Rule2026-11269

Establishing United States Citizenship for MARAD Program Participation; Simplifying the Application Process

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
June 4, 2026
Effective
June 4, 2026

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentMaritime Administration

Abstract

On July 1, 2025, MARAD published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), titled "How to Best Evidence Corporate Citizenship: Policy and Regulatory Review," soliciting public comment on actions MARAD could take to improve the process for evidencing U.S. citizenship. The final rule will simplify and modernize the process for establishing United States citizenship of corporations and other business formations participating in MARAD programs. In the interest of minimizing the unnecessary disclosure of personally identifiable information, the final rule will also eliminate the requirement to provide dates and places of birth of corporate executives, directors, and stock owners as required in the current form of affidavit of citizenship. The final rule will also amend the form of affidavit with respect to entities that are publicly traded by eliminating the requirement to provide certain information regarding registered owners of stock, eliminate the notarization requirement, and provide a simple and streamlined process for recertification.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 107 (Thursday, June 4, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33635-33640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-11269]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

46 CFR Part 355

[Docket Number MARAD-2025-0087]
RIN 2133-AB90


Establishing United States Citizenship for MARAD Program 
Participation; Simplifying the Application Process

AGENCY: Maritime Administration (MARAD), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2025, MARAD published a Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NPRM), titled ``How to Best Evidence Corporate Citizenship: 
Policy and Regulatory Review,'' soliciting public comment on actions 
MARAD could take to improve the process for evidencing U.S. 
citizenship. The final rule will simplify and modernize the process for 
establishing United States citizenship of corporations and other 
business formations participating in MARAD programs. In the interest of 
minimizing the unnecessary disclosure of personally identifiable 
information, the final rule will also eliminate the requirement to 
provide dates and places of birth of corporate executives, directors, 
and stock owners as required in the current form of affidavit of 
citizenship. The final rule will also amend the form of affidavit with 
respect to entities that are publicly traded by eliminating the 
requirement to provide certain information regarding registered owners 
of stock, eliminate the notarization requirement, and provide a simple 
and streamlined process for recertification.

DATES: This final rule is effective on June 4, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael C. Pucci, Office of the Chief 
Counsel, Division of Maritime Programs, (202) 366-5167 or via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c41656f646d6960225c796f6f654c686378226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f72565c575e5a53116f4a5c5c567f5b504b11585049">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during business hours. 
The FIRS is available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, to 
leave a message or question. You will receive a reply during normal 
business hours. You may send mail to U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Maritime Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Division of 
Legislation and Regulations, W24-220, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 
Washington, DC 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access and Filing

    This final rule and all comments may be viewed online through the 
Federal eRulemaking portal at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. An electronic copy 
of this document may also be downloaded by accessing the Office of the 
Federal Register's home page at: <a href="http://www.federalregister.gov">www.federalregister.gov</a>.
    Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments 
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). For information on 
DOT's compliance with the Privacy Act, please visit <a href="https://www.transportation.gov/privacy">https://www.transportation.gov/privacy</a>.

Background

    On July 1, 2025, MARAD published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
(NPRM), titled ``How to Best Evidence Corporate Citizenship: Policy and 
Regulatory Review,'' soliciting public comment on actions MARAD could 
take to simplify and modernize the process for evidencing U.S. 
citizenship (90 FR 28513). Previously, on May 1, 2019, MARAD published 
an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM), titled ``How to Best 
Evidence Corporate Citizenship: Policy and Regulatory Review'' (84 FR 
18468) soliciting public

[[Page 33636]]

comment seeking the same information and whether MARAD should revise 
its regulations.
    MARAD received comments to the original ANPRM, but the only comment 
received to the NPRM was outside the scope of this rulemaking and is 
therefore not addressed in the discussion below. MARAD developed this 
final rule by incorporating many of the comments and recommendations 
received in response to the ANPRM.

Discussion of Comments Received

    In response to the agency's ANPRM seeking ways to simplify annual 
requirements to evidence corporate citizenship, MARAD received one 
comment from The Maritime Law Association of the United States (MLA), 
which included several recommendations developed by the MLA's standing 
committee on Marine Financing. The agency responds to the MLA's 
recommendations as follows:
    The MLA first recommended MARAD consider regulatory changes to make 
compliance more efficient and assured by eliminating the inclusion of 
birth dates and places of birth on the form of affidavit of U.S. 
citizenship.
    MARAD agrees. Inclusion of this information in the affidavit of 
U.S. citizenship does not significantly improve U.S. citizenship 
certainty and creates an unnecessary risk of release of personally 
identifiable information. In any instance of doubt, MARAD will retain 
the authority to request that information from submitting parties. The 
final rule's form of affidavit at section 355.2 eliminates that 
requirement.
    MLA next asked MARAD to consider permitting streamlined 
certifications for follow-on affidavits when there has been no material 
change to the information contained in the earlier affidavit rather 
than having each affidavit repeat all the required information under 
the current regulation, which requires annual submission of affidavits.
    MARAD agrees with this recommendation. Permitting an optional 
streamlined certification will reduce the burden of annual filing for 
those entities whose ownership information has not changed since the 
last affidavit was filed without impacting MARAD's ability to make 
annual U.S. citizenship determinations. Section 355.4(b) of the final 
rule will include a provision for optional annual certification of 
citizenship information.
    The MLA further recommended that MARAD revise its regulations to 
take into account the current state of public stock ownership and other 
factors affecting the ability of any public company to prove its U.S. 
citizenship. In particular, the MLA provided the following five 
recommendations concerning public companies:
    1. The MLA asked that MARAD consider coordinating with the U.S. 
Coast Guard (USCG) to provide the affected industry guidance that is 
practical and adequately implements the intent of U.S. maritime 
citizenship laws. The MLA further suggested that USCG's November 26, 
2012, Federal Register Notice, ``Mechanisms of Compliance with United 
States Citizenship Requirements for the Ownership of Vessels Eligible 
to Engage in Restricted Trades by Publicly Traded Companies'' (77 FR 
70453), would be a good starting point for developing a regulation that 
both agencies would promulgate.
    MARAD agrees. The guidance contained in USCG's November 2012 Notice 
is the basis for MARAD's revisions to the form of affidavit of U.S. 
citizenship to be used by publicly traded corporations and other 
business formations whose ownership interests are publicly traded. 
Adoption of this guidance will harmonize the agencies' approaches to 
evidencing citizenship. Section 355.3(d) will provide publicly traded 
entities flexibility in applying several reasonably available methods 
to ensure ongoing compliance with U.S. ownership requirements without 
sacrificing the accuracy of ownership information upon which such 
entities must rely upon to affirm their citizenship status.
    2. The MLA recommended that further improvements might be 
considered with respect to the fair inference rule including relaxing 
the percentages and making it clear that address lists made available 
by financial intermediaries can be relied upon.
    MARAD agrees that the ``fair inference rule,'' as applied to 
corporations that are publicly traded, must be updated because it 
relies upon stock records that are no longer controlled by the issuing 
corporation since the advent of electronic trading. The final rule 
reflects a modified fair inference rule under which a publicly traded 
corporation may rely upon reasonably available shareholder residence 
information, including geographic surveys, and statistical sampling. 
However, MARAD will not adjust the current non-citizen ownership 
percentage limits of the fair inference rule until such time that we 
have confidence that reducing such limits will not result in an 
unreasonable risk of submitters breaching the statutory non-citizen 
ownership levels.
    3. The MLA recommended that MARAD review methods adopted by other 
Federal agencies for establishing U.S.-citizen citizenship.
    MARAD agrees. The rule is informed by our review of guidance and 
rules of other agencies, including the Federal Communications 
Commission's Review of Foreign Ownership Policies for Broadcast, Common 
Carrier, and Aeronautical Radio Licensees under Section 310(b)(4) of 
the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended (Sep. 30, 2016); Federal 
Aviation Administration regulations; and USCG's November 2012 Notice 
(discussed above). The final rule will afford submitters flexibility in 
selecting the methods they use to determine ownership while maintaining 
compliance with annual filing requirements.
    4. The MLA recommended that MARAD work with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission and the Depository Trust Company to improve the 
SEG-100 system to make it an even more reliable indicator of U.S. 
citizen stock ownership.
    Considering the obsolescence of the current form of affidavit, 
MARAD has accepted annual filers' participation in the SEG-100 system 
as a basis for affirming U.S. stock ownership. The final rule will now 
include participation in the SEG-100 system as an acceptable method for 
maintaining and evidencing U.S. ownership. The final rule does not make 
participation in SEG-100 mandatory.
    5. The MLA recommended that MARAD, in coordination with USCG, adopt 
a process by which companies can present their citizenship compliance 
plans for approval by the two agencies and, if acting on the basis of 
those plans for approval by the two agencies, have the benefit of a 
presumption that they satisfy the applicable citizenship standard and 
the benefit of a grace period to come back into compliance if the 
maximum permissible non-citizenship threshold is exceeded due to market 
trading.
    MARAD agrees that submitters should be permitted to submit their 
citizenship compliance plans for MARAD's review and approval. The final 
rule includes an option for submitting compliance methods for MARAD 
review and approval. As noted above, MARAD's rule is intended to 
harmonize its compliance procedures with the guidance from USCG's 
November 2012 notice. Upon request from submitters, MARAD will share 
such determinations with USCG.
    The final rule adopts the changes described above and updates 
statutory

[[Page 33637]]

authorities, which have changed since the current rule was published on 
July 18, 1970.

Rulemaking Analysis and Notices

Executive Orders 12866

    Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provide for making determinations 
whether a regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and to the requirements of 
E.O. 12866.
    This rule will streamline the process for establishing United 
States citizenship of corporations and other business formations 
participating in MARAD programs by removing the unnecessary disclosure 
of personally identifiable information. It also amends the form of 
affidavit with respect to entities that are publicly traded to 
eliminate the requirement to provide certain information regarding 
registered owners of stock, which is no longer consistent with how 
stocks are traded in U.S. equity markets today.
    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866 
and was therefore not reviewed by OMB. It is also not considered a 
major rule for purposes of Congressional review under Public Law 104-
121.

Executive Order 14192

    E.O. 14192 requires that for ``each new [E.O. 14192 regulatory 
action] issued, at least ten prior regulations be identified for 
elimination.'' Implementation guidance for E.O. 14192, issued by OMB 
(Memorandum M-25-20, March 26, 2025), defines an E.O. 14192 
deregulatory action as ``an action that has been finalized and has 
total costs less than zero.'' This rule will have total costs less than 
zero, and therefore is an E.O. 14192 deregulatory action.

Executive Order 13132

    MARAD analyzed this rulemaking in accordance with the principles 
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 and has determined that 
it does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. This rulemaking 
has no substantial effect on the States, or on the current Federal-
State relationship, or on the current distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various local officials. Nothing in this 
document preempts any State law or regulation. Therefore, MARAD did not 
consult with State and local officials and did not prepare a federalism 
summary impact statement.

Executive Order 13175

    MARAD does not believe that this rulemaking will significantly or 
uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments when 
analyzed under the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 13175. 
Therefore, the funding and consultation requirements of this Executive 
Order do not apply.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 
(SBREFA) of 1996), whenever an agency is required to publish a notice 
of proposed rulemaking or final rule, the agency must prepare and make 
available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that 
describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small 
businesses, small organizations and small governmental jurisdictions), 
unless the head of the agency certifies the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Agencies must also provide a statement of the factual basis for this 
certification.
    For the following reasons, the Maritime Administrator certifies 
that this rulemaking action would not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The rule simplifies 
and modernizes the process for establishing United States citizenship 
of corporations and other business formations participating in MARAD 
programs. The rule also eliminates the requirement to provide dates and 
places of birth of corporate executives, directors, and stock owners as 
required in the current form of affidavit of citizenship. The final 
rule also amends the form of affidavit with respect to entities that 
are publicly traded by eliminating the requirement to provide certain 
information regarding registered owners of stock, eliminate the 
notarization requirement, and provide a simple and streamlined process 
for recertification.

Privacy Impact Assessment

    Section 522(a)(5) of the Transportation, Treasury, Independent 
Agencies, and General Government Appropriations Act, 2005 (Pub. L. 108-
447, div. H, 118 Stat. 2809 at 3268) requires DOT and certain other 
Federal agencies to conduct a privacy impact assessment of each 
proposed rule that will affect the privacy of individuals. This 
rulemaking, which only eliminates the requirement to provide dates and 
places of birth of corporate executives, directors and stockholders, 
eliminates certain information regarding registered owners of stock, 
and the notarization requirement, does not result in personally 
identifiable information (PII) being collected or maintained in a 
Government-run website or IT system. Therefore, MARAD did not conduct a 
Privacy Impact Assessment.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires Agencies to 
evaluate whether an agency action would result in the expenditure by 
State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 
private sector, of $212 million or more (as adjusted for inflation, in 
2026) in any 1 year, and if so, to take steps to minimize these 
unfunded mandates. This rulemaking will not impose unfunded mandates 
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It will not result in 
costs of $212 million or more to either State, local, or Tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, so the 
analytical requirements of the UMRA do not apply. The rule is the least 
burdensome alternative that achieves MARAD's stated objectives for the 
rule.

National Environmental Policy Act

    Pursuant to 49 CFR 1.81, the Secretary has delegated the 
``functions'' under NEPA to the Administrators ``as they relate to the 
matters within the primary responsibility of each Operating 
Administration.'' MARAD has determined that this proposed rule is 
categorically excluded pursuant to DOT Order 5610.1D, subpart C, 
section (e)(3). A categorical exclusion (CE) is an action identified in 
an agency's NEPA procedures that does not normally have a significant 
impact on the environment and therefore does not require either an 
environmental assessment (EA) or environmental impact statement (EIS). 
See DOT Order 5610.1D, section 9. In analyzing the applicability of a 
CE, the agency must also consider whether extraordinary circumstances 
are present that would warrant the preparation of an EA or EIS. Id. at 
section 9(b). MARAD may utilize its own CEs, in addition to CEs listed 
in DOT Order 5610.1D Appendix A or another Operating Administration's 
CEs, using the procedures described in DOT Order 5610.1D, section 9, 
and subpart C, section (e). This rulemaking, Establishing United States 
Citizenship for MARAD Program Participation; Simplifying the 
Application Process, is categorically excluded pursuant to DOT Order 
5610.1D, subpart C, section (e)(3): ``Internal orders and procedures 
not required to be published in the Federal

[[Page 33638]]

Register, promulgation of rules, regulations, directives, and 
amendments thereto which do not require a regulatory impact analysis 
under section 3 or do not have a potential to cause a significant 
impact on the environment . . .'' MARAD does not anticipate any 
environmental impacts, and there are no extraordinary circumstances 
present in connection with this rulemaking.

Regulation Identifier Number

    A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory 
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The 
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in 
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading 
of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the 
Unified Agenda.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) (PRA) 
requires that DOT consider the impact of paperwork and other 
information collection burdens imposed on the public. This final rule 
will likely result in a reduction in the burden hours required for 
information collection 2133-0012, Requirements for Establishing U.S. 
Citizenship--46 CFR 355, because changes to the regulation will shorten 
the time and effort to evidence citizenship for many first-time 
applicants as well as those that must recertify. We expect that the 
information collection requirement under this rule will reduce the 
``hours per response'' from five hours to four hours resulting in a 20 
percent reduction in burden hours annually and having a net cost saving 
of $24,756 annually across 550 respondents.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person is not 
required to respond to a collection of information by a federal agency 
unless the collection displays a valid OMB control number.

List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 355

    Citizenship and naturalization, Maritime carriers, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    For the reasons described in the preamble, MARAD is revising 46 CFR 
part 355 to read as follows:

PART 355--REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTABLISHING UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP

Sec.
355.1 General.
355.2 Evidencing U.S. citizenship; affidavit guide.
355.3 Criteria to be applied in support of stock data in affidavit.
355.4 Changes in citizenship data.
355.5 Additional material.

PART 355--REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTABLISHING UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 50501, 50502; secs. 2, 204, Public Law 64-
260, 39 Stat. 729, as amended, Public Law 74-835, 49 Stat. 1987, as 
amended, Public Law 86-327, 73 Stat. 597.


Sec.  355.1  General.

    (a) Under 46 U.S.C. 50501, no corporation is deemed to be a citizen 
of the United States unless:
    (1) It is organized under the laws of the United States or of a 
State, Territory, District, or possession thereof;
    (2) Its president or other chief executive officer, and the 
chairman of its board of directors are citizens of the United States, 
and no more of its directors than a minority of the number necessary to 
constitute a quorum are non-citizens; and
    (3) The controlling interest therein is owned by citizens of the 
United States or, in the case of a corporation operating any vessel in 
the coastwise trade, on the Great Lakes, or inland lakes of the United 
States, 75 per centum of the interest in such corporation is owned by 
citizens of the United States.
    (b) As used in this part, the term primary corporation includes, 
but not exclusively, participants in certain transactions or programs 
under title 46 of the U.S. Code, such as Owner Trustees and certain 
vessel owners and contractors under 46 U.S.C. 53102 or Capital 
Construction Fund holders under 46 U.S.C. 53501 et seq.
    (c) To satisfy the statutory requirements, an Affidavit of U.S. 
Citizenship of a primary corporation by one of its officers duly 
authorized to execute such Affidavit, should be submitted. This 
Affidavit should contain facts from which the corporation's citizenship 
can be determined.


Sec.  355.2  Evidencing U.S. citizenship; affidavit guide.

    In order to establish that a corporation is a citizen of the United 
States within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. 50501, as amended, the form of 
affidavit to be used as a guide is hereby prescribed for execution on 
behalf of the primary corporation and filing with an application or, if 
required, subsequent filing within 30 days after the annual meeting of 
the stockholders (if the primary corporation is a wholly owned 
subsidiary and contrary to the bylaw provision does not hold the annual 
meeting of stockholders, the subsequent filing should be annually and 
related to the date of the original filing) as evidence of the 
continuing U.S. citizenship of a filing entity:
Affidavit of U.S. Citizenship
(NAME OF CORPORATION)

State of _____)

 ) ss.:

County of ____)

    I, (Name), of (Physical residence address, city, and state), being 
duly sworn, depose and say:
    1. That I am the (Title of office(s) held) of (Name of 
Corporation), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of 
the State of ___ (hereinafter called the ``Corporation''), with offices 
at (Business address), in evidence of which incorporation a certified 
copy of the Articles or Certificate of Incorporation (or Association) 
is filed herewith (or has been filed) together with a certified copy of 
the corporate Bylaws. [Evidence of continuing U.S. citizenship status, 
including amendments to said Articles or Certificate and Bylaws, should 
be filed within 30 days after the annual meeting of the stockholders or 
annually, within 30 days after the original affidavit if there has been 
no meeting of the stockholders prior to that time.];
    2. That I am authorized by and on behalf of the Corporation to 
execute and deliver this Affidavit of U.S. Citizenship;
    3. That the names of the Chief Executive Officer, by whatever 
title, Vice Presidents or other individuals who are authorized to act 
in the absence or disability of the Chief Executive Officer, by 
whatever title, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, and the 
Directors of the Corporation are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Name                                  Title                     Citizen of the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Name                                 Title                                Yes/No
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 33639]]

    [Note: The foregoing list should include the officers, whether or 
not they are also directors, and all directors, whether or not they are 
also officers] and that each of said individuals is a citizen of the 
United States by virtue of birth in the United States, birth abroad of 
U.S. citizen parents, by naturalization, by naturalization during 
minority through the naturalization of a parent, by marriage (if a 
woman) to a U.S. citizen prior to September 22, 1922, or as otherwise 
authorized by law, except (give name and nationality of all Non-Citizen 
officers and directors, if any); however, the By-laws of the 
Corporation provide that (Number) of the directors are necessary to 
constitute a quorum; therefore, the alien directors named represent no 
more than a minority of the number necessary to constitute a quorum;
    [Select and complete the applicable paragraph 4 describing the 
Corporation's stock ownership and strike inapplicable paragraphs 4]
    4. Information as to stock, where a non-publicly traded Corporation 
has 30 or more stockholders:
    That I have access to the stock books and records of the 
Corporation; that said stock books and records have been examined and 
disclose (a) that, as of (Date), the Corporation had issued and 
outstanding (Number) shares of (Class or series), the only class or 
series of stock of the Corporation has issued and outstanding [if such 
is the case], owned of record by (Number) stockholders, said number of 
stockholders representing the ownership of the entire issued and 
outstanding stock of the Corporation, and (b) that no stockholder owned 
of record as of said date five per centum (5 percent) or more of the 
issued and outstanding stock of the Corporation of any class. [If 
different classes or series of stock exist, give the same information 
for each class or series issued and outstanding, showing the monetary 
value and voting rights per share in each class or series. If there is 
an exception to the statement in clause (b), the name, address, and 
citizenship of the stockholder and the amount and class or series of 
stock owned should be stated.]
    That the registered addresses of (Number) owners of record of 
(Number) shares of the issued and outstanding (Class or series) stock 
of the Corporation are shown on the stock books and records of the 
Corporation as being within the United States, said ___ shares being 
___ per centum (___ percent) of the total number of shares of said 
stock (each class or series). [The exact figure as disclosed by the 
stock books of the corporation must be given and the per centum figure 
must not be less than 65 per centum, except that for a corporation 
operating a vessel in the coastwise trade, the per centum figure must 
be not less than 95 per centum. These per centum figures apply to 
corporate stockholders as well as to the primary corporation.]
    (The same statement should be made with reference to each class or 
series of stock, if there is more than one class.)
    4. Information as to stock, where Corporation's shares are publicly 
traded on a U.S. stock exchange:
    That the Corporation has diligently employed, administered, and 
adhered to methods such as those identified at 46 CFR 355.3(d) to 
monitor the Corporation's stock ownership.
    [In the case of Corporation seeking to demonstrate controlling 
interest ownership (greater than 50 percent U.S. Citizen ownership) use 
the following]:
    That, based on the foregoing, the percentage of shares of the 
Corporation owned by U.S. citizens eligible to document vessels in 
their own right is greater than 50 per centum.
    [In the case of a Corporation seeking to demonstrate eligibility 
for a coastwise endorsement (at least 75 percent U.S. ownership), use 
the following]:
    That, based on the foregoing, the percentage of shares of the 
Corporation owned by U.S. citizens eligible to document vessels in 
their own right is 75 percent or greater.
    4. Information as to stock, where Corporation has less than 30 
stockholders:
    That the information as to stock ownership, upon which the 
Corporation relies to establish that the required percentage \1\ of the 
stock ownership is vested in Citizens of the United States, is as 
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 75 percent if Corporation is operating in the coastwise 
trade, on the Great Lakes, or on bays, sounds, rivers, harbors, or 
inland lakes of the United States; and controlling interest if 
Corporation is operating solely in the foreign trade, both terms as 
defined in 46 U.S.C. 50501.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              Percentage of shares owned (each
         Name of Stockholder           Number of shares owned (each class)            class or series)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Name                           Number and Class                      Number and Class
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


and that each of said individual stockholders is a Citizen of the 
United States by virtue of birth in the United States, birth abroad of 
U.S. citizen parents, by naturalization during minority through the 
naturalization of a parent, by marriage (if a woman) to a U.S. citizen 
prior to September 22, 1922, or as otherwise authorized by law.
    5. That the controlling interest (or 75 percent of the interest) 
\2\ in (each) said Corporation, as established by the data hereinbefore 
set forth, is owned by citizens of the United States; that the title to 
a majority (or 75 percent) of the stock of (each) said Corporation is 
vested in Citizens of the United States free from any trust or 
fiduciary obligation in favor of any person not a citizen of the United 
States; that such proportion of the voting power of (each) said 
Corporation is vested in citizens of the United States; that through no 
contract or understanding is it so arranged that the majority (or more 
than 25 percent) of the voting power of (each) said Corporation may be 
exercised, directly or indirectly, on behalf of any person who is not a 
Citizen of the United States; and that by no means whatsoever, is 
control of (each) said Corporation (or any interest in said Corporation 
in excess of 25 percent) conferred upon or permitted to be exercised by 
any person who is not a citizen of the United States; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Strike inapplicable language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. That affiant has carefully examined this Affidavit and asserts 
that all the statements and representations contained therein are true 
to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief.

Dated:-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

(Name and title of affiant)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Penalty for False Statement: A fine or imprisonment, or both, are 
provided for violation of the proscriptions contained in 18 U.S.C. 1001 
(see also, 18 U.S.C. 286, 287).


Sec.  355.3  Criteria to be applied in support of stock data in 
affidavit.

    (a) The same criteria should be observed in obtaining information 
to be furnished for stockholders named

[[Page 33640]]

(direct ownership of required percentage of shares of stock of each 
class or series) in the Affidavit as those observed for the primary 
corporation. If, on the other hand, the ``fair inference rule'' is 
applied with respect to stock ownership (see Collier Advertising 
Service, Inc. v. Hudson River Day Line, 14 Fed. Supp. 335), the extent 
of U.S. citizen ownership of stock should be ascertained in the 
requisite percentage (65 percent for foreign operation and 95 percent 
for coastwise operation) in order that the veracity of the statutory 
statements made in the Affidavit (paragraph 5) (see Sec.  355.2) may be 
relied upon by the Maritime Administration (MARAD).
    (b) When applying the fair inference rule (where there are more 
than 30 stockholders, except where one or more of such number actually 
owns the controlling or 75 percent interest) in order to prove U.S. 
citizen ownership in the required percentages:
    (1) For non-publicly traded corporations:
    (i) For foreign operation, 65 percent of the shares of stock of 
each class or series must be shown to be held by persons with 
registered addresses within the United States to prove that 51 percent 
or controlling interest is vested in citizens of the United States; and
    (ii) For coastwise operation, 95 percent of the shares of stock of 
each class or series must be shown to be held by persons having 
registered addresses within the United States to prove that 75 percent 
of the interest in the corporation is vested in citizens of the United 
States; and
    (2) For publicly traded corporations:
    (i) At least 95 percent of the stock (each class) of the 
corporation be held directly or beneficially by Persons having a U.S. 
address in order to infer at least 75 percent ownership by U.S. 
Citizens; or
    (ii) At least 65 percent of the stock (each class) of the 
corporation be held directly or beneficially by Persons having a U.S. 
address in order to infer at least 51 percent ownership by U.S. 
Citizens; and
    (3) For determining the requisite percentage of stockholders with 
U.S. addresses, the corporation may rely on the methods outlined in 
paragraph (d) of this section; and
    (c) If the primary corporation is consecutively owned by several 
``parent'' corporations (holders of 100 percent of the stock of each or 
all classes or series of stock issued and outstanding), the facts 
should be given in proper sequence either by chart or in narrative 
form, revealing the facts of stock ownership. The information with 
respect to the ultimate parent should include data relative to the 
basis upon which controlling or 75 percent (depending upon whether the 
primary corporation operates in the domestic or foreign commerce) is 
established, together with the names of the owners of record or 
beneficial owners of 5 percent or more of each class or series of 
stock, if more than one class or series, and a statement that such 
owners are citizens of the United States. In any case where different 
classes or series of stock exist, each class or series will be treated 
depending upon whether ``closely held'' or ``publicly held,'' 
individually in applying the fair inference rule, if applicable, or 
giving the relevant information with respect to United States citizens 
owning of record 51 percent or 75 percent of the interest.
    (d) If the corporation is publicly traded, the corporation may 
employ the following methods to measure, monitor, determine, and affirm 
the required percentage U.S. citizen share ownership for the primary 
corporation:
    (1) Use of the Depository Trust Company segregated account (or 
``SEG-100'') system;
    (2) Monitoring SEC filings for 5 percent holders (Schedules 13D, 
13G, Form 13F) and follow-up requests for information from filers;
    (3) Use of protective provisions in organizational documents in 
order to guard against and rectify the possibility of what are referred 
to as excess shares;
    (4) Communications with Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners (or 
``NOBOs'');
    (5) Geographic surveys or statistical analyses of shareholder 
residences;
    (6) Use of dual stock certificates; and
    (7) Alternative methods upon written MARAD approval.


Sec.  355.4  Changes in citizenship data.

    (a) It is incumbent upon the party filing an affidavit under this 
part to apprise MARAD promptly in writing relative to changes in data 
last furnished with respect to officers, directors, and stockholders 
holding 5 percent or more of the issued and outstanding stock of each 
class or series, together with statements concerning the citizenship 
status thereof.
    (b) If the information contained in a party's most recent affidavit 
of citizenship filing has not changed materially, as an alternative to 
submitting an annual affidavit of citizenship under this part, a party 
may file a certification with MARAD. The certification should be 
substantially in the following format:
    ``I, , [Title] of [Name of Corporation] (``Corporation''), being 
duly authorized by the Corporation, certify to you that there have been 
no changes to the ownership information contained in the Affidavit of 
Citizenship filed with the Maritime Administration on [DATE].''


Sec.  355.5  Additional material.

    If additional material is determined to be essential to clarify or 
support the evidence of U.S. citizenship, such material must be 
furnished by the primary corporation upon request by MARAD.

(Authority: 46 U.S.C. 50501, 49 CFR 1.93(a))

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2026-11269 Filed 6-3-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on June 4, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.