Rule2026-10745

Air Plan Approval; Virginia; Repeal of Existing Stationary Source Regulations

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 29, 2026
Effective
June 29, 2026

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state implementation plan (SIP) revision (Revision B23) submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The revision removes two existing stationary sources regulations, emission standards for petroleum refinery operations and emissions standards for large appliance coating application systems, from Virginia's SIP as there are no longer any applicable sources in Virginia. The EPA is approving these revisions to the Virginia SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 103 (Friday, May 29, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31922-31925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-10745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2025-0226; FRL-13007-02-R3]


Air Plan Approval; Virginia; Repeal of Existing Stationary Source 
Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state 
implementation plan (SIP) revision (Revision B23) submitted by the 
Commonwealth of Virginia. The revision removes two existing stationary 
sources regulations, emission standards for petroleum refinery 
operations and emissions standards for large appliance coating 
application systems, from Virginia's SIP as there are no longer any 
applicable sources in Virginia. The EPA is approving these revisions to 
the Virginia SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air 
Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on June 29, 2026.

[[Page 31923]]


ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2025-0226. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in the 
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential 
business information (CBI) or other information the disclosure of which 
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available through <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>, or please contact the person 
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for 
additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah McCabe, Planning & 
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John F. Kennedy 
Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is 
(215) 814-5786. Ms. McCabe can also be reached via electronic mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83eee0e0e2e1e6adf0e2f1e2ebc3e6f3e2ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e68b8585878483c8958794878ea6839687c8818990">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On November 28, 2025 (90 FR 54607), the EPA published a notice of 
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the Commonwealth of Virginia. In the 
NPRM, the EPA proposed to repeal Article 11, Emission Standards for 
Petroleum Refinery Operations (9VAC5-40-1340 through 5-40-1510), and 
Article 26, Emissions Standards for Large Appliance Coating Application 
Systems (9VAC5-40-3560 through 5-40-3700), from the Virginia SIP. 
Revision B23 was published in the Virginia Register of Regulations on 
February 26, 2024, and became effective on April 11, 2024. The formal 
SIP revision was submitted by Virginia through the Virginia Department 
of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) on December 20, 2024. For additional 
background information on this action, please refer to the NPRM.

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    In this action, the EPA is approving the repeal of Article 11, 
Emission Standards for Petroleum Refinery Operations (9VAC5-40-1340 
through 5-40-1510), and Article 26, Emissions Standards for Large 
Appliance Coating Application Systems (9VAC5-40-3560 through 5-40-
3700), from the Virginia SIP because there are no remaining petroleum 
refinery operations or large appliance coating application systems in 
Virginia. As more fully described in the NPRM and section III in this 
preamble, the repeal of these articles is in accordance with CAA 
section 110(l).
    The rationale for the EPA's now final action is explained in the 
NPRM and will not be restated here. A summary of the comments received, 
as well as the EPA's response, are in section III of this preamble.

III. EPA's Response to Comments Received

    The EPA's November 28, 2025 NPRM (90 FR 54607) opened a comment 
period which closed on December 29, 2025. The EPA received comments 
from one commenter. All comments received have been placed in the 
docket for this action.
    A summary of the relevant comments and the EPA's response thereto 
are listed below.
    Comment 1: The commenter asks the EPA to deny approval of the 
repeal of Articles 11 and 26 in 9VAC5-40, or at minimum require 
Virginia to provide a complete technical support package, including 
transparent assumptions, sensitivity runs, and an enforceability 
analysis that is specific enough to demonstrate CAA section 110(l) 
noninterference.
    Response 1: The EPA disagrees with the commenter that further 
analysis of CAA section 110(l) is necessary in this instance. The EPA 
acknowledges the importance of a CAA section 110(l) noninterference 
demonstration. As stated in section II of the NPRM, the removal of 
Articles 11 and 26 in 9VAC5-40 from the Virginia SIP is in accordance 
with section 110(l) of the CAA. Virginia demonstrated noninterference 
through a review of 9VAC5-40 and VADEQ's Comprehensive Environmental 
Data System database, indicating that there are no longer any 
facilities subject to the articles proposed for removal. Additionally, 
the EPA confirmed that there are neither petroleum refineries nor large 
appliance coating application systems remaining in Virginia through the 
analysis of the most recently available emissions data.\1\ Moreover, 
Virginia's Existing Stationary Source Regulations only apply to 
stationary sources constructed, modified, or relocated before March 17, 
1972, and stationary sources reconstructed before December 10, 1976. As 
there are no petroleum refinery operations or large appliance coating 
application systems remaining in Virginia, the repeal of Articles 11 
and 26 in 9VAC5-40 will have no impact on RFP, the NAAQS, or any other 
CAA requirement. Any future facilities would need to assess 
applicability to Federal and State regulations, such as New Source 
Review and 9VAC5-50 New and Modified Stationary Sources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 2020 National Emissions Inventory (NEI).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comment 2: The EPA must evaluate the environmental justice 
implications of the repeal of Articles 11 and 26 in 9VAC5-40.
    Response 2: This action is consistent with Executive Order 14173 of 
January 21, 2025 (Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-
Based Opportunity) which rescinded Executive Order 12898 on 
environmental justice, and Executive Order 14148 of January 20, 2025 
(Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions) which 
rescinded Executive Order 14096 ``Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment 
to Environmental Justice for All''.

IV. Final Action

    The EPA is approving Revision B23, submitted on December 20, 2024 
by VADEQ, as a revision to the Virginia SIP, because the submission 
meets the requirements of CAA section 110. Revision B23 repeals Article 
11, Emission Standards for Petroleum Refinery Operations (9VAC5-40-1340 
through 5-40-1510), and Article 26, Emissions Standards for Large 
Appliance Coating Application Systems (9VAC5-40-3560 through 5-40-
3700), from the Virginia SIP.

V. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the 
Commonwealth of Virginia

    In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to 
certain conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit) 
``privilege'' for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a 
regulated entity. The legislation further addresses the relative burden 
of proof for parties either asserting the privilege or seeking 
disclosure of documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's 
legislation also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty 
waiver for violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity 
discovers such violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation 
and voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes 
prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's 
Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-
1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents and 
information about the content of those documents that are the product 
of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not

[[Page 31924]]

extend to documents or information that: (1) are generated or developed 
before the commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2) 
are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) demonstrate a 
clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public health or 
environment; or (4) are required by law.
    On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the 
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the 
Privilege law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege 
to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents 
and information ``required by Federal law to maintain program 
delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce 
Federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less 
stringent than their Federal counterparts. . . .'' The opinion 
concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec.  10.1-1198, therefore, documents or 
other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of 
these programs could not be privileged because such documents and 
information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required 
by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or 
approval.''
    Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that 
``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal 
law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a 
state agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute, 
regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from 
administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12, 
1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute 
inapplicable to enforcement of any Federally authorized programs, since 
``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal 
penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent with 
Federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.''
    Therefore, the EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and 
Immunity statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its 
program consistent with the Federal requirements. In any event, because 
the EPA has also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity 
law can affect only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on 
Federal enforcement authorities, the EPA may at any time invoke its 
authority under the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 
205, 211, or 213, to enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the 
State plan, independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition, 
citizen enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected 
by this, or any, State audit privilege or immunity law.

VI. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that 
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is removing the incorporation by reference of the 
amendments to Virginia Administrative Code 9VAC5-40 Existing Stationary 
Sources, repealing 9VAC5-40-1340 through 9VAC5-40-1510, and 9VAC5-40-
3560 through 9VAC5-40-3700, as discussed in sections II and III of this 
preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials 
generally available through <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> and at the EPA Region 
III Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act 
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Is not an Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 
2025) regulatory action because this action is not significant under 
Executive Order 12866;
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe 
has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 28, 2026. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Particulate matter, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic 
compounds.

Amy Van Blarcom-Lackey,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 
52 as follows:

[[Page 31925]]

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart VV--Virginia


Sec.  52.2420  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by:
0
a. Removing the table heading ``Article 11 Emission Standards for 
Petroleum Refinery Operations (Rule 4-11)'' and the entries ``5-40-
1340'' through ``5-40-1510''; and
0
b. Removing the table heading ``Article 26 Emission Standards for Large 
Coating Application Systems (Rule 4-26)'' and the entries ``5-40-3560'' 
through ``5-40-3700.''

[FR Doc. 2026-10745 Filed 5-28-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 29, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.