Notice2026-11924

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule by Removing the Note Appended to the RPI Add Tier

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
June 15, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 114 (Monday, June 15, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36020-36022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-11924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-105653; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2026-044]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Its Fee Schedule by Removing the Note Appended to the RPI Add 
Tier

June 10, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on June 1, 2026, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') proposes to 
amend its Fee Schedule by removing the note appended to the RPI Add 
Tier. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Commission's website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>), the 
Exchange's website (<a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/">https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/</a>), and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its 
equities trading platform (``EDGX Equities'') by removing the note 
appended to the RPI Add Tier. The Exchange proposes to implement these 
changes effective June 1, 2026.
    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 17 registered equities exchanges, as well as a 
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues 
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), to which market 
participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available 
information,\3\ no single registered equities exchange has more than 
15% of the market share. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly 
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of order flow. The Exchange in 
particular operates a ``maker-taker'' model whereby it pays rebates to 
members that add liquidity and assesses fees to those that remove 
liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume 
Summary, Month-to-Date (May 26, 2026), available at <a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/_statistics/">https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/_statistics/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates and 
rates applied per share for orders that provide and remove liquidity, 
respectively. Currently, for orders in securities priced at or above 
$1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00160 per share 
for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per share 
for orders that remove liquidity.\4\ For orders in securities priced 
below $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of 0.00003 per 
share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of the 
dollar value for orders that remove liquidity.\5\ The Exchange offers 
various fee codes applicable to orders that add or remove liquidity on 
EDGX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 19, 2026, the Commission approved the Exchange's proposed 
adoption of the EDGX RPI Program.\6\ The EDGX RPI Program launched on 
the Exchange on April 10, 2026. The EDGX RPI Program seeks to enable 
Members to offer price improvement to eligible Retail Orders through 
use of Retail Price Improvement Orders (``RPI Orders'') \7\ in 
securities priced at or above $1.00. In anticipation of the EDGX RPI 
Program's launch, the Exchange introduced fee code ZP to its Fee 
Schedule on April 1, 2026.\8\ Rather than providing the standard 
rebate, fee code ZP assesses a fee of $0.0002 to RPI Orders in 
securities priced at or above $1.00 that add liquidity to the 
Exchange.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 105052 (March 19, 
2026), 91 FR 14052 (March 24, 2026) (SR-CboeEDGX-2025-072).
    \7\ See Rule 11.21(a)(3). A ``Retail Price Improvement Order'' 
or ``RPI Order'' consists of nondisplayed interest on the Exchange 
that is eligible to interact with incoming Retail Orders and that is 
identified by the Retail Liquidity Identifier described in Rule 
11.21(e). To be executable, an RPI Order for a security priced at or 
above $1.00 must be priced at least $0.001 better than the Protected 
NBB or Protected NBO and may be priced in $0.001 increments (e.g., 
$10.001). An RPI Order may not be entered in securities priced below 
$1.00. An RPI Order is ineligible to execute at prices equal to or 
inferior to the Protected NBB (for buy orders) or Protected NBO (for 
sell orders). An RPI Order that is ineligible to execute because it 
is priced equal to or inferior to the Protected NBB or Protected NBO 
will not be canceled and will become eligible to execute against 
incoming Retail Orders should the RPI Order become priced better 
than the Protected NBB (for buy orders) or Protected NBO (for sell 
orders) at a later time. An incoming RPI Order will not be eligible 
to interact with a resting Retail Order on the EDGX Book and upon 
entry will post to the EDGX Book to execute against later-arriving 
Retail Orders.
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 105321 (April 28, 
2026), SR-CboeEDGX-2026-026.
    \9\ See Rule 11.21(a)(3). Securities with executions priced 
below $1.00 are not eligible to be appended with fee code ZP, as an 
RPI Order may not be entered in securities priced below $1.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under footnote 6 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange offers RPI Add 
Tier 1. Specifically, this tier provides a reduced fee for qualifying 
orders (e.g., orders appended with fee code ZP \10\) that satisfy the 
RPI Add ADV criteria.

[[Page 36021]]

Additionally, RPI Add Tier 1 contains a note, which provided that for 
May 2026, RPI Add Tier 1 is only available for qualification and shall 
utilize quoting and trading activity from May 2026 for its volume 
calculations. Payment for this tier shall not begin until June 2026 for 
those Members that satisfy the criteria during May 2026. The Exchange 
now proposes to remove the note appended to RPI Add Tier 1 as the tier 
will utilize the prior month's quoting and trading activity to derive 
volume figures, in accordance with the General Notes section of the Fee 
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Fee code ZP is appended to Retail Price Improving Orders 
that add liquidity to the EDGX Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the 
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the 
Act.\11\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change 
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \12\ requirements that the rules 
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts 
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to 
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirement that the rules of 
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as well as Section 6(b)(4) \14\ 
as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable 
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using 
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes removing the text accompanying RPI Add Tier 1 
promotes just and equitable principles of trade, provides for the 
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges, and is 
not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to all Members equally, 
in that any Member seeking to achieve the criteria of RPI Add Tier 1 
will be utilizing quoting and trading activity from the prior month, in 
accordance with the General Notes section of the Fee Schedule. No 
Member shall be permitted to use quoting and trading activity from the 
current month when seeking to achieve the criteria of RPI Add Tier 1. 
Providing this additional clarity on the Exchange's Fee Schedule 
ensures that all market participants have information regarding the 
quoting and trading activity being utilized to determine qualification 
for RPI Add Tier 1, which provides for the equitable allocation of 
reasonable fees among the Exchange's Members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above, 
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes will encourage the 
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby 
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution 
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all 
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes 
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering 
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of 
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any 
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed 
removal of the note associated with RPI Add Tier 1 is not being made 
for competitive reasons, but rather to appropriately define the 
applicable time period for which the Exchange will utilize quoting and 
trading activity for the tier's volume calculations.
    Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose 
any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously 
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. 
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on 
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the 
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on 
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more 
than 15% of the market share.\15\ Therefore, no exchange possesses 
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed, 
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange 
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed 
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in 
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. 
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the 
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, 
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has 
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its 
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed 
companies.'' \16\ The fact that this market is competitive has also 
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one 
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC 
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of 
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing 
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for 
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share 
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, 
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker 
dealers'. . . .''.\17\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its 
proposed fee changes impose any burden on competition that is not 
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Supra note 4.
    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
    \17\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \18\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \19\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may

[[Page 36022]]

temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, 
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5022253c357d333f3d3d353e2423102335337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9be9eef7feb6f8f4f6f6fef5efe8dbe8fef8b5fcf4ed">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-CboeEDGX-2026-044 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2026-044. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2026-044 and should be 
submitted on or before July 6, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-11924 Filed 6-12-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on June 15, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.