-Penny Orders.
    \14\ Options overlying the components of the Cboe Bitcoin U.S. 
ETF Index, Cboe Mini Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index (and the underlying 
exchange-traded funds (``ETFs'')) are actively traded (as are the 
underlying ETFs) (for example, IBIT options).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes 
related to standard transaction fees for CBTX or MBTX will impose any 
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the fee amounts for 
each separate type of market participants will be assessed equally to 
all such market participants. While different fees are assessed to 
different market participants in some circumstances, the obligations 
and circumstances between these market participants differ, as 
discussed above.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the 
proposed fees assessed apply to Exchange proprietary products, which 
are traded exclusively on the Exchange. As stated above, the Exchange 
notes that market participants retain the ability to migrate activity 
to economically similar products available at other venues.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \16\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 36181]]

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec9e998089c18f8381818982989fac9f898fc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7301061f165e101c1e1e161d0700330016105d141c05">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-CBOE-2026-051 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CBOE-2026-051. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-CBOE-2026-051 and should be submitted on 
or before July 7, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-12028 Filed 6-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on June 16, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.