Notice2026-12026
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Texas, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Partial Cabinet Solution Bundles
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 16, 2026
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36169-36173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-12026]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-105661; File No. SR-NYSETEX-2026-21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Texas, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Partial Cabinet Solution Bundles
June 11, 2026.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on June 1, 2026, the NYSE Texas, Inc. (``NYSE Texas'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Partial Cabinet Solution bundles
offered as part of its co-location services. The description of the
Partial Cabinet Solution bundles and related fees in the Connectivity
Fee Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') would be updated accordingly. The
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
<a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a> and at the principal office of the Exchange.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
[[Page 36170]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Partial Cabinet Solution bundles
offered as part of its co-location services. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to delete the current 1 kW Partial Cabinet Solution (``PCS'')
bundle and change the fee charged for the 2 kW PCS bundle. The
description of the PCS bundles and related fees in the Fee Schedule
would be updated accordingly.
The Exchange expects that the proposed rule change would become
operative no later than October 31, 2026. The Exchange will announce
the date through a customer notice.
Background
Currently, there are two PCS bundles available to Users,\4\ each of
which includes a partial cabinet; access to the Liquidity Center
Network (``LCN'') and internet protocol (``IP'') network, the local
area networks available in the data center; two NMS network \5\
connections, two fiber cross connections; and connectivity to one of
two time feeds.\6\ Option A has a 1 kW partial cabinet, and Option B
has a 2 kW partial cabinet. In addition to other requirements, a User
and its Affiliates \7\ must have an Aggregate Cabinet Footprint \8\ of
2 kW or less to qualify for either Option A or Option B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For purposes of the Exchange's colocation services, a
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive
colocation services directly from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 87408 (October 28, 2019), 84 FR 58778 at
n.6 (November 1, 2019) (SR-NYSECHX-2019-12). As specified in the Fee
Schedule, a User that incurs colocation fees for a particular
colocation service pursuant thereto would not be subject to
colocation fees for the same colocation service charged by the New
York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., and
NYSE National, Inc. (together, the ``Affiliate SROs''). Each
Affiliate SRO has submitted substantially the same proposed rule
change to propose the change described herein.
\5\ The NMS Network is an alternate dedicated network connection
that Users use to access the NMS feeds for which the Securities
Industry Automation Corporation is engaged as the securities
information processor. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88972
(May 29, 2020), 85 FR 34472 (June 4, 2020) (SR-NYSECHX-2020-18).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97751 (June 16,
2023), 88 FR 41178 (June 23, 2023) (SR-NYSECHX-2023-12).
\7\ An ``Affiliate'' of a User is any other User or Hosted
Customer that is under 50% or greater common ownership or control of
the first User. Fee Schedule, p 1.
\8\ The ``Aggregate Cabinet Footprint'' of a User is the total
kW of the User's cabinets, including both partial and dedicated
cabinets. Fee Schedule, p 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PCS bundles were designed to attract smaller Users, including
those with minimal power or cabinet space demands or those for which
the costs attendant with having a dedicated cabinet or greater network
connection bandwidth are too burdensome.\9\ That has not changed. But
as hardware and other infrastructure has evolved, even those with
minimal demands need more power to meet the requirements of their
hardware, such that even smaller Users may find the 1 kW PCS bundle
inadequate to meet their needs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 84 FR 58778, supra note 4, at 58782. See also Securities
Exchange Act No. 77072 (February 5, 2016), 81 FR 7394 (February 11,
2016) (SR-NYSE-2015-53).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the same time, the monthly recurring fees that Users pay for IP
and LCN ports (also referred to as ``connections'' and ``network
access'') increased \10\ but the fees for the 2 kW PCS bundle did not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act No. 104065 (September 25,
2025), 90 FR 46966 (September 30, 2025) (SR-NYSETEX-2025-35)
(increasing the monthly recurring fees for IP and LCN ports by
between 9.1% and 11.1%) (the ``2025 Price Change'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Changes
The Exchange proposes to make the following changes. First,
presumably as a result of the increased power needs of newer hardware,
there are no Users with a 1 kW PCS bundle. The Exchange believes that
there is no remaining User demand for the 1 kW PCS bundle and therefore
proposes to delete it from the Fee Schedule as obsolete.
Second, the Exchange proposes to change the monthly recurring
charge for the 2 kW PCS bundle. With this proposal, the Exchange
proposes to increase the monthly recurring fees by 10.0% (the initial
charge would not change). Because it would be the only PCS bundle that
remained, the Exchange also proposes to delete ``Option B''.
To implement the changes, the Exchange would amend the Fee Schedule
as follows (proposed deletions bracketed, proposed addition
italicized):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of service Description Amount of charge
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Cabinet Solution [Option A:.......... [10,000 initial
bundles. 1 kW partial charge per bundle
cabinet, 1 LCN plus $14,000
connection (10 Gb monthly charge per
LX or 40 Gb), 1 IP bundle].
network connection
(10 Gb or 40 Gb), 2
NMS Network
connections (10 Gb
or 40 Gb each), 2
fiber cross
connections and
either the Network
Time Protocol Feed
or Precision Timing
Protocol].
Note: A User and its
Affiliates are limited to
one Partial Cabinet
Solution bundle at a time.
A User and its Affiliates
must have an Aggregate
Cabinet Footprint of 2 kW
or less to qualify for a
Partial Cabinet Solution
bundle. See Note 1 under
``Colocation Notes.''.
A purchaser of a Partial [Option B:]......... $10,000 initial
Cabinet Solution bundle 2 kW partial charge per bundle
must select NMS Network cabinet, 1 LCN plus
connections of the same connection (10 Gb $[15,000]16,500
size (i.e. 10 Gb or 40 Gb) LX or 40 Gb), 1 IP monthly charge per
as the related LCN and IP network connection bundle.
network connections. (10 Gb or 40 Gb), 2
NMS Network
connections (10 Gb
or 40 Gb each), 2
fiber cross
connections and
either the Network
Time Protocol Feed
or Precision Timing
Protocol.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed fee increase would enable the Exchange to maintain and
improve its market technology and services to remain competitive with
its peers. Over the years, customer demand for more sophisticated,
higher-throughput, lower-latency, and higher-power connectivity
solutions has increased. The Exchange continues to
[[Page 36171]]
invest in maintaining, improving, and enhancing its connectivity
products, services, and facilities for the benefit and often at the
behest of its customers. Such enhancements include refreshing hardware
and expanding the Exchange's existing colocation facility to offer
customers additional space and power.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ In addition, in 2020, the Exchange began providing Users,
at no additional charge, one port on the new NMS Network for each 10
Gb or 40 Gb IP Network port or LCN port that Users purchased. The
Exchange did not increase the underlying IP Network or LCN port fees
at the time. See note 5, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nevertheless, the Exchange has not increased the fees for the 2 kW
PCS bundle since 2016 \12\ while inflation has been 15.98% since
February 2016 as measured using the ``Data PPI'' metric described below
\13\ and the monthly recurring fees that Users pay for IP and LCN ports
recently increased.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The price was originally reduced for PCS bundles for 24
months so long as the User ordered its PCS bundle by a given date.
If the PCS bundle was ordered after that date, it paid the full fee.
See note 9, supra.
\13\ See <a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCU51825182#0">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCU51825182#0</a>.
\14\ See 2025 Price Change, note 10, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed below, the Exchange proposes to adjust its fees by an
industry- and product-specific inflationary measure. It is reasonable
and consistent with the Act for the Exchange to recoup its investments,
at least in part, by adjusting its fees. Continuing to operate at fees
for the 2 kW PCS bundle frozen at 2016 levels impacts the Exchange's
ability to enhance its offerings and the interests of market
participants and investors.
The fee increase the Exchange proposes is based on an industry-
specific Producer Price Index (``PPI''), which is a tailored measure of
inflation.\15\ As a general matter, the PPI is a family of indexes that
measures the average change over time in selling prices received by
domestic producers of goods and services. PPI measures price change
from the perspective of the seller. This contrasts with other metrics,
such as the Consumer Price Index (``CPI''), that measure price change
from the purchaser's perspective.\16\ About 10,000 PPIs for individual
products and groups of products are tracked and released each
month.\17\ PPIs are available for the output of nearly all industries
in the goods-producing sectors of the U.S. economy--mining,
manufacturing, agriculture, fishing, and forestry--as well as natural
gas, electricity, and construction, among others. The PPI program
covers approximately 69 percent of the service sector's output, as
measured by revenue reported in the 2017 Economic Census.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See note 13, supra.
\16\ See <a href="https://www.bls.gov/ppi/overview.htm">https://www.bls.gov/ppi/overview.htm</a>.
\17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of this proposal, the relevant industry-specific PPI
is the Data Processing and Related Services PPI (``Data PPI''), which
is an industry net-output PPI that measures the average change in
selling prices received by companies that provide data processing
services.
The Data PPI was introduced in January 2002 by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (``BLS'') as part of an ongoing effort to expand PPI
coverage of the services sector of the U.S. economy and is identified
as NAICS 518210 in the North American Industry Classification
System.\18\ According to the BLS,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ NAICS appears in table 5 of the PPI Detailed Report and is
available at <a href="https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/PCU518210518210">https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/PCU518210518210</a>.
[t]he primary output of NAICS 518210 is the provision of
electronic data processing services. In the broadest sense, computer
services companies help their customers efficiently use technology.
The processing services market consists of vendors who use their own
computer systems--often utilizing proprietary software--to process
customers' transactions and data. Companies that offer processing
services collect, organize, and store a customer's transactions and
other data for record-keeping purposes. Price movements for the
NAICS 518210 index are based on changes in the revenue received by
companies that provide data processing services. Each month,
companies provide net transaction prices for a specified service.
The transaction is an actual contract selected by probability, where
the price-determining characteristics are held constant while the
service is repriced. The prices used in index calculation are the
actual prices billed for the selected service contract.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See <a href="https://www.bls.gov/ppi/factsheets/producer-price-index-for-the-data-processing-and-related-services-industry-naics-518210.htm">https://www.bls.gov/ppi/factsheets/producer-price-index-for-the-data-processing-and-related-services-industry-naics-518210.htm</a>.
The Exchange believes the Data PPI is an appropriate measure to be
considered in the context of the proposed rule change to modify the
monthly fee for the 2 kW PCS bundle because the Exchange uses its ``own
computer systems'' and ``proprietary software,'' i.e., its own data
center, including the hardware and equipment that it uses to bring
customers' orders, transactions, and other data into the data center
for processing, routing, and execution. In other words, the Exchange is
in the business of data processing and related services.
For purposes of this proposed rule change, the Exchange examined
the Data PPI value for the period from February 2016 through December
2025 (the last month for which finalized data is available).\20\ The
Data PPI had a starting value of 106.6 in February 2016 and an ending
value of 123.64 in December 2025, a 15.98% increase. This indicates
that companies who are also in the data storage and processing business
have generally increased prices for a specified service covered under
NAICS 518210 by an average of 15.98% during this period. Based on that
percentage change, the Exchange proposes to increase its monthly
recurring fees for the 2 kW PCS bundle by 10.0%--below the Data PPI
increase of 15.98%--which reflects an increase covering the entire
period since the last price adjustment to these fees was made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See note 18, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further believes the Data PPI is an appropriate
measure for purposes of the proposed rule change on the basis that it
is a stable metric with limited volatility, unlike other consumer-side
inflation metrics. In fact, the Data PPI has not experienced a greater
than 3.3% increase for any one calendar year period since it was
introduced. The average calendar year change from 2002 to 2025 was
0.8%, with a cumulative increase of 19.7% over this period.\21\ The
Exchange believes the Data PPI is considerably less volatile than other
inflation metrics such as CPI, which has had individual calendar year
increases averaging 2.5%, and a cumulative increase of 83.0% during the
same period.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See id.
\22\ See <a href="https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/consumer-price-index-and-annual-percent-changes-from-1913-to-2008/">https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/consumer-price-index-and-annual-percent-changes-from-1913-to-2008/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the Data PPI, and significant investments
into, and enhanced performance of, the Exchange support the
reasonableness of the proposed fee increase.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See supra discussion of system performance advancements.
Additionally, other exchanges, including the Affiliate SROs, have
filed for increases in certain fees, based in part on comparisons to
inflation. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 102073
(January 2, 2025), 90 FR 1558 (January 8, 2025) (SR-BOX-2024-30);
102103 (January 3, 2025), 90 FR 2045 (January 10, 2025) (SR-NASDAQ-
2024-087); 102574 (March 11, 2025), 90 FR 12439 (March 17, 2025)
(SR-NYSEARCA-2025-20); 104061 (September 25, 2025), 90 FR 47009
(September 30, 2025) (SR-NYSE-2025-37);104062 (September 25, 2025),
90 FR 46950 (September 30, 2025) (SR-NYSEAmer-2025-60); 104063
(September 25, 2025), 90 FR 47038 (September 30, 2025) (SR-NYSEArca-
2025-71); 104064 (September 25, 2025), 90 FR 46960 (September 30,
2025) (SR-NYSENAT-2025-23); and 100994 (September 10, 2024), 89 FR
75612 (September 16, 2024) (SR-NYSEARCA-2024-79).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application and Impact of the Proposed Change
The proposed change would apply to all PCS bundles. The proposed
change would not apply differently to distinct types or sizes of market
participants.
[[Page 36172]]
Rather, it would apply to all Users equally.
Users that require other sizes or combinations of cabinets, network
connections and cross connects could still request them. As is
currently the case, the purchase of any colocation service, including
PCS bundles, is completely voluntary and the Price List is applied
uniformly to all Users.
As no Users have the 1 kW PCS bundle, none would be impacted by its
deletion. The Exchange expects to obtain no new Users as a result of
changing the fees for 2 kW PCS bundles.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\24\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\25\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange further believes
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,\26\ because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This belief is based on two factors. First, the current fees for
the 2 kW PCS bundle do not properly reflect the quality of the services
and products, as fees for the 2 kW PCS bundle have been static in
nominal terms, and therefore falling in real terms due to inflation.
Second, the Exchange believes that investments made in enhancing the
capacity and speed of Exchange systems has increased the performance of
these ports.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
As noted above, the Exchange has not increased the fees for the 2
kW PCS bundle since 2016. However, in the years following the last fee
increases, the Exchange has made significant investments in upgrades to
its connectivity products, services, and facilities, enhancing the
quality of its services. In other words, Exchange customers have
greatly benefited, while the Exchange's ability to recoup its
investments has been hampered.
Between February 2016 and December 2025, the total inflation rate
was 36.7%.\27\ Using the more targeted inflation number of Data PPI,
the cumulative inflation rate was 15.98%. The Exchange believes the
Data PPI is a reasonable metric to base this fee increase on because it
is targeted to producer-side increases in the data processing industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See note 22, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notwithstanding inflation, as noted above, the Exchange has not
increased its fees for the 2 kW PCS bundle for more than eight years.
The price change would be commensurate with the 2025 fee changes to the
LCN and IP network and below the amount of the increase in the Data
PPI. The proposed fee change therefore represents a modest increase
from the current fees.
The Exchange believes the proposed fee increase is reasonable in
light of the Exchange's continued expenditure in maintaining a robust
technology ecosystem. Furthermore, the Exchange continues to invest in
maintaining and enhancing its connectivity products--for the benefit
and often at the behest of its customers and global investors. Such
enhancements include refreshing several aspects of the technology
ecosystem including software, hardware, and network while introducing
new and innovative products and expanded and modernized facilities. The
goal of the enhancements discussed above, among other things, is to
provide faster, higher-capacity, and more modern connectivity products
and services. Accordingly, the Exchange continues to expend resources
to innovate and modernize its technology so that it may benefit its
members in offering connectivity products and services.
Additional Considerations
The PCS bundles were designed to attract smaller Users, including
those with minimal power or cabinet space demands or those for which
the costs attendant with having a dedicated cabinet or greater network
connection bandwidth are too burdensome. As equipment has evolved, even
those with minimal demands need more power to meet the requirements of
their hardware, such that even smaller Users may not find the 1 kW PCS
bundle meets their needs adequately. As a consequence, there are no
Users with a 1 kW PCS bundle and accordingly the Exchange believes that
to delete the 1 kW PCS bundle would be reasonable.
The Proposed Fees Are Equitably Allocated and Not Unfairly
Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposed fee increase is equitably
allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because it would apply to all
market participants that choose to purchase the 2 kW PCS bundle from
the Exchange. Any participant that chooses to purchase the 2 kW PCS
bundle would be subject to the same Fee Schedule, regardless of what
type of business they operate or the use they plan to make of the
products and services. Additionally, the fee increases would be applied
uniformly to market participants without regard to Exchange membership
status or the extent of any other business with the Exchange or
affiliated entities.
The Exchange also believes that the proposal represents an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
because Exchange fees have fallen in real terms during the relevant
period. Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee changes
are not unfairly discriminatory because the fees would be assessed
uniformly across all market participants, in the same manner they are
today, that voluntarily purchase the Exchange's connectivity products
and services, which would remain available for purchase by all market
participants.
The PCS bundles were designed to attract smaller Users, including
those with minimal power or cabinet space demands or those for which
the costs attendant with having a dedicated cabinet or greater network
connection bandwidth are too burdensome. As equipment has evolved, even
those with minimal demands need more power to meet the requirements of
their hardware, such that even smaller Users may not find the 1 kW PCS
bundle meets their needs adequately. As a consequence, there are no
Users with a 1 kW PCS bundle and accordingly the Exchange believes that
to delete the 1 kW PCS bundle would be equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule changes will not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
[[Page 36173]]
furtherance of the purposes of Section 6(b)(8) of the Act.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The Exchange believes that the proposed
fees do not put any market participants at a relative disadvantage
compared to other market participants. As noted above, the Fee Schedule
would continue to apply to all purchasers of the Exchange's
connectivity products and services in the same manner as it does today,
albeit at inflation-adjusted rates for the 2 kW PCS bundle, and
customers may choose whether to purchase these products and services at
all. The Exchange also believes that the deletion of the 1 kW PCS
bundle and the level of the proposed fees neither favors nor penalizes
one or more categories of market participants in a manner that would
impose an undue burden on competition.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange believes that the removal of
the 1 kW PCS bundle and the proposed fees for the 2 kW PCS bundle do
not impose a burden on competition or on other SROs that is not
necessary or appropriate.
First, presumably as a result of the increased power needs of newer
hardware, there are no Users with a 1 kW PCS bundle. The Exchange
believes that there is no remaining User demand for the 1 kW PCS
bundle, and so no Users would be impacted by its deletion.
Second, in determining the proposed fees, the Exchange utilized an
objective and stable metric with limited volatility. Utilizing Data PPI
over a specified period of time is a reasonable means of recouping the
Exchange's investment in maintaining and enhancing its connectivity
products, services, and facilities. The Exchange believes utilizing
Data PPI, a tailored measure of inflation, to increase certain fees for
connectivity products and services to recoup the Exchange's investment
in maintaining and enhancing such products, services, and facilities
would not impose a burden on competition.
For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule changes reflect this competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
D. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \29\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\30\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \31\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \32\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\30\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\32\ Rule 19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) requires a
self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice
of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \33\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1260677e773f717d7f7f777c6661526177713c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8aaadb4bdf5bbb7b5b5bdb6acab98abbdbbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-NYSETEX-2026-21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSETEX-2026-21. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions
should refer to file number SR-NYSETEX-2026-21 and should be submitted
on or before July 7, 2026.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-12026 Filed 6-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 16, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.