Rule2026-10782

Pipeline Safety: Class Location Change Requirements; Correction

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 29, 2026
Effective
May 29, 2026

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Abstract

PHMSA is making a technical correction to a January 14, 2026 final rule that amended the class location change requirements. The final rule allows an operator to confirm or to restore the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of an eligible gas transmission pipeline segment that experiences a class location change by implementing an integrity management (IM) alternative. For MAOP restorations, PHMSA is clarifying in this correction notice that the 24-month deadline for implementing the initial programmatic requirements of the IM alternative runs from the effective date of the final rule or the date that an operator decides to initiate an MAOP restoration, whichever is later. This clarification is consistent with the requirements in the final rule, including the deadline in the IM alternative that applies to MAOP confirmations, which runs from the effective date of the final rule or the date of the class location change, whichever is later.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 103 (Friday, May 29, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31979-31981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-10782]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 192

[Docket No. PHMSA-2017-0151]
RIN 2137-AF29


Pipeline Safety: Class Location Change Requirements; Correction

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA is making a technical correction to a January 14, 2026 
final rule that amended the class location change requirements. The 
final rule allows an operator to confirm or to restore the maximum 
allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of an eligible gas transmission 
pipeline segment that experiences a class location change by 
implementing an integrity management (IM) alternative. For MAOP 
restorations, PHMSA is clarifying in this correction notice that the 
24-month deadline for implementing the initial programmatic 
requirements of the IM alternative runs from the effective date of the 
final rule or the date that an operator decides to initiate an MAOP 
restoration, whichever is later. This clarification is consistent with 
the requirements in the final rule, including the deadline in the IM 
alternative that applies to MAOP confirmations, which runs from the 
effective date of the final rule or the date of the class location 
change, whichever is later.

DATES: This rule is effective May 29, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Bottini, Inspection 
Development and Support Division, at 816-663-1361 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de0ecf9f9e5e8faa3efe2f9f9e4e3e4cde9e2f9a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14797560607c71633a767b60607d7a7d54707b603a737b62">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Discussion

    On January 14, 2026, PHMSA issued a final rule amending the class 
location change requirements in 49 CFR 192.611.\1\ The final rule 
allows operators to confirm the maximum allowable operating pressure 
(MAOP) of an eligible gas transmission segment that experiences a class 
location change by implementing an integrity management (IM) 
alternative. The final rule prescribes a 24-month deadline for 
completing the compliance activities necessary to use the IM 
alternative. That 24-month deadline runs from the date of the class 
location change or an initial compliance window from the effective date 
of the final rule, i.e., March 16, 2026, whichever is later. The 24-
month deadline is also referenced in other provisions in the IM 
alternative that determine the extent of an operator's compliance 
obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Pipeline Safety: Class Location Change Requirements, 91 FR 
1608 (Jan. 14, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As relevant here, the final rule also allows operators to use the 
IM alternative to restore the MAOP of eligible segments that previously 
experienced class location changes. Before implementing an MAOP 
restoration, an operator must comply with the uprating requirements in 
subpart K and the integrity management requirements in subpart O, and 
complete initial programmatic activities required by the IM 
alternative. See Sec.  192.611(d)(1)-(3). As with MAOP confirmations, 
an operator must also implement certain ongoing compliance activities 
to use the IM alternative to maintain a restored MAOP.
    The final rule did not prescribe a specific deadline for satisfying 
the initial programmatic requirements in the IM alternative under Sec.  
192.611(a)(4)(i) for MAOP restorations; however, PHMSA made clear in 
the preamble and final regulatory impact analysis that the same 
deadlines apply to all uses of the IM alternative.\2\ In other words, 
PHMSA intended the 24-month deadline in the IM alternative to run from 
either of the following dates, whichever is later: (1) the effective 
date of the final rule or (2) the date of the action that requires the 
operator to confirm or to restore the MAOP of an eligible segment under 
Sec.  192.611.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See PHMSA, Class Location Change Requirements: Regulatory 
Impact Analysis, Docket ID No. PHMSA-2017-0151-0083, at 46 (Jan. 
2026) (``This [rule] enables eligible Class 3 segments that have 
first employed the pressure reduction confirmation option to select 
the IM alternative and restore their pressure using procedures in 
amended Sec.  192.611(d) . . . and some portion may restore and use 
the IM alternative later in the [20-year] analysis period.''); 91 FR 
at 1635 (``[T]he methods traditionally authorized for confirming or 
revising the MAOP of class change segments--MAOP reductions, 
pressure testing, and pipe replacement--do not account for modern 
risk management principles and impose unnecessary burdens on the 
regulated community and consumers. The MAOP restoration requirements 
in the final rule provide a safe, efficient, and practicable 
approach for eliminating those burdens and increasing pipeline 
capacity.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To avoid any potential ambiguity in applying the IM alternative to 
restorations, PHMSA is amending Sec.  192.611(d) to clarify that the 
24-month deadline to complete the initial programmatic requirements in 
Sec.  192.611(a)(4)(i) and begin the ongoing programmatic requirements 
in Sec.  192.611(a)(4)(ii) runs from the date that an operator decides 
to initiate an MAOP restoration. Because that action can occur any time 
after an MAOP reduction under Sec.  192.611(a)(1)-(2), the date of the 
decision to initiate an MAOP restoration functions as the date of the 
class location change for purposes of the IM alternative, providing an 
operator with a 24-month window to complete initial programmatic 
requirements of Sec.  192.611(a)(4)(i). This ensures that the (a)(4)(i) 
requirements are completed close in time to the actual restoration and 
are thus not out-of-date. Accordingly, PHMSA is amending Sec.  
192.611(d) to clarify that an operator must use that date in 
implementing the requirements in the IM alternative.

II. Regulatory Analysis

A. Legal Authority

    PHMSA is authorized to administer the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws 
(49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.) pursuant to a delegation of authority from 
the Secretary of Transportation. 49 CFR 1.97. Section 60102 authorizes 
PHMSA to prescribe minimum safety standards for the design, 
installation, inspection, emergency plans and procedures, testing, 
construction, extension, operation, replacement, and maintenance of gas 
transmission pipeline facilities. PHMSA has good cause to issue this 
correction without notice and comment pursuant to Section 553(b)(B) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act because this technical correction 
aligns the regulatory text with the intent of the final rule, notice 
and public comment are unnecessary.

[[Page 31980]]

Further delaying this clarification would hinder the public interest in 
clear regulations.
    The Administrative Procedure Act also generally requires that an 
agency publish a rule in the Federal Register 30 days before it becomes 
effective, 5 U.S.C. 553(d), a requirement that does not apply if the 
agency finds good cause for making the rule effective sooner. For the 
same reasons, PHMSA finds good cause to make the rules effective on May 
29, 2026.

B. Regulatory Planning and Review: Executive Order 12866 and DOT Order 
2100.6B

    This technical correction has been evaluated in accordance with 
existing policies and procedures and is considered not significant 
under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review; 58 
FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993)) and 49 CFR part 5, subpart B. While the 
January 2026 final rule was reviewed as a significant rule under E.O. 
12866, this technical correction is consistent with the final rule and 
does not impose additional incremental compliance costs or adversely 
affect safety.

C. Energy-Related Executive Orders 13211, 14154, and 14156

    PHMSA has prepared this technical correction consistent with E.O. 
14156 (Declaring a National Energy Emergency; 90 FR 8353 (Jan. 29, 
2025)) and E.O. 14154 (Unleashing American Energy; 90 FR 8353 (Jan. 29, 
2025)). PHMSA determined that the January 2026 final rule was not a 
``significant energy action'' under E.O. 13211 (Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use; 66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), and neither is this technical 
correction that is consistent with it.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires 
Federal agencies to consider the impact of their rules on small 
entities, to analyze alternatives that minimize those impacts, and to 
make their analyses available for public comment. PHMSA completed an 
interim and final regulatory flexibility analysis in the January 2026 
final rule, analysis that this technical correction does not alter. As 
a regulatory flexibility analysis is required of a rulemaking subject 
to notice-and comment, 5 U.S.C. 604(a), and, as PHMSA has ``good 
cause'' under the Administrative Procedure Act to issue this technical 
correction without prior notice-and-comment, no additional regulatory 
flexibility analysis is necessary.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Small Business Administration, A Guide for Government 
Agencies: How to Comply with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 55 
(2017) (``If an NPRM is not required, the RFA does not apply.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)

    PHMSA analyzed the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) in the January 2026 
final rule and this technical correction has no substantial effect on 
that analysis, as it will not impose any additional incremental 
compliance cost. This technical correction will not impose any 
enforceable duty on State, local, or Tribal governments, nor on the 
private sector of $100 million or more, adjusted for inflation, in any 
given year.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This technical correction imposes no new or revised information 
collection requirements beyond those discussed in the January 2026 
final rule.

G. National Environmental Policy Act

    The technical correction has no effect on PHMSA's analysis under 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) of 
the January 2026 final rule that is contained in the environmental 
analysis available in the rulemaking docket.

H. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    PHMSA analyzed this notice in accordance with the principles and 
criteria in E.O. 13132 (Federalism; 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999)) and 
the Presidential Memorandum (Preemption; 74 FR 24693 (May 22, 2009)). 
PHMSA determined that the January 2026 final rule did not impose any 
substantial direct effect on the States, the relationship between the 
National Government and the States, or the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government, and nor does 
this technical correction that is consistent with that final rule. 
Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of E.O. 13132 do 
not apply.

I. Executive Order 13175

    PHMSA analyzed this notice according to the principles and criteria 
in E.O. 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments; 65 FR 67249 (Nov. 9, 2000)) and DOT Order 5301.1A 
(Department of Transportation Tribal Consultation Policies and 
Procedures). Because nothing in this technical correction has Tribal 
implications or imposes substantial direct compliance costs on Indian 
Tribal governments, the funding and consultation requirements of E.O. 
13175 and DOT Order 5301.1A do not apply.

J. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis

    The technical correction does not impact international trade, 
though PHMSA evaluated E.O. 13609 (Promoting International Regulatory 
Cooperation; 77 FR 26413 (May 4, 2012)), which requires agencies to 
consider whether significant variations between domestic and 
international regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may impair the 
ability of American business to export and compete internationally, and 
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39, as amended by Pub. L. 
103-465), which prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any 
standards or engaging in related activities that create unnecessary 
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States.

K. Cybersecurity and Executive Order 14028

    E.O. 14028 (Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity; 86 FR 26633 (May 
17, 2021)) directs the Federal Government to improve its efforts to 
identify, deter, and respond to ``persistent and increasingly 
sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns.'' PHMSA considered the 
cybersecurity effects of the January 2026 final rule, and this 
technical correction has no effect on that analysis.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 192

    Natural gas, Pipeline safety, Pipelines.
    In consideration of the foregoing, PHMSA amends 49 CFR part 192 by 
making the following correcting amendment:

PART 192--TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE: 
MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS

0
1. The authority citation for part 192 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60101 et. seq., 
and 49 CFR 1.97.


0
2. Amend Sec.  192.611 by revising the introductory text of paragraph 
(d) to read as follows:


Sec.  192.611  Change in class location: Confirmation or revision of 
maximum allowable operating pressure.

* * * * *
    (d) Confirmation or revision of maximum allowable operating 
pressure required as a result of a study under Sec.  192.609 must be 
completed within 24 months of the change in class location. Pressure 
reduction under paragraph

[[Page 31981]]

(a)(1) or (2) of this section within the 24-month period does not 
preclude establishing the maximum allowable operating pressure of a 
segment under paragraph (a)(3) of this section or restoring the maximum 
allowable operating pressure of a segment under paragraph (a)(4) of 
this section at a later date, provided the date of the decision to 
restore the maximum allowable operating pressure is treated as the date 
of the class location change. Before restoring the maximum allowable 
operating pressure of an eligible Class 3 segment pursuant to paragraph 
(a)(4) of this section, an operator must:
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 27, 2026, under authority 
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Linda Daugherty,
Acting Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2026-10782 Filed 5-28-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 29, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.